![]() |
Re: Doesn’t Matter Who Wins the K Race; We’re All the Same
Quote:
|
Re: Doesn’t Matter Who Wins the K Race; We’re All the Same
Quote:
|
Re: Doesn’t Matter Who Wins the K Race; We’re All the Same
Quote:
|
Re: Doesn’t Matter Who Wins the K Race; We’re All the Same
Quote:
Trump is fighting against political enemies using the instruments available to him. This is all about power. To say something like the “rule of law” is at risk is bizarre. The sort of thing a lawyer might say, as he’s been trained to hold a romantic idea of the law’s purity and importance. The law is written by dimwit politicians, increasingly based off source text of lobbyists. To fret that it’s under siege by a strip mall r/e developer strongman is beneath you. The law and its procedures are being used and abused as they've always been by politicians. This just seems more dramatic because Trump is a gambler who’s employing tactics to which other more skilled or moderate operators in the past haven’t had to resort. A silver lining of the Trump era will be that the public will see in technicolor how politicians and bureaucrats treat the law like a chess game - mere moves to be employed for advantage. I fear what Trump does to the social fabric of this country. The damage he’s doing to the bureaucracy, the two party system, and the fantasy foisted on the public that we have a “rule of law” in politics (and generally, really), rather than a rule of power and money, doesn’t concern me. Those rotted systems and narratives need a radical reset. |
Re: Doesn’t Matter Who Wins the K Race; We’re All the Same
Quote:
Trump is fighting against bogeymen in the closet and under the bed, and he's doing it using his little wooden horses and knights. Take the current trade war with China. He imagines he has all these ways of fighting, he imagines someone will respond to a threat by quaking in their boots rather than by levying tariffs themselves (as people have in this circumstance for centuries). All of this to fight things that aren't really a problem because he wants a bogeyman to blame other problems, like automation, on. Likewise, he blames refugees, encourages his crowds to yell about shooting them, breaks laws trying to keep them out, says Mexico will pay for the wall. Folks, we have net emigration to, not immigration from, Mexico. The reason he ignores the law is simple: reality doesn't matter, whether it is the reality of what the law says or the reality of someone paying $10 for soybeans that cost $20 to grow. |
Re: Doesn’t Matter Who Wins the K Race; We’re All the Same
Quote:
|
Re: Doesn’t Matter Who Wins the K Race; We’re All the Same
Quote:
|
Re: Doesn’t Matter Who Wins the K Race; We’re All the Same
Quote:
|
Re: Doesn’t Matter Who Wins the K Race; We’re All the Same
Quote:
The only other way out is if we can get get Johnson 7% of the vote in 2020 so he’ll get matching money in 2024. |
Re: Doesn’t Matter Who Wins the K Race; We’re All the Same
see below
|
Re: Doesn’t Matter Who Wins the K Race; We’re All the Same
Quote:
|
Re: Doesn’t Matter Who Wins the K Race; We’re All the Same
Quote:
I think we have the rule of property protection. I think we have an antiquated system of laws crafted in considerable part by special interests, idiot politicians, and lawyers (the latter two having significant overlap). If you've done criminal work, you realize quickly the level of nihilism on the side of the agents and the targets is usually equal. The architecture of the system isn't designed to deliver reasonable, just results. It's a barbarous relic of an age where zero sum competition was seen as the best way to resolve issues. Our civil system is actually a perfect environment for a person with Trump's caveman mentality, which probably explains his affinity for lawsuits. |
Re: Doesn’t Matter Who Wins the K Race; We’re All the Same
Quote:
By the way, disciplining China is not irrational or unwarranted: https://www.amazon.com/Hundred-Year-.../dp/1250081343 Whether Trump is aware of any of the well considered arguments on why and how to do that is another issue. I tend to doubt it. I don't disagree with the rest of your assessment of Trump. As I noted in reply to Ty earlier, he's just playing the hand he has. He's being attacked by people who know the system well, and has succeeded so far by confusing them in repeatedly refusing to follow their rules. I know you know beltway sorts, and so do I, and I don't think we'd disagree that they assume things work along rules that they tend to follow, and they're not terribly fast on their feet when someone goes way off script and is unpredictable because, at least on policy, he doesn't even know himself what his next move might be. Ty seems to think there's Trump vs. the Rule of Law (however that's defined). I see a group of people aligned against Trump using the tools at their disposal to try to push him from power and him using a bizarre campaign of attacks, lies, and aggressive refusals to play by the rules (ignoring subpoenas, to cite the most recent off-the-chessboard move) to counter. It's a simple power struggle. One I don't see him winning. But I do see a silver lining. The kind of politics Newt started and Trump has now used to enter the White House needs to end. My concern, however, is that it can't and won't as long as we have this lousy two party system. |
Re: Doesn’t Matter Who Wins the K Race; We’re All the Same
Quote:
|
Re: Doesn’t Matter Who Wins the K Race; We’re All the Same
Quote:
Strzok played a key role in the Hillary Clinton investigation, worked briefly on Mueller's team. Strzok was eventually fired. Page resigned. McCabe was Direct Comey's deputy at the FBI, lied to internal investigators about leaking information to the press. He was fired last year. So I want to go to our questioner. This is Christy McCampbell. Christy worked for more than 30 years in law enforcement, including roles at the State Department and the Department of Homeland Security, state of California. She currently works as a strategic consultant for law enforcement agencies. QUESTION: Good evening. Considering the high standards that we set for law enforcement, what do you think should have been the consequences for Peter Strzok, Lisa Page, and Andrew McCabe? JAMES COMEY: I thank you for the question. I think, given the standards that we have, and especially we in the FBI have, there should have been and was severe discipline around their behavior, as Anderson said, very different episodes of behavior. Everyone has opinions about political issues and religious issues and sports issues. You can't bring them to work and have them affect your work. There have to be severe consequences. http://www.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1905/09/se.01.html |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:44 PM. |
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com