| 
	
		
			
				|  » Site Navigation |  
	|  |  
	
		
			
				|  » Online Users: 126 |  
| 0 members and 126 guests |  
		| No Members online |  
		| Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM. |  | 
	
		|  |  |  
	
	
	
	
		|  08-17-2006, 05:09 PM | #1 |  
	| I am beyond a rank! 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 
					Posts: 17,175
				      | 
	Quote: 
	
		| Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop Question for constitutional scholars: If President Bush has the Article II power to order the wiretapping notwithstanding FISA, assuming that FISA forbids such activity, why does he have to obey an injunction to stop?
 |  Because to not do so is to throw out our system of checks and balances entirely. |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  08-17-2006, 05:12 PM | #2 |  
	| I am beyond a rank! 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 
					Posts: 17,175
				      | 
				
				Uh Oh!!!
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| Originally posted by SlaveNoMore The trouble begins here....
 |  We shall see.  Yesterday a flight was diverted because a middle eastern woman had a screw driver, vasoline, and multiple notes referencing al queda.  Today it turns out it was just a clastrophobic woman who freaked out and had none of those things (although she had some prohibited hand cream). |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  08-17-2006, 05:15 PM | #3 |  
	| Moderator 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Pop goes the chupacabra 
					Posts: 18,532
				      | 
	Quote: 
	
		| Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop Question for constitutional scholars: If President Bush has the Article II power to order the wiretapping notwithstanding FISA, assuming that FISA forbids such activity, why does he have to obey an injunction to stop?
 |  Because it is emphatically the province and duty of the courts to say what the law is.
 
If Bush didn't make the constitutional argument, and he's enjoined, then his lawyers did a bad job of lawyering.
				__________________[Dictated but not read]
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  08-17-2006, 05:15 PM | #4 |  
	| Moderasaurus Rex 
				 
				Join Date: May 2004 
					Posts: 33,080
				      | 
				
				Uh Oh!!!
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| Originally posted by Adder We shall see.  Yesterday a flight was diverted because a middle eastern woman had a screw driver, vasoline, and multiple notes referencing al queda.  Today it turns out it was just a clastrophobic woman who freaked out and had none of those things (although she had some prohibited hand cream).
 |  You're missing the big news -- that robots have infiltrated the West Virginia State Police.
 
I, for one, welcome our new robot overlords from the West Virginia State Police.
				__________________“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
 
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  08-17-2006, 05:16 PM | #5 |  
	| Moderasaurus Rex 
				 
				Join Date: May 2004 
					Posts: 33,080
				      | 
	Quote: 
	
		| Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) Because it is emphatically the province and duty of the courts to say what the law is.
 |  I hereby deputize you to answer Hank's follow-up questions on this point.
				__________________“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
 
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  08-17-2006, 05:18 PM | #6 |  
	| World Ruler 
				 
				Join Date: Apr 2003 
					Posts: 12,057
				      | 
				
				Uh Oh!!!
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop You're missing the big news -- that robots have infiltrated the West Virginia State Police.
 
 I, for one, welcome our new robot overlords from the West Virginia State Police.
 |  Where did they find inbred robots?
				__________________"More than two decades later, it is hard to imagine the Revolutionary War coming out any other way."
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  08-17-2006, 05:20 PM | #7 |  
	| Moderasaurus Rex 
				 
				Join Date: May 2004 
					Posts: 33,080
				      | 
				
				Uh Oh!!!
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| Originally posted by Adder Today it turns out it was just a clastrophobic woman who freaked out and had none of those things (although she had some prohibited hand cream).
 |  She peed on the floor , which is kinda like terrorism.
				__________________“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
 
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  08-17-2006, 05:24 PM | #8 |  
	| Moderator 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Pop goes the chupacabra 
					Posts: 18,532
				      | 
				
				Uh Oh!!!
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop She peed on the floor, which is kinda like terrorism.
 |  Question -- if she was restrained in plastic cuffs, and the plane was being escorted by F-15s, why divert the flight to Boston rather than having it land at Dulles, where it was headed?  Was there a ba (not a ba, a bomb) on the plane that was about to go off?  I'm sure they disembarked right quick in Boston . . .
				__________________[Dictated but not read]
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  08-17-2006, 05:25 PM | #9 |  
	| Proud Holder-Post 200,000 
				 
				Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Corner Office 
					Posts: 86,149
				      | 
				
				Uh Oh!!!
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| Originally posted by Shape Shifter Where did they find inbred robots?
 |   oh please. you think your home state has a leg up on West Virginia? Huntington is almost DC bedroom community.
				__________________I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts   |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  08-17-2006, 05:28 PM | #10 |  
	| Consigliere 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Pelosi Land! 
					Posts: 9,480
				      | 
				
				Uh Oh!!!
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) Question -- if she was restrained in plastic cuffs, and the plane was being escorted by F-15s, why divert the flight to Boston rather than having it land at Dulles, where it was headed?  Was there a ba (not a ba, a bomb) on the plane that was about to go off?  I'm sure they disembarked right quick in Boston . . .
 |  No one - outside of Boston - cares if you blow up Boston?
 
Just a guess. |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  08-17-2006, 05:35 PM | #11 |  
	| Moderator 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Pop goes the chupacabra 
					Posts: 18,532
				      | 
				
				Uh Oh!!!
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| Originally posted by Hank Chinaski oh please. you think your home state has a leg up on West Virginia? Huntington is almost DC bedroom community.
 |  Yet, curiously, Huntington is 275 miles from Detroit, whereas DC is 294 miles.
calculator
				__________________[Dictated but not read]
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  08-17-2006, 05:36 PM | #12 |  
	| Registered User 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Flyover land 
					Posts: 19,042
				      | 
				
				Uh Oh!!!
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| Originally posted by SlaveNoMore No one - outside of Boston - cares if you blow up Boston?
 
 Just a guess.
 |   Boston (to me) is kind of like NYC and SF.  Just to update you. |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  08-17-2006, 05:38 PM | #13 |  
	| WacKtose Intolerant 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: PenskeWorld 
					Posts: 11,627
				      | 
				
				Uh Oh!!!
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop She peed on the floor, which is kinda like terrorism.
 |  I have read that drinking urine can cause renal failure, so there seems there was some danger to the other passengers. If she tried to pee in their mouths. But just peeing starts you down the slippery slope, so I think the arrest was warranted. eta: Figuratively. I am assuming no actual warrant was issued prior to the arrest.
				__________________Since I'm a righteous man, I don't eat ham;
 I wish more people was alive like me
 
 
 
 
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  08-17-2006, 05:40 PM | #14 |  
	| Proud Holder-Post 200,000 
				 
				Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Corner Office 
					Posts: 86,149
				      | 
				
				Uh Oh!!!
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| Originally posted by Penske_Account I have read that drinking urine can cause renal failure, so there seems there was some danger to the other passengers. If she tried to pee in their mouths. But just peeing starts you down the slippery slope, so I think the arrest was warranted. eta: Figuratively. I am assuming no actual warrant was issued prior to the arrest.
 |   how did we come to know she had peed? isn't that the operative question? certainly peeing on a plane is fine- i have done so on several occasions. So it must be the manner or location of the peeing that is in question. I am troubled how the Bush administration went about discovering these facts w/o seeking a warrent.
				__________________I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts  
				 Last edited by Hank Chinaski; 08-17-2006 at 05:43 PM..
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  08-17-2006, 05:41 PM | #15 |  
	| WacKtose Intolerant 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: PenskeWorld 
					Posts: 11,627
				      | 
				
				WSJ Poll of the Day
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| Originally posted by Penske_Account Should profiling of airline passengers based on ethnicity or race be allowed?
 
 So far
 
 
 Yes
 1893 votes (87%)
 
 No
 283 votes (13%)
 
 
 FWIW, these things usually skew more left than one might expect.  Apparently a lot of Dems read the journal......know thy enemy, indeed.
 |  Update:
 
Yes 
5141 votes (86%) 
 
No 
811 votes (14%)
				__________________Since I'm a righteous man, I don't eat ham;
 I wish more people was alive like me
 
 
 
 
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		|  |  |  
 
 
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is Off 
 |  |  |  
 
	
	
		
	
	
 |