LawTalkers

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Fashionable (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=14)
-   -   This is the thread where the fringster comes back with teeth (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=840)

Hank Chinaski 09-25-2009 09:21 PM

Re: Vs.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Adder (Post 401310)
Does it come with a side of big boobs?

eta: If so, go with the Keeley instead of the Lucy.

fringey was making a comment about artificial implants and modern society. She was being meta.

ltl/fb 09-25-2009 11:31 PM

Re: Vs.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 401311)
fringey was making a comment about artificial implants and modern society. She was being meta.

I don't think I need implants as much as a tooth and maybe scar removal. Oh, and to be all better. Yeah, implants are very very low on my list and they'd have to be smallish or I'd be a freakshow. I have discernable boobs.

taxwonk 09-26-2009 03:21 PM

Re: Vs.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ThurgreedMarshall (Post 401299)
Big boob edition.

Lucy Pinder

http://memetrics.files.wordpress.com...lusive_024.jpg

vs

Keely Hazzell

http://i216.photobucket.com/albums/c...leyHazell1.jpg

I'll take Keely every time.

TM

They seem virtually interchangeable. Perhaps I'm getting old, but I just don't find tits to be enough of a distinguishing factor.

taxwonk 09-26-2009 03:23 PM

Re: Vs.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by LessinSF (Post 401304)
Both are British "Page 3" girls. Keeley wins, if only because she has a sex tape.

Okay. See, now "sex tape" is a distinguishing factor. Go, Keely!

taxwonk 09-26-2009 03:24 PM

Re: Vs.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ltl/fb (Post 401309)
I don't get my temp tooth until mid Oct, it turns out.

Did they make you hungry? Not that you aren't entitled to change your mind, but in case you had forgotten, you weren't much for the boob-munching pre-accident.

taxwonk 09-26-2009 03:26 PM

Re: Vs.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ltl/fb (Post 401312)
I don't think I need implants as much as a tooth and maybe scar removal. Oh, and to be all better. Yeah, implants are very very low on my list and they'd have to be smallish or I'd be a freakshow. I have discernable boobs.

Starkist don't want discernable boobs; Starkist wants boobs of discernment.

ltl/fb 09-26-2009 11:11 PM

Re: Vs.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by taxwonk (Post 401317)
Starkist don't want discernable boobs; Starkist wants boobs of discernment.

I don't want them cut off and canned anyway

ltl/fb 09-28-2009 08:56 AM

Re: This is the thread where the fringster comes back with teeth
 
500 Days of Summer?

Fugee 09-28-2009 09:00 AM

Re: This is the thread where the fringster comes back with teeth
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ltl/fb (Post 401322)
500 Days of Summer?

Fall arrived here with a blustery windy evening. It was pretty chilly.

Did you just call me Coltrane? 09-28-2009 09:21 AM

Two New Shows
 
  • Modern Family - love the "hip" dad
  • Ken Burns: The National Parks - great footage...and John Muir was nuts

ltl/fb 09-28-2009 09:24 AM

Re: This is the thread where the fringster comes back with teeth
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Fugee (Post 401323)
Fall arrived here with a blustery windy evening. It was pretty chilly.

No, I mean the movie.

Adder 09-28-2009 10:06 AM

Re: This is the thread where the fringster comes back with teeth
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ltl/fb (Post 401322)
500 Days of Summer?

The two women with whom I saw it both didn't like it that well because they thought the guy was too much of a wimp. I thought it was decent for its genre of movie, which is not my favorite.

Fugee 09-28-2009 10:10 AM

Monday. Ugh.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ltl/fb (Post 401325)
No, I mean the movie.

D'oh!

greatwhitenorthchick 09-28-2009 10:46 AM

Hyacinth Bucket
 
So I didn't expect to have this in common with Snoop:

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage...noop-Dogg.html

Nut Case, Sensitive 09-28-2009 10:55 AM

Re: Two New Shows
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Did you just call me Coltrane? (Post 401324)
  • and John Muir was nuts

?!

Where, where!?!

NUTS!?!

NUTS!?!

Oliver_Wendell_Ramone 09-28-2009 11:35 AM

Confidential to Less and Flinty
 
42-3

p.s. Over. Rated.

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 09-28-2009 11:39 AM

Re: Confidential to Less and Flinty
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Oliver_Wendell_Ramone (Post 401335)
42-3

p.s. Over. Rated.

Who is he that hideth counsel without knowledge? Therefore have I uttered that I understood not; things too wonderful for me, which I knew not.

Job 42:3

You didn't think I could crack the code, did you?

Gattigap 09-28-2009 11:40 AM

Re: Confidential to Less and Flinty
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Oliver_Wendell_Ramone (Post 401335)
42-3

p.s. Over. Rated.

I figured Cal was just freaked out looking at the throwback uni's.

You gotta give people some warning about those colors, man.

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) 09-28-2009 11:45 AM

Re: Confidential to Less and Flinty
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gattigap (Post 401338)
You gotta give people some warning about those colors, man.

That was the first time in a while where Oregon didn't need to give a warning about its colors.

http://i.cnn.net/si/2003/sioncampus/.../lg_oregon.jpg

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) 09-28-2009 11:46 AM

Re: This is the thread where the fringster comes back with teeth
 
BTW, what is it with the PNW and freak-show uniforms?

Day-glo green? Really?

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/photos...meId=290927026

Flinty_McFlint 09-28-2009 11:51 AM

Re: Confidential to Less and Flinty
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Oliver_Wendell_Ramone (Post 401335)
42-3

p.s. Over. Rated.

Yes, which is why you didn't hear me crowing about them here. I've been a fan for far too long to start drinking any Kool Aid. The only way they can convince me is by winning the Pac 10 once and winning the Rose Bowl. Not going to the Rose Bowl, winning it. I thought Oregon did an awesome job.

Atticus Grinch 09-28-2009 11:53 AM

Re: Two New Shows
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Did you just call me Coltrane? (Post 401324)
  • Modern Family - love the "hip" dad

2. I LOLed more during that pilot than anything on TV since Arrested Development went off the air. Even the creepy Latino stepkid is funny. Reminded me of the late lamented Sons & Daughters, the part improv sitcom that disappeared after a season.

BTW, Hank, I've been giving Frisky Dingo a chance. Better than ATHF, not as good as Sealab, a bit too much reliance on the gross-out killing off of characters, but a good number of laughs for 15 minutes, so thanks for the tip.

Gattigap 09-28-2009 11:56 AM

Re: Confidential to Less and Flinty
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Flinty_McFlint (Post 401341)
Yes, which is why you didn't hear me crowing about them here. I've been a fan for far too long to start drinking any Kool Aid. The only way they can convince me is by winning the Pac 10 once and winning the Rose Bowl. Not going to the Rose Bowl, winning it. I thought Oregon did an awesome job.

If this series of events motivates Cal to beat USC next week, I for one think Cal's humiliating loss this past weekend will have been well worth it.

The Trojans beat up on hapless WSU this weekend, yet the vibe among fans and the local media is that trouble is in the air because said beating was not sufficiently complete or profound. Blech.

Cletus Miller 09-28-2009 12:02 PM

Re: Confidential to Less and Flinty
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gattigap (Post 401343)
If this series of events motivates Cal to beat USC next week, I for one think Cal's humiliating loss this past weekend will have been well worth it.

The Trojans beat up on hapless WSU this weekend, yet the vibe among fans and the local media is that trouble is in the air because said beating was not sufficiently complete or profound. Blech.

USC fell 24+ points short of covering the spread. If SC can't cover the spread against Wazzu, in LA, then it's not even close to enough of a beatdown.

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) 09-28-2009 12:02 PM

Re: Confidential to Less and Flinty
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gattigap (Post 401343)
the vibe among fans and the local media is that trouble is in the air because said beating was not sufficiently complete or profound.

Headline I enjoyed this morning:

Washington Bails out Detroit.

Congratulations (?), Hank.

notcasesensitive 09-28-2009 12:10 PM

Re: Confidential to Less and Flinty
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) (Post 401345)
Headline I enjoyed this morning:

Washington Bails out Detroit.

Congratulations (?), Hank.

I picked Detroit to win in my weekly pick 'em!! Washington has looked completely inept on offense this year and I doubt it will get better until Campbell is replaced.

I also picked Cincinnati over Pittsburgh! Unfortunately I lacked the conviction to believe Tennessee would start 0-3 and I had no idea that Jacksonville might win a game.

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) 09-28-2009 12:27 PM

Re: Confidential to Less and Flinty
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by notcasesensitive (Post 401346)
I doubt it will get better until Campbell is replaced.

27 of 41 for 300+ yards? Are you married to Todd Collins?

It's a lack of blocking, especially in the running game. Zero yards rushing in a half? And some extremely mediocre coaching, both in terms of play calling and also, it seems, in motivational tactics. But that's the extent of thinking I care to do about this team. Too bad you have to wait until December to play them again.

Hank Chinaski 09-28-2009 12:33 PM

the longest time it took for a sex act to come back and haunt someone?
 
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...092801782.html

LA needs a new TV trial, so i get the timing-

I don't get how people can urge giving him a pass on the whole "fucking a 13 YO" thing- even Spanky would be squeeked out by that.

notcasesensitive 09-28-2009 12:33 PM

Re: Confidential to Less and Flinty
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) (Post 401348)
27 of 41 for 300+ yards? Are you married to Todd Collins?

It's a lack of blocking, especially in the running game. Zero yards rushing in a half? And some extremely mediocre coaching, both in terms of play calling and also, it seems, in motivational tactics. But that's the extent of thinking I care to do about this team. Too bad you have to wait until December to play them again.

I didn't watch this week. My observation of offensive ineptitude is based solely on weeks 1 and 2. Did they score a touchdown this week?

A team that I have watched a lot of (and had high hopes for) and am completely unimpressed with is Green Bay. Their O line is terrible. Rodgers will be lucky if he makes it through the year without a big injury unless someone gets that line together. Bright side is the defense is pretty good.

Replaced_Texan 09-28-2009 12:35 PM

Re: Confidential to Less and Flinty
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by notcasesensitive (Post 401346)
I picked Detroit to win in my weekly pick 'em!! Washington has looked completely inept on offense this year and I doubt it will get better until Campbell is replaced.

I also picked Cincinnati over Pittsburgh! Unfortunately I lacked the conviction to believe Tennessee would start 0-3 and I had no idea that Jacksonville might win a game.


I was at that game. The Texans lost it more than Jacksonville won it. Who the fuck fumbles at the half-inch line???

Icky Thump 09-28-2009 12:37 PM

Re: Confidential to Less and Flinty
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) (Post 401348)
27 of 41 for 300+ yards? Are you married to Todd Collins?

It's a lack of blocking, especially in the running game. Zero yards rushing in a half? And some extremely mediocre coaching, both in terms of play calling and also, it seems, in motivational tactics. But that's the extent of thinking I care to do about this team. Too bad you have to wait until December to play them again.

Daniel Snyder must have been throwing the telephone books they put on his chair all over the place.

taxwonk 09-28-2009 12:37 PM

Re: Vs.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ltl/fb (Post 401319)
I don't want them cut off and canned anyway

Why not? It did wonders for B'n'B.

taxwonk 09-28-2009 12:38 PM

Re: Hyacinth Bucket
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by greatwhitenorthchick (Post 401330)
So I didn't expect to have this in common with Snoop:

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage...noop-Dogg.html

She funny.

taxwonk 09-28-2009 12:45 PM

Re: the longest time it took for a sex act to come back and haunt someone?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 401352)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...092801782.html

LA needs a new TV trial, so i get the timing-

I don't get how people can urge giving him a pass on the whole "fucking a 13 YO" thing- even Spanky would be squeeked out by that.

I thought Switzerland didn't havee an extradition treaty with anyone. That's why the call it, y'know...Switzerland. Am I wrong?

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) 09-28-2009 12:49 PM

Re: Confidential to Less and Flinty
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by notcasesensitive (Post 401353)
Did they score a touchdown this week?

No. 2 FGs and 4 safeties.

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 09-28-2009 12:50 PM

Re: the longest time it took for a sex act to come back and haunt someone?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 401352)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...092801782.html

LA needs a new TV trial, so i get the timing-

I don't get how people can urge giving him a pass on the whole "fucking a 13 YO" thing- even Spanky would be squeeked out by that.

Let Spanky speak for himself. I'm not so sure.

How about the whole fugitive from justice/jumping bail thing, too? It's not as squicky, but there also just aren't any defenses to that one. Does anyone who hides for some period of time get off from now on? Whitey?

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) 09-28-2009 12:51 PM

Re: the longest time it took for a sex act to come back and haunt someone?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by taxwonk (Post 401359)
I thought Switzerland didn't havee an extradition treaty with anyone. That's why the call it, y'know...Switzerland. Am I wrong?

Yes.

My question is, after he pleaded guilty, how did he get out of the country? I assume he was released pending sentencing or something, but don't you have to surrender your passport and do other various things?

notcasesensitive 09-28-2009 12:52 PM

Re: Confidential to Less and Flinty
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) (Post 401361)
No. 2 FGs and 4 safeties.

I'm sure you get that I was just being snarky after the big 9 point win last week, so we can move along.

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) 09-28-2009 12:55 PM

Re: Confidential to Less and Flinty
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Icky Thump (Post 401356)
Daniel Snyder must have been throwing the telephone books they put on his chair all over the place.

The damage was limited, though, since he had to give half of them to Tom Cruise.

http://media.star-telegram.com/smedi...filiate.58.jpg

Replaced_Texan 09-28-2009 01:04 PM

Re: the longest time it took for a sex act to come back and haunt someone?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 401352)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...092801782.html

LA needs a new TV trial, so i get the timing-

I don't get how people can urge giving him a pass on the whole "fucking a 13 YO" thing- even Spanky would be squeeked out by that.

He didn't "fuck" her. He drugged her, raped her vaginally and then turned her over and forcibly sodomized her anally. Regardless of her age, she didn't consent to any of that.

I think his movies are very good, I feel terrible that his pregnant wife was killed, but he committed a crime, plead guilty to that crime and then fled the country before he served a day in jail. I don't give a fuck if he's already paid her off. I don't give a fuck that it's so unfair that he's had to live a life of exiled luxury in France. I don't give a fuck if he didn't get to pick up his Oscar personally. He raped a girl, and he was convicted of that rape. And he should go to jail.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:36 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com