Fashion Board 4-6-04 to 5-7-04

[ThurgreedMarshall]

Originally posted by Mister_Ruysbroeck
Not true.

Stop it. It's so fucking obvious that this is some loser guy with no life who does this on a bunch of boards. Don't humor it.

TM

[Sidd Finch]

Originally posted by Did you just call me Coltrane?
Sorry. I guess we have different definitions of 'work appropriate'. This kind of stuff hasn't been criticized in the past, so I thought it was okay.

I'll spree lingerie photos if everyone else promises to spree Jacko photos. That shit is offensive.

No biggie. And I agree with you on Jocko. Blech.

[Mister_Ruysbroeck]

Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall
Stop it. It's so fucking obvious that this is some loser guy with no life who does this on a bunch of boards. Don't humor it.

TM

While "she" may piss you off, I find her highly amusing.

Amusing in the same way as when a cat plays around with a mouse before killing and eating it.

From Salon:

As the White House whiffs, Kerry needs to swing for the fences

[ThurgreedMarshall]

Originally posted by Mister_Ruysbroeck
Yes, we need to spree that kind of stuff.

That being said, you can all go to the following link: User Options and take care of this problem for good.

In the third section down, titled "Thread View Options," there is an option that says "Show image attachments and [img] code in Posts?" If you select "No" for that option, you will never see images in posts, but will always get a link instead.

That's what I have my options set to.

You can also turn off avatars and signatures on that page if you want to be even less conspicuous when you are viewing the forums.

Don't you love this software?

Nice.

My suggestion would be that only photos of naked people and parts should be linked. If it's something that you could see in a newspaper (like that FHM photo), I would rather be able to see it here. If you don't want that stuff popping up, change your preferences.

It's more important to me to manage the sites I visit (because IT can catalogue them) than what appears on my screen at this site. I don't know if that's the way other people feel or what.

TM

[greatwhitenorthchick]

Originally posted by Mister_Ruysbroeck
While "she" may piss you off, I find her highly amusing.

Amusing in the same way as when a cat plays around with a mouse before killing and eating it.

I think you may be the only one. I have her on ignore and I can't ignore her if others keep quoting and responding to her. Please, for the love of god.

[Mister_Ruysbroeck]

Originally posted by greatwhitenorthchick
I think you may be the only one. I have her on ignore and I can't ignore her if others keep quoting and responding to her. Please, for the love of god.

I thought we decided that telling people you have them on ignore defeats the purpose?

At any rate, I will soon tire of her and move on to something else. I have a short attention span.

What were we talking about? I was distracted by your legs.

[ThurgreedMarshall]

Originally posted by Mister_Ruysbroeck
While "she" may piss you off, I find her highly amusing.

Amusing in the same way as when a cat plays around with a mouse before killing and eating it.

Okay. Which one are you then, dumbass?

And you're the only one who finds it amusing, so amuse yourself over pm.

TM

[notcasesensitive]

now that I've read through the chatter of the lst day and a half, the only topic I find worthy of another visit is paigow's disgust with the non-matching hair/bush combo. I had no idea that people felt strongly about this issue. I mean, isn't it a given that 50-80% (there is likely a geographical variance in the exact percentage - I'd guess the % is higher here in Texas, for example) of blonde women are bottle blondes? And why would blonde (really, light brown) pubes be somehow more appealing than darker ones? Why are darker ones "gross"? I find this odd. Enlighten me, please.

[Mister_Ruysbroeck]

Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall
Okay. Which one are you then, dumbass?

And you're the only one who finds it amusing, so amuse yourself over pm.

TM

Complain much?

[Shape Shifter]

Originally posted by notcasesensitive
And why would blonde (really, light brown) pubes be somehow more appealing than darker ones? Why are darker ones "gross"? I find this odd. Enlighten me, please.

I'll be there in 5 with a bottle of Clairol.

[Tyrone Slothrop]

Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall
It's more important to me to manage the sites I visit (because IT can catalogue them) than what appears on my screen at this site. I don't know if that's the way other people feel or what.

Wouldn't your IT get the URL of the picture, and the site hosting it?

Asking because I really don't know, but I would think this would make pictures from certain sites problematic, whether they show unclothed parts or not.

[notcasesensitive]

Originally posted by Shape Shifter
I'll be there in 5 with a bottle of Clairol.

make it a bottle of warm medium brown. my pubes are apparently too light.

[Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)]

Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall


It's more important to me to manage the sites I visit (because IT can catalogue them) than what appears on my screen at this site. I don't know if that's the way other people feel or what.

MR can explain the technology, but I think if you post a picture from, say, playboy, your browser will send a request to playboy for the pic. IT will see that request, and not be able to tell that's it's different than if you visited teh site directly. So far as I can tell, my IT's porn filter has, for that reason, prevented me from seeing parts of your best posts.

[tmdiva]

Originally posted by notcasesensitive
now that I've read through the chatter of the lst day and a half, the only topic I find worthy of another visit is paigow's disgust with the non-matching hair/bush combo. I had no idea that people felt strongly about this issue. I mean, isn't it a given that 50-80% (there is likely a geographical variance in the exact percentage - I'd guess the % is higher here in Texas, for example) of blonde women are bottle blondes? And why would blonde (really, light brown) pubes be somehow more appealing than darker ones? Why are darker ones "gross"? I find this odd. Enlighten me, please.

I don't really get it, either. Even the blondest natural blond will have pubes a shade or two darker because they don't get exposed as much. And some people have different colored hair in different places (like DS said).

I have dark blond hair (chemically assisted to reach the medium golden blond of my adolescence), but my pubes and eyebrows have always been medium brown, and my eyelashes dark brown.

tm