LawTalkers

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   Politics (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   Patting the wrists, rolling the eyes. (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=661)

taxwonk 04-06-2005 11:08 AM

I knew it
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Query--is that provision constitutional? Can Congress by statute define "good behavior"? If so, of what consequence is it? Congress would still have to vote to impeach, no?
Of course it isn't Constitutional. Shelby's grandstanding for the folk back home and to puff up his war chest. You can't simply legislate away the Establishemnt Clause, not to mention that whole "separation of powers" thing that permeates the document.

Hank Chinaski 04-06-2005 11:10 AM

Do you really think this photo is anti-American?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Shape Shifter
Ah, I missed this post. Your point that the AP is biased because of which photos it decided to submit for a journalism award is too stupid even to consider. I wouldn't have wasted any more time on the subject.
You miss a lot of shit. At work do people have trouble understanding you?

Shape Shifter 04-06-2005 11:18 AM

Do you really think this photo is anti-American?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
You miss a lot of shit. At work do people have trouble understanding you?
I had a better opinion of you before I read that post. My subconcious must have a set of blinders. I'm really just trying to see you in the most positive light.

Hank Chinaski 04-06-2005 11:30 AM

Do you really think this photo is anti-American?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Shape Shifter
I had a better opinion of you before I read that post. My subconcious must have a set of blinders. I'm really just trying to see you in the most positive light.
You're trying to see me in the light? RT said she caught you in the dark trying to see her through her bedroom window. Why the diff?

Replaced_Texan 04-06-2005 11:41 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
What's the over/under on DeLay stepping down? Two weeks? Three? Am I being too hasty?

Less, what'd'you say?
Stepping down from the chair?

I was part of a conference call with Richard Morrison last night, and none of us were THAT optimistic.*

DeLay's power stems from his amazing ability to raise and control money for other Republicans. Until it's clear that he doesn't control the purse strings anymore, not that many Rs are going to make moves against him.

*ETA: There is a lot of hope, though. It was a good call.

Sexual Harassment Panda 04-06-2005 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Too hasty. He's survived this long . . . must not be perceived as enough of a liability to the party yet. I would say before the next election season gears up, though, so probably late this year, early next year.
And yet, new stuff keeps popping up virtually every day. I think this moves it up to the early fall at least.

Shape Shifter 04-06-2005 12:11 PM

Do you really think this photo is anti-American?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
You're trying to see me in the light? RT said she caught you in the dark trying to see her through her bedroom window. Why the diff?
So You Won a Pulitzer. Who Cares?

"There's no real science or even fairness behind the picking of winners and losers, with the prizes handed out according to a formula composed of one part log-rolling, two parts merit, three parts 'we owe him one,' and four parts random distribution. "

ltl/fb 04-06-2005 12:18 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Sexual Harassment Panda
And yet, new stuff keeps popping up virtually every day. I think this moves it up to the early fall at least.
Oh please. I'm sure they were providing valuable services. (Seriously, I doubt that that will be the straw. Or even a major contributor. I think his daughter is legitimately an event planner, and it looks like nearly half that money went to her business, and not directly to her as payo . . . a payroll expense. If it went to the business, it probably paid for actual goods and services, etc. I may be being some combination of too cynical and not cynical enough, though.)

Replaced_Texan 04-06-2005 12:24 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
Oh please. I'm sure they were providing valuable services. (Seriously, I doubt that that will be the straw. Or even a major contributor. I think his daughter is legitimately an event planner, and it looks like nearly half that money went to her business, and not directly to her as payo . . . a payroll expense. If it went to the business, it probably paid for actual goods and services, etc. I may be being some combination of too cynical and not cynical enough, though.)
His daughter ran his campaign last year.

sgtclub 04-06-2005 12:25 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
Oh please. I'm sure they were providing valuable services. (Seriously, I doubt that that will be the straw. Or even a major contributor. I think his daughter is legitimately an event planner, and it looks like nearly half that money went to her business, and not directly to her as payo . . . a payroll expense. If it went to the business, it probably paid for actual goods and services, etc. I may be being some combination of too cynical and not cynical enough, though.)
Seems to me that Hillary should step down under this logic as well.

ltl/fb 04-06-2005 12:27 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
Seems to me that Hillary should step down under this logic as well.
Sweet pea, darling, fucking jackasshole, I was actually more or less defending the payments. Christ. I WENT OUT OF MY WAY to defend actions of a PERSON I LOATHE and you fucking bring up Hilary like the knee-jerk assjack you are.

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) 04-06-2005 12:31 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
His daughter ran his campaign last year.
I was waiting for the part in the article shifter linked to that explained his daughter was 11 years old, but had a killer collection of beanie babies. Oh well, not that easy.

BTW, shifter, I think Ty had that article in mind (i certainly did). He reads today's news yesterday, so he's primed for debate here.

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 04-06-2005 12:32 PM

Photos
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
Oh. Thanks.
Anytime, dude. Like, sorry to have to impose reality on you - I know it's a bummer.

Way cool avatar man.

Sidd Finch 04-06-2005 12:40 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
Sweet pea, darling, fucking jackasshole, I was actually more or less defending the payments. Christ. I WENT OUT OF MY WAY to defend actions of a PERSON I LOATHE and you fucking bring up Hilary like the knee-jerk assjack you are.

See? Next time, don't try coddling up to Club like that.

ltl/fb 04-06-2005 12:43 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
See? Next time, don't try coddling up to Club like that.
I didn't do it for that assjacky asshole. I did it in a spirit of, you know, like fairness and shit.

I don't care what his registration card says. He's a fucking R through and through, including all the morality crap.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:18 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com