![]() |
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
Quote:
I'm tired of defending myself to the right and the left. I hear the arguments from both sides. Really, I get it. The right tells me I didn't care about the working stiffs getting fucked in the economy, and oddly, that because I didn't back their guy, I don't deserve what Trump will bring. Well, I am pretty fucking sure that I don't deserve that, at all. The left barks about the sky falling, and that I'm a traitor for knowing better and not doing the right thing. They're being dramatic and more than a bit obnoxious. How's a guy to win here? I've explained that I had no choice. And I'm not going to dignify anyone telling me I should be more frightened, upset, or horrified. I might be at some point. I just as well might not. I'll do as Chapelle suggested and see what happens. |
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
Quote:
|
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
Quote:
|
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
Quote:
|
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
Quote:
Meanwhile, the speaker of the house is promising to dismantle Medicare and Medicaid. Maybe he will still moderate, but we're not seeing it to any meaningful degree yet. And Reince Priebus is a worm. |
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
Quote:
Not. Even. Trump. Think about it. Or don't. I actually have been trying not to, because all the hyperventilating is getting people worried. |
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
Quote:
Granted, he also thinks gay marriage is stare decisis. I have no idea where he thinks he'd find a judge with a judicial philosophy that would decide those two that way. |
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
Quote:
Choices: Investment in industries that will compete going forward and job training in those industries (if people would vote against the assholes blocking all of that) or magically taking us back to the good old days with protectionist policy for jobs that are completely fucking gone. Sure "we can argue" about these things. But why would we? The message 4 out of 5 morons prefer is: Magical High Paying Jobs for Life for Everybody! TM |
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
Quote:
TM |
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
Quote:
You act like you come here to give us insight that we can't see when you're almost always talking out of your ass. When we point out all of the ass-talking, you think you're being attacked. Again, no one gives a shit if you're frightened, upset, or horrified. When people think you're wrong, they say so. When Greedy or Wonk disagrees with me, they let me know. When I disagree with them, I let them know. It's the same for everyone here. People do not single you out because you're you, snowflake. They disagree with what you post because what you post is disagreeable. So put on your pull-ups and stop complaining. Or don't. "How's a guy to win here." That's rich. No one fucking wins here. It's the politics board. TM |
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
Quote:
Quote:
TM |
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
Quote:
|
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
Quote:
Who's the true moron in this trainwreck? The candidate who realized the public was largely morons and sold them what they wanted, or the stuffed suit who sold a voting public 66% of whom wanted change: "I'll give you more of the same!" She wasn't even creative enough to argue, "I know you want change, but things are beginning to move in the right direction, and I'll improve on the current situation." |
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
Quote:
|
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
Quote:
I've tried to engage with you, but you either don't respond or you change the subject. I guess you just must be worn out. Just to be specific, I think it's pretty obvious that Trump is a disaster from a libertarian perspective, unless "libertarian" is a code word for "rich dude who wants to pay less taxes." Which, to be fair, is often the case. Your response was to say something about Hillary being an equal threat to liberty, without explaining what you mean. Which, to be fair, would have been seriously hard. GGG then called you a country-club Republican, suggesting that you just care about your taxes. So you go off on something about "managed decline." In context, that was a Trumpian non-sequitur. Post all day about managed decline if you've got something to say, but don't pretend you were actually responding to the thread. You were changing the subject. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:29 PM. |
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com