![]() |
Re: Sheeeeeeyit
Quote:
|
Re: Sheeeeeeyit
Quote:
Kennedy had every opportunity for a lot of years to do that. There are many political candidates who would have welcomed her involvement and participation. She just showed no interest until she wanted one of the top jobs. There's a reason for cutting your teeth somewhere - in Caroline's case, for example, a run for Congress would have undoubtedly ironed out some of those little speaking quirks that got picked out and left her better prepared. |
Re: Sheeeeeeyit
Quote:
Word is there was plenty of back stabbing and power brokering that went on to avoid havijng to work on his files. |
Re: Sheeeeeeyit
Quote:
But if you want other examples, a bit of internet research reminds me that other two other Minnesota multi-term Senators were also neophytes: Dave Durenberger and Rudy Boschwitz (who Wellstone beat in a surprise upset). Granted Durenberger ended up with some ethical issues in the Senate, but still. ETA: The point being that I don't think it is that uncommon for Senator to be someone first political office. |
Re: Sheeeeeeyit
Quote:
She might have been a wonderful Senator - and all credentials are is a way to say there's good reason to make that bet. But I'd rather bet on Gillibrand for the job myself - even though I probably agree with Kennedy (from what I can ascertain) on more issues. If I saw Caroline Kennedy out there running a good election, the way I believe Wellstone did, it would increase my comfort level. It certainly increased my comfort level with Deval Patrick, for example, though he still stumbled (now looks to be recovering). |
Re: Sheeeeeeyit
Quote:
I really don't care one way or the other about Caroline. As mommylawyer has pointed out, I think there is ample room to have defended the pick if it was needed. But for most part, the criticisms of her are her are noise that is meant to cover for either an instinctive dislike of Kennedies, or aversion to perceived dynasties. |
Re: Sheeeeeeyit
Quote:
|
Re: Sheeeeeeyit
Quote:
|
Re: Sheeeeeeyit
Quote:
|
Re: Sheeeeeeyit
Quote:
|
Re: Sheeeeeeyit
Quote:
|
Re: We will never agree on this and therefore it is pointless to talk about!
Kennedy Removes Self From Senate Consideration
One day before New York governor David Patterson made his selection, Caroline Kennedy, the daughter of President John F. Kennedy, has withdrawn her bid to replace Hillary Clinton in the Senate. What do you think? http://www.theonion.com/content/file...o5.article.jpg Scott Gallivan, Systems Analyst "It's about time the Kennedy family's string of good luck ended." http://www.theonion.com/content/file...o4.article.jpg Erin Phirman, Warehoue Supervisor "I guess at this point she just goes back to being a Level Two Kennedy." http://www.theonion.com/content/file...o3.article.jpg Cody Lofgren, Electronics Tester "That's all right, she's already done so much to help this country by having John F. Kennedy as a father." http://www.theonion.com/content/amvo...lf_from_senate |
Re: Sheeeeeeyit
Quote:
lol |
Re: Sheeeeeeyit
Quote:
|
Re: Sheeeeeeyit
Quote:
|
Re: Sheeeeeeyit
Quote:
|
Re: Sheeeeeeyit
Quote:
As for the D comment, aren't you tired of that partisan shite yet? I supported, in particular order Gillibrand, Cuomo, Maloney, and Lowey for the appointment. Aren't they all Ds? |
Re: Sheeeeeeyit
Quote:
|
Re: Sheeeeeeyit
Quote:
|
Re: Sheeeeeeyit
Quote:
|
Re: Sheeeeeeyit
Quote:
|
Re: Sheeeeeeyit
Quote:
|
Re: Sheeeeeeyit
Quote:
|
Re: Sheeeeeeyit
Quote:
|
Re: Sheeeeeeyit
Quote:
|
Re: Sheeeeeeyit
Quote:
|
Re: Sheeeeeeyit
Quote:
|
Re: Sheeeeeeyit
Quote:
|
The Geithner Defense
Already being hauled out:
KERIK EYES 'GEITHNER' TAX BREAK "In new court papers, the former police commissioner complains that the feds want to send him to prison for the same sort of problems that officials overlooked in Geithner, whom the Senate confirmed yesterday as treasury secretary." http://www.nypost.com/seven/01272009...eak_152201.htm |
Re: Sheeeeeeyit
Quote:
|
Re: Sheeeeeeyit
Quote:
Interesting thing to note, after your assumptions, I actually have a soft spot for the Camelot mystique and grew up with a fond idealisation of John and Bobby. My first campaign work was for Dodd, who, while not a Kennedy, fashioned a Kennedyesque head of hair for himself, and also, based on some first hand observation was able to stay drink for drink with Teddy. That said, I assume the living Kennedys, while all or mostly Ds (is Schwvarzanegger an honourary K?), have some diversity in to their positions, so I can't say I have a dislike of all of their politics, although I dislike a lot of Teds (however, keep in mind, his presidential campaign was my second endeavour in working on a campaign). Personally, to the extent that I have met any kennedys, and I have, they seemed like decent folk, so no instinctive dislike there either. I do, however, have an aversion to political dynasties and acheivement by legacy and/or nepotism, although that's probably my bias of having grown up at the bottom of the ladder and not having had a name or family wealth to leverage. If I had the latter, I would probably look down my nose on all of you proles. |
Re: Sheeeeeeyit
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Sheeeeeeyit
Quote:
|
Re: Sheeeeeeyit
Quote:
TM |
Re: Sheeeeeeyit
Quote:
|
Re: Sheeeeeeyit
Quote:
Lindy Boggs (D-La) Jo Ann Emerson (R-Mo) Lois Capps (D-Ca) Doris Matsui (D-Ca) These women were, however, elected following the deaths of their incumbent spouses, which I contend is healthier than appointment, though personally I can't see myself voting for a candidate who pledged to carry out the so-called legacy of anyone. That sounds like a prescription for trouble. |
Re: Sheeeeeeyit
Quote:
|
Re: Sheeeeeeyit
Quote:
It's hard to reconcile the above with my earlier understanding of things Penske. Sure, some look at it and call it "post-partisan," but I think that superficial labels such as these only obscure the underlying reality of what's going on, and it's time we just came out and say it: until I saw it with mine own eyes from a Penske post, I had no idea about the transformative qualities of an in-office bidet. |
Re: Sheeeeeeyit
Quote:
I'm pretty ambivalent when it comes to Caroline being a Senator (although I really like what she's done for education in New York). But at some point it comes down to the following question: What can you get done for the constituents of the state of New York? And she probably surpasses most incoming Senators in terms of contacts and influence. TM |
Re: The Geithner Defense
Quote:
ETA: I better tell some clients that this is how it works now. They will be very happy. Hopefully the message reaches the right federal judges. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:26 PM. |
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com