LawTalkers
Page 107 of 124 « First 75797105106 107 108109117 Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Fashionable (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=14)
-   -   Congratulations Slave and Catrin!!! (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=814)

dtb 01-21-2009 07:46 PM
Re: Actual Fashion Question
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adder (Post 378516)
I like this scale, in particular in that the higher scores are all clearly better. But for some reason I didn't think that was what dtb is getting at.

ETA: Apparently I was wrong. For what it is worth, this is not the type of analysis that comes to mind for men when asked about a persons sluttiness.
Oh, adder. You really don't understand us sluts, do you?

Hank Chinaski 01-21-2009 07:50 PM
Re: Actual Fashion Question
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by dtb (Post 378515)
Yes, exactly. This is heLpful (naturally, as GWINK is such a peach). Wild in bed, passionate, really likes fucking, etc. (however you want to phrase it). Please, gentlemen, your accurate and candid replies are the raw data (so to speak) that we need!
a problem is that the ones likely to be the sluttier ones tended to not be around long enough for confirmation.

LessinSF 01-21-2009 07:54 PM
Re: Actual Fashion Question
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by dtb (Post 378518)
Oh, adder. You really don't understand us sluts, do you?
I am with Adder - variety and ability in sex are not what "slut" means to me. It means promiscuity and ease. Based on GWNC's scale, my number is not 100%.

dtb 01-21-2009 08:04 PM
Re: Actual Fashion Question
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by LessinSF (Post 378520)
I am with Adder - variety and ability in sex are not what "slut" means to me. It means promiscuity and ease. Based on GWNC's scale, my number is not 100%.
Well, what would you call it, then? The Nasty Scale? (that sound pejorative, and I don't mean it that way, of course)

Slut just seemed like a good summary word.

Hank Chinaski 01-21-2009 08:04 PM
Re: Actual Fashion Question
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by LessinSF (Post 378520)
I am with Adder - variety and ability in sex are not what "slut" means to me. It means promiscuity and ease. Based on GWNC's scale, my number is not 100%.
true. I can't remember the last girl* that wouldn't put a dick in her mouth, though several were not sluts, and who is bothered by doggie style, less stimulated due to lowered clitoral contact perhaps, but not refused for any other reason.

But less we are asked to help answer dtb's question. don't fight her definitions.


*edit- lots of girls wouldn't let me do that, but they wouldn't let me touch anything else.

Sidd Finch 01-21-2009 08:08 PM
Re: Actual Fashion Question
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by dtb (Post 378515)
Yes, exactly. This is heLpful (naturally, as GWINK is such a peach). Wild in bed, passionate, really likes fucking, etc. (however you want to phrase it). Please, gentlemen, your accurate and candid replies are the raw data (so to speak) that we need!
Not enough.

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) 01-21-2009 08:55 PM
Re: Top 99 Most Desirable Women
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by greatwhitenorthchick (Post 378493)
I firmly believe that askmen is populated by men who never get laid.
Translation: I should be on the top of the list.

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) 01-21-2009 08:55 PM
Re: Actual Fashion Question
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by greatwhitenorthchick (Post 378514)
8 -- gives three-hour blowjobs and does anal
9 -- all that plus likes to have sex at least 10x a day
10 --all that plus has a certain magical quality I will call charisma
Translation: Because I go to 11!

Adder 01-21-2009 09:00 PM
Re: Actual Fashion Question
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by dtb (Post 378523)
Well, what would you call it, then? The Nasty Scale? (that sound pejorative, and I don't mean it that way, of course)

Slut just seemed like a good summary word.
I am all for the reclamation of the word, but I guess I would have said something like sexually adventures. Passionate, sensual or sexual are all in the right neighborhood too, although perhaps too vague.

taxwonk 01-21-2009 11:17 PM
Re: Actual Fashion Question
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by dtb (Post 378515)
Yes, exactly. This is heLpful (naturally, as GWINK is such a peach). Wild in bed, passionate, really likes fucking, etc. (however you want to phrase it). Please, gentlemen, your accurate and candid replies are the raw data (so to speak) that we need!
Based on Gwink's scale, I'd say 90%. I don't know that I buy the use of the term "slut" though. I tend to reserve the concept of "slut" for things like Flinty's client development techniques or Coltrane's approach to a pastrami sandwich.

Jack Manfred 01-22-2009 04:03 AM
Re: Actual Fashion Question
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by greatwhitenorthchick (Post 378514)
Maybe by slut scale, dtb means not that they sleep around, but that they are wild in bed. I don't know, maybe it is as follows (I made my scale 1-10):

1 -- only has missionary sex in total darkness
2 -- has missionary sex sometimes with the lights on
3 -- sometimes does it doggie-style
4 -- does it doggie-style and gets on top
5 -- gives blowjobs but only after some convincing
6 -- gives blowjobs once in a while
7 -- gives three-hour blowjobs
8 -- gives three-hour blowjobs and does anal
9 -- all that plus likes to have sex at least 10x a day
10 --all that plus has a certain magical quality I will call charisma

Please feel free to add -- this is just off the top of my head.
There seems to be a big jump on that scale from 6 to 7. I think the upper reaches may need to be revised a bit for the general population.

Add me to the list of people who wouldn't like this to be called the "slut scale." I've not found a correlation between the willingness to experiment in bed and the willingness to jump in bed with whomever is available, in my (limited) experience. Dan Savage advocated the phrase "Good, Giving & Game" to describe an adventurous sex partner, and while I think that phrase is nearing its sell-by date, I prefer it to "slut" for these purposes.

The more important question that may be gained from raw data is whether the men on the board preferred to be in a relationship with high numbers and/or whether they had longer-term or more successful relationships with high numbers (or perhaps corresponding numbers). I remember dating a woman some years ago who seemed determined to bring back the repressed Catholic female stereotype from the dustheap of the 1950's. After a few dates, she memorably called me a "sex fiend," primarily because I wanted to have sex with her. Soon after that, I stopped calling her. I have to admit the repression thing wasn't all bad. She was never going to introduce me to any new sexual positions, but she did introduce me to some restaurants that were new to me.

As this is gwinky's list, and as it does not contain any mention of a threesome, despite the fact that several months ago gwinky mentioned wanting to engage in a FMF with her current beau/everlasting gobstopper, I have to chide her for a lack of focus in her lovelife. Some (many? all?) of us are counting on gwinky to hold up her end of the vicarious bargain.

Jack Manfred 01-22-2009 05:40 AM
Re: Top 99 Most Desirable Women
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThurgreedMarshall (Post 378464)
And Eva Mendes tops the list? http://www.askmen.com/specials/2009_...-mendes-1.html

She's hot, but I don't think so.
So here's the AskMen.com top 10:

1. Eva Mendes (Wasn't she coked up last year? Did that make her hotter to the voters?)
2. Megan Fox (consensus hot-babe-du-jour/Angelina Jolie (#42?!) wannabe)
3. Marisa Miller (board favorite; perhaps TM's #1?)
4. Keeley Hazell (pneumatic Brit)
5. Anne Hathaway (many of you will now stop reading the rest of the list)
6. Alessandra Ambrosio (Victoria's Secret model)
7. Scarlett Johansson
8. Rhianna
9. Kristen Bell (deserving of a top-10 finish)
10. Kate Beckinsale (So hot she makes Brian Posehn angry (NSFW).)

That Top Ten is fatally flawed because it doesn't contain either January Jones (#98?) or Christina Hendricks (#52) from Mad Men. You can prefer the icy, Hitchcockian blonde charms of January Jones as lavishly photographed in Vanity Fair to the period-accurate pulchritude of Christina Hendricks as a youtube video mashnote, but one of these women has to make the top 5 for the list to be culturally and sexually relevant.

For an off the top of my head top 10, I'd add Sarah Shahi (#85) from Life and The L Word, Cobie Smulders from How I Met Your Mother, and Kaley Cuoco from The Big Bang Theory. She plays a hottie living next door to a couple of physicist/nerds, so you'd think that would hit the AskMen.com demographic in the parent's basement where they live. Keep Megan, Scarlett, Kristen, and Kate and add #12 Emmanuelle Chriqui to my picks for a much-improved list.

There are plenty of pics of Sarah Shahi and Kaley Cuoco, but none of the ones I liked were easily linkable/hotlinkable. Google Search will have to do for you.

Jack Manfred 01-22-2009 05:50 AM
Re: Actual Fashion Question
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop (Post 378395)
It's hard to understand the thinking behind Banana Republic's initial business model.
Maybe they were prescient enough to think that someday, millions of people would want to dress like a correspondent on The Daily Show?

Secret_Agent_Man 01-22-2009 08:15 AM
Re: Actual Fashion Question
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by dtb (Post 378515)
Yes, exactly. This is heLpful (naturally, as GWINK is such a peach). Wild in bed, passionate, really likes fucking, etc. (however you want to phrase it). Please, gentlemen, your accurate and candid replies are the raw data (so to speak) that we need!
In my experience, I'd say _maybe_ 20% of the women would be rated above a 5-6 on that scale. Wish there were more.

S_A_M

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 01-22-2009 08:49 AM
Re: Actual Fashion Question
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by greatwhitenorthchick (Post 378514)
Maybe by slut scale, dtb means not that they sleep around, but that they are wild in bed. I don't know, maybe it is as follows (I made my scale 1-10):

1 -- only has missionary sex in total darkness
2 -- has missionary sex sometimes with the lights on
3 -- sometimes does it doggie-style
4 -- does it doggie-style and gets on top
5 -- gives blowjobs but only after some convincing
6 -- gives blowjobs once in a while
7 -- gives three-hour blowjobs
8 -- gives three-hour blowjobs and does anal
9 -- all that plus likes to have sex at least 10x a day
10 --all that plus has a certain magical quality I will call charisma

Please feel free to add -- this is just off the top of my head.
You see, this is a different question from what I thought was being asked. I associate slutiness with an approach to sex as recreational activity rather than emotional commitment. This scale is more about favorite installments in the Kama Sutra.

Now, I've been faithfully monomogous since the 80s, so my response will be based on half-remembered and perhaps mythologized liaisons. But I think there is (was) a sweet spot in there around 6 or 7 where almost all the women I loved before fell. There may have been one or two over 8, but if so they went straight to 10 without stopping at 8 or 9. I believe I was friends with all the sluts and slept with the sweet ones, though.

Hank Chinaski 01-22-2009 09:19 AM
Re: Actual Fashion Question
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Secret_Agent_Man (Post 378553)
In my experience, I'd say _maybe_ 20% of the women would be rated above a 5-6 on that scale. Wish there were more.

S_A_M
i believe gwnc was using comedic license for the upper numbers.

okay, pre-marriage I was not with anyone for any length of time that didn't go to 6. there were probably short time things were a 5/6 was never completed, but they would at least have been started (e.g. leading up to something else).

Here is some data: my wife walks with about 8 other married women. they talk while walking. one woman brags about encouraging her husband to jerk in the shower to reduce her burden, and she is clear that even when she does let him have some of her likely very frigid love he must pull out.

the other seven are shocked by the woman's life, feeling badly not just for the guy, but also the woman. she is apparently unhappy.

given this response, I would guess they most of these women go to at least 4. given that they are heavily married Jewesses, I would hesitate to stick my neck out predictions re. steps 5/6.

Adder 01-22-2009 10:03 AM
Re: Actual Fashion Question
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack Manfred (Post 378550)
I have to admit the repression thing wasn't all bad. She was never going to introduce me to any new sexual positions, but she did introduce me to some restaurants that were new to me.
Totally not worth the trade off.

ThurgreedMarshall 01-22-2009 10:23 AM
Re: Actual Fashion Question
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by dtb (Post 378517)
My additions might include "does it in a public place -- but not necessarily in front of third parties in public" (perhaps merge the doggie-style entries [HA!] to make room for this one), and maybe uses "marital aids" (or whatever euphemism). Maybe combine 4&5 to make room for this one.

Your suggestions are welcome!
I don't know how this scale helps at all. It's the old, "Want a lady in the streets, but a freak in the bed" saying, right? If she's fantastic in bed, that doesn't necessarily mean she's slutty. And if she sucks in bed (no pun intended but welcomed nevertheless), that doesn't mean she's not a huge slut.

I thought sluttiness had to do with number of partners and willingness to have anonymous sex.

But I will give you both answers (although, I don't know how you expect to get an answer based on GWNC's 10 point scale -- is anything above 5 slutty? Do you only approach sluttiness when you hit 8?).

Under my definition, I would say that a third of the women I've fucked have been pretty slutty. Under GWNC's (and I have to subsitute "long blowjob" for "3 hour blowjob" because I can count on one hand the number of three hour blowjobs I've had and none of them were from sluts), I would say that maybe 5% of the women I've fucked passed 8 on GWNC's scale.

Who knew a sex poll could make me depressed? Where are these GWNCy-type sluts hiding?

TM

ThurgreedMarshall 01-22-2009 10:26 AM
Re: Actual Fashion Question
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adder (Post 378533)
I am all for the reclamation of the word, but I guess I would have said something like sexually adventures. Passionate, sensual or sexual are all in the right neighborhood too, although perhaps too vague.
The word you are looking for is "freaky."

It's the GWNC Freak Scale (and it should be sliding, because that sounds much more freaky).

TM

Hank Chinaski 01-22-2009 10:29 AM
Re: Actual Fashion Question
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThurgreedMarshall (Post 378558)
I don't know how this scale helps at all. It's the old, "Want a lady in the streets, but a freak in the bed" saying, right? If she's fantastic in bed, that doesn't necessarily mean she's slutty. And if she sucks in bed (no pun intended but welcomed nevertheless), that doesn't mean she's not a huge slut.

I thought sluttiness had to do with number of partners and willingness to have anonymous sex.

But I will give you both answers (although, I don't know how you expect to get an answer based on GWNC's 10 point scale -- is anything above 5 slutty? Do you only approach sluttiness when you hit 8?).

Under my definition, I would say that a third of the women I've fucked have been pretty slutty. Under GWNC's (and I have to subsitute "long blowjob" for "3 hour blowjob" because I can count on one hand the number of three hour blowjobs I've had and none of them were from sluts), I would say that maybe 5% of the women I've fucked passed 8 on GWNC's scale.

Who knew a sex poll could make me depressed? Where are these GWNCy-type sluts hiding?

TM
can't you count the number of three hour blow jobs on zero hands? I thought that was something paigow invented.

ThurgreedMarshall 01-22-2009 10:43 AM
Re: Actual Fashion Question
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 378560)
can't you count the number of three hour blow jobs on zero hands? I thought that was something paigow invented.
No. A few times with X and a couple of times when super stoned I got blowjobs that might have hit the 3 hour mark.

TM

Gattigap 01-22-2009 10:46 AM
Re: Actual Fashion Question
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThurgreedMarshall (Post 378561)
No. A few times with X and a couple of times when super stoned I got blowjobs that might have hit the 3 hour mark.

TM
Presumably, the women worked in shifts. One worked, the others rested and to pass the time played pinochle.

greatwhitenorthchick 01-22-2009 11:09 AM
Re: Actual Fashion Question
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack Manfred (Post 378550)
As this is gwinky's list, and as it does not contain any mention of a threesome, despite the fact that several months ago gwinky mentioned wanting to engage in a FMF with her current beau/everlasting gobstopper, I have to chide her for a lack of focus in her lovelife. Some (many? all?) of us are counting on gwinky to hold up her end of the vicarious bargain.
I miss fringey. Waaaahhhhhh!!!!!

You are right though, Jack. I have neglected this. The stumbling block I'm having is that I really think he's the love of my life and I don't want to wreck anything. It could be a good thing, but it could be a bad thing. I'm a little scared right now to find out. Unfortunately also, he's had a bit of turmoil in his life recently that has shaken his confidence, so while a threesome might be just what the doctor ordered, it might also not be. I'm kind of leaving the decision up to him right now.

dtb 01-22-2009 11:14 AM
Re: Actual Fashion Question
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThurgreedMarshall (Post 378559)
The word you are looking for is "freaky."

It's the GWNC Freak Scale (and it should be sliding, because that sounds much more freaky).

TM
That's IT! Yes!! The Freaky Scale -- that's much better because "slut" can be misinterpreted.

Someone else said this I think, but I'd still be curious to know the answer -- would you consider yourself fortunate or cursed (or somewhere in between) to have a partner who was toward the upper reaches of the Freaky Scale? At what point (if any) would your view morph from "blessed" to "cursed"?

Adder 01-22-2009 11:19 AM
Re: Actual Fashion Question
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by dtb (Post 378566)
Someone else said this I think, but I'd still be curious to know the answer -- would you consider yourself fortunate or cursed (or somewhere in between) to have a partner who was toward the upper reaches of the Freaky Scale? At what point (if any) would your view morph from "blessed" to "cursed"?
I'm not sure there is a tipping point. In my view at least, the higher the better, and anything under 6.5 or so on the GWINK scale is disappointing.

John Phoenix 01-22-2009 11:21 AM
Re: Actual Fashion Question
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by dtb (Post 378566)
would you consider yourself fortunate or cursed (or somewhere in between) to have a partner who was toward the upper reaches of the Freaky Scale? At what point (if any) would your view morph from "blessed" to "cursed"?
Fortunate. My views would not morph at any point when going up that scale.

bold_n_brazen 01-22-2009 11:28 AM
Re: Actual Fashion Question
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by dtb (Post 378566)
That's IT! Yes!! The Freaky Scale -- that's much better because "slut" can be misinterpreted.

Someone else said this I think, but I'd still be curious to know the answer -- would you consider yourself fortunate or cursed (or somewhere in between) to have a partner who was toward the upper reaches of the Freaky Scale? At what point (if any) would your view morph from "blessed" to "cursed"?
I think it's more important to have freaky parity in a relationship than it is to be on one side or the other of the freaky scale.

I am happiest when my partner is within one or two points of me on the freaky scale. Anything else leaves me feeling just like a freak and not particularly freaky.

Hank Chinaski 01-22-2009 11:29 AM
Re: Actual Fashion Question
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by dtb (Post 378566)
That's IT! Yes!! The Freaky Scale -- that's much better because "slut" can be misinterpreted.

Someone else said this I think, but I'd still be curious to know the answer -- would you consider yourself fortunate or cursed (or somewhere in between) to have a partner who was toward the upper reaches of the Freaky Scale? At what point (if any) would your view morph from "blessed" to "cursed"?
well our "slut" scale crosses gwnc's at 9, at least for me. if someone I'm dating needs 10 sessions (as opposed to orgasms) a day she'll be needing to cheat on me. but below that is all good.

the main thing to me though is personality and her eyes, she has to have piercing eyes.

ThurgreedMarshall 01-22-2009 11:31 AM
Re: Actual Fashion Question
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by dtb (Post 378566)
That's IT! Yes!! The Freaky Scale -- that's much better because "slut" can be misinterpreted.

Someone else said this I think, but I'd still be curious to know the answer -- would you consider yourself fortunate or cursed (or somewhere in between) to have a partner who was toward the upper reaches of the Freaky Scale? At what point (if any) would your view morph from "blessed" to "cursed"?
Good question. Everyone wants someone who is sexually skilled and adventurous. The question is, does everyone want someone who became sexually skilled because they fucked 500 people and got lots of exposure to different stuff elsewhere?

To be honest, I would rather my partner say, "You dirty bastard. I've never tried that before, but let's do it! I'm game." Or, "Something I've always fantasized about I would like to try with you." You don't want to hear, "That's your dirtiest fantasy? Shit, I did that with like two dozen guys already. Hell, I dedicated a whole year of my life to that one and it wasn't even in my Top 5 Dirtiest Years."

Obviously everyone is different and I'm sure a bunch of posters will say they don't feel that way and what happened before doesn't mean anything and they're just appreciative of good sex with the person they love. But I would be lying if I said that wouldn't bother me. In reality, you have to accept the fact that you are probably never going to be someone's first in every freaky category and you can appreciate some skills your partner has picked up somewhere else. And everyone has a different limit on what they're mature or secure enough to handle.

So, in short, I would consider myself fortunate to have an SO who was high on the Freaky Scale, but got there with me. I probably wouldn't make someone who had already conquered the Freaky Scale before I met them my SO, but I would count myself fortunate to fuck around with them for awhile.

TM

greatwhitenorthchick 01-22-2009 11:33 AM
Re: Actual Fashion Question
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by bold_n_brazen (Post 378571)
I think it's more important to have freaky parity in a relationship than it is to be on one side or the other of the freaky scale.

I am happiest when my partner is within one or two points of me on the freaky scale. Anything else leaves me feeling just like a freak and not particularly freaky.
I agree with you 100%.

dtb 01-22-2009 11:42 AM
Re: Actual Fashion Question
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by greatwhitenorthchick (Post 378574)
I agree with you 100%.

ABSOLUTELY. She makes a very good point -- as does TM, with the "freaky, yes, but let's get there more-or-less together" point.

Adder 01-22-2009 11:44 AM
Re: Actual Fashion Question
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by dtb (Post 378575)
ABSOLUTELY. She makes a very good point -- as does TM, with the "freaky, yes, but let's get there more-or-less together" point.
I agree on the first point, but not so much on the second. I really don't care if I am there for the first of her freaky experiences, or really what came before, as long as she has the good sense to be tacticful when discussing it.

Hank Chinaski 01-22-2009 11:53 AM
Re: Actual Fashion Question
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by dtb (Post 378575)
ABSOLUTELY. She makes a very good point -- as does TM, with the "freaky, yes, but let's get there more-or-less together" point.
I'm surprised by you and thurgreed feeling that way. I would sort of want a SO to have had a slutty night or two, so she iisn't wondering if she is missing something.

my sister married the first boy she dated. where ever they are, they got there together, but I believe they're miserable and the lack of experience is a main factor.

ThurgreedMarshall 01-22-2009 11:54 AM
Re: Actual Fashion Question
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 378578)
I'm surprised by you and thurgreed feeling that way. I would sort of want a SO to have had a slutty night or two, so she iisn't wondering if she is missing something.

my sister married the first boy she dated. where ever they are, they got there together, but I believe they're miserable and the lack of experience is a main factor.
There is a huge gap between what I'm saying and your example.

TM

greatwhitenorthchick 01-22-2009 11:59 AM
Re: Actual Fashion Question
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 378578)
I'm surprised by you and thurgreed feeling that way. I would sort of want a SO to have had a slutty night or two, so she iisn't wondering if she is missing something.

my sister married the first boy she dated. where ever they are, they got there together, but I believe they're miserable and the lack of experience is a main factor.
A slutty night or two is one thing. Rock of Love Bus vagina-shot skankiness takes it to a whole new level. I wouldn't want to date anyone at that level or close to it. For his professed tolerance, I'm not sure that Adder would either. There's sexually adventurous and then there's a complete lack of self-respect.

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) 01-22-2009 12:06 PM
Re: Actual Fashion Question
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by greatwhitenorthchick (Post 378565)
while a threesome might be just what the doctor ordered,
Dr. Spacemen?



ETA: That doesn't work so well in print.

bold_n_brazen 01-22-2009 12:06 PM
Re: Actual Fashion Question
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by greatwhitenorthchick (Post 378582)
A slutty night or two is one thing. Rock of Love Bus vagina-shot skankiness takes it to a whole new level. I wouldn't want to date anyone at that level or close to it. For his professed tolerance, I'm not sure that Adder would either. There's sexually adventurous and then there's a complete lack of self-respect.
Bret should have just chosen Heather at the end of season one. They would still be together today.

Cletus Miller 01-22-2009 12:14 PM
Re: Actual Fashion Question
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by bold_n_brazen (Post 378586)
Bret should have just chosen Heather at the end of season one. They would still be together today.
Which, of course, is why he didn't.

Flinty_McFlint 01-22-2009 12:22 PM
Re: Actual Fashion Question
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThurgreedMarshall (Post 378558)
I don't know how this scale helps at all. It's the old, "Want a lady in the streets, but a freak in the bed" saying, right? If she's fantastic in bed, that doesn't necessarily mean she's slutty. And if she sucks in bed (no pun intended but welcomed nevertheless), that doesn't mean she's not a huge slut.

I thought sluttiness had to do with number of partners and willingness to have anonymous sex.

But I will give you both answers (although, I don't know how you expect to get an answer based on GWNC's 10 point scale -- is anything above 5 slutty? Do you only approach sluttiness when you hit 8?).

Under my definition, I would say that a third of the women I've fucked have been pretty slutty. Under GWNC's (and I have to subsitute "long blowjob" for "3 hour blowjob" because I can count on one hand the number of three hour blowjobs I've had and none of them were from sluts), I would say that maybe 5% of the women I've fucked passed 8 on GWNC's scale.

Who knew a sex poll could make me depressed? Where are these GWNCy-type sluts hiding?

TM
What's sex like? My momma says girls are icky and doesn't allow me to date.

ThurgreedMarshall 01-22-2009 12:24 PM
Re: Actual Fashion Question
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flinty_McFlint (Post 378590)
What's sex like? My momma says girls are icky and doesn't allow me to date.
dtb?

TM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:34 PM.
Page 107 of 124 « First 75797105106 107 108109117 Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com