LawTalkers

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   Politics (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   You (all) lie! (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=848)

Tyrone Slothrop 02-09-2010 08:03 PM

Re: You (all) lie!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by PresentTense Pirate Penske (Post 415761)
That's a retarded comparison.....is that palin's blog?

This country's failure to get its shit together to get high-speed rail going is, uh, disappointing. Nothing against wine trains. I hear they have wine buses in Washington where they serve the boxed stuff as you cruise out to Walla Walla -- true?

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) 02-09-2010 08:06 PM

Re: You (all) lie!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop (Post 415766)
This country's failure to get its shit together to get high-speed rail going is, uh, disappointing.

No shit. China can make the trains run on time--why can't we?

sebastian_dangerfield 02-09-2010 08:12 PM

Re: This is totally awesome
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by PresentTense Pirate Penske (Post 415765)
Perfect for a large B cup. I want more than enough.

I like the perfect teardrop. A thing to behold.

(I like the others fine, too, but if we're picking favorites...)

ThurgreedMarshall 02-09-2010 08:13 PM

Re: This is totally awesome
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Atticus Grinch (Post 415750)
The question is whether the people who think the MSM actually report real facts about the world have become a minority within the GOP. Once that threshold is reached, each party will have its own news sources and what CNN says about Palin will be as irrelevant as what Fox says about Obama -- no one who watches either will be susceptible of persuasion at all. At that point in the nation's history -- the day the last GOP voter who actually thinks Fox sucks balls and CNN and the NYT are actually better at reporting the news dies of old age, the term "swing voter" will be a sly winking euphemism for people who can't be bothered to read or watch the news and form all of their opinions based on TV ads.

I'm pretty sure this day passed already.

TM

PresentTense Pirate Penske 02-09-2010 08:19 PM

Re: You (all) lie!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop (Post 415766)
This country's failure to get its shit together to get high-speed rail going is, uh, disappointing. ?

Yes, maybe, but you don't want a high speed wine train. You want one that breaks down and your stuck. on the train. with wine. to infinity.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop (Post 415766)
Nothing against wine trains. I hear they have wine buses in Washington where they serve the boxed stuff as you cruise out to Walla Walla -- true?

No, Seattle just extended its lite rail.

PresentTense Pirate Penske 02-09-2010 08:20 PM

Re: This is totally awesome
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 415769)
I like the perfect teardrop. A thing to behold.

(I like the others fine, too, but if we're picking favorites...)

I like more than a teardrop, but that like is not at the expense of acknowledging the beauty of the teardrop. which. i. do.

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 02-09-2010 11:09 PM

Re: This is totally awesome
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sidd Finch (Post 415735)
Not at all true, for me at least. I used wealthy people as examples for a very specific reason: That I didn't want Penske (or Sebby) to come back with "well, Palin's richer than him so she must be smarter."

I used conservatives for a similar reason, to avoid an ur-Penske response.

Those would be two reasons why I didn't use you as an example. Your failure to grasp what I thought was a pretty obvious (i.e., high school debate-team level) tactic is, arguably, a third.

Umm, actually, I meant Sebby instead of Sidd. It may be the first time you've been confused with him, but you both start with S and I have a cold.

And where's your assessment of the breasts, anyways? Your sense of priority is deeply disturbing.

Adder 02-09-2010 11:17 PM

Re: This is totally awesome
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 415763)
you're a moron (or perhaps an imbecile... Maybe an idiot). Those are perfect - perfect - breasts.

2

Hank Chinaski 02-09-2010 11:20 PM

Re: This is totally awesome
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy (Post 415779)
Umm, actually, I meant Sebby instead of Sidd. It may be the first time you've been confused with him, but you both start with S and I have a cold.

And where's your assessment of the breasts, anyways? Your sense of priority is deeply disturbing.

they seem quite nice, small breasts.

Adder 02-09-2010 11:27 PM

Life According to Newt
 
John Stewart: Doesn't [military tribunals] build terrorists up, aren't they thugs, aren't they criminals?

Newt: "No."

Hank Chinaski 02-09-2010 11:28 PM

Re: You (all) lie!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop (Post 415766)
This country's failure to get its shit together to get high-speed rail going is, uh, disappointing.

what proposals have been made on this? replaced the NE Amtrak corridor? something out West? it strikes me that replacing the NE Amtrak routes is pointless, and putting other routes elsewhere merely threatens the airlines' ability to survive.

Tyrone Slothrop 02-09-2010 11:34 PM

Re: You (all) lie!
 
Gingrich, on The Daily Show, says Richard Reid was tried in an Article III court because he was an American citizen. No, he wasn't. Gingrich doesn't have someone on his staff who can check Wikipedia for him?

Tyrone Slothrop 02-09-2010 11:37 PM

Re: You (all) lie!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 415783)
what proposals have been made on this? replaced the NE Amtrak corridor? something out West? it strikes me that replacing the NE Amtrak routes is pointless, and putting other routes elsewhere merely threatens the airlines' ability to survive.

Routes have been proposed elsewhere:

http://www.treehugger.com/obama-high...l-corridor.png

Upgrading the NE corridor is hardly pointless, if you make travel faster. And "threatening" the airlines on corridors where high-speed rail makes more sense is a great idea, just like threatening horse-and-buggies was cars was a good thing.

Hank Chinaski 02-09-2010 11:44 PM

Re: You (all) lie!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop (Post 415785)
Routes have been proposed elsewhere:

http://www.treehugger.com/obama-high...l-corridor.png

Upgrading the NE corridor is hardly pointless, if you make travel faster. And "threatening" the airlines on corridors where high-speed rail makes more sense is a great idea, just like threatening horse-and-buggies was cars was a good thing.

have you riden any high speed rail? I've been on the Japanese bullets. They start out slow and ramp up. The NE is stop and go with the stops, it might get marginally quicker after spending a gazillion dollars.

the other areas ignore the basic problem that you are connecting cities that have no effective public transport. You've posted a link from texas to little rock. what you gonna do when you get to little rock and don't have a car?

I don't have a problem with improving rail travel, but it seems a poor investment compared with investing in hybrid/ecar or giving cities money to build subways etc.

ps the airlines aren't dinosaurs since they can cross water and get to many places faster. and their suppliers are my clients.

Adder 02-10-2010 12:01 AM

Re: You (all) lie!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 415786)
The NE is stop and go with the stops, it might get marginally quicker after spending a gazillion dollars.

Not that I necessarily disagree, but it doesn't have to be stop and go. It could easily be DC-NY-Boston. Or even DC-Philly-Boston.

But we already spent billions to shave 15 minutes off of DC to NY and a half hour off NY to Boston, although my recollection is that the Acela has never performed as it was originally advertised. Something about not tilting the way it was supposed to on the widely track north of NYC.

Quote:

the other areas ignore the basic problem that you are connecting cities that have no effective public transport. You've posted a link from texas to little rock. what you gonna do when you get to little rock and don't have a car?
Again, not that I disagree, but they have taxis and rental cars, no? If I take the train to NYC, I don't typically take the subway to my final destination. But, of course, in NYC my destination is in the city, and in Little Rock it is just as likely to be well outside of downtown (which is why I don't disagree).

Quote:

ps the airlines aren't dinosaurs since they can cross water and get to many places faster. and their suppliers are my clients.
Not dinosaurs, but from the outside seem to have a lot in common with the car companies: go broke every time there is a downturn, mostly overloaded with debt, provide a product that no one is really happy with, and loaded down with high union labor costs. But at least they have Congress to protect them from foreign competition, so you got that going for you.

ETA: Also, to spend the money to do high speed between the NEC and Pittsburgh, and Chicago and Cleveland, but not between Pittsburgh and Cleveland seems wasteful.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:07 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com