![]() |
Re: Downward Departures for Gout
Quote:
|
Re: Downward Departures for Gout
Quote:
The better question is "would a pardon make any of this fuzzy brained 3rd party voters come to their senses?" If only we knew someone we could ask. |
Re: Downward Departures for Gout
Quote:
I can't believe after the midterms he'd think those states are his. He is fucked in PA and WI. |
Re: Downward Departures for Gout
Quote:
|
Re: Downward Departures for Gout
Quote:
1. Having the govt pay for space in Trump buildings; 2. Emoluments issues (mostly, it seems, re: Trump DC hotel); 3. Getting his kids security passes; 4. Suborning lies about a Trump hotel development in Moscow; 5. $130k of campaign finance violations re: Stormy Am I missing things? I must be. 2 is a real case, ongoing. But it's civil. 1 has already been vetted. It sounds sketchy, but it's legal. 3 is sketchy but legal. 4 is definitely illegal. Got him there. 5 is illegal, but really hard to prove and small potatoes. I think the really fucked up stuff Trump has done predates the Presidency and involves possible money laundering through his projects. Those are serious crimes. But his post-election corruption looks like a lot of "meh." I'd say his risk is on the business side. |
Re: Downward Departures for Gout
Quote:
|
Re: Downward Departures for Gout
Quote:
The fed crim code can be used to indict a person like Mother Theresa if a prosecutor feels a desire to so use it. And often that desire is political (or ambition). Do we really want politicians leaning on prosecutors to send other politicians to jail more than they already do? We need fewer prosecutions of all kinds in this country. That sort of thing should never be used as a political tool. If you believe in the rule of law, the idea that any man is in jail based on a selective prosecution (where no other person would be prosecuted) simply because he happens to be a high profile or politically useful target should disgust the shit out of you. Some lady got 5 years in TX a year ago for accidentally voting without having properly registered as a felon. She was, wait for it... Black. And she was prosecuted for one reason and one reason only: To scare other minority voters. It seems right to punish Trump post-office. And he probably deserves a lot of punishment for many things. But of the many things that characterize banana republics, having courts that are used as political tools is top five. And when that becomes even more commonplace, it won't be used on Trumps as much as it will be on people like that lady in TX. |
Re: Downward Departures for Gout
Quote:
But srsly, he's fucked. |
Re: Downward Departures for Gout
Quote:
You're not going to be able to divorce his other crimes from what he did to get into office. It will all be interrelated. And once we discover more evidence of him selling US policy for personal gain (gaining office or financial) or for assurances that info won't get out in order to protect himself, how the fuck do we walk away from that? I understand not wanting to drag this country through what may appear to those of us who are completely ignorant and stupid to be political trials, but I think, once uncovered, the extent of the fuckery this man is engaged in will be overwhelming. Quote:
If the level of criminality I think this asshole is engaged in is made public, it would be a crime not to go after him. Quote:
TM |
Re: Downward Departures for Gout
Quote:
Quote:
TM |
Re: Downward Departures for Gout
Quote:
|
Re: Downward Departures for Gout
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Downward Departures for Gout
Quote:
Also, you are missing the issue with 2. The Emoluments Clause is about whether Trump should be allowed to accept facially legit payments for things like hotel use. Even if that's OK, do you doubt that there are people in the government who are using their position to encourage third parties to make those payments? It's not clear to me if 3. is legal, either. It depend on how it happened. The law imposes a bunch of process requirements. Not clear that they were met. Also, clearly there was something in Jared's dealings that made national security officials uncomfortable with him being in the loop. What do you think it was? High possibility for corruption there. |
Re: Downward Departures for Gout
Quote:
|
Re: Downward Departures for Gout
Quote:
|
Re: Downward Departures for Gout
Quote:
|
Re: Downward Departures for Gout
F
Quote:
I know numerous people who got caught doing what Martha Stewart did with much larger dollars. Penalties, warnings, fines, and disgorgement was all they received. I’ve known and known of several individuals with six and even seven figure tax evasions who negotiated repayments in lieu of prosecution. Common theme? None were famous. None political. How many people cut deals in the Swiss bank scandal a few years back? How about the Panama Papers? D’Souza was a high profile scalp. That’d almost never happen to a nobody. Prosecutorial discretion is one of the last few utterly unchecked powers. And it’s one of those most in need of aggressive oversight. For further reading, do a news search on Jeffrey Epstein. |
Re: Downward Departures for Gout
Quote:
On 3, if Trump broke a rule, then it was illegal. But from what I’ve read, he did not. What we know now is high ranking intel recommended against givin Kushner clearance and Trump overruled them, which is legal. And if high ranking intel looked into Kushner, it sounds to me like necessary vetting was performed. |
Re: Downward Departures for Gout
Quote:
|
Re: Downward Departures for Gout
Quote:
Quote:
TM |
Re: Downward Departures for Gout
Quote:
None of what you are saying is a reason to decline to bring a case against Trump. |
Re: Downward Departures for Gout
Quote:
Kraft is a pathetic old fool. Trump is a clown who can’t control access to the rooms in which he’s sitting at his own hotel. |
Re: Downward Departures for Gout
Quote:
On 2, agreed with a caveat. Adder makes an important point. I’d add that we should not charge political opponents just because we can. It should only cover extreme circumstances. Trump’s payoff for Stormy doesn’t warrant prosecution. If he made decisions because Putin told him to, that qualifies. |
Re: Downward Departures for Gout
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Downward Departures for Gout
Quote:
|
Re: Downward Departures for Gout
Quote:
|
Re: Downward Departures for Gout
Quote:
Law enforcement has the difficult job of figuring out which is which, but there will be both dead ends and surprises when someone really gets to figuring out the whole Trump crime empire. It's possible that sometimes Trump is just playing golf with those mob bosses, sex traffickers, mercenaries, and grifters he hangs out with. |
Re: Downward Departures for Gout
Quote:
|
Re: Downward Departures for Gout
Quote:
D'Souza was caught red handed and lied about it, which dug his hole deeper and gave the prosecution good reason not to give him a pass. That said, he didn't get prison time and he got a fairly modest fine. I know at least one person who lost their house over a similar crime (this person used their employees as straws as well as a couple dummy names to make contributions in support of Paul Tsongas when he ran for President - the Tsongas campaign was horrified and cooperated, and he felt they should have instead been thanking him). If you work on a political campaign and someone wants to see the candidate to give him a handful of contributions and then has a dozen money orders for $1000 each, it's time to call the feds. |
Re: Downward Departures for Gout
Quote:
TM |
Re: Downward Departures for Gout
Quote:
TM |
Re: Downward Departures for Gout
Quote:
|
Re: Downward Departures for Gout
Quote:
|
Re: Downward Departures for Gout
Quote:
But even assuming he likes to hang with goodfellas, a hand job magnate? WTF? Then again, the couple people I know who are members at Mar a Lago are seriously cheesy and weird, so perhaps it's not unexpected. Michael Wolfe should have done a book on that club rather than the White House. The shit that goes in in there must be amazing. |
Re: Downward Departures for Gout
Quote:
|
Re: Downward Departures for Gout
Quote:
I'm not sure that's a high crime or misdemeanor, but I also can't be certain it isn't. Seems on the line. |
Re: Downward Departures for Gout
Quote:
That dude could hold a motherlode of dirt on serious scumbaggery by some seriously powerful men. |
Re: Downward Departures for Gout
Quote:
But in the spirit of Point/Counterpoint, Trump does seem to prefer playmates and porn stars. Karen McDougal isn't trading hand jobs at the local rub n tug. Nor is Stormy (for at least another five years). So maybe not? |
Re: Downward Departures for Gout
Quote:
TM |
Re: Downward Departures for Gout
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:46 PM. |
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com