LawTalkers

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   Politics (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   Pepper sprayed for public safety. (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=863)

Adder 08-09-2012 03:11 PM

Re: Should 5% appear too small.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop (Post 471373)

Why do you think the Koch's will be against Romney's corporate welfare budgets?

Tyrone Slothrop 08-09-2012 04:32 PM

Re: Should 5% appear too small.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Adder (Post 471374)
Why do you think the Koch's will be against Romney's corporate welfare budgets?

I think the internal logic of the GOP keeps pushing itself farther to the right, and thinking that the DC establishment will win out over the tea parties is wishful thinking.

Adder 08-09-2012 05:00 PM

Re: Should 5% appear too small.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop (Post 471376)
I think the internal logic of the GOP keeps pushing itself farther to the right, and thinking that the DC establishment will win out over the tea parties is wishful thinking.

I agree with the first half of your sentence, but not the second half. Once they are hypothetically back in power (which won't happen this election cycle), I think the money wins out.

sebastian_dangerfield 08-10-2012 09:08 AM

Re: Should 5% appear too small.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy (Post 471364)
Become bankers and i-bankers and whine about regulation after the government saves your ass.

Right, of course. But seriously, is there anything to lose electing Romney? If nothing else, should his mere ascension fail to invigorate broad business investment, the GOP will forever lose the talking point, "The job creators on strike, waiting for a Republican!"

sebastian_dangerfield 08-10-2012 09:39 AM

Re: Should 5% appear too small.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Adder (Post 471374)
Why do you think the Koch's will be against Romney's corporate welfare budgets?

I went looking for a piece listing the tens of billions in revenue the Kochs brought in via crony contracts with the government. There's some sweetheart deal revenue, some lobbying, and some exploitation of subsidies, but none of it's significant: http://thinkprogress.org/economy/201...-koch-welfare/

The Kochs probably wouldn't dig Romney's corporate welfare all that much. But, again, the enemy of your enemy is your friend.

Adder 08-10-2012 10:37 AM

Re: Should 5% appear too small.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 471399)
I went looking for a piece listing the tens of billions in revenue the Kochs brought in via crony contracts with the government. There's some sweetheart deal revenue, some lobbying, and some exploitation of subsidies, but none of it's significant: http://thinkprogress.org/economy/201...-koch-welfare/

The Kochs probably wouldn't dig Romney's corporate welfare all that much. But, again, the enemy of your enemy is your friend.

They're in oil and gas. They would get paid under a Romney regime.

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 08-10-2012 11:29 AM

Re: Should 5% appear too small.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 471398)
Right, of course. But seriously, is there anything to lose electing Romney? If nothing else, should his mere ascension fail to invigorate broad business investment, the GOP will forever lose the talking point, "The job creators on strike, waiting for a Republican!"

Last time a Republican was elected we had two recessions, a couple of wars, massive increases in the deficit, and a never ending circus in Washington. Or do you think of those as the glory years?

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 08-10-2012 11:35 AM

Re: Should 5% appear too small.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop (Post 471376)
I think the internal logic of the GOP keeps pushing itself farther to the right, and thinking that the DC establishment will win out over the tea parties is wishful thinking.

Increasingly, the Washington DC establishment includes much of the tea party. The Rs no longer have any kind of an anchor in business oriented states; who can you identify within the Republican party as an elected official who really speaks and understands Wall Street, for example? Can you think of any elected official from the tri-state area whose actual constituents include major Wall Street money folks?

On the other hand, Schumer and Gillibrand hang with the Wall Street crowd every day.

Adder 08-10-2012 11:47 AM

Re: Should 5% appear too small.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy (Post 471407)
Increasingly, the Washington DC establishment includes much of the tea party. The Rs no longer have any kind of an anchor in business oriented states; who can you identify within the Republican party as an elected official who really speaks and understands Wall Street, for example? Can you think of any elected official from the tri-state area whose actual constituents include major Wall Street money folks?

On the other hand, Schumer and Gillibrand hang with the Wall Street crowd every day.

It's interesting that you conflate Wall Street and "business." There's a lot of business that's not Wall Street, and lots of it is in red states too.

And, of course, Wall Street is everyone's favorite source of cash, regardless.

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 08-10-2012 12:51 PM

Re: Should 5% appear too small.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Adder (Post 471409)
It's interesting that you conflate Wall Street and "business." There's a lot of business that's not Wall Street, and lots of it is in red states too.

And, of course, Wall Street is everyone's favorite source of cash, regardless.

It was once the core of the Republican business community and the base for all the Rs who were fiscally conservatvie and socially liberal. It's separation from the Republican Party is part of why that party looks like it does today.

People like Sebby think of themselves as Rs because of that muscle memory, not based on whee the party is today.

Tyrone Slothrop 08-10-2012 12:53 PM

Re: Should 5% appear too small.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 471398)
Right, of course. But seriously, is there anything to lose electing Romney? If nothing else, should his mere ascension fail to invigorate broad business investment, the GOP will forever lose the talking point, "The job creators on strike, waiting for a Republican!"

Are you on crack?

Just to take one point, why on Earth do you think business capital is sitting on the sidelines waiting for a Republican to be elected President? This is a Just So story without any of the pretense of internal logic.

Adder 08-10-2012 01:02 PM

Re: Should 5% appear too small.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 471398)
Right, of course. But seriously, is there anything to lose electing Romney? If nothing else, should his mere ascension fail to invigorate broad business investment, the GOP will forever lose the talking point, "The job creators on strike, waiting for a Republican!"

The risk is that I'm wrong and Ty's right and a Romney administration actually goes down a Paul Ryan/Tea Party path. In addition to all the just plane morally wrong stuff they want to do, there's a serious risk of plunging us into a Depression.

So, yeah, it seems to me that there is a very significant potential downside in electing Romney.

Tyrone Slothrop 08-10-2012 01:39 PM

Re: Pepper sprayed for public safety.
 

Diane Ravitch responds to Michelle Rhee
. Interesting POV on US education.

Tyrone Slothrop 08-10-2012 02:26 PM

Re: Pepper sprayed for public safety.
 

Slate's news quiz
.

I got 8/12, which was not great but still better than Yglesias.

Tyrone Slothrop 08-10-2012 02:40 PM

Re: Pepper sprayed for public safety.
 
Harry Reid's source: Jon Huntsman Sr.?


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:10 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com