LawTalkers

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   Politics (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   A disgusting vat of filth that no self-respecting intelligent person would wade into. (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=757)

nononono 01-23-2007 08:45 PM

Throw-off lines
 
Quote:

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
Then why does Al-Zawahari practically parrot Durbin's, Mutha's (et. al.) anti-war diatribes in his "Missives from an Afghan Cave, Parts 25-32"



I gave up litigation a long time ago - was that a qualified admission?



I gave you 2 direct links and refused to bother linking to the HuffPost and KOS, since no one is denying either.

What more do you want?
Is he just looking for any old place where U.S. troops are called torturers? Because I have some of those...or are there restrictions on who it is who can be cited?

Adder 01-23-2007 08:52 PM

Empty Promise to the Board
 
Quote:

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
Oh, don't sell the Democrats short. They're a lot stupider than you think.

People in Philly not only think she's electable, they think she's a sure thing. They can't wait to get their Harrison Bergeron economic fix when she gets in the white house...

They should raze that city and sell it for scrap metal.
I am hearing formerly anti-Hilary dems starting to consider her again. In fact, I am not sure she is as much of a non-starter as you suggest.

But I agree, she has a huge hole to climb out of, and I do not think she is the best choice at the moment.

Penske_Account 01-23-2007 08:53 PM

Empty Promise to the Board
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
2.
Translation: I might not miss him in the abstract, but given the choice between Penske and Hillary, I'd take Penske.

Adder 01-23-2007 08:56 PM

Throw-off lines
 
Quote:

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
"World outcry over Muslim violence in Somalia - nil"

"World outcry over Israeli retaliation in Lebanon against Hezballah - incessant"
First all, that is bullshit.

Second of all, you do see a difference, right? One actor is a member of modern Western civilization, that enjoys the defacto stamp of approval of the U.S.

The other is a mess that no one quite knows what to do with, and certainly doesn't get material or other support from the civilized world.

Penske_Account 01-23-2007 08:57 PM

Empty Promise to the Board
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Adder
I am hearing formerly anti-Hilary dems starting to consider her again. In fact, I am not sure she is as much of a non-starter as you suggest.

But I agree, she has a huge hole to climb out of, and I do not think she is the best choice at the moment.
Translation: If she knocks Penske outtda box, I could hold my nose and vote for her.

Penske_Account 01-23-2007 09:05 PM

Throw-off lines
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Adder
First all, that is bullshit.

No, its not. Sadly, only 60 years after the holocaust, Weurope is once again rabidly anti-semitic, as is the Middle East, and the American Left is attempting to have us join them. Thankfully a few of us patriots are still pro-Israel, but a Hillary victory would signal the deathknell, I fear.

Diane_Keaton 01-23-2007 09:07 PM

Throw-off lines
 
Quote:

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
"World outcry over Muslim violence in Somalia - nil"
Haven't seen anything about that in CAIR's action alerts. And their link titled, 'Not in the Name of Islam Campaign' brings you to a blank page. (!!) As millions of Muslims slaughter innocents in the very name of Islam, CAIR is posting "Action Alerts" once a month urging American Muslims to complain about the shortage of postage stamps a few years ago commemorating Eid ul-Fitr and Eid ul-Adha and
here too.

Nice.

Adder 01-23-2007 09:08 PM

16-1
 
Anyone else hoping that the President, inspired by the recent revelation of a legendary hockey coach, will finally come out as a functional illeterate?

This is going to be painful, but I may actually decide to watch.

Adder 01-23-2007 09:10 PM

Empty Promise to the Board
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
Translation: If she knocks Penske outtda box, I could hold my nose and vote for her.
I will vote for her if she is the nominee, but I will not support her in the primaries. And I don't even have to hold my nose.

As to you, I would just be happy if I could put you on ignore.

Adder 01-23-2007 09:11 PM

Throw-off lines
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Diane_Keaton
Haven't seen anything about that in CAIR's action alerts. And their link titled, 'Not in the Name of Islam Campaign' brings you to a blank page. (!!) As millions of Muslims slaughter innocents in the very name of Islam, CAIR is posting "Action Alerts" once a month urging American Muslims to complain about the shortage of postage stamps a few years ago commemorating Eid ul-Fitr and Eid ul-Adha and
here too.

Nice.
I am fairly certain that you and Slave are the only two people who care what CAIR says.

Diane_Keaton 01-23-2007 09:22 PM

Throw-off lines
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Adder
I am fairly certain that you and Slave are the only two people who care what CAIR says.
I only care about CAIR not caring. Nothing else.

In other words, whiff.

SlaveNoMore 01-23-2007 09:24 PM

Throw-off lines
 
Quote:

Adder
I am fairly certain that you and Slave are the only two people who care what CAIR says.
Reuters, AP, the NYT and WaPo sure give them a lot of ink - for such an irrelevant group

Adder 01-23-2007 09:26 PM

Throw-off lines
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Diane_Keaton
I only care about CAIR not caring. Nothing else.

In other words, whiff.
Right. Which is why you felt the need to devote an entire post to them.

Speaking of whiff...

Penske_Account 01-23-2007 09:27 PM

Throw-off lines
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Adder
I am fairly certain that you and Slave are the only two people who care what CAIR says.
I do too.

Tyrone Slothrop 01-23-2007 09:28 PM

Throw-off lines
 
Quote:

Originally posted by taxwonk
So, what you're saying is that anyone who doesn't stand silent in the face of certain military personnel violating basic standards of human conduct and decency is giving succor to the enemy?
So long, succor?

SlaveNoMore 01-23-2007 09:30 PM

Three dollar words
 
Quote:

Tyrone Slothrop
So long, succor?
FWIW, I should get a prize for getting the word "succor" back in the PB lexicon.

Adder 01-23-2007 09:33 PM

Three dollar words
 
Quote:

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
FWIW, I should get a prize for getting the word "succor" back in the PB lexicon.
Whatever, sucker.

Adder 01-23-2007 09:36 PM

Corn(holing)
 
Anyone know if ethanol is actually energy saving? Yes, I am too lazy to google whether it take more electricty (produced by burning coal) than it saves in oil not burned.

I am always skeptical that ethanol is anything other than a giant give away to corn farmers. And Grassley's reaction to Bush's suggest did not help convince me otherwise.

sebastian_dangerfield 01-23-2007 09:41 PM

SOTU
 
Quote:

Originally posted by taxwonk
They're controlled by the Jews.
Chart?

Adder 01-23-2007 09:44 PM

Iran, and kept on runnin'
 
I actually sort of agree with him about Iran. Unfortunately, rather than wiat for a target to develop that is actually linked to Islamic fundamentalism, we went after its secular (although evil) neighbor and now lack both the ability and the will to act against the real sponsors of "Islamofascism."

Tyrone Slothrop 01-23-2007 09:48 PM

Three dollar words
 
Quote:

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
FWIW, I should get a prize for getting the word "succor" back in the PB lexicon.
"I'm gonna git you succor."

-- Slave

Adder 01-23-2007 09:51 PM

Reading between the lines
 
Bush, his advisors and the military discussed all options. But HE chose the surge as the best chance of succes. Note that no one else necessarily agreed.

Diane_Keaton 01-23-2007 10:18 PM

Throw-off lines
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Adder
Right. Which is why you felt the need to devote an entire post to them.

Speaking of whiff...
I found the items in my post to be very telling about the largest organization of Muslim-Americans and very relevant to the discussion of the so-called Muslim "response" to world events. And one small illustration of a larger issue you seem to be ignoring.

Gattigap 01-23-2007 10:29 PM

Throw-off lines
 
Quote:

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
Reuters, AP, the NYT and WaPo sure give them a lot of ink - for such an irrelevant group
It's true. A search of the WaPo archives, for example, reveals that the paper has mentioned "CAIR" in 79 different pieces.

Since 1987.

God, those motherfuckers.

Adder 01-23-2007 10:30 PM

Throw-off lines
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Diane_Keaton
I found the items in my post to be very telling about the largest organization of Muslim-Americans and very relevant to the discussion of the so-called Muslim "response" to world events. And one small illustration of a larger issue you seem to be ignoring.
Translation: I care about CAIR.

Hank Chinaski 01-23-2007 10:37 PM

Throw-off lines
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Gattigap
It's true. A search of the WaPo archives, for example, reveals that the paper has mentioned "CAIR" in 79 different pieces.

Since 1987.

God, those motherfuckers.
"council on american-islamic relations" has 311 hits since 1987. Can you say "Sorry Slave?"

Tyrone Slothrop 01-23-2007 10:45 PM

Throw-off lines
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
"council on american-islamic relations" has 311 hits since 1987. Can you say "Sorry Slave?"
The Citizens for Agriculture and Irrigation Reform have really been marginalized since 2001.

Secret_Agent_Man 01-23-2007 10:49 PM

SOTU
 
Quote:

Originally posted by taxwonk
It is not often that my belief in God is shaken. But when you can call me disrespectful and not be struck by a bolt of lightning, my soul trembles ever so slightly.
How do you know he wasn't?

S_A_M

Hank Chinaski 01-23-2007 11:05 PM

Throw-off lines
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
The Citizens for Agriculture and Irrigation Reform have really been marginalized since 2001.
I don't get this. Is there some book I should have read?

SlaveNoMore 01-24-2007 12:01 AM

Throw-off lines
 
Quote:

Hank Chinaski
"council on american-islamic relations" has 311 hits since 1987. Can you say "Sorry Slave?"
The conservative-libertarian wing of the GOP is a forgiving bunch.

I'm also guessing Gatti went with WaPo, as the Reuters search probably crashed his computers

SlaveNoMore 01-24-2007 12:07 AM

Summed up nicely
 
President Bush:

Quote:

This is not the fight we entered in Iraq, but it is the fight we are in. Every one of us wishes that this war were over and won. Yet it would not be like us to leave our promises unkept, our friends abandoned, and our own security at risk. Ladies and gentlemen: On this day, at this hour, it is still within our power to shape the outcome of this battle. So let us find our resolve, and turn events toward victory.

Democrats (all seated):

Quote:

.....[crickets]....[Yawn!!!].....

Fugee 01-24-2007 12:13 AM

Empty Promise to the Board
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Adder
I will vote for her if she is the nominee, but I will not support her in the primaries. And I don't even have to hold my nose.
I don't know if I'd vote for her if she is the nominee. It would depend on who the GOP candidate is.

I was once very pro-Hillary, but was very disappointed in her. If the GOP candidate were a moderate, I'd definitely vote GOP over her. If the GOP candidate were someone heinous, I don't know what I'd do.

But I hope it won't come down to that. I'd love a choice between a moderate Dem and a moderate GOP -- but would settle for two candidates I can at least respect.

SlaveNoMore 01-24-2007 12:14 AM

but....
 
as recounted by the brilliant Mark Steyn:

Quote:

...On the other hand, Nancy flew up for the reference to Darfur and the Dems all leapt up to follow. It’s surely very revealing that the Democrats seem most enthused about the one issue where all you have to do is posture ineffectually while the UN stonewalls until everybody’s been killed. But on Iraq or anywhere else America moves beyond posturing to action the Dems sit on their hands.
follow-up commentary by Andy McCarthy:

Quote:

Just watched Steny Hoyer get interviewed on Fox. He wants to assure everyone that Democrats strongly support the war on terror ... but feel that the war is really in Afghanistan, not so much in Iraq. Really? Osama bin Laden says Iraq is, for al Qaeda, the central front in the war. Ayman Zawahiri says he wishes we'd send more than 20,000 more troops because al Qaeda is in Iraq and would like to kill more Americans there. A big part of why Iraq is so difficult is that al Qaeda has contributed mightily to the chaos and killing. (Who did more to foment the sectarian infighting than the late Abu Musab Zarqawi, head of al Qaeda in Iraq?) I'm not saying that Afghanistan is unimportant. But the enemy is massed in Iraq and is braying that it thinks defeating us in Iraq is its top objective. Under those circumstances, how do you conceivably say the war we need to win isn't really in Iraq?
Steyn follow-thru:

Quote:

Andy is right about Steny Hoyer. You can argue that Iraq is not the most important part of the war but it’s ludicrous to insist that it’s no part of it at all. For one thing, any outcome that can be presented as a US defeat will be a huge boost for our enemies around the world, and be very revealing of our credibility. This Dem device of always being in favor of some war somewhere other than the one you’re in is laughable. And, after calling for more troops for years and then objecting when it actually happens, Democrat butching up on this tired trope should be seen for what it is: bad-faith poseur politics on the critical issue of our times.
yes, on the Corner

SlaveNoMore 01-24-2007 12:16 AM

Empty Promise to the Board
 
Quote:

Fugee
I don't know if I'd vote for her if she is the nominee. It would depend on who the GOP candidate is.

I was once very pro-Hillary, but was very disappointed in her. If the GOP candidate were a moderate, I'd definitely vote GOP over her. If the GOP candidate were someone heinous, I don't know what I'd do.

But I hope it won't come down to that. I'd love a choice between a moderate Dem and a moderate GOP -- but would settle for two candidates I can at least respect.
Can you define "moderate Dem" for the peanut gallery here?

Fugee 01-24-2007 12:41 AM

Empty Promise to the Board
 
Quote:

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
Can you define "moderate Dem" for the peanut gallery here?
I guess I define a moderate, on either side of the aisle, as someone who balances economic and social concerns -- the particular party would make one side weigh a little heavier than the other but doesn't sacrifice one for the other. And who doesn't have a history of voting straight party line or make too many promises to the extremes in the party.

But I realize someone like that is unlikely to win nomination on either side. I'd be happy with candidates who are complained about by the hardliners in their own parties as not being "pure" enough.

And while I'm wishing for the impossible, I'll also wish that people who call themselves evangelical Christians would spend their time, energy and political capital on something other than abortion and gay marriage.

SlaveNoMore 01-24-2007 12:49 AM

Empty Promise to the Board
 
Quote:

Fugee
I guess I define a moderate, on either side of the aisle, as someone who balances economic and social concerns -- the particular party would make one side weigh a little heavier than the other but doesn't sacrifice one for the other. And who doesn't have a history of voting straight party line or make too many promises to the extremes in the party.
Isn't Bush a moderate Republican by this test?

His big budget-unlimited spending compassionate conservatism (gag) is populist, Democrat-ish, and makes folks like me, Club and Spanky lie awake at night.

Penske_Account 01-24-2007 01:32 AM

Empty Promise to the Board
 
Quote:

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
Isn't Bush a moderate Republican by this test?

His big budget-unlimited spending compassionate conservatism (gag) is populist, Democrat-ish, and makes folks like me, Club and Spanky lie awake at night.

Hi! Am I on ignore?

SlaveNoMore 01-24-2007 02:33 AM

Empty Promise to the Board
 
Quote:

Penske_Account
Hi! Am I on ignore?
I've seen your interactions with the homeless up close. Compassionate is your middle name.

Secret_Agent_Man 01-24-2007 08:18 AM

Summed up nicely
 
Quote:

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
President Bush:

Democrats (all seated):
Why should anyone applaud Bush's policy statements on Iraq until he provides some demonstration that he can deliver on the big talk -- that his administration can execute?

[Even within the more cramped confines of what is currently possible.]

Really -- he is our leader and all, and we have to do something and we don't want things to get worse -- but his credibility on Iraq is close to zero by this point.

Oh yeah, except that he really, really means what he says and he tries really really really hard. Honest. That is enough for me to applaud my small child, but not my President.

So, shut up and show us something.

S_A_M

Tyrone Slothrop 01-24-2007 08:23 AM

Throw-off lines
 
Quote:

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
The conservative-libertarian wing of the GOP is a forgiving bunch.
All CAIR does, as near as I can tell, is issue press releases. Although I suppose this makes them an essential and ideal adversary in conservatives' ongoing battles.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:26 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com