LawTalkers
Page 106 of 124 « First 65696104105 106 107108116 Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Fashionable (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=14)
-   -   Congratulations Slave and Catrin!!! (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=814)

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) 01-21-2009 02:50 PM
Re: Actual Fashion Question
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by bold_n_brazen (Post 378433)
These are a few of my favorite things.
Dad, get me out of this.

Atticus Grinch 01-21-2009 02:58 PM
Re: Actual Fashion Question
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Phoenix (Post 378430)
Not a good look on that suit coat. If you were to get one, the suit coat probably should have 2 buttons and a double vent. The ticket pocket should be smaller than that one. I've seen ticket pockets on more British-cut suits. The one in the picture above seems to be an amalgamation of a bunch of styles. The suit jackets below both have ticket pockets, and I think they look pretty good. Plus, you almost have the ability to test AG's theory.

http://men.style.com/slideshows/mens...on1/00004f.jpg
Quod erat demonstrandum, which is actually what we call a McRib sandwich.

sebastian_dangerfield 01-21-2009 03:08 PM
Re: Inaugural fashion
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sidd Finch (Post 378425)
He should wear ties made of Kente cloth. After all, when he dressed in a dashiki it was really well-received.
Most of the Kente patterns I've seen are unfortunately reminiscent of Jerry Garcia ties.

Not a good looking brand of tie. Even in 1995.

Fugee 01-21-2009 03:35 PM
Re: Actual Fashion Question
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atticus Grinch (Post 378436)
Quod erat demonstrandum, which is actually what we call a McRib sandwich.
Not a good test of your theory because the black guy would look better than the white guy in any outfit because he's just better looking.

Did you just call me Coltrane? 01-21-2009 03:46 PM
Re: Actual Fashion Question
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Phoenix (Post 378430)
Not a good look on that suit coat. If you were to get one, the suit coat probably should have 2 buttons and a double vent. The ticket pocket should be smaller than that one. I've seen ticket pockets on more British-cut suits. The one in the picture above seems to be an amalgamation of a bunch of styles. The suit jackets below both have ticket pockets, and I think they look pretty good. Plus, you almost have the ability to test AG's theory.

http://men.style.com/slideshows/mens...on1/00004f.jpg
Is that Vanilla Ice?

Fugee 01-21-2009 03:47 PM
Re: More inaugural fashion
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sidd Finch (Post 378422)
Are you kidding? She totally pulled it off. Yeah, it's a horrible hat -- but if you're Aretha Franklin, you can do that shit.

I think the only other woman who could wear a hat like that would be the Queen of England.
Aretha's hat is a classic "church" hat and I bet there are quite a number of black women who rock hats just like that on Sunday mornings.

I still love it and wish white Minnesota women still wore hats to church.

Adder 01-21-2009 03:48 PM
Re: More inaugural fashion
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fugee (Post 378442)
I still love it and wish white Minnesota women still wore hats to church.
Have you tried starting a trend?

dtb 01-21-2009 03:50 PM
Re: More inaugural fashion
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fugee (Post 378442)
Aretha's hat is a classic "church" hat and I bet there are quite a number of black women who rock hats just like that on Sunday mornings.

I still love it and wish white Minnesota women still wore hats to church.
I'll bet you all 17 Minnesota Jewesses (the married ones) wear hats to their equivalent of church.

Adder 01-21-2009 03:53 PM
Re: More inaugural fashion
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by dtb (Post 378444)
I'll bet you all 17 Minnesota Jewesses (the married ones) wear hats to their equivalent of church.
Are they are..um... spectacular... as Aretha's?

And btw, I heard that Rachel moved away, so it's down to 16 now.

taxwonk 01-21-2009 04:02 PM
Re: Actual Fashion Question
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 378396)
This is more of a J. Peterman thing.
Actually, when Banana Republic first opened, they offered a full line of private label safari wear. I'm amazed they didn't just disappear the first three months they existed, never to be heard from again.

It's like trying to picture Isaac Mizrahi designing for Target.

Did you just call me Coltrane? 01-21-2009 04:03 PM
Re: Actual Fashion Question
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by taxwonk (Post 378447)

It's like trying to picture Isaac Mizrahi designing for Target.
Seriously. Like that guy would ever do something like that.







I have no idea who you're talking about.

taxwonk 01-21-2009 04:08 PM
Re: Inaugural fashion
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) (Post 378426)
And while he's at it drop the lapel pin.
Why do you hate America?

Fugee 01-21-2009 04:10 PM
Re: More inaugural fashion
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by dtb (Post 378444)
I'll bet you all 17 Minnesota Jewesses (the married ones) wear hats to their equivalent of church.
We have mostly Reform here -- maybe a few Orthodox (your 17 Jewesses!) but I bet they don't wear hats with quite the flair of the black women.

If I feel the need to wear a hat in church, I'll have to head up to North Minneapolis. But I'd also have to dress better than I usually do for church so that might take some of the hat thrill away.

taxwonk 01-21-2009 04:15 PM
Re: Actual Fashion Question
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Did you just call me Coltrane? (Post 378448)
I have no idea who you're talking about.
http://images.businessweek.com/ss/06...ahi_target.jpg

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) 01-21-2009 04:16 PM
Re: Actual Fashion Question
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by taxwonk (Post 378451)
I'm glad to see Spuds McKenzie was able to find other employment in this tough economy.

Hank Chinaski 01-21-2009 04:21 PM
Re: More inaugural fashion
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by dtb (Post 378444)
I'll bet you all 17 Minnesota Jewesses (the married ones) wear hats to their equivalent of church.
17?

the twin cities field large Maccabee teams, that is a large number of athletes. most are short though, so not large in that sense.

LessinSF 01-21-2009 04:22 PM
Re: More inaugural fashion
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Replaced_Texan (Post 378374)
2. I wish I could pull off a hat like that.
Wasn't Atticus in the market for a hat?

LessinSF 01-21-2009 04:29 PM
Re: More inaugural fashion
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by notcasesensitive (Post 378389)
That is my problem with it. She is tall and lean and she managed to have a custom gown made for her that cuts off her torso?? WHY???????
I'm not so sure about "lean." Salon thinks she has a big, black booootay - http://www.salon.com/mwt/feature/200...oty/index.html

Replaced_Texan 01-21-2009 04:34 PM
Re: Actual Fashion Question
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by taxwonk (Post 378451)
I met him--the pooch, not the designer--last year. My boyfriend was working the AFI film festival in Dallas and Target was the lead sponsor. They sent down their spokes model for one of the parties. Good dog, not at all as stuck up as you'd think he'd be.

taxwonk 01-21-2009 04:36 PM
Re: Actual Fashion Question
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Replaced_Texan (Post 378457)
I met him--the pooch, not the designer--last year. My boyfriend was working the AFI film festival in Dallas and Target was the lead sponsor. They sent down their spokes model for one of the parties. Good dog, not at all as stuck up as you'd think he'd be.
If only the same could be said of Isaac.

ThurgreedMarshall 01-21-2009 04:53 PM
Top 99 Most Desirable Women
 
And Eva Mendes tops the list? http://www.askmen.com/specials/2009_...-mendes-1.html

She's hot, but I don't think so.

http://www.celebritywonder.com/pictu...tz_5552010.jpg

TM

bold_n_brazen 01-21-2009 04:54 PM
Re: Top 99 Most Desirable Women
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThurgreedMarshall (Post 378464)
She has perfect eyebrows.

Sidd Finch 01-21-2009 05:42 PM
Re: Actual Fashion Question
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy (Post 378431)
Ammo, drugs and money.
What about lube? Nothing like a little anal sex out on the veldt.

greatwhitenorthchick 01-21-2009 06:14 PM
Re: Actual Fashion Question
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy (Post 378431)
Ammo, drugs and money.
I hardly think those squishy pussy tourists were carrying ammo and drugs (unless you mean Viagra), but ok.

greatwhitenorthchick 01-21-2009 06:18 PM
Re: Top 99 Most Desirable Women
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThurgreedMarshall (Post 378464)
I firmly believe that askmen is populated by men who never get laid. Of course they are entitled to their opinion about who's hot and who's not, but I think you have to consider the source.

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 01-21-2009 06:27 PM
Re: Top 99 Most Desirable Women
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThurgreedMarshall (Post 378464)

It's all those memorable movie rolls.

dtb 01-21-2009 06:31 PM
Re: Actual Fashion Question
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sidd Finch (Post 378478)
What about lube? Nothing like a little anal sex out on the veldt.
Speaking of this sort of thing, all you FBills out there, what percentage of women whom you have known biblically (theoretically, of course) would you say would have a rating on the slut scale of 8 or above?

dtb 01-21-2009 06:32 PM
Re: Actual Fashion Question
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by greatwhitenorthchick (Post 378492)
I hardly think those squishy pussy tourists were carrying ammo and drugs (unless you mean Viagra), but ok.
Squishy-pussy tourists? I hear they have whole tours of southeast asia dedicated to that kind of thing.

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 01-21-2009 06:34 PM
Re: Actual Fashion Question
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by dtb (Post 378497)
Speaking of this sort of thing, all you FBills out there, what percentage of women whom you have known biblically (theoretically, of course) would you say would have a rating on the slut scale of 8 or above?
Why do you ask?

Adder 01-21-2009 06:37 PM
Re: Actual Fashion Question
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by dtb (Post 378497)
Speaking of this sort of thing, all you FBills out there, what percentage of women whom you have known biblically (theoretically, of course) would you say would have a rating on the slut scale of 8 or above?
So judgmental. Make love, not.. um... judgments about people's sluttiness.

dtb 01-21-2009 06:45 PM
Re: Actual Fashion Question
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adder (Post 378501)
So judgmental. Make love, not.. um... judgments about people's sluttiness.
Judgmental?!? Shirley, you jest.

dtb 01-21-2009 06:47 PM
Re: Actual Fashion Question
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy (Post 378499)
Why do you ask?
Just a theory that a girlfriend and I were concocting (heh) that neither of us is able to confirm without information from a sampling of men who've had a sampling of women.

Will publish results when info is received.

Cletus Miller 01-21-2009 06:58 PM
Re: Actual Fashion Question
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by dtb (Post 378497)
Speaking of this sort of thing, all you FBills out there, what percentage of women whom you have known biblically (theoretically, of course) would you say would have a rating on the slut scale of 8 or above?
Where can I find this "slut scale", with an explanation of the scoring methodology?

ThurgreedMarshall 01-21-2009 07:18 PM
Re: Actual Fashion Question
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by dtb (Post 378497)
Speaking of this sort of thing, all you FBills out there, what percentage of women whom you have known biblically (theoretically, of course) would you say would have a rating on the slut scale of 8 or above?
0%. All the women I fucked the first night told me they never did anything like that before.

TM

LessinSF 01-21-2009 07:20 PM
Re: Actual Fashion Question
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThurgreedMarshall (Post 378509)
0%. All the women I fucked the first night told me they never did anything like that before.

TM
Probably 100%.

dtb 01-21-2009 07:29 PM
Re: Actual Fashion Question
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThurgreedMarshall (Post 378509)
0%. All the women I fucked the first night told me they never did anything like that before.

TM
dude. I may have been born at night, but it wasn't last night.

greatwhitenorthchick 01-21-2009 07:36 PM
Re: Actual Fashion Question
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThurgreedMarshall (Post 378509)
0%. All the women I fucked the first night told me they never did anything like that before.

TM
Maybe by slut scale, dtb means not that they sleep around, but that they are wild in bed. I don't know, maybe it is as follows (I made my scale 1-10):

1 -- only has missionary sex in total darkness
2 -- has missionary sex sometimes with the lights on
3 -- sometimes does it doggie-style
4 -- does it doggie-style and gets on top
5 -- gives blowjobs but only after some convincing
6 -- gives blowjobs once in a while
7 -- gives three-hour blowjobs
8 -- gives three-hour blowjobs and does anal
9 -- all that plus likes to have sex at least 10x a day
10 --all that plus has a certain magical quality I will call charisma

Please feel free to add -- this is just off the top of my head.

dtb 01-21-2009 07:38 PM
Re: Actual Fashion Question
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by greatwhitenorthchick (Post 378514)
Maybe by slut scale, dtb means not that they sleep around, but that they are wild in bed. I don't know, maybe it is as follows (I made my scale 1-10):

1 -- only has missionary sex in total darkness
2 -- has missionary sex sometimes with the lights on
3 -- sometimes does it doggie-style
4 -- does it doggie-style and gets on top
5 -- gives blowjobs but only after some convincing
6 -- gives blowjobs once in a while
7 -- gives three-hour blowjobs
8 -- gives three-hour blowjobs and does anal
9 -- all that plus likes to have sex at least 10x a day
10 --all that plus has a certain magical quality I will call charisma
Yes, exactly. This is heLpful (naturally, as GWINK is such a peach). Wild in bed, passionate, really likes fucking, etc. (however you want to phrase it). Please, gentlemen, your accurate and candid replies are the raw data (so to speak) that we need!

Adder 01-21-2009 07:40 PM
Re: Actual Fashion Question
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by greatwhitenorthchick (Post 378514)
Maybe by slut scale, dtb means not that they sleep around, but that they are wild in bed. I don't know, maybe it is as follows (I made my scale 1-10):

1 -- only has missionary sex in total darkness
2 -- has missionary sex sometimes with the lights on
3 -- sometimes does it doggie-style
4 -- does it doggie-style and gets on top
5 -- gives blowjobs but only after some convincing
6 -- gives blowjobs once in a while
7 -- gives three-hour blowjobs
8 -- gives three-hour blowjobs and does anal
9 -- all that plus likes to have sex at least 10x a day
10 --all that plus has a certain magical quality I will call charisma

Please feel free to add -- this is just off the top of my head.
I like this scale, in particular in that the higher scores are all clearly better. But for some reason I didn't think that was what dtb is getting at.

ETA: Apparently I was wrong. For what it is worth, this is not the type of analysis that comes to mind for me when asked about a persons sluttiness.

dtb 01-21-2009 07:45 PM
Re: Actual Fashion Question
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by greatwhitenorthchick (Post 378514)
Maybe by slut scale, dtb means not that they sleep around, but that they are wild in bed. I don't know, maybe it is as follows (I made my scale 1-10):

1 -- only has missionary sex in total darkness
2 -- has missionary sex sometimes with the lights on
3 -- sometimes does it doggie-style
4 -- does it doggie-style and gets on top
5 -- gives blowjobs but only after some convincing
6 -- gives blowjobs once in a while
7 -- gives three-hour blowjobs
8 -- gives three-hour blowjobs and does anal
9 -- all that plus likes to have sex at least 10x a day
10 --all that plus has a certain magical quality I will call charisma

Please feel free to add -- this is just off the top of my head.
My additions might include "does it in a public place -- but not necessarily in front of third parties in public" (perhaps merge the doggie-style entries [HA!] to make room for this one), and maybe uses "marital aids" (or whatever euphemism). Maybe combine 4&5 to make room for this one.

Your suggestions are welcome!


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:51 PM.
Page 106 of 124 « First 65696104105 106 107108116 Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com