LawTalkers

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Fashionable (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=14)
-   -   This is the thread where the fringster comes back with teeth (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=840)

Icky Thump 10-01-2009 02:28 PM

Re: Tucker is an Irvin fan?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Did you just call me Coltrane? (Post 401954)
2.

Let's see how snobby this place actually is: has anyone here ever worn a jersey to a sporting event? I haven't and don't intend to do so. Jerseys are for players. And football jerseys look ridiculous without shoulder pads (unless they're the tight-fitting jerseys made for women - I like those).

Indeed. When one sits with the proles at a sporting event, more sophisticated attire is required:

http://www.demotivateus.com/posters/...nal-poster.jpg

taxwonk 10-01-2009 02:30 PM

Re: This is the thread where the fringster comes back with teeth
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 401964)
do you know one main reason statutory rape laws still exist? it's for situations where it's an actual rape. "she dressed like a whore, and got in the hot tub?" "and how old was she when she dresed like a whore and got in the hot tub?" "ummmm..." none of that is a defense. she was 13? you are guilty.

i don't see anyone raising a question about whether he'd have been found innocent or guilty back then- he admits guilt- and all of the crap that might have been thrown at the girl ina trial in the 1970s would have been thrown at her in a Rape. trial. in. the 70s. it was a crime then, or there wouldn't have been that whole trial thing to worry about, right?

Statutory rape laws still exist because minors are not competent to consent, and non-minors have a duty to inquire.

Icky Thump 10-01-2009 02:32 PM

Re: Tucker is an Irvin fan?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by notcasesensitive (Post 401979)
Packers fans have been overwhelmingly nice to me when I've worn Giants gear into their stadium. Even though the Giants won both games. Far nicer than San Diego or Seattle fans. We'll be at the Packers-Lions game in a couple of weeks and I'm really hoping that the Pack win because I'm very close to being banned from Lambeau by Mr. Man's family.

Packer fans are an exceptional bunch. My team, however: not so much. http://assets.nydailynews.com/img/20...4/alg_fans.jpg

Did you just call me Coltrane? 10-01-2009 02:33 PM

Re: Tucker is an Irvin fan?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Cletus Miller (Post 401999)
You don't find Comiskey to be a minefield of drunken trouble?

Although at Sox/Cubs gamse, it's almost always the visting fans that are most likely to be trouble--at one game on the southside, the only obnoxiousness* was from Cubs fans.

*Apart from numerous Sox fans with offensive shirts--but I put that down to their limited grasp of written english.

Not even close. But I usually have really really good seats at Comiskey.*

I tailgated south of McCormick before the Steelers game two weeks ago. Walking from there to Soldier Field made me realize that very few Bears fans actually live in the city. Just an angry group of people who had no problems smashing their bottles of beer on the ground after finishing them.**

*I sound like e/o now. Even when I don't have good seats, I find Bears fans to be exponentially worse than Sox fans. But maybe that's b/c I'm a Sox fan (although I'm fully aware of the general white-t-ness of it all).

**ETA another Coming to America reference!

"Fascinating! Semmi, look at this! America is great indeed. Imagine a country so free, one can throw glass on the streets!"

Did you just call me Coltrane? 10-01-2009 02:39 PM

Re: Tucker is an Irvin fan?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Atticus Grinch (Post 402002)
I think this is a great tradition and will start doing so myself. I happened to note your LS has the same colors as my undergrad school. Would you mind mailing a pair so I can get started? Foot ball season starts soon, so time is of the essence.

Do you think you know more or less about football than Prince Akeem in Coming to America?

Prince Akeem: Sir, did you happen to catch the professional football contest on television last night?
Cleo McDowell: No, I didn't.
Prince Akeem: Oh sir, the Giants of New York took on the Packers of Green Bay. And in the end, the Giants triumphed by kicking an oblong ball made of pigskin through a big "H". It was a most ripping victory.
Cleo McDowell: Son.
Prince Akeem: Yes?
Cleo McDowell: If you want to keep working here, stay off the drugs.
Prince Akeem: Yes.

Hank Chinaski 10-01-2009 02:39 PM

Re: This is the thread where the fringster comes back with teeth
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by taxwonk (Post 402006)
Statutory rape laws still exist because minors are not competent to consent, and non-minors have a duty to inquire.

ummm, a majority of my son's graduating class are potentially felons, and yet no one was prosecuted. can you break that down for me?

Cletus Miller 10-01-2009 02:41 PM

Re: Tucker is an Irvin fan?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Did you just call me Coltrane? (Post 402008)
Not even close. But I usually have really really good seats at Comiskey.*

I tailgated south of McCormick before the Steelers game two weeks ago. Walking from there to Soldier Field made me realize that very few Bears fans actually live in the city. Just an angry group of people who had no problems smashing their bottles of beer on the ground after finishing them.

*I sound like e/o now. Even when I don't have good seats, I find Bears fans to be exponentially worse than Sox fans. But maybe that's b/c I'm a Sox fan (although I'm fully aware of the general white-t-ness of it all).

Oh, Bears fans are generally worse, but I don't hear about anyone around Chicago except thugs at Sox games (won't call them fans) beating up fathers who ask nicely for less profanity around the kids.

Of course, at Soldier Field the fathers encourage the kids to join in the profanity and beating up anyone who disagrees with them.

Did you just call me Coltrane? 10-01-2009 02:42 PM

Re: This is the thread where the fringster comes back with teeth
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 402010)
ummm, a majority of my son's graduating class are potentially felons, and yet no one was prosecuted. can you break that down for me?

I was statutorily raped by a senior cheerleader. Or I would have been if someone wouldn't have walked in when I had my dick out.

taxwonk 10-01-2009 02:43 PM

Re: This is the thread where the fringster comes back with teeth
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 402010)
ummm, a majority of my son's graduating class are potentially felons, and yet no one was prosecuted. can you break that down for me?

Nobody's dad got pissed enough to push the point. I didn't think I really had to state that these statutes are among the class of laws that are very selectively enforced.

Fugee 10-01-2009 02:43 PM

Re: Tucker is an Irvin fan?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by notcasesensitive (Post 401995)
Interesting. My sources tell me that in Green Bay the worst, by a large margin, are the Vikings fans.

I'm guessing the flipside is true at Vikings games.

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 10-01-2009 02:43 PM

Re: Tucker is an Irvin fan?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Did you just call me Coltrane? (Post 402008)
Not even close. But I usually have really really good seats at Comiskey.*

I have the seats of one of the Sox owners for opening day next year, because we went to a charity auction and my wife told me we had to buy something. I don't think that was what she had in mind...

I've had really good seats before, but I'm expecting this to be "really really" good.

Hank Chinaski 10-01-2009 02:45 PM

Re: This is the thread where the fringster comes back with teeth
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by taxwonk (Post 402013)
Nobody's dad got pissed enough to push the point. I didn't think I really had to state that these statutes are among the class of laws that are very selectively enforced.

yeah, like when the girl was actually raped.

Cletus Miller 10-01-2009 02:45 PM

Re: This is the thread where the fringster comes back with teeth
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 402010)
ummm, a majority of my son's graduating class are potentially felons, and yet no one was prosecuted. can you break that down for me?

What's MI law? Is it like CA, where it's 18-1 minute is jailbait for anyone 18+1 minute*? Or is it somewhat rational.

*plus something else like 2 years difference in age (or something) if they're both under 18, so long as both are over 14.

Did you just call me Coltrane? 10-01-2009 02:48 PM

Re: This is the thread where the fringster comes back with teeth
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Cletus Miller (Post 402017)
What's MI law? Is it like CA, where it's 18-1 minute is jailbait for anyone 18+1 minute*? Or is it somewhat rational.

*plus something else like 2 years difference in age (or something) if they're both under 18, so long as both are over 14.

Can someone translate?

Hank Chinaski 10-01-2009 02:49 PM

Re: This is the thread where the fringster comes back with teeth
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Did you just call me Coltrane? (Post 402019)
Can someone translate?

cletus thinks i do research.

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 10-01-2009 02:50 PM

Re: This is the thread where the fringster comes back with teeth
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 402010)
ummm, a majority of my son's graduating class are potentially felons, and yet no one was prosecuted. can you break that down for me?

I know of such a prosecution around here. I never quite got the backstory, but it was pled out with a stiffer sentence than the director asshole got.

Fugee 10-01-2009 02:51 PM

Re: This is the thread where the fringster comes back with teeth
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 402010)
ummm, a majority of my son's graduating class are potentially felons, and yet no one was prosecuted. can you break that down for me?

From a quick google, I doubt a majority of them meet the elements of a felony. Probably more would be a misdemeanor.

Pretty Little Flower 10-01-2009 02:53 PM

Re: This is the thread where the fringster comes back with teeth
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 401988)
in law school my prof was a DC prosecutor- he told us that. and, it wasn't why they started such laws, it was why they were typically still used at the time. Since then the only time I have heard of St. rape being charged was for a 17 y.o. black kid who had consenual sex with his 15 white gf in Ms. and drew 20 years, AND times when the crime was an actual rape. So I'll stand by my statement.

P.S. i went to one of the 40 top 20 law schools in the country FWIW.

your writing is always clear- still, i read this 5 times to see if i missed something, but nope, you're stuck on "it made sense that he ran." I will say 2.

how does this change the propriety of charging him now?

Well, since we are relying on anecdotal information for our arguments, I am married to a public defender who has handled a case of statutory rape involving consensual sex and is personally aware of a number of other such cases, and they involved white people in the north.

As for my second paragraph, I was simply pointing out that your argument that societal attitudes have not changed because rape was a crime in the 70s and is still a crime now is so moronic that I am embarrassed for you that I have to rebut it twice.

evenodds 10-01-2009 02:54 PM

Re: Tucker is an Irvin fan?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Atticus Grinch (Post 402002)
I think this is a great tradition and will start doing so myself. I happened to note your LS has the same colors as my undergrad school. Would you mind mailing a pair so I can get started? Foot ball season starts soon, so time is of the essence.

I was thinking that my colors were unusual, but there are at least half a dozen in 1-A alone.

When I used to teach at a local university, my boss wanted me to include the university's colors into my handout and presentations. Instead, I used my alma mater's version of the color. I was only called out once, when a prof asked during an informal presentation whether I realized that my color palette was precisely that of [my alma mater], where she had been on faculty.

Replaced_Texan 10-01-2009 02:55 PM

Re: Top Chef
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by greatwhitenorthchick (Post 401996)
If anyone is a fan of Fabio (this is Top Chef, not Top Scallop) from last season, he is getting his own Bravo show. I will at least watch the first episode.
http://www.variety.com/article/VR111...ryid=1071&cs=1

Also Padma is knocked up.

I liked Fabio.

And I had a panic attack last night when my DVR failed to record Top Chef. It never occured to me that they'd not air a new episode.

Pretty Little Flower 10-01-2009 02:55 PM

Re: This is the thread where the fringster comes back with teeth
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy (Post 402021)
I know of such a prosecution around here. I never quite got the backstory, but it was pled out with a stiffer sentence than the director asshole got.

The fact that a recent consensual statutory rape pled out with a stiffer sentence that Polanski got for drugging and anally raping a 13 year old in the 70s seems to suggest that societal attitudes on rape may have changed, but Hank busted that myth pretty good, so your case must be an outlier.

Cletus Miller 10-01-2009 02:56 PM

Re: This is the thread where the fringster comes back with teeth
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 402020)
cletus thinks i do research.

No, but it seemed to be one of your areas of expertise.

Pretty Little Flower 10-01-2009 02:58 PM

Re: This is the thread where the fringster comes back with teeth
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 402010)
ummm, a majority of my son's graduating class are potentially felons, and yet no one was prosecuted. can you break that down for me?

Are you serious? Please tell me that you can figure out the answer to this one by yourself.

Hank Chinaski 10-01-2009 02:59 PM

Re: This is the thread where the fringster comes back with teeth
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pretty Little Flower (Post 402023)
I was simply pointing out that your argument that societal attitudes have not changed because rape was a crime in the 70s and is still a crime now is so moronic that I am embarrassed for you that I have to rebut it twice.

ok, and other than pretty baby can you point the slimmest thread of evidence that the lax 70s attitudes extended to 13 Year olds. does that evidence extend to anally raped 13 year olds? how about drugged ones?

i mean shit, if anything, attitudes about 15/16/17 year old girls being sexually active have probably relaxed since the 70s-

Hank Chinaski 10-01-2009 03:00 PM

Re: This is the thread where the fringster comes back with teeth
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pretty Little Flower (Post 402027)
The fact that a recent consensual statutory rape pled out with a stiffer sentence that Polanski got for drugging and anally raping a 13 year old in the 70s seems to suggest that societal attitudes on rape may have changed, but Hank busted that myth pretty good, so your case must be an outlier.

polanski didn't "get a sentence" yet. maybe he'll get one soon. ask your wife about the lawyer terms before you toss them around.

Pretty Little Flower 10-01-2009 03:06 PM

Re: This is the thread where the fringster comes back with teeth
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 402031)
polanski didn't "get a sentence" yet. maybe he'll get one soon. ask your wife about the lawyer terms before you toss them around.

I cannot spend my day explaining obvious things to you. Go back and look at the post I was responding to and see if you can figure out why I used the terms that I did.

Replaced_Texan 10-01-2009 03:07 PM

Re: Tucker is an Irvin fan?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 401992)
if you go with kids, pro football is a minefield of drunken trouble. but baseball and basketball and college football are all cool.

Huh. There seem to be a LOT of kids at Texans games. My dad even remarked on it when we were leaving last week and we watched some father carrying his sleeping daughter off. I pointed out that he used to take me to Oilers games when I was a kid, and he said that he never took a kid who couldn't make it through the whole game and walk on their own two feet out of the stadium.

A family of five sat behind us last week. The non-infant kids got bored pretty early and kept on asking when they could go. The dad pointed out the game clock and told them that they only had however minutes left. I suspect his wife was happy that the last Texans touchdown was flagged away and then fumbled away, because it could have easily otherwise gone into overtime.

I couldn't want to take kids to a pro-football game mainly because it's pricey, and they don't get much out of it. The seventy bucks plus concessions is better spent on a babysitter.

Cletus Miller 10-01-2009 03:10 PM

Re: This is the thread where the fringster comes back with teeth
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 402020)
cletus thinks i do research.

So, i looked it up. Michigan is much tougher than the (old) CA law I opaquely set out. The relevant section is:

750.520d: (1) A person is guilty of criminal sexual conduct in the third degree if the person engages in sexual penetration with another person and if any of the following circumstances exist:

(a) That other person is at least 13 years of age and under 16 years of age.

...

(2) Criminal sexual conduct in the third degree is a felony punishable by imprisonment for not more than 15 years.

No carveout for similar ages. Two fifteen year olds doing any of "sexual intercourse, cunnilingus, fellatio, anal intercourse, or any other intrusion, however slight, of any part of a person's body or of any object into the genital or anal openings of another person's body, but emission of semen is not required." are both potential felons.

Of course, there's no stated exception for medical professionals or anyone else, either. I guess a wet willie could thoeretically get you 15 years hard time.

Adder 10-01-2009 03:10 PM

Re: This is the thread where the fringster comes back with teeth
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 402030)
ok, and other than pretty baby can you point the slimmest thread of evidence that the lax 70s attitudes extended to 13 Year olds. does that evidence extend to anally raped 13 year olds? how about drugged ones?

i mean shit, if anything, attitudes about 15/16/17 year old girls being sexually active have probably relaxed since the 70s-

I took his point to be (1) that back then you could present the "she's a slut" defence much more easily, and (2) that it was much more likely to be accepted then, regardless of the age of the victim.

I have no idea whether that second part is true, but the first undoubtedly is. I do think it is likely that there was much more stigma attached to sexually active unmarried women then than there is now, which seems important to evaluating (2). The question is whether the victim's age trumps that.

Replaced_Texan 10-01-2009 03:11 PM

Re: This is the thread where the fringster comes back with teeth
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Cletus Miller (Post 402017)
What's MI law? Is it like CA, where it's 18-1 minute is jailbait for anyone 18+1 minute*? Or is it somewhat rational.

*plus something else like 2 years difference in age (or something) if they're both under 18, so long as both are over 14.

Texas is 17. Affirmative defense if the victim is over 14 and the defendant is a) opposite sex and b) not more than three years older.

It pisses me off that there's a reporting requirement for healthcare professionals if the find out a minor is sexually active with someone of the same sex, even if there's little or no age difference.

Hank Chinaski 10-01-2009 03:12 PM

Re: Tucker is an Irvin fan?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Replaced_Texan (Post 402033)
Huh. There seem to be a LOT of kids at Texans games. My dad even remarked on it when we were leaving last week and we watched some father carrying his sleeping daughter off. I pointed out that he used to take me to Oilers games when I was a kid, and he said that he never took a kid who couldn't make it through the whole game and walk on their own two feet out of the stadium.

A family of five sat behind us last week. The non-infant kids got bored pretty early and kept on asking when they could go. The dad pointed out the game clock and told them that they only had however minutes left. I suspect his wife was happy that the last Texans touchdown was flagged away and then fumbled away, because it could have easily otherwise gone into overtime.

I couldn't want to take kids to a pro-football game mainly because it's pricey, and they don't get much out of it. The seventy bucks plus concessions is better spent on a babysitter.

do you sit in no-alcohol sections? when my kids were like 10-13 we went to several games, and actually sat in the "executive level at the silverdome and then ford field.

my children have seen their role models somewhat drunk, so don't take this as a prudish statement, but their were drunken fights and near fights all around me. I really couldn't relax.

Gattigap 10-01-2009 03:14 PM

Re: This is the thread where the fringster comes back with teeth
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 402010)
ummm, a majority of my son's graduating class are potentially felons, and yet no one was prosecuted. can you break that down for me?

http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.co...de55970c-320wi

Explained here.

Hank Chinaski 10-01-2009 03:16 PM

Re: This is the thread where the fringster comes back with teeth
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Adder (Post 402035)
I took his point to be (1) that back then you could present the "she's a slut" defence much more easily, and (2) that it was much more likely to be accepted then, regardless of the age of the victim.

I have no idea whether that second part is true, but the first undoubtedly is. I do think it is likely that there was much more stigma attached to sexually active unmarried women then than there is now, which seems important to evaluating (2). The question is whether the victim's age trumps that.

dude "she's a slut" is not a defense to "you had sex with someone who is 13."

there's that whole "elements of a crime" thing.

1 did Roman have sex? Yes
2 was the female 13? yes
if so > guilty

WAIT! she was asking for it!

doesn't matter-

it like if you steal a TV and try to argue that it was defective, so you really didn't steal much

Cletus Miller 10-01-2009 03:17 PM

Re: This is the thread where the fringster comes back with teeth
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Replaced_Texan (Post 402036)
It pisses me off that there's a reporting requirement for healthcare professionals if the find out a minor is sexually active with someone of the same sex, even if there's little or no age difference.

I can't say I'm surprised about that. With tougher enforcement and penalties than for the duty to report child abuse, too?

Adder 10-01-2009 03:18 PM

Re: This is the thread where the fringster comes back with teeth
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 402040)
dude "she's a slut" is not a defense to "you had sex with someone who is 13."

there's that whole "elements of a crime" thing.

1 did Roman have sex? Yes
2 was the female 13? yes
if so > guilty

WAIT! she was asking for it!

doesn't matter-

it like if you steal a TV and try to argue that it was defective, so you really didn't steal much


You're right. Juries always ignore things that are legally irrelevant and instead focus closely on the elements of the law.

ETA: I haven't been paying that much attention, but I had assumed that had Polanski pulled out of the plea deal he would have faced the forcible rape charges that were initiall brought (perhaps in addition to statutory rape).

evenodds 10-01-2009 03:19 PM

Re: Tucker is an Irvin fan?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy (Post 402015)
I have the seats of one of the Sox owners for opening day next year, because we went to a charity auction and my wife told me we had to buy something. I don't think that was what she had in mind...

I've had really good seats before, but I'm expecting this to be "really really" good.

Because I am e/o, I believe in only attending sporting events when you have really really good seats, which, because I am e/o, I have frequently had. Aside from hoops, most sporting events are better on tv, unless you're at the alma mater, standing and singing, etc.

My best seats ever were on the floor at a basketball game that a friend bought at a charity auction. We knew that they could absolutely hear our trash-talking. Apparently, hot girls yelling very technical complaints at the refs can make basketball players laugh. (Or maybe it was the girls turning to the OddMan to say "did I say that right?")

I bought a package of playoff tickets for the OM for his birthday one year so he could see his favorite NBA team play the local-ish boys. They were shitty seats since I had no pull and was not a season ticket holder, and in the last one we attended, his team lost by 30-40 points (though came back to win the series). He begged me to never do that again. Even our previous seats in the 8th row would not have made that better, but he would have been less likely to get into a fist fight.

Adder 10-01-2009 03:21 PM

Re: Tucker is an Irvin fan?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by evenodds (Post 402043)
unless you're at the alma mater, standing and singing, etc.

Your persona is inconsistent with having an alma mater at which this would happen.

Hank Chinaski 10-01-2009 03:21 PM

Re: This is the thread where the fringster comes back with teeth
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Adder (Post 402042)
You're right. Juries always ignore things that are legally irrelevant and instead focus closely on the elements of the law.

i have no experience with criminal juries- do you have any non-TV experience?

i do have experience with juries generally, and i think one could keep them focused on the facts of this one.

i am done with this- it sickens me to discuss it.

Fugee 10-01-2009 03:22 PM

Re: This is the thread where the fringster comes back with teeth
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Replaced_Texan (Post 402036)
Texas is 17. Affirmative defense if the victim is over 14 and the defendant is a) opposite sex and b) not more than three years older.

It pisses me off that there's a reporting requirement for healthcare professionals if the find out a minor is sexually active with someone of the same sex, even if there's little or no age difference.

When my cousin's oldest son was graduating from high school, he started dating an 8th grader. As the "family lawyer," I had a little chat with him about the statutory rape laws.

Replaced_Texan 10-01-2009 03:22 PM

Re: Tucker is an Irvin fan?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 402037)
do you sit in no-alcohol sections? when my kids were like 10-13 we went to several games, and actually sat in the "executive level at the silverdome and then ford field.

my children have seen their role models somewhat drunk, so don't take this as a prudish statement, but their were drunken fights and near fights all around me. I really couldn't relax.

No. I sit right on the corner of the north end zone, about 20 rows up, and beer is flowing until the third quarter. There also is a lot of tailgating in the parking lot before the games. I've only seen two or three fights in the 8 seasons I've had tickets. There are always a couple of drunken jackasses, but generally no one violent or near violent. There was a guy the first few years who was a little over enthusiastic in his cheering, and I think that other fans complained. He stopped going after awhile, though.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:35 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com