Lamest k race win ever

[notcasesensitive]

Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy

I enjoy a good game of football, but, I will confess, I don't go for the intellectual stimulation of picking apart a well-orchestrated and executed play. Sometimes, it's fun to see 250 pounds of pure muscle just flattened.

IT DOESN'T HAVE TO BE INTELLECTUAL FOR YOU TO LIKE IT. Really. Once you accept that, you may even find yourself enjoying a good auto race.* And, if I've offended Peyton Manning in any way, my apologies, but I'm still not planning on challenging him to a game of chess any time soon.


* Note that drivers have to process a lot of information quickly, but it's still kind of cool when one of them screws up and there's a five car collision and beer flies in the grandstands.

That isn't what we are talking about at all. You said a good QB doesn't need to fit 3 thoughts in his head at once. That is ricockulous. You are wrong. I don't watch football for my mental stimulation but that doesn't mean these guys don't have to know anything or have any intellectual abilities to play the game.

[notcasesensitive]

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski

But I think the test is closer "who is president of Uganda" that " how does a safety tip a blitZ."

I think really good decision makers see the game in slow motion. I heard magic break down everything he saw on a fast break and it was crazy. Me? I typically find myself on the court wondering if thurgreed did it on purpose.

I'm not arguing for the test. Ryan Fitzpatrick isn't the best QB in the NFL though he is definitely the smartest. I think the test results are interesting, but not necessarily indicative of too much.* I'm just saying it is stupid to say all QB's need to be is guys who hit other guys hard and hold a thought or two in their heads. It displays a complete lack of understanding of the game.

*Though seeing a guy score a 14 starts an alarm bell or two.

[Greedy,Greedy,Greedy]

Originally Posted by notcasesensitive

That isn't what we are talking about at all. You said a good QB doesn't need to fit 3 thoughts in his head at once. That is ricockulous. You are wrong.

Indeed, I would even go beyond saying it is ricockulous. It was hyperballsy.

[Replaced_Texan]

Originally Posted by notcasesensitive

I'm not arguing for the test. Ryan Fitzpatrick isn't the best QB in the NFL though he is definitely the smartest. I think the test results are interesting, but not necessarily indicative of too much.* I'm just saying it is stupid to say all QB's need to be is guys who hit other guys hard and hold a thought or two in their heads. It displays a complete lack of understanding of the game.

*Though seeing a guy score a 14 starts an alarm bell or two.

I think that probably athleticism (and luck/sheer will/determination) will make up for some lack of ability to think quickly and accurately, but not so much that a relatively dumb qb will last long in the NFL.

[Flinty_McFlint]

Originally Posted by Adder

Only if they're really young!

This one time, I totally hooked up with a 16 yo.

Of course, I was 16 at the time too.

I usually don't like to reply to an Adder post for the obvious reasons, but in this case, I just have to.

I just got emailed by my first serious gf from high school. Essentially, it was like an apology email (she moved mid-year, and after a couple of months long distance, she broke up with me). We also hooked up a couple of times in college, but other than that, really no contact for 20 years. Email is about how she feels bad that she treated me poorly (she did?) and that if it makes me feel better, she's been treated poorly by her hubby for 20 years and they're divorcing.

I need a ruling here--obviously she wants to get with me right? Right? Sadly, she didn't send a picture, and you can only imagine that she can't have gotten better after 16 right? I mean she's like 39 or something. Ick.

[Icky Thump]

Originally Posted by LessinSF

Bullshit. If a girl that age approaches me, I don't think its creepy. Hanging around high schools may be creepy, but there are girls who like older men, or there is an attraction, or she just wants to have a strings-free encounter, or whatever.

Well since I am old enough to be Mark Sanchez's dad it is way creepy because she's probably retarded or blind or is simply helping me find my puppy in exchange for candy.

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally Posted by notcasesensitive

I'm not arguing for the test. Ryan Fitzpatrick isn't the best QB in the NFL though he is definitely the smartest. I think the test results are interesting, but not necessarily indicative of too much.* I'm just saying it is stupid to say all QB's need to be is guys who hit other guys hard and hold a thought or two in their heads. It displays a complete lack of understanding of the game.

*Though seeing a guy score a 14 starts an alarm bell or two.

And to be clear I was not taking ggg's side.

You know what everyone on PB nick named him right??

[Greedy,Greedy,Greedy]

Those of you impressed by football player's scores may want to take the Wonderlic Test.

The sample takes 5 minutes. But I'll bet most of you can do it in less. Remember, Peyton Manning got about half right, and he's pretty smart.

[Penske 2.0]

Originally Posted by Sidd Finch

I guess he could have done more to determine if she was smart or discreet, like questioning her regarding her Facebook postings and so forth. But that's not really what I expect from a 24-yo who meets someone in a club. And I don't really care. From what RT posted, there was nothing illegal, abusive, or overbearing in what he did. And there wasnothing that I consider immoral, even if I did look to the NFL for moral guidelines.

People who care about this are kidding themselves.

I care......I'm a little jealous, and I don't think I am kidding myself in that posture.

[Did you just call me Coltrane?]

Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy

Those of you impressed by football player's scores may want to take the Wonderlic Test.

The sample takes 5 minutes. But I'll bet most of you can do it in less. Remember, Peyton Manning got about half right, and he's pretty smart.

I need a pen and paper to take this thing? What is this, 2006?

[Did you just call me Coltrane?]

Originally Posted by Flinty_McFlint

I usually don't like to reply to an Adder post for the obvious reasons, but in this case, I just have to.

I just got emailed by my first serious gf from high school. Essentially, it was like an apology email (she moved mid-year, and after a couple of months long distance, she broke up with me). We also hooked up a couple of times in college, but other than that, really no contact for 20 years. Email is about how she feels bad that she treated me poorly (she did?) and that if it makes me feel better, she's been treated poorly by her hubby for 20 years and they're divorcing.

I need a ruling here--obviously she wants to get with me right? Right? Sadly, she didn't send a picture, and you can only imagine that she can't have gotten better after 16 right? I mean she's like 39 or something. Ick.

Have her meet TM in person and he can assess her looks for us. Then we can decide what to do.

[Gattigap]

Originally Posted by Flinty_McFlint

I usually don't like to reply to an Adder post for the obvious reasons, but in this case, I just have to.

I just got emailed by my first serious gf from high school. Essentially, it was like an apology email (she moved mid-year, and after a couple of months long distance, she broke up with me). We also hooked up a couple of times in college, but other than that, really no contact for 20 years. Email is about how she feels bad that she treated me poorly (she did?) and that if it makes me feel better, she's been treated poorly by her hubby for 20 years and they're divorcing.

I need a ruling here--obviously she wants to get with me right? Right? Sadly, she didn't send a picture, and you can only imagine that she can't have gotten better after 16 right? I mean she's like 39 or something. Ick.

Totally go for it, Flinty. I'll arrange the venue for you if it helps. Just remember, try to ignore the camera locations.

[ThurgreedMarshall]

Originally Posted by Adder

I am sure everyone will mainly agree that most of us would think you were creepy for banging a 17 yo.

I think this is ridiculous. If you go around looking for 17 year olds, you're creepy. If you happen to meet one and she doesn't come across like she's a child (and I think any woman most guys here would be attracted to, wouldn't), it wouldn't be creepy to bang her. To sum up:

If you are looking for barely legal girls to bang, you're creepy.
If the barely legal girl you happen to meet wants to bang you and she acts like she's a child, you're creepy.
If you happen upon a barely legal girl who acts like an adult, bang her.

TM

[notcasesensitive]

Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy

Indeed, I would even go beyond saying it is ricockulous. It was hyperballsy.

Way to distance yourself from your own argument. Clearly I'm the one who screwed up by engaging with you.

[Flinty_McFlint]

Originally Posted by ThurgreedMarshall

I think this is ridiculous. If you go around looking for 17 year olds, you're creepy. If you happen to meet one and she doesn't come across like she's a child (and I think any woman most guys here would be attracted to, wouldn't), it wouldn't be creepy to bang her. To sum up:

If you are looking for barely legal girls to bang, you're creepy.
If the barely legal girl you happen to meet wants to bang you and she acts like she's a child, you're creepy.
If you happen upon a barely legal girl who acts like an adult, bang her.

TM

What if I happen upon barely legal? I would have written come upon barely legal, but that's just wrong.