LawTalkers

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   Politics (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused. (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=879)

Pretty Little Flower 03-24-2017 12:24 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SEC_Chick (Post 506404)
Sometimes reading this board is even creepier than that Reddit where everyone refers to Trump as "Daddy".

My love for funk music is profound, but I don't think it is fetishistic. I do refer to George Clinton as "Daddy" though.

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 03-24-2017 12:44 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SEC_Chick (Post 506404)
Sometimes reading this board is even creepier than that Reddit where everyone refers to Trump as "Daddy".

Sorry, sister. Was it the Golden Showers reference?

sebastian_dangerfield 03-24-2017 12:59 PM

Re: Foxes in the Henhouse
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop (Post 506395)
I know this is going to sound like crazy talk, but bear with me. It's possible that there are things that happened -- and could be proven in a court of law, for example -- but which haven't been reported yet.

I'm not suggesting the Dems abort investigations. I'm just suggesting they lead with HC for the moment. Russia is stealing some of HC's thunder, and there's a solid chance it'll yield very little. HC is looking right now like a deadlock winner.

sebastian_dangerfield 03-24-2017 01:08 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SEC_Chick (Post 506382)
A bit of a pet peeve of mine when anyone refers to it as "Garland's seat".

Just for clarification, I am assuming that you also refer to Kennedy as holding "Bork's seat"?

It is his seat. The GOP abused procedure there and did something contrary to the rules, and their spirit. That Bork was borked doesn't give the GOP a pass. Garland was a sensible moderate. Bork was a lunatic the moderates in the GOP (remember when there were "Liberal Republicans"?) didn't even like.

Fucking Garland was what older litigators used to call "sharp practice." That kind of thing comes back to bite you. And you can't whine when people call it what it is.

sebastian_dangerfield 03-24-2017 01:10 PM

Re: Foxes in the Henhouse
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop (Post 506385)
Wonking, but this is getting awfully close to criminal conspiracy.

Encouraging an enemy of a political opponent to smear her with stolen emails is not conspiracy.

sebastian_dangerfield 03-24-2017 01:22 PM

Re: Foxes in the Henhouse
 
Quote:

You can rest assured that I read everything you wrote.
I rest assured in all circumstances. To steal a line from Bob Weir, once down, "it takes dynamite to get me up."

Quote:

It's not. You're not grappling with the espionage aspect.
Sure I am. No one was interfering with our government. They were interfering with HRC's campaign, and the DNC. Neither of those two things is part of the govt.

HRC and the DNC could sue Trump's campaign for civil conspiracy. But there was no interference with the US Govt. Nor was there any effort to undermine the US Govt. All efforts were aimed at a political opponent.

HRC would only have qualified as a govt entity, triggering application of the espionage act, if she won the election. And even there, actions taken against her while she was a private citizen would not be espionage.

I understand many people think they were entitled to have her as President, and she was robbed of the office. But at the time the actions at issue were taken, she was a private citizen.

sebastian_dangerfield 03-24-2017 01:32 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SEC_Chick (Post 506404)
Sometimes reading this board is even creepier than that Reddit where everyone refers to Trump as "Daddy".

The only valid statements about Trump are negative. Full stop.

Even entertaining the suggestion he is tolerable in some respects is heresy.

BUT... It is the same thing we heard from the Right for eight years under Obama. Nobody on the right has authority to bitch. It's repayment for all of those years we had to endure "Socialist!," "Kenyan Muslim!," "Bill Ayers Acolyte!" and all the other cuckoo pants lunacy your right wing relatives stuffed into your email inbox every day.

It's also a lot of fun to say, "I like Trump. I think he's doing a great job," to Lefties at parties. It works like that line in Dylan's "Motorpsycho Nightmare," where he screams "I like Fidel Castro and his beard!" to piss off the crazy farmer. Thankfully, the Lefties don't chase you from the room with a shotgun.

I suggest trying it. It also works on Bush Republicans.

Adder 03-24-2017 01:42 PM

Re: Foxes in the Henhouse
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 506410)
Sure I am. No one was interfering with our government.

They were gaining material to interfere with our government in the future, you nitwit.

Adder 03-24-2017 01:45 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 506411)
BUT... It is the same thing we heard from the Right for eight years under Obama.

It is, but the difference is they were full of shit and while we're talking about real stuff.

FEMA camps weren't real. He isn't a Muslim. He wasn't born in Kenya. He wasn't coming for their guns.

Immigration raids are real. The travel ban is real. They really are coming for your health insurance. There's at least enough smoke to warrant looking in to how compromised by the Russians he is.

sebastian_dangerfield 03-24-2017 01:55 PM

Re: Foxes in the Henhouse
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Adder (Post 506412)
They were gaining material to interfere with our government in the future, you nitwit.

They hacked Podesta's private email, and DNC servers. Future intent is immaterial. If I run with your dumbass construct, all hacking of private citizens which could potentially impact govt or disclose govt secrets could be espionage.

Unless Podesta and the DNC had classified info in their servers and accounts, which is arguably a separate criminal act by them, there is no theft of state secrets, and no espionage.

I understand I just pulled an essential pin out of your argument. And the typical lawyer response is to try to build an alternative theory to shoehorn things back into your theory. But sometimes, you're just missing an essential element of the crime. And here, that element is the theft of state information. Unless the DNC and Podesta are the govt, you're coming up flat.

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 03-24-2017 01:56 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 506411)

It's also a lot of fun to say, "I like Trump. I think he's doing a great job," to Lefties at parties. It works like that line in Dylan's "Motorpsycho Nightmare," where he screams "I like Fidel Castro and his beard!" to piss off the crazy farmer. Thankfully, the Lefties don't chase you from the room with a shotgun.

I suggest trying it. It also works on Bush Republicans.

And when you take shit for sucking up to Trump at your cocktail parties do you leave in a huff and say you're not coming back?

sebastian_dangerfield 03-24-2017 02:09 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Adder (Post 506413)
It is, but the difference is they were full of shit and while we're talking about real stuff.

FEMA camps weren't real. He isn't a Muslim. He wasn't born in Kenya. He wasn't coming for their guns.

Immigration raids are real. The travel ban is real. They really are coming for your health insurance. There's at least enough smoke to warrant looking in to how compromised by the Russians he is.

I agree with pursuing a Russia investigation. At a minimum, we should figure out how they operate in terms of cyber warfare. I just don't we'll find much of a link to Trump.

But I wasn't talking about Russia in the post to which you've responded. I was talking about the Left's general proposition that the only valid comment about Trump is negative, and any hint of tolerance for him, or even a blasé attitude toward him, is invalid or heresy. That's batshit.

No intelligent person looks to the politician. They judge the policies. His immigration ban is idiotic and counterproductive. But his attempt to pare regulation is good. His unfortunately incoherent effort to undo McCarran Ferguson, allowing cross-border insurance competition, is good. His defunding of Planned Parenthood is abhorrent. His tax plan's feature which would allow repatriation of foreign held US corporate money is good. His tariff plans are abysmal. His relaxation of Dodd Frank, if it ever happens, is good. His preferred climate change denial is unforgivably cynical.

Reasonable people could have a conversation about the good and bad of any candidate. Even Donald Trump. That he's a loon who speaks in absolutes does not mean we should do so. Look at the man as a dim sum restaurant. Compromise on the good dishes, register dislike with the bad ones.

Adder 03-24-2017 02:11 PM

Re: Foxes in the Henhouse
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 506414)
Future intent is immaterial.

Not the hacking. The coordinating with Trump. One advantage they get out of coordinating with Trump is influence over Trump, including the ability to threaten him with the release of the coordination.

Stop being intentionally obtuse.

SEC_Chick 03-24-2017 02:11 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
I will have to say that my absolute favorite story of this year is how Shia Labeouf cannot even successfully fly a stupid flag in protest, even outside of the US. I know virtually nothing about 4Chan, but if the CIA showed that kind of initiative, the world would be a safer place.

sebastian_dangerfield 03-24-2017 02:28 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy (Post 506415)
And when you take shit for sucking up to Trump at your cocktail parties do you leave in a huff and say you're not coming back?

I'm never in a pile-on there, so I don't have to. Unlike this place (when it's in pile-on mode), you can pivot from one person or group to another, and get wildly differing views.

I'll be at two bars w/in the next 36 hrs. In them, I'll be able to speak with people who are varying degrees of left and right, moderate, or politically agnostic.

This place lacks balance.

Adder 03-24-2017 02:30 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 506416)
I just don't we'll find much of a link to Trump.

If you mean they won't find Trump personally on the phone, that might be right, but we're already aware of two of his top aids, and Roger Stone, so I'd call that a link. We just don't know how serious the things they were up to are.

As for connecting to Trump personally, this seems a bit conspiratorial so I'm not going to vouch for it's credibility, but check out this Twitter thread.

Quote:

But I wasn't talking about Russia in the post to which you've responded.
No, you were equating how normal people are now freaking out to how the Fox News crowd freaked out under Obama. These things are not the same. Which I why I listed valid reasons for freaking out, only one of which is Russia.

Quote:

I was talking about the Left's general proposition that the only valid comment about Trump is negative
Feel free to share what you think has been positive. All I've got is that in sort of respecting the courts on his immigration orders, he's not been as horribly authoritarian as I'd feared. Yet.

Meanwhile, he's till openly courting racists.

Quote:

, and any hint of tolerance for him, or even a blasé attitude toward him, is invalid or heresy. That's batshit.
So crazy to care about refugees, immigrants and vaild visa holders. Or the 24 million people who will lose their health insurance (won't actually as they've already failed to pass the AHCA, but still). Crazy to think immigration raids and deportations of people are scary and unwarranted. Just total batshit.

But we know, you don't care about other people.

ETA: Oh, yeah, and how his DOJ is going back into private prisons. That's great.

Quote:

But his attempt to pare regulation is good.
No it isn't, especially not in the stupid, ham-fisted way he's "attempted" to do it. Seriously? An exec order that creates extra busywork for beaurocrats to rearrange regs to they can count fewer? It's meaningless on it's face.

Quote:

His unfortunately incoherent effort to undo McCarran Ferguson, allowing cross-border insurance competition, is good.
Honestly, I don't even know if it's in the AHCA, but no, it's not "good" and it's not "competition." It's being able to sell the shittiest policy you can get past the shittiest state regulator nationwide.

Or do you think health insurance doesn't need regulation? Because it very much does.

If you want the federal government to take over insurance regulation, then fine, you can sell it across state lines.

Quote:

His tax plan's feature which would allow repatriation of foreign held US corporate money is good.
OMG. Seriously? No, this is widely acknowledged, like all across the political spectrum, as bad policy.

Quote:

His relaxation of Dodd Frank, if it ever happens, is good.
Is it? How can you tell if you don't know what it actually means?

Quote:

Look at the man as a dim sum restaurant. Compromise on the good dishes, register dislike with the bad ones.
They're aren't any dishes good enough to make it worthwhile. This isn't normal. He's not W.

sebastian_dangerfield 03-24-2017 02:39 PM

Re: Foxes in the Henhouse
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Adder (Post 506417)
Not the hacking. The coordinating with Trump. One advantage they get out of coordinating with Trump is influence over Trump, including the ability to threaten him with the release of the coordination.

Stop being intentionally obtuse.

Dude, seriously... Are you asserting Trump's people engaged in espionage by putting themselves in a position to be blackmailed? I want to call this a Rube Goldberg theory, because it's such a tortured mechanism. But technically, a Rube Goldberg Machine works. This does not.

Creating a situation in which a foreign nation can exert influence over a sitting President is not a crime. In fact, it happens all the time. In your scenario, intelligence sharing among spy agencies could render their employees traitors.

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 03-24-2017 02:39 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Adder (Post 506420)
If you mean they won't find Trump personally on the phone, that might be right, but we're already aware of two of his top aids, and Roger Stone, so I'd call that a link. We just don't know how serious the things they were up to are.

As for connecting to Trump personally, this seems a bit conspiratorial so I'm not going to vouch for it's credibility, but check out this Twitter thread.



No, you were equating how normal people are now freaking out to how the Fox News crowd freaked out under Obama. These things are not the same. Which I why I listed valid reasons for freaking out, only one of which is Russia.



Feel free to share what you think has been positive. All I've got is that in sort of respecting the courts on his immigration orders, he's not been as horribly authoritarian as I'd feared. Yet.

Meanwhile, he's till openly courting racists.



So crazy to care about refugees, immigrants and vaild visa holders. Or the 24 million people who will lose their health insurance (won't actually as they've already failed to pass the AHCA, but still). Crazy to think immigration raids and deportations of people are scary and unwarranted. Just total batshit.

But we know, you don't care about other people.

ETA: Oh, yeah, and how his DOJ is going back into private prisons. That's great.



No it isn't, especially not in the stupid, ham-fisted way he's "attempted" to do it. Seriously? An exec order that creates extra busywork for beaurocrats to rearrange regs to they can count fewer? It's meaningless on it's face.



Honestly, I don't even know if it's in the AHCA, but no, it's not "good" and it's not "competition." It's being able to sell the shittiest policy you can get past the shittiest state regulator nationwide.

Or do you think health insurance doesn't need regulation? Because it very much does.

If you want the federal government to take over insurance regulation, then fine, you can sell it across state lines.



OMG. Seriously? No, this is widely acknowledged, like all across the political spectrum, as bad policy.



Is it? How can you tell if you don't know what it actually means?



They're aren't any dishes good enough to make it worthwhile. This isn't normal. He's not W.


The areas I follow closest are taxes and foreign policy. Here's the thing on foreign policy, where I'm accustomed to finding plenty of Rs to agree with in dealing with one issue or another: his approach to every situation is just incredibly assinine. He's a clown who has assembled a clown car for a team. There are - count them - two people on his foreign policy team who have avoided self-inflicted wounds in the first 60 days - Haley, who has done nothing useful but at least hasn't screwed up badly, and Greenblatt, who may be the surprise star of the administration in part because he seems to admit his shortcomings and be willing to learn.

Tillerson, who ought to be at least competent, proved himself about the worst of them on the Asia trip.

I never believed I would say this, but I really miss Cheney and his neo-cons.

Adder 03-24-2017 03:16 PM

Re: Foxes in the Henhouse
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 506421)
Dude, seriously... Are you asserting Trump's people engaged in espionage by putting themselves in a position to be blackmailed?

Let's review.

Sebby: "Of course the Trump people talked to the Russians, who wouldn't?"

Me: "Anyone with half a brain, as it compromises the Trump people."

Sebby: "It only matters if they talked about something illegal."

Me: "You're ignoring the espionage value to the Russians."

Sebby: "No I'm not but talking to them isn't illegal espionage."

Me: "Dude, the point is they compromised themselves."

Sebby: "You're saying that being compromised is illegal espionage?"

Me, having caught up to real time: No, I'm saying that letting yourself be compromised is a very serious blunder.

Above and beyond whether the Trump people did anything illegal (I have no idea why you'd be certain they didn't), the contacts alone are a major scandal that undermines the administration's credibility, and may have left them compromised. It was stupid. It wasn't what "anybody" would do. It's bad even if it isn't illegal.

ETA: And if you're really caught up on illegal behavior, it's not hard to extrapolate from the facts we know to Manafort or whoever joining in on an ongoing criminal hacking conspiracy.

Adder 03-24-2017 03:17 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy (Post 506422)
Here's the thing on foreign policy, where I'm accustomed to finding plenty of Rs to agree with in dealing with one issue or another: his approach to every situation is just incredibly assinine. He's a clown who has assembled a clown car for a team.

Yes. Much of this stuff isn't even partisan.

Pretty Little Flower 03-24-2017 04:54 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 506411)

It's also a lot of fun to say, "I like Trump. I think he's doing a great job," to Lefties at parties. It works like that line in Dylan's "Motorpsycho Nightmare," where he screams "I like Fidel Castro and his beard!" to piss off the crazy farmer. Thankfully, the Lefties don't chase you from the room with a shotgun.

I suggest trying it. It also works on Bush Republicans.

You mischievous rascal! How I'd love to be a fly on the wall for all that. I bet your fellow party-goers, after their initial outrage, end up having a grudging respect for your witty provocations.

Daddy has some soothing music to ease your woes. The Daily Dose:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sSERB93GYfw

Hank Chinaski 03-24-2017 06:43 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pretty Little Flower (Post 506425)
You mischievous rascal! How I'd love to be a fly on the wall for all that. I bet your fellow party-goers, after their initial outrage, end up having a grudging respect for your witty provocations.

Don't want to learn
About etiquette
From glossy magazines
Why should I try
To talk correct
Like they do
In another scenes
Say no more
About imagery
You're starting to confuse
Just make an offer
Of more romance
Of course I can't refuse

Tyrone Slothrop 03-24-2017 07:21 PM

Re: Foxes in the Henhouse
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 506409)
Encouraging an enemy of a political opponent to smear her with stolen emails is not conspiracy.

Perhaps not, but hacking is pretty easy to prosecute (cf. Aaron Swartz), and the line between encouraging and conspiring is not one I'd want to count on to keep me out of prison.

Tyrone Slothrop 03-24-2017 07:23 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SEC_Chick (Post 506418)
I will have to say that my absolute favorite story of this year is how Shia Labeouf cannot even successfully fly a stupid flag in protest, even outside of the US. I know virtually nothing about 4Chan, but if the CIA showed that kind of initiative, the world would be a safer place.

That was pretty funny.

Hank Chinaski 03-25-2017 06:11 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Health Care: Spending a year with people actually thinking about what to change that could get through Congress might be a good thing. An actually functional HC act would be a good thing. And I've felt forever that 2018 and the "Ford Pinto" tax kicking in would be the point that makes clear the ACA was a really evil deal. Once 50% of America sees its HC significantly lowered there might be critical mass to fix some shit.

And the failure to push through some half-baked hate act, despite the "it is all in our control" gives me a little bit of hope that we will ultimately be able to get through this*?


*this being the next years, not just HC

Tyrone Slothrop 03-25-2017 11:48 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 506429)
Health Care: what to change that could get through Congress

I don't see how any Republican on the Hill can work with Democrats on a bill to improve the ACA without getting primaried and losing his or her seat.

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 03-26-2017 11:15 AM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 506429)
Health Care: Spending a year with people actually thinking about what to change that could get through Congress might be a good thing. An actually functional HC act would be a good thing. And I've felt forever that 2018 and the "Ford Pinto" tax kicking in would be the point that makes clear the ACA was a really evil deal. Once 50% of America sees its HC significantly lowered there might be critical mass to fix some shit.

And the failure to push through some half-baked hate act, despite the "it is all in our control" gives me a little bit of hope that we will ultimately be able to get through this*?


*this being the next years, not just HC

The pinto/caddy tax, whatever you want to call it, has been delayed to 2020. While apparently economists who like to force people to see the real cost of their health care, instead of the tax-advantaged costs, people don't, and most betting is that it will be foreover out there, a gimmick used to offset accounting costs that is forever delayed.

The only people who can do a big health care bill, that addresses system-wide issues, on the scale of the Affordable Care Act or even Trump Care, are the republicans. What do you think their next bill will look like? Do you see any chance they'd even talk to Dems about the shape of the bill while they control both houses?

Expect dems to put forward a series of little bills, fixing individual pieces or making proposals on one part or another - e.g., a government payor option at least for places where a state opts for it or where there is only a single option under ACA, an attempt to fund the coops, that sort of thing. Anything else is for show, and can't have a snowball's chance in Hell until they have control of at least one house, and probably at least one house and the Presidency.

Adder 03-27-2017 10:43 AM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 506429)
Health Care: Spending a year with people actually thinking about what to change that could get through Congress might be a good thing. An actually functional HC act would be a good thing. And I've felt forever that 2018 and the "Ford Pinto" tax kicking in would be the point that makes clear the ACA was a really evil deal. Once 50% of America sees its HC significantly lowered there might be critical mass to fix some shit.

We have one party that's fully willing to fix some shit. And one that is still posturing only.

Quote:

And the failure to push through some half-baked hate act, despite the "it is all in our control" gives me a little bit of hope that we will ultimately be able to get through this*?


*this being the next years, not just HC
The dark thought of the morning is that an incapacititated legislative branch may actually facilitate authoritarian creep. Let's hope not.

sebastian_dangerfield 03-27-2017 11:08 AM

Re: Foxes in the Henhouse
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop (Post 506427)
Perhaps not, but hacking is pretty easy to prosecute (cf. Aaron Swartz), and the line between encouraging and conspiring is not one I'd want to count on to keep me out of prison.

True. That's why I'm confident if there was culpable contact, it was expendable infantry like Stone. There will always be plausible deniability at the upper levels. And if you can't get anyone near the top, it's meh...

A cynic would say Stone is being set up to take the fall already. I think he's just too dim to shut his mouth.

sebastian_dangerfield 03-27-2017 11:14 AM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy (Post 506431)
The pinto/caddy tax, whatever you want to call it, has been delayed to 2020. While apparently economists who like to force people to see the real cost of their health care, instead of the tax-advantaged costs, people don't, and most betting is that it will be foreover out there, a gimmick used to offset accounting costs that is forever delayed.

The only people who can do a big health care bill, that addresses system-wide issues, on the scale of the Affordable Care Act or even Trump Care, are the republicans. What do you think their next bill will look like? Do you see any chance they'd even talk to Dems about the shape of the bill while they control both houses?

Expect dems to put forward a series of little bills, fixing individual pieces or making proposals on one part or another - e.g., a government payor option at least for places where a state opts for it or where there is only a single option under ACA, an attempt to fund the coops, that sort of thing. Anything else is for show, and can't have a snowball's chance in Hell until they have control of at least one house, and probably at least one house and the Presidency.

Why did we pass a bill that was due to explode by 2020?

Adder 03-27-2017 11:15 AM

Re: Foxes in the Henhouse
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 506433)
True. That's why I'm confident if there was culpable contact, it was expendable infantry like Stone. There will always be plausible deniability at the upper levels. And if you can't get anyone near the top, it's meh...

A cynic would say Stone is being set up to take the fall already. I think he's just too dim to shut his mouth.

If all that happened was coordinating on leaks, maybe they can have Stone or Manafort be the fall guy.

But the biggest allegation in the dossier is that Putin offered Trump a stake in Rosneft in exchange for lifting sanctions. There's no fall guy for that, if true.

sebastian_dangerfield 03-27-2017 11:26 AM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 506426)
Don't want to learn
About etiquette
From glossy magazines
Why should I try
To talk correct
Like they do
In another scenes
Say no more
About imagery
You're starting to confuse
Just make an offer
Of more romance
Of course I can't refuse

Civility's overrated. - Hitchens, 2008

Everything's funny. - Carlin

Let's get ice cream. - Kaufman

sebastian_dangerfield 03-27-2017 11:28 AM

Re: Foxes in the Henhouse
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Adder (Post 506435)
If all that happened was coordinating on leaks, maybe they can have Stone or Manafort be the fall guy.

But the biggest allegation in the dossier is that Putin offered Trump a stake in Rosneft in exchange for lifting sanctions. There's no fall guy for that, if true.

If Trump took that deal he deserves to be jailed on the simple proposition no being that stupid should be seen outside a zoo.

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 03-27-2017 11:29 AM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 506434)
Why did we pass a bill that was due to explode by 2020?

We didn't you imbecile.

But I would point out the tax change that Hank is upset by is the main component of the ACA bill that is a sop to folks with an approach that I think you have advocated: letting individual consumers bear the full costs of care and counting on them to then negotiate a better deal. Now, it only exposes the high-end plans to that rule, assuming that if it works those are the people with the most negotiating leverage able to fend for themselves.

You can argue with Hank over its pros and cons, but the fact is, even with a substantial number of Dems willing to ride on this one, the Republicans can't muster the votes to take that tax subsidy out of the system.

sebastian_dangerfield 03-27-2017 11:32 AM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy (Post 506438)
We didn't you imbecile.

That's not what Carlyle says.

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 03-27-2017 11:43 AM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop (Post 506430)
I don't see how any Republican on the Hill can work with Democrats on a bill to improve the ACA without getting primaried and losing his or her seat.

Focus on small bills, single points, little fixes.

Everyone wants to go big on healthcare, but there is a lot that can be done by fiddling around the edges and making little changes, and that's likely the only way to do anything positive in healthcare for the next couple years.

That said, if Bernie can get any traction with his Medicare for all approach, he'll be hailed as a genius. He doesn't have a great history of finding folks across the aisle to work with him, but maybe with his newfound clout...

Adder 03-27-2017 12:28 PM

Re: Foxes in the Henhouse
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 506437)
If Trump took that deal he deserves to be jailed on the simple proposition no being that stupid should be seen outside a zoo.

The man is not bright.

Tyrone Slothrop 03-27-2017 12:53 PM

Re: Foxes in the Henhouse
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 506433)
True. That's why I'm confident if there was culpable contact, it was expendable infantry like Stone. There will always be plausible deniability at the upper levels. And if you can't get anyone near the top, it's meh...

A cynic would say Stone is being set up to take the fall already. I think he's just too dim to shut his mouth.

The FBI knows how to flip infantry to get them to turn on the officers. BTW, CNN reported this weekend that Flynn is cooperating with the FBI.

Tyrone Slothrop 03-27-2017 12:53 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 506434)
Why did we pass a bill that was due to explode by 2020?

Why do you think it's exploding?

Adder 03-27-2017 12:58 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop (Post 506443)
Why do you think it's exploding?

It's exploding and imploding at the same time.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:00 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com