LawTalkers

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Fashionable (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=14)
-   -   This is the thread where the fringster comes back with teeth (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=840)

Fugee 06-29-2009 10:31 AM

"But the kid is not my son" indeed
 
The stream of "tell alls" is starting. I don't think anyone is surprised to hear that Michael Jackson's first 2 children were not conceived naturally, but I don't understand why he wouldn't have used his own sperm. It sounds like she's not going to press for custody of them.

http://www.theage.com.au/lifestyle/p...0629-d1r9.html

Hank Chinaski 06-29-2009 10:40 AM

Re: Education fail
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by LessinSF (Post 393831)
I felt the wind from this whiff all the way over here.

LessinKotaKinabalu, Borneo, Malaysia

I whiffed, or sidd?

greatwhitenorthchick 06-29-2009 10:57 AM

Re: Education fail
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sidd Finch (Post 393807)
Then how did Athletics make spot ## 4?

I think you mean "Atheletics."

Shape Shifter 06-29-2009 12:04 PM

Re: This is the thread where the fringster comes back with teeth
 
So I listened to one of those "all Michael, all the time" stations for a while over the weekend and came away even more convinced of my thesis, namely that TM is an idiot.

Obviously MJ is incredibly talented. AI has shown that yes, it does take some amount of talent to make pointless pop songs. With the Jackson 5 stuff, yes MJ was a huge star, but he was not the pop phenomenon that he later came. He was great then but arguably constrained by the Motown system, much like Stevie Wonder and Marvin Gaye were for a time.

It was Quincy Jones who created Michael's signature sound and who was able to harness Michael's eccentricities into coherent, disciplined form. Listening to Michael's post-Quincy stuff (all of which is produced well, naturally, as he could afford the best), it just sounded like generic pop music. Sure, it sold well (though some of it lost money), but it wasn't iconic, and none of it is memorable.

Think Jackson is a genius in the studio? Listen to "State of Shock," a duet with Mick Jagger which he arranged and produced for the Jacksons's Victory album in 1984, the peak of his success. It's crap. Crap crap crap crap crap. Do you remember it? Didn't think so, even though it's a duet with Michael Fucking Jackson and Mick Fucking Jagger.

Shape Shifter 06-29-2009 12:11 PM

Re: This is the thread where the fringster comes back with teeth
 
P.S. I was on 125th St. yesterday and decided to check out the scene at The Apollo. I'm not sure I've ever seen so much genuinely licensed Michael Jackson merchandise in my life.

sebastian_dangerfield 06-29-2009 12:14 PM

Re: This is the thread where the fringster comes back with teeth
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Shape Shifter (Post 393850)
Think Jackson is a genius in the studio? Listen to "State of Shock," a duet with Mick Jagger which he arranged and produced for the Jacksons's Victory album in 1984, the peak of his success. It's crap. Crap crap crap crap crap. Do you remember it? Didn't think so, even though it's a duet with Michael Fucking Jackson and Mick Fucking Jagger.

I remember it and I liked it. And as far as Jagger duets go, it's decent. It's not half as good as Jagger's cover of "Use Me" with Lenny Kravitz or my personal favorite, his backing vocals on Carly Simon's "You're So Vain," but it's a hundred times better than Mick's version of "Dancing in the Streets" with Bowie.*

*"Salt of the Earth" off Beggar's Banquet is excluded from this analysis as that was Jagger and Richards in the same band. Hence, not a true duet for purposes of the discussion.

sebastian_dangerfield 06-29-2009 12:16 PM

Re: Good Night, Michael
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jack Manfred (Post 393806)
Having said all that, Qunicy Jones also deserves credit for another one of his productions:

http://chrisonrails.files.wordpress....hida_jones.jpg

She's cute, but she's no Thriller. Not even Off the Wall. But yes, she's better than Bad.

Shape Shifter 06-29-2009 12:33 PM

Re: This is the thread where the fringster comes back with teeth
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 393852)
I remember it and I liked it. And as far as Jagger duets go, it's decent. It's not half as good as Jagger's cover of "Use Me" with Lenny Kravitz or my personal favorite, his backing vocals on Carly Simon's "You're So Vain," but it's a hundred times better than Mick's version of "Dancing in the Streets" with Bowie.*


You're dead to me.

Fugee 06-29-2009 12:53 PM

Re: This is the thread where the fringster comes back with teeth
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Shape Shifter (Post 393850)
So I listened to one of those "all Michael, all the time" stations for a while over the weekend and came away even more convinced of my thesis, namely that TM is an idiot.

Obviously MJ is incredibly talented. AI has shown that yes, it does take some amount of talent to make pointless pop songs. With the Jackson 5 stuff, yes MJ was a huge star, but he was not the pop phenomenon that he later came. He was great then but arguably constrained by the Motown system, much like Stevie Wonder and Marvin Gaye were for a time.

It was Quincy Jones who created Michael's signature sound and who was able to harness Michael's eccentricities into coherent, disciplined form. Listening to Michael's post-Quincy stuff (all of which is produced well, naturally, as he could afford the best), it just sounded like generic pop music. Sure, it sold well (though some of it lost money), but it wasn't iconic, and none of it is memorable.

Think Jackson is a genius in the studio? Listen to "State of Shock," a duet with Mick Jagger which he arranged and produced for the Jacksons's Victory album in 1984, the peak of his success. It's crap. Crap crap crap crap crap. Do you remember it? Didn't think so, even though it's a duet with Michael Fucking Jackson and Mick Fucking Jagger.

I think you are undervaluing MJ's contribution to the collaboration to make your point.

My point (and I think TM's, but I won't speak for him) is that two very talented people came together at just the right time to make some great music. I don't think you can give either of them the majority of the credit. Without MJ's voice and performing talent and the writing of at least a number of the songs, you'd lose something. If Quincey had produced the same songs with a different singer, I don't think the result would have been the same. And without Quincey's production, you'd lose something for sure.

For the albums they did together, it was like 1+1=3.

Shape Shifter 06-29-2009 01:10 PM

Re: This is the thread where the fringster comes back with teeth
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Fugee (Post 393859)
I think you are undervaluing MJ's contribution to the collaboration to make your point.

My point (and I think TM's, but I won't speak for him) is that two very talented people came together at just the right time to make some great music. I don't think you can give either of them the majority of the credit. Without MJ's voice and performing talent and the writing of at least a number of the songs, you'd lose something. If Quincey had produced the same songs with a different singer, I don't think the result would have been the same. And without Quincey's production, you'd lose something for sure.

For the albums they did together, it was like 1+1=3.

So why did all his post-Quincy stuff suck?

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) 06-29-2009 01:38 PM

Re: This is the thread where the fringster comes back with teeth
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Shape Shifter (Post 393863)
So why did all his post-Quincy stuff suck?

Are you sure it wasn't just the Bubbles the Chimpanzee era that sucked?

Fugee 06-29-2009 02:26 PM

Re: This is the thread where the fringster comes back with teeth
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Shape Shifter (Post 393863)
So why did all his post-Quincy stuff suck?

His life & health were spiraling downward. Even with Quincey it probably wouldn't have been much better.

You can't just look at one factor (Quincey or no Quincey) and decide that is the whole deal. And Quincey certainly hasn't had anything like the success of the albums he produced with Michael so I stick with my point that it was the combination of the two of them at just the right time in both their lives.

Shape Shifter 06-29-2009 02:33 PM

Re: This is the thread where the fringster comes back with teeth
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Fugee (Post 393873)
His life & health were spiraling downward. Even with Quincey it probably wouldn't have been much better.

You can't just look at one factor (Quincey or no Quincey) and decide that is the whole deal. And Quincey certainly hasn't had anything like the success of the albums he produced with Michael so I stick with my point that it was the combination of the two of them at just the right time in both their lives.


Well, he arranged for Frank Sinatra, Lionel Hampton, and Dizzy Gillespie before Michael, so it's not like Quincy needed Michael for his legacy.

Gattigap 06-29-2009 02:43 PM

Re: This is the thread where the fringster comes back with teeth
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) (Post 393869)
Are you sure it wasn't just the Bubbles the Chimpanzee era that sucked?

Word is that Bubbles did the arrangement for the MJ/Jagger duet, so you may have something there.

ThurgreedMarshall 06-29-2009 02:50 PM

Re: This is the thread where the fringster comes back with teeth
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Shape Shifter (Post 393850)
So I listened to one of those "all Michael, all the time" stations for a while over the weekend and came away even more convinced of my thesis, namely that TM is an idiot.

Obviously MJ is incredibly talented. AI has shown that yes, it does take some amount of talent to make pointless pop songs. With the Jackson 5 stuff, yes MJ was a huge star, but he was not the pop phenomenon that he later came. He was great then but arguably constrained by the Motown system, much like Stevie Wonder and Marvin Gaye were for a time.

It was Quincy Jones who created Michael's signature sound and who was able to harness Michael's eccentricities into coherent, disciplined form. Listening to Michael's post-Quincy stuff (all of which is produced well, naturally, as he could afford the best), it just sounded like generic pop music. Sure, it sold well (though some of it lost money), but it wasn't iconic, and none of it is memorable.

Think Jackson is a genius in the studio? Listen to "State of Shock," a duet with Mick Jagger which he arranged and produced for the Jacksons's Victory album in 1984, the peak of his success. It's crap. Crap crap crap crap crap. Do you remember it? Didn't think so, even though it's a duet with Michael Fucking Jackson and Mick Fucking Jagger.

Now you're just being annoying. Your examples are as forgettable as Say Say Say and The Girl is Mine (produced by Jones). The reason why these collaborations are all forgettable is because two stars are meeting in the middle from two completely different genres, so don't get a good pop song and you don't get a good rock song.

But whatever. I'm no longer interested in having the argument since it seems pretty obvious Michael gave you some Jesus Juice and had you suck him off in front of MacCauley in the early 90s.

TM

Fugee 06-29-2009 02:53 PM

Re: This is the thread where the fringster comes back with teeth
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Shape Shifter (Post 393876)
Well, he arranged for Frank Sinatra, Lionel Hampton, and Dizzy Gillespie before Michael, so it's not like Quincy needed Michael for his legacy.

You seem to think I am dismissing Quincey. I never said he needed Michael for his legacy. My point is that the two of them together achieved something together that was better than either one could have done apart. Is that so hard to agree with?

Shape Shifter 06-29-2009 02:57 PM

Re: This is the thread where the fringster comes back with teeth
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ThurgreedMarshall (Post 393882)
Now you're just being annoying. Your examples are as forgettable as Say Say Say and The Girl is Mine (produced by Jones). The reason why these collaborations are all forgettable is because two stars are meeting in the middle from two completely different genres, so don't get a good pop song and you don't get a good rock song.

Relistened to those songs over the weekend. The songs suck, but they're very well produced.

Quote:

But whatever. I'm no longer interested in having the argument since it seems pretty obvious Michael gave you some Jesus Juice and had you suck him off in front of MacCauley in the early 90s.

TM
OUTABLE!!!

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 06-29-2009 02:57 PM

Re: This is the thread where the fringster comes back with teeth
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Fugee (Post 393873)
His life & health were spiraling downward. Even with Quincey it probably wouldn't have been much better.

You can't just look at one factor (Quincey or no Quincey) and decide that is the whole deal. And Quincey certainly hasn't had anything like the success of the albums he produced with Michael so I stick with my point that it was the combination of the two of them at just the right time in both their lives.

Does anyone actually like the stuff on Bad?

I mean Thriller was an amusingly self-glorifying paeon to pop stuperstardom with a sort of cool and catchy beat, but with Bowie's "Scary Monsters" still in everyone's mind, the thing was more about parody than groundbreaking music. And, I mean, if you take a time capsule back to 1982, would you be listening to "Thriller" or "The Message"?

So Thriller was already about an aging pop idol losing it, it just made money with that general theme, and you wonder why he went downhill?

He started the slide long before Quincy Jones, when he stopped feeling the blues and started counting the change, circa age 13 or 14. But he had enough talent to release some glitzy self-aggrandizing self-parody that sold a lot of records and riveted a lot of people to MTV.

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) 06-29-2009 03:04 PM

Re: This is the thread where the fringster comes back with teeth
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Shape Shifter (Post 393886)
OUTABLE!!!

NFW.

You're in a cast of thousands, anonymity preserved.

Fugee 06-29-2009 03:04 PM

Re: This is the thread where the fringster comes back with teeth
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy (Post 393887)
Does anyone actually like the stuff on Bad?

I mean Thriller was an amusingly self-glorifying paeon to pop stuperstardom with a sort of cool and catchy beat, but with Bowie's "Scary Monsters" still in everyone's mind, the thing was more about parody than groundbreaking music. And, I mean, if you take a time capsule back to 1982, would you be listening to "Thriller" or "The Message"?

So Thriller was already about an aging pop idol losing it, it just made money with that general theme, and you wonder why he went downhill?

He started the slide long before Quincy Jones, when he stopped feeling the blues and started counting the change, circa age 13 or 14. But he had enough talent to release some glitzy self-aggrandizing self-parody that sold a lot of records and riveted a lot of people to MTV.

You're just trying to be provoking, aren't you? Tsk tsk

greatwhitenorthchick 06-29-2009 03:05 PM

Re: This is the thread where the fringster comes back with teeth
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy (Post 393887)
Does anyone actually like the stuff on Bad?

I mean Thriller was an amusingly self-glorifying paeon to pop stuperstardom with a sort of cool and catchy beat, but with Bowie's "Scary Monsters" still in everyone's mind, the thing was more about parody than groundbreaking music. And, I mean, if you take a time capsule back to 1982, would you be listening to "Thriller" or "The Message"?

So Thriller was already about an aging pop idol losing it, it just made money with that general theme, and you wonder why he went downhill?

He started the slide long before Quincy Jones, when he stopped feeling the blues and started counting the change, circa age 13 or 14. But he had enough talent to release some glitzy self-aggrandizing self-parody that sold a lot of records and riveted a lot of people to MTV.

All this Quincy talk makes my mind wander to:

http://redriverautographs.files.word...pg?w=315&h=390

Pretty Little Flower 06-29-2009 03:25 PM

Re: This is the thread where the fringster comes back with teeth
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy (Post 393887)
Does anyone actually like the stuff on Bad?

I mean Thriller was an amusingly self-glorifying paeon to pop stuperstardom with a sort of cool and catchy beat, but with Bowie's "Scary Monsters" still in everyone's mind, the thing was more about parody than groundbreaking music. And, I mean, if you take a time capsule back to 1982, would you be listening to "Thriller" or "The Message"?

So Thriller was already about an aging pop idol losing it, it just made money with that general theme, and you wonder why he went downhill?

He started the slide long before Quincy Jones, when he stopped feeling the blues and started counting the change, circa age 13 or 14. But he had enough talent to release some glitzy self-aggrandizing self-parody that sold a lot of records and riveted a lot of people to MTV.

I like some of the Jackson 5 stuff but don't have much of an opinion on the laters stuff. And anyone who disagrees with me only does so because of past humiliating experiences involving fellatio with Michael Jackson and/or the mother(s) of one or more posters here.

Fugee 06-29-2009 03:26 PM

Re: This is the thread where the fringster comes back with teeth
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by greatwhitenorthchick (Post 393892)
All this Quincy talk makes my mind wander to:

http://redriverautographs.files.word...pg?w=315&h=390

I didn't remember that Quincy M.D. had green hair (or is it just my monitor?).

greatwhitenorthchick 06-29-2009 03:31 PM

Re: This is the thread where the fringster comes back with teeth
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Fugee (Post 393902)
I didn't remember that Quincy M.D. had green hair (or is it just my monitor?).

Fugee, I think you are forgetting "Quincy, M.E.: The Punk Years."

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 06-29-2009 03:36 PM

Re: This is the thread where the fringster comes back with teeth
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by greatwhitenorthchick (Post 393905)
Fugee, I think you are forgetting "Quincy, M.E.: The Punk Years."

Quincy had some real talent, but I credit the best of those years to his hairdresser.

Replaced_Texan 06-29-2009 03:47 PM

Re: This is the thread where the fringster comes back with teeth
 
My boyfriend is DJing the wedding we're going to in NYC next weekend, and he started looking for Michael Jackson mashups to add to his sets. It seems like every dj in the world was busy taking apart Quincy Jones' masterpiece and putting it back together again. Some of them were pretty good (I really liked Franz Ferdinand vs. Beat It), and some of them were pretty crappy.

Mashuptown put together a whole two CD set of some of them, and the comment sections have more: http://www.mashuptown.com/2009/06/wi...-his.html#more

ThurgreedMarshall 06-29-2009 03:49 PM

Re: This is the thread where the fringster comes back with teeth
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy (Post 393887)
Does anyone actually like the stuff on Bad?

Yes. Absolutely. Everyone hated Bad because (i) it came out after Thriller, which couldn't be topped and (ii) he thought that stupid fucking video was a good idea after Thriller. But Remember the Time, The Way You Make Me Feel (Latoya's appearance in the video notwithstanding), Man in the Mirror and Smooth Criminal are all good songs. The Way You Make Me Feel is one of my favorites.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy (Post 393887)
I mean Thriller was an amusingly self-glorifying paeon to pop stuperstardom with a sort of cool and catchy beat, but with Bowie's "Scary Monsters" still in everyone's mind, the thing was more about parody than groundbreaking music. And, I mean, if you take a time capsule back to 1982, would you be listening to "Thriller" or "The Message"?

I think you're misrembering 1982. As someone who was listening to both, not many people even knew about The Message back then.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy (Post 393887)
So Thriller was already about an aging pop idol losing it, it just made money with that general theme...

?

TM

Hank Chinaski 06-29-2009 03:58 PM

Re: This is the thread where the fringster comes back with teeth
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by greatwhitenorthchick (Post 393892)
All this Quincy talk makes my mind wander to:

http://redriverautographs.files.word...pg?w=315&h=390

when i think about alternative careers and think about acting, I don't fantasize about being Tom Cruise, I see Jack Klugman as my "reach" dream. He had a journeyman's career, but still pretty enviable:

Took over Oscar from Walter M. and had several good years there- and of course Quincy- both of those making him wealthy but he also has the honor of being in 12 Angry Men and Days of Wine and Roses, plus banging Brett Somers is pretty cool.

Shape Shifter 06-29-2009 04:03 PM

Re: This is the thread where the fringster comes back with teeth
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 393912)
when i think about alternative careers and think about acting, I don't fantasize about being Tom Cruise, I see Jack Klugman as my "reach" dream. He had a journeyman's career, but still pretty enviable:

Took over Oscar from Walter M. and had several good years there- and of course Quincy- both of those making him wealthy but he also has the honor of being in 12 Angry Men and Days of Wine and Roses, plus banging Brett Somers is pretty cool.


And he testified before Congress about medical issues. Has Tom Cruise ever testified about fighter jets, prostitutes, or bizarre orgies?

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 06-29-2009 04:51 PM

Nobody home
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ThurgreedMarshall (Post 393911)
Yes. Absolutely. Everyone hated Bad because (i) it came out after Thriller, which couldn't be topped and (ii) he thought that stupid fucking video was a good idea after Thriller. But Remember the Time, The Way You Make Me Feel (Latoya's appearance in the video notwithstanding), Man in the Mirror and Smooth Criminal are all good songs. The Way You Make Me Feel is one of my favorites.

I think you're misrembering 1982. As someone who was listening to both, not many people even knew about The Message back then.

?

TM

Excuse me, but I think I'm going to dance with PLF.

Fugee 06-29-2009 05:03 PM

Re: This is the thread where the fringster comes back with teeth
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Replaced_Texan (Post 393910)
My boyfriend is DJing the wedding we're going to in NYC next weekend, and he started looking for Michael Jackson mashups to add to his sets. It seems like every dj in the world was busy taking apart Quincy Jones' masterpiece and putting it back together again. Some of them were pretty good (I really liked Franz Ferdinand vs. Beat It), and some of them were pretty crappy.

Mashuptown put together a whole two CD set of some of them, and the comment sections have more: http://www.mashuptown.com/2009/06/wi...-his.html#more

Not a mashup but Weird Al's "Eat It" has always cracked me up. In the mashup realm, I like Nirvana v. MJ "Smells Like Teen Billie Jean.".

ThurgreedMarshall 06-29-2009 05:43 PM

Re: Nobody home
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy (Post 393925)
Excuse me, but I think I'm going to dance with PLF.

I'm going to think about why I thought responding to you was a good idea.

TM

Fugee 06-29-2009 05:57 PM

Re: Nobody home
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy (Post 393925)
Excuse me, but I think I'm going to dance with PLF.

Which one of you does it backwards and in heels?

Shape Shifter 06-29-2009 06:05 PM

Re: Nobody home
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Fugee (Post 393928)
Which one of you does it backwards and in heels?

Does what?

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 06-29-2009 06:16 PM

Re: Nobody home
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Fugee (Post 393928)
Which one of you does it backwards and in heels?

I'm OK with backwards but he gets the heels.

Fugee 06-29-2009 06:33 PM

Re: Nobody home
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Shape Shifter (Post 393929)
Does what?

He said he's dancing with PLF. I just wanted to know which one was Ginger Rogers.

sebastian_dangerfield 06-29-2009 07:07 PM

Re: This is the thread where the fringster comes back with teeth
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Shape Shifter (Post 393856)
You're dead to me.

You're here trying to argue Michael Jackson wasn't primarily responsible for his success? Have you lost your mind?

Was he the most important R&B artist (something I heard some clown from Rolling Stone say yesterday)? Fuck no - not by miles. Most influential? Hell no, but only because he was unique enough to pretty much be copy-proof. Second biggest artist behind the Beatles? Possibly, but if that's the case, he's so far behind it's a silly comparison. So yeah, we can criticize some of the excessive praise lumped on the guy, but come on... Who in the last 30 years has been more iconic? Madonna works her ass off at it and still can't compete. Pink Floyd, Zeppelin, the Eagles, AC/DC, Fleetwood Mac... lots of groups have sold as many if not more records than Jackson, but do any of them immediately come to mind so vividly? Few artists reach as many people as Jackson did, and have staying power through a pair of fucking pedophilia scandals. The guy was a monster, and I don't care how good Quincy was at the boards - that comes from the artist's charisma and talent, not his alleged Svengali.

Shape Shifter 06-29-2009 07:28 PM

Re: This is the thread where the fringster comes back with teeth
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 393936)
You're here trying to argue Michael Jackson wasn't primarily responsible for his success? Have you lost your mind?

Was he the most important R&B artist (something I heard some clown from Rolling Stone say yesterday)? Fuck no - not by miles. Most influential? Hell no, but only because he was unique enough to pretty much be copy-proof. Second biggest artist behind the Beatles? Possibly, but if that's the case, he's so far behind it's a silly comparison. So yeah, we can criticize some of the excessive praise lumped on the guy, but come on... Who in the last 30 years has been more iconic? Madonna works her ass off at it and still can't compete. Pink Floyd, Zeppelin, the Eagles, AC/DC, Fleetwood Mac... lots of groups have sold as many if not more records than Jackson, but do any of them immediately come to mind so vividly? Few artists reach as many people as Jackson did, and have staying power through a pair of fucking pedophilia scandals. The guy was a monster, and I don't care how good Quincy was at the boards - that comes from the artist's charisma and talent, not his alleged Svengali.


Blah, blah, blah, blah. I was commenting on your admiration of State of Shock. Really now.

Quote:

Gotta be mine
'Cos you're so fine
I like your style
It makes me wild
You take it to me good
Just like you know you should
Get me on my knees
Please, baby, please

Pretty Little Flower 06-29-2009 09:19 PM

Re: This is the thread where the fringster comes back with teeth
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Shape Shifter (Post 393938)
Blah, blah, blah, blah. I was commenting on your admiration of State of Shock. Really now.

Your opinion on this matter demonstrates that you have engaged in simultaneous fellatio of the mothers of Sebastian and Thurgreed, who at the time were both engaged in fellating Michael Jackson, while he was fellating Quincy Jones. I'm sorry this experience has caused you to be so misguided.

Ty, I don't want a venn diagram here.

Hank Chinaski 06-29-2009 09:31 PM

Re: This is the thread where the fringster comes back with teeth
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pretty Little Flower (Post 393955)
Your opinion on this matter demonstrates that you have engaged in simultaneous fellatio of the mothers of Sebastian and Thurgreed, who at the time were both engaged in fellating Michael Jackson, while he was fellating Quincy Jones. I'm sorry this experience has caused you to be so misguided.

Ty, I don't want a venn diagram here.

you're becoming the kind of sock coltrane will friend request on facebook. most of us he won't, so you got that.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:37 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com