| 
		
			| mmm3587 | 09-28-2004 05:43 PM |  
 Sex and Dating Question for the Group
 
	Quote: 
	
		| Originally posted by Gattigap
 I'm not terribly concerned about the number of previous lovers, but I must admit I've never heard of a minimum before.
 
 What happens to those who don't make the cut?  "Sorry, babe, but you've only had 10 previous lovers.  Come back later."
 
 I imagine that this strategy would also limit the fuckability pool, at least a little.  Given the likely demographics, I don't know how Less, for example, could adhere to this standard.
 
 |  It's not a hard limit, but say that you, a virulent lad, were in the market for a lover.  And you wanted to be with someone who had the skills and vigor requisite to satisfying and enjoying her experiences with a strapping, intelligent, successful law like yourself.  And you were enamored with a young lass, but you found out she had only had one lover.  That wouldn't make you wonder whether she would be a good lover?
 
Maybe it's more retrospective.  Looking back on the women I have slept over my years of sexual activity, the ones with more experience and more lovers have been far more interesting and satisfying to me sexually, much more likely to orgasm from different kinds of sex, including oral sex, and generally just better lovers.  The ones with few former lovers have been at the other end of the scale.  Good sex is important to me, and I've observed this correlation.  Maybe it's not a rule, but if the number of lovers a potential lover has had comes up before the initial sexual encounter, my spidey sense suspects lesser ability if she's only been with six dudes. |