Whatever. More monkeys in robes putting out goofy inconsistent opinions.

The country's been moving toward a "cash bar" society for a long time. If I need an abortion, I'll get one. If I want to smoke dope, I'll smoke dope. I can't really get wound up about this silliness anmore. The only people getting fucked don't know they're getting fucked and don't care or vote anyway.

Nothing's going to change the fact that I'll be out of my skull in five hours and won't be back until Monday around noon.

BREAKING NEWS-WE WIN!-MORE TO COME
 

That's round two. The first round will be a bloodbath where the GOP reluctantly withdraws the nomination bitching all along about Democrat history of obstructing judicial nominations. They've been building that one up for five years.

Then they'll nominate a Kennedy type that will get through no problem.

Then when Rehnquist retires, they'll bring forth a Thomas/Scalia/Attilla the Hun type that makes their first person seem like Gahndi, but everyone will be so battle scarred by that first fight that this guy will get through with token objection and only one person testifying that he ruined her life.

BREAKING NEWS-WE WIN!-MORE TO COME
 

I am the one and only.

A devout Rockefeller Repub who would like to see Ralph Reed and his ilk covered in butterscotch sauce and thrown into a pit of fire ants with Monsieur Kerry and the anti-gun lobby.

BREAKING NEWS-WE WIN!-MORE TO COME
 

Ralph's tit is in the ringer. Didn't you read about the emails Abramoff turned over discussing how Reed was fucking over the christian orgs he was supposed to be lobbying for. He helped swindle a Christian anti-gambling org into lobbying against a state lottery... to benefit a tribe who wanted to control gambling in the state.

If Kennedy is so worried about stopping anyone "who would roll back individual rights" why is he and his socialist pals have no respect for or concern for rolling my right to retain my hard earned property (i.e. income and assets)?

Which, combined with my total lack of interest in travelling south of the Donna Dixon line for anything more than a football saturday, is why a true ideologically consistent federalist would be a victory for our great nation. Does one exist?

BREAKING NEWS-WE WIN!-MORE TO COME
 

I doubt Bush will risk his legacy on a Kennedy. It will just be a less obviously offensive conservative. The one thing Bush has demonstrated is that he learned from his dad's mistakes. Now that W has rectified the Iraq fuckup and the cut taxes repeatedly (unlike Daddy) the last big fuckup out there is Souter. W will not risk a Souter.

BREAKING NEWS-WE WIN!-MORE TO COME
 

Interesting, but no. I was speaking in generalities though, the whole evangelical movement and their forays into pushing for a theocracy make me nauseous. I'll have to read about that, those types generally end up getting caught with their pants down with a pair of trannies in the closet or otherwise exposed as frauds and charlatans.

Ted Olsen? He could cruise to approval. He is the safe fallback or the first pick if an open liberal was to leave.

Matthew 19:16-21.

Too stridently right. Too many speaking engagements at federalist societies.

And too involved in digging dirt on Clinton. Total slimeball.

You think we'll get that clean a split? I'm inclined to get on the federalist bandwagon, but I have this sneaking suspicion that the evangelical trash has a broader agenda.

Shit, I'm not going to have a choice. Federalism it is.

Olsen was a Clintoin hunter? Hmmm.

Dissent. The average person doesn't know what the Fed Soc is and the Dems won't be able to spin that affectively. Compared with the Rove wing he is a moderate. Plus his dead wife would add to his teflon.