| ThurgreedMarshall |
06-11-2010 04:33 PM |
Re: Needing tips
Quote:
Originally Posted by Did you just call me Coltrane?
(Post 426262)
Isn't that exactly what it is? If the defensive player establishes a position on the court (regardless of whether he anticipated where the offensive player was going), an offensive player cannot "charge" into him.
|
The foul was created to penalize overly aggressive offensive players. Running and jumping to a spot in anticipation of where a player will be is not the point. That's why a charge is supposed to only be called when the offensive player clearly has time to make an adjustment to avoid running someone over, but doesn't.
The problem is, the whole concept has morphed into a reward for a defensive player for anticipating where a player will go. And to the extent that you get in a player's way, that's absolutely good defense. But at least 70% of charges called occur when a defensive player slips into the path of an offensive player who is already (i) in his two-step move to the basket or (ii) in the air!
The other point is, even if you are in perfect defensive position in time and the offensive player makes some contact and you pretend it's enough to make you fall, you shouldn't be awarded. The whole point of the foul is to penalize the offensive player for being so aggressive that they hit the defensive player more than is necessary. But refs now make the call based on good defensive position, instead of the aggressive nature of the guy with the ball. That's the problem.
Hell, it's called "charging," not "making contact."
TM
|