LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 278
0 members and 278 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 4,499, 10-26-2015 at 07:55 AM.
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-19-2017, 04:24 PM   #3991
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,077
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop View Post
I like the irony of your citing a medical authority from Houston here.
I wish I could take credit, but I'm not facile enough with the Google to have done that intentionally.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.

Last edited by sebastian_dangerfield; 02-19-2017 at 04:27 PM..
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
Old 02-20-2017, 10:57 AM   #3992
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,077
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop View Post
My point is that the second scenario is absurd.
Except it's not, and saying it's absurd is incorrect.

Don't dissemble. I'm not trying to "win," and this is not a zero sum game. It's a discussion, and I just wanted to expose an overlooked perverse incentive that warps prices.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
Old 02-20-2017, 11:28 AM   #3993
Adder
I am beyond a rank!
 
Adder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 17,113
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski View Post
If this is meant as a joke, okay, but if you are serious, you are crippled (or I suppose you might say "male raised challenged").
It's not a joke.
Adder is offline  
Old 02-20-2017, 11:33 AM   #3994
Adder
I am beyond a rank!
 
Adder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 17,113
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop View Post
In your world, a car dealer gets an RFP for a fleet purchase from Avis, and has a brilliant idea -- it just tells Avis that its prices are higher, and voila! Profits!
Every once in awhile I have the pleasure of sitting down with our health care group, which among other things represents physician groups and practices, to whom the whole "antitrust" thing is a bit foreign. The one message that's completely clear from those conversations, however, is how the docs are getting fat on how much they get to charge third party payers
Adder is offline  
Old 02-20-2017, 01:00 PM   #3995
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
Registered User
 
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Government Yard in Trenchtown
Posts: 20,182
Re: national brotherhood week

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adder View Post
Every once in awhile I have the pleasure of sitting down with our health care group, which among other things represents physician groups and practices, to whom the whole "antitrust" thing is a bit foreign. The one message that's completely clear from those conversations, however, is how the docs are getting fat on how much they get to charge third party payers
Everyone thinks everyone else is overpaid while they are overworked.

Docs and hospitals, blame drug companies and device manufacturers, who blame third party payors, who blame hospitals and doctors, who then blame each other. And everyone blames the lawyers.
__________________
A wee dram a day!
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy is offline  
Old 02-20-2017, 01:09 PM   #3996
Adder
I am beyond a rank!
 
Adder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 17,113
Re: national brotherhood week

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy View Post
Everyone thinks everyone else is overpaid while they are overworked.

Docs and hospitals, blame drug companies and device manufacturers, who blame third party payors, who blame hospitals and doctors, who then blame each other. And everyone blames the lawyers.
Every one of those groups except the lawyers is overpaid in our system.

But more seriously, sure, docs inflate the reported headline price but that doesn't imply that insurers aren't ultimately getting the lowest available price.
Adder is offline  
Old 02-20-2017, 02:43 PM   #3997
Tyrone Slothrop
Moderasaurus Rex
 
Tyrone Slothrop's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 32,939
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.

Quote:
Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield View Post
Except it's not, and saying it's absurd is incorrect.

Don't dissemble. I'm not trying to "win," and this is not a zero sum game. It's a discussion, and I just wanted to expose an overlooked perverse incentive that warps prices.
It is absurd, and your ability to use the Google to find an obscure article by an obscure law professor in an obscure journal doesn't change that. In reality, Avis gets better prices when it buys cars than you do.

All else equal, a seller of goods may be able to get some relative benefit from anchoring with a high initial price. But all else is not equal, and the other benefits that insurers have in negotiating with providers are considerable. Moreover -- and this seems to be another key point that you have no answer to -- if anchoring gives an advantage in negotiations with insurers, it surely gives no less of an advantage in negotiations with individual consumers.

You haven't identified a perverse incentive. You've discovered that health-care providers want to charge as much as they can for their services, just like any other for-profit enterprise.
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
Tyrone Slothrop is offline  
Old 02-20-2017, 03:26 PM   #3998
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,077
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop View Post
It is absurd, and your ability to use the Google to find an obscure article by an obscure law professor in an obscure journal doesn't change that. In reality, Avis gets better prices when it buys cars than you do.

All else equal, a seller of goods may be able to get some relative benefit from anchoring with a high initial price. But all else is not equal, and the other benefits that insurers have in negotiating with providers are considerable. Moreover -- and this seems to be another key point that you have no answer to -- if anchoring gives an advantage in negotiations with insurers, it surely gives no less of an advantage in negotiations with individual consumers.

You haven't identified a perverse incentive. You've discovered that health-care providers want to charge as much as they can for their services, just like any other for-profit enterprise.
I could offer dozens of articles showing how the TPA system warps prices. Did you see the footnotes in the paper? They're more than half the page on many pages.

I said the TPA system warps prices. I supported my contention. I suggested that a system in which that warping was removed could lower costs across the board. You have responded to that by simply repeating, "Insurance gets the consumer a better price on preventative care!" You still have not addressed the argument that removal of the TPA system for preventative care could provide savings on ALL forms of care, in aggregate, which outweigh the preventative care savings from the TPA's intervention.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
Old 02-20-2017, 03:38 PM   #3999
notcasesensitive
Flaired.
 
notcasesensitive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Out with Lumbergh.
Posts: 9,954
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adder View Post
It's not a joke.
I did not take it as a joke. If you dislike a female politician because she's too schoolmarmy for you, it is based in misogyny. It's good of you to at least recognize that.

I have thought A LOT about our brand of misogyny over the last year. And I read (listened to the audiobook of) A Brief History of Misogyny by Jack Holland, which offers an interesting historical perspective, but alas ends before our current era and was more optimistic about present day when it ended in the early 2000's (the author died in 2004 and this book was published posthumously) than it might be if published today.
__________________
See you later, decorator.
notcasesensitive is offline  
Old 02-20-2017, 03:42 PM   #4000
Adder
I am beyond a rank!
 
Adder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 17,113
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.

Quote:
Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield View Post
I suggested that a system in which that warping was removed could lower costs across the board.
You understand that the disagreement is about this part, right?
Adder is offline  
Old 02-20-2017, 03:49 PM   #4001
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,077
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adder View Post
You understand that the disagreement is about this part, right?
No. I had no idea.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.

Last edited by sebastian_dangerfield; 02-20-2017 at 03:51 PM..
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
Old 02-20-2017, 03:53 PM   #4002
Adder
I am beyond a rank!
 
Adder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 17,113
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.

Quote:
Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield View Post
No. I had no idea.
Well good. Now that you know, you can provide some evidence for the assertion that is actually in question.
Adder is offline  
Old 02-20-2017, 03:53 PM   #4003
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,077
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adder View Post
Well good. Now that you know, you can provide some evidence for the assertion that is actually in question.
You idiot. Seriously?
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
Old 02-20-2017, 04:01 PM   #4004
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,077
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop View Post
It is absurd, and your ability to use the Google to find an obscure article by an obscure law professor in an obscure journal doesn't change that. In reality, Avis gets better prices when it buys cars than you do.

All else equal, a seller of goods may be able to get some relative benefit from anchoring with a high initial price. But all else is not equal, and the other benefits that insurers have in negotiating with providers are considerable. Moreover -- and this seems to be another key point that you have no answer to -- if anchoring gives an advantage in negotiations with insurers, it surely gives no less of an advantage in negotiations with individual consumers.

You haven't identified a perverse incentive. You've discovered that health-care providers want to charge as much as they can for their services, just like any other for-profit enterprise.
You ignore the papers focus on the total lack of rational relationship between the price charged by the provider and a true value of the service provided. This is not a situation where a provider is merely trying to get the best price for its services. This is a situation in which a third-party payer has created a scenario in which the provider is charging outrageous and unsupportable amount to offset bulk discounts.

The argument you are making is intentionally obtuse. That's not an allegation, but a logical conclusion, as there is no other reason for you to ignore the lack of rational relationship between the value and the price charged except in order to avoid recognizing the inflating effect of the TPA.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.

Last edited by sebastian_dangerfield; 02-20-2017 at 04:03 PM..
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
Old 02-20-2017, 04:13 PM   #4005
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,077
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.

Quote:
Originally Posted by notcasesensitive View Post
I did not take it as a joke. If you dislike a female politician because she's too schoolmarmy for you, it is based in misogyny. It's good of you to at least recognize that.
What if you dislike a male politician because he is too schoolmarmy?

I think most people dislike the schoolmarmy of both sexes, reflexively. Ever heard anyone use the adjective in a positive sense?

It's one of those words like fastidious, or officious, which aren't technically insulting, but describe personality traits to which most people aren't drawn. "He's a hall monitor," "...typical rule custodian," etc.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:45 AM.