LawTalkers

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Big Board (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=13)
-   -   It was the wrong thread (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=573)

Atticus Grinch 09-29-2009 03:04 AM

Re: It was the wrong thread
 
Blast from the past.

Replaced_Texan 10-02-2009 04:32 PM

Re: It was the wrong thread
 
I heart lawyers sometimes.

LessinSF 10-02-2009 05:45 PM

Re: It was the wrong thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Replaced_Texan (Post 402253)

That rocked. I am going to steal it from you and pass it on.

Gattigap 10-02-2009 06:09 PM

Re: It was the wrong thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Replaced_Texan (Post 402253)

"There is no indication that the Respondent has intentionally attempted to
confuse anyone searching for Mr. Beck’s own website, nor that anyone
was unintentionally confused – even initially. Only an abject imbecile
could believe that the domain name would have any connection to the
Complainant."

I likey.

Hank Chinaski 10-02-2009 06:14 PM

Re: It was the wrong thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gattigap (Post 402279)
"There is no indication that the Respondent has intentionally attempted to
confuse anyone searching for Mr. Beck’s own website, nor that anyone
was unintentionally confused – even initially. Only an abject imbecile
could believe that the domain name would have any connection to the
Complainant."

I likey.

wanna take bets on who wins?

Gattigap 10-02-2009 06:22 PM

Re: It was the wrong thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 402280)
wanna take bets on who wins?

You mean in the subsequent defamation suit?

I do look forward to the day that the subsequent defamation suit reaches the Supreme Court, and a distinguished attorney rises to explain Fark.com to the befuddled justices.

PresentTense Pirate Penske 10-02-2009 06:23 PM

Re: It was the wrong thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Atticus Grinch (Post 401544)

One of my socks almost hit dat [sniff]

Replaced_Texan 10-02-2009 06:38 PM

Re: It was the wrong thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gattigap (Post 402285)
You mean in the subsequent defamation suit?

I do look forward to the day that the subsequent defamation suit reaches the Supreme Court, and a distinguished attorney rises to explain Fark.com to the befuddled justices.

I had to explain Facebook to a bunch of befuddled academics today. Upon looking at my own facebook page as an example, "But why would you spend time to write that stuff? Is this why it's taking people forever to get their grants done?"

Atticus Grinch 10-02-2009 06:53 PM

Re: It was the wrong thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Replaced_Texan (Post 402287)
I had to explain Facebook to a bunch of befuddled academics today. Upon looking at my own facebook page as an example, "But why would you spend time to write that stuff? Is this why it's taking people forever to get their grants done?"

To ask the question is to answer it.

Flinty_McFlint 10-02-2009 07:08 PM

Re: It was the wrong thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Atticus Grinch (Post 402288)
To ask the question is to answer it.

Are you an asshole or a douche?

Atticus Grinch 10-02-2009 07:10 PM

Re: It was the wrong thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Flinty_McFlint (Post 402289)
Are you an asshole or a douche?

Douché.

Flinty_McFlint 10-02-2009 07:11 PM

Re: It was the wrong thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Atticus Grinch (Post 402290)
Douché.

Oh, I can't stay mad at you for long, you big lug.

PresentTense Pirate Penske 10-02-2009 07:12 PM

Re: It was the wrong thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Flinty_McFlint (Post 402289)
Are you an asshole or a douche?

Why the use of "or"? Aren't you thereby unfairly discounting the possibility that he is both??

LessinSF 10-02-2009 07:35 PM

Re: It was the wrong thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gattigap (Post 402279)
"There is no indication that the Respondent has intentionally attempted to
confuse anyone searching for Mr. Beck’s own website, nor that anyone
was unintentionally confused – even initially. Only an abject imbecile
could believe that the domain name would have any connection to the
Complainant."

I likey.

I so wish I could let my linguistic freak flag fly in my filings.

Hank Chinaski 10-02-2009 07:45 PM

Re: It was the wrong thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gattigap (Post 402285)
You mean in the subsequent defamation suit?

I do look forward to the day that the subsequent defamation suit reaches the Supreme Court, and a distinguished attorney rises to explain Fark.com to the befuddled justices.

2. it is hard to explain shit to people who have no idea what they're talking about.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:21 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com