Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop (Post 471188)

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 471201)

Pizza HQ jobs or in the store jobs? cuz I don't think most in store zas jobs come with benefits.

Originally Posted by Not Bob (Post 471207)

I think the point of the article was that Governor Romney would rather leave the public with the impression that he played fast and loose with residency requirements than reveal details of his financial dealings. Which, given the standards of transparency governing national politics in the last 20 plus years (standards that, Alanicly, were established by Governor Romney pere), is weird. And which makes one wonder what the heck he's hiding.

And I as a voter care what a candidate's tax return says -- does she have any charitable deductions? Did he check the $3 "yes" box re public financing? And, re the presumptive GOP nominee, does he shelter money offshore?

PS: So, you weren't among the Republicans making noise about John Kerry's wife's tax returns in 2004?

A

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 471213)

No offense but I'm the only one on this board thinking about who he'll vote for and it is a non-issue.

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 471213)

No offense but I'm the only one on this board thinking about who he'll vote for and it is a non-issue.

Originally Posted by Not Bob (Post 471216)

Not Offended. But it probably is not a non-issue to blue collar undecideds or soft supporters of either Barry Sotero or the Mittster in, say, a swing state like Ohio.

Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop (Post 471217)

In a narrow sense, I agree. But every day that the media keeps discussing what Mitt has or has not disclosed and whether he has paid his taxes, etc., is a good day for the Obama campaign.

Originally Posted by Adder (Post 471215)

Not true. I'm casually thinking about whether to vote for the Green Party or Libertarian candidate or other bozo in protest of Obama's police state tendencies. Whether such a protest is an option will depend on the polling in Minnesota as we get closer to November (if likely will be).

But yeah, I'm certainly not giving much consideration to voting for plastic-say-and-do-what-ever-is-necessary-to-win-so-I-can-cut-my-own-taxes. It would be funny that you have to think about it if it wasn't so sad.

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 471218)

starting 10/1 you will see 10 commercials a day about how obama 1) took working people money in the form of a tax and gave health care to people who don't work and 2) that obama killed welfare reform.

Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop (Post 471204)

I don't know enough about the facts or the law to have a view about the legality of what he did.

Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop (Post 471222)

If Mitt is running ads where I live, he definitely has too much money and should be forced to give some of it to me. In any event, I'm not sure I watch enough TV to see ten commercials a day of any sort.

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 471224)

Slave believes that obama may pay for mitt's ads to air in your cadre to stir up your anger and get you to open your checkbooks. extreme libs are the simplest people to manipulate, alas. once you see the problem, call me and I'll help you work to address your flaws.

Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop (Post 471226)

Slave lives amongst extreme libs. I don't.

Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop (Post 471229)

Sounds like Romney wasn't paying income taxes?