LawTalkers

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   Politics (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused. (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=879)

Not Bob 11-08-2016 12:31 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ferrets_bueller (Post 503457)
I loathe him because I am the same age as he is. I got drafted, saw combat, and he hired a doctor to get him out of the draft so that other people could go in his stead. And the bastard then said he always wanted a Purple Heart. Calling out John McCain? Making fun of a Gold Star Mother?

Huh. "Save ferrets" takes on a whole new meaning, my friend. :)

ThurgreedMarshall 11-08-2016 12:32 PM

Re: Cross-post From the Other FB
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 503401)
ETA: I think the Left needs to be a little more judicious in throwing allegations of sexism and racism. It is tiring to hear everyone who disagrees with progressives smeared at least to some small extent as a racist or sexist. The Dems can smear Trump with this stuff, but they should be careful about overusing those attacks on all non-progressives. High risk of desensitization, and backlash.

I am so fucking sick of this refrain.

People who don't want to be accused of sexism and racism should stop saying and doing racist and sexist shit.

Every. single. poster. on this board has made point after point on all kinds of issues whether in support of Hillary or in opposition to Trump. It is without question that Trump's non-stances on every fucking issue and his idiotic stances on trade, taxes, and immigration have been consumed, discussed, and discarded. Absolutely everything has been discussed, including the detestable actions of the people who support him. You don't get to then act like people on the left just reject Trump's supporters because we assume they're all racist, sexist assholes without any evidence.

TM

ferrets_bueller 11-08-2016 12:36 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Semi-outable photograph from an unusual source:

http://www.vintagezodiacs.com/watchstories.php

Enlarge the first picture. There are certain legal circles where I am known by my Military MOS.

LessinSF 11-08-2016 12:49 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
I will be playing this on repeat tonight - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=czx2p-GHBhk .

ThurgreedMarshall 11-08-2016 12:56 PM

Re: Cross-post From the Other FB
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by greatwhitenorthchick (Post 503428)
Are we allowed to talk about sex on the politics board? Because I can't help myself.

This is a joke, right? Are you implying that sex never comes up when it comes to politicians?

TM

ThurgreedMarshall 11-08-2016 12:59 PM

Re: Cross-post From the Other FB
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 503439)
I'm better than you who care because while you'll be manipulated, I'll state flatly to anyone who asks, "We're hardly all that different from Putin's Russia. Increasingly, power is the only law."

You'll argue otherwise, I'm sure. But if you boil the current corporatist system to its core, that's our reality.

It's all a game. The fear and loathing of Trump by elite sorts isn't because he's a twisted bigot. It's because he creates volatility. Unpredictability is the one character the oweners of the systems that run your life, mine, and everyone's here, can't abide. It's just perfect for them he also happens to be a flaming lunatic. Were a sober, sensible populist to emerge, they'd have to kill him.

If you still believe in the institutions, you're no better than the rednecks or the true believers at Hillary rallies. I'm a lot more honest than you, and far less self-deluded.

How much money and power do you have? That's the entirety of the value of your life here, and the measure of the leverage and control over it you will enjoy. Politics is bread and circuses. It's an annoyance, an irritant... And it offends me to be impacted by it enough to have to consider it.

ETA: I also feel like a sucker for desiring any sort of reform of this govt or its systems. That is never going to happen. I'm engaging in the worst form of parlor game there. Power will do as it likes, with only mild concessions here and there to keep away unrest.

Wow. I am consistently surprised at the amount of horseshit you are able to generate. You're like a fucking Clydesdale with the runs.

TM

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 11-08-2016 01:18 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ferrets_bueller (Post 503460)
Semi-outable photograph from an unusual source:

http://www.vintagezodiacs.com/watchstories.php

Enlarge the first picture. There are certain legal circles where I am known by my Military MOS.

We're all snipers here.

LessinSF 11-08-2016 01:32 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ferrets_bueller (Post 503460)
Semi-outable photograph from an unusual source:

http://www.vintagezodiacs.com/watchstories.php

Enlarge the first picture. There are certain legal circles where I am known by my Military MOS.

Our oldest member ever? Even than Bilmore and Not Bob?

Two posts from me in an hour? I know. Work upgraded various platforms, such as Internet Explorer, and I now appear to be able to post from my office computer for the first time in over 2.5 years. This is not necessarily good.

LessinSF (for now)

Tyrone Slothrop 11-08-2016 01:36 PM

Re: Cross-post From the Other FB
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 503439)
I'm better than you who care because while you'll be manipulated, I'll state flatly to anyone who asks, "We're hardly all that different from Putin's Russia. Increasingly, power is the only law."

You'll argue otherwise, I'm sure. But if you boil the current corporatist system to its core, that's our reality.

It's all a game. The fear and loathing of Trump by elite sorts isn't because he's a twisted bigot. It's because he creates volatility. Unpredictability is the one character the oweners of the systems that run your life, mine, and everyone's here, can't abide. It's just perfect for them he also happens to be a flaming lunatic. Were a sober, sensible populist to emerge, they'd have to kill him.

If you still believe in the institutions, you're no better than the rednecks or the true believers at Hillary rallies. I'm a lot more honest than you, and far less self-deluded.

How much money and power do you have? That's the entirety of the value of your life here, and the measure of the leverage and control over it you will enjoy. Politics is bread and circuses. It's an annoyance, an irritant... And it offends me to be impacted by it enough to have to consider it.

ETA: I also feel like a sucker for desiring any sort of reform of this govt or its systems. That is never going to happen. I'm engaging in the worst form of parlor game there. Power will do as it likes, with only mild concessions here and there to keep away unrest.

Dude, if you think you don't get manipulated, you aren't reading your own posts.

Tyrone Slothrop 11-08-2016 01:39 PM

Re: Oh noes.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SEC_Chick (Post 503440)
Before I gave up, I would engage with Trump supporters on twitter. I did not seek it out, but I would retweet something by a NR contributor and then get the obligatory, "Not voting Trump is a vote for Killary!" Many Trump supporters are unable to understand basic math, it seems, that would demonstrate that this is patently untrue, nor were they persuaded that my non-vote for Hillary was by the same logic, a vote for Trump. I was also repeatedly told by Sean Hannity that #NeverTrump owns Hillary and the Supreme Court and all of the atrocities she will commit. As you would expect, Sean Hannity does not respond to reason. You are coming perilously close to Hannity logic here.

Sebby's vote belongs to him and him alone. He owns his own vote, not the collective votes of Hillary or Trump supporters. He has the right to vote as if his own vote is meaningless to the election except as to its impact on his own character. Even in a close election.

Of course he does. And when I say own it, what I mean, accept that if he's going to make the masturbatory gesture of voting for Johnson instead of a real challenger to Trump, own up to the fact that it might make a difference.

Quote:

Trump was so bad, I could have been persuaded to have voted for almost anyone else (it would have been exceedingly hard to sell me on Stein, but anyone else I took a serious look at). I considered Libertarians, the kooky Constitution Party, other minor parties that have limited ballot access. Heck, if Hillary had gone to the center like Bill did, I could even have been persuaded by her. I would have taken a sane moderate (but positions like advocating for the repeal of the Hyde amendment and "free" college education is not exactly a way to win *me* over). My vote makes a difference to my character, even if it impacts no one else.
If you, like Sebby, want to use your vote as an expressive gesture, that is your right. eta: But also, what TM said.

Tyrone Slothrop 11-08-2016 01:48 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Reality-based, and worth a read.

SEC_Chick 11-08-2016 02:01 PM

Re: Oh noes.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop (Post 503467)
Of course he does. And when I say own it, what I mean, accept that if he's going to make the masturbatory gesture of voting for Johnson instead of a real challenger to Trump, own up to the fact that it might make a difference.

That's the point. Trump's loss isn't on #NeverTrump, it is on Trump and his supporters who nominated an unelectable imbecile and failed to make a case why #NeverTrump should vote for him.

But if Hillary loses PA by one vote, that's not on Sebby, that's on Hillary for being so corrupt and dishonest, among other failures, and the party for nominating such a weak candidate.

Tyrone Slothrop 11-08-2016 02:11 PM

Re: Oh noes.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SEC_Chick (Post 503474)
That's the point. Trump's loss isn't on #NeverTrump, it is on Trump and his supporters who nominated an unelectable imbecile and failed to make a case why #NeverTrump should vote for him.

But if Hillary loses PA by one vote, that's not on Sebby, that's on Hillary for being so corrupt and dishonest, among other failures, and the party for nominating such a weak candidate.

C'mon, that's horseshit. They can share the blame.

I agree that Hillary isn't a great candidate. Calling her "corrupt" is hyperbolic, inaccurate, and a disservice to the many politicians who work hard to actually do corrupt things. I don't think Hillary is any more dishonest than just about every other politician, but I do think that she has learned over decades in the public eye that things go poorly when she speaks her mind, and as a result she has developed a public persona that is controlled, calculating and inauthentic.

But in the end, the voters make the decision, and if you choose to piss away your vote on an expressive gesture in favor of a candidate who isn't going to win, you share the blame if a different vote would have made a difference. As I say, that happened to me once.

sebastian_dangerfield 11-08-2016 02:18 PM

Re: Oh noes.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SEC_Chick (Post 503474)
That's the point. Trump's loss isn't on #NeverTrump, it is on Trump and his supporters who nominated an unelectable imbecile and failed to make a case why #NeverTrump should vote for him.

But if Hillary loses PA by one vote, that's not on Sebby, that's on Hillary for being so corrupt and dishonest, among other failures, and the party for nominating such a weak candidate.

I love you.

sebastian_dangerfield 11-08-2016 02:28 PM

Re: Oh noes.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop (Post 503475)
C'mon, that's horseshit. They can share the blame.

I agree that Hillary isn't a great candidate. Calling her "corrupt" is hyperbolic, inaccurate, and a disservice to the many politicians who work hard to actually do corrupt things. I don't think Hillary is any more dishonest than just about every other politician, but I do think that she has learned over decades in the public eye that things go poorly when she speaks her mind, and as a result she has developed a public persona that is controlled, calculating and inauthentic.

But in the end, the voters make the decision, and if you choose to piss away your vote on an expressive gesture in favor of a candidate who isn't going to win, you share the blame if a different vote would have made a difference. As I say, that happened to me once.

I vote D, R, and L. I wanted a D who offered something different. Instead I got a retread - a robot who knows only to serve her masters. Am I bothered? No. She's a centrist at core. Am I concerned enough about Trump to vote for her? No.

The important calculation here is I was not concerned enough about her to vote for Trump.

Again, in the end, none of these people favor individual freedom of the kind I think the Republic was designed to provide.

I'll repeat it one more time: Because I don't care which I receive in a choice of two things I did not want, there is no rational reason for me to have voted any other way than I did.

I'll get Hillary. My household will make necessary adjustments to avoid anything she might do to try to transfer additional resources from us to others... That's the lamentable Modern Condition. But the world will keep on spinning. They'll still make Quarter Cask Laphroaig, we've got another 30 years of decent seafood in the oceans, and orgasms will still be orgasms. I'd like serious change, but if I can't have it as I want it, which isn't going to happen, I'll just navigate the game and "tend to my garden."


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:29 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com