LawTalkers

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   Politics (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   Is Ted Cruz Satan? Discuss. (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=875)

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 05-04-2015 01:06 PM

Re: Pam Geller was right
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sidd Finch (Post 495878)
It's Obama's fault.

That goes without saying.

Thank God for Guns, Geller and Gov. Abbott.

Tyrone Slothrop 05-04-2015 01:16 PM

Re: Is Ted Cruz Satan? Discuss.
 
"When one thinks of all the people who support or have supported Fascism, one stands amazed at their diversity. What a crew! Think of a programme which at any rate for a while could bring Hitler, Petain, Montagu Norman, Pavelitch, William Randolph Hearst, Streicher, Buchman, Ezra Pound, Juan March, Cocteau, Thyssen, Father Coughlin, the Mufti of Jerusalem, Arnold Lunn, Antonescu, Spengler, Beverley Nichols, Lady Houston, and Marinetti all into the same boat! But the clue is really very simple. They are all people with something to lose, or people who long for a hierarchical society and dread the prospect of a world of free and equal human beings. Behind all the ballyhoo that is talked about ‘godless’ Russia and the ‘materialism’ of the working class lies the simple intention of those with money or privileges to cling to them."

- George Orwell

Tyrone Slothrop 05-04-2015 02:19 PM

ugh
 
Update on Israel's use of force in Gaza.

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 05-04-2015 04:03 PM

Re: ugh
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop (Post 495887)

Great to see a Philippe Sands quote. He was a law school prof. of mine (despite only being a year older than me - damn overachiever).

As to the substance - is anyone surprised here?

And will anyone be surprised when Israel does the same to the part of East Jerusalem they are penning in, just like Gaza?

Sidd Finch 05-04-2015 04:12 PM

Re: ugh
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy (Post 495889)
Great to see a Philippe Sands quote. He was a law school prof. of mine (despite only being a year older than me - damn overachiever).

As to the substance - is anyone surprised here?

And will anyone be surprised when Israel does the same to the part of East Jerusalem they are penning in, just like Gaza?

I'm surprised -- and I would think your former prof is too. Why would he find this "troubling" if it's what he expected all along?

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 05-04-2015 04:41 PM

Re: ugh
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sidd Finch (Post 495890)
I'm surprised -- and I would think your former prof is too. Why would he find this "troubling" if it's what he expected all along?

I find it troubling but fully expected it. Indeed, I find the fact that I expected it, and expect few to care, just as troubling.

Really, you're surprised? Isn't this exactly what was being reported from Gaza by just about every correspondent there?

Here's the sentence that really highlights how unsurprising this is: "They suggest that an overarching priority was the minimisation of Israeli military casualties even at the risk of Palestinian civilians being harmed." Like, duh, right?

Sidd Finch 05-04-2015 05:57 PM

Re: ugh
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy (Post 495891)
I find it troubling but fully expected it. Indeed, I find the fact that I expected it, and expect few to care, just as troubling.

Really, you're surprised? Isn't this exactly what was being reported from Gaza by just about every correspondent there?

Here's the sentence that really highlights how unsurprising this is: "They suggest that an overarching priority was the minimisation of Israeli military casualties even at the risk of Palestinian civilians being harmed." Like, duh, right?


The last part didn't surprise me. I think most military operations has that same overarching priority, of minimizing their own casualties. The question, of course, is how far you go to achieve that priority, in terms of both how much death and destruction you are willing to inflict and how much you are willing to compromise the military objective.

What surprised me was the testimony that the presumption was that there were no civilians in areas the military entered, and essentially the "shoot everything that moves" strategy.

Hank Chinaski 05-04-2015 07:10 PM

Re: ugh
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sidd Finch (Post 495892)
The last part didn't surprise me. I think most military operations has that same overarching priority, of minimizing their own casualties. The question, of course, is how far you go to achieve that priority, in terms of both how much death and destruction you are willing to inflict and how much you are willing to compromise the military objective.

What surprised me was the testimony that the presumption was that there were no civilians in areas the military entered, and essentially the "shoot everything that moves" strategy.

Never assume anything Ty posts is accurate or factual ESPECIALLY when fro a source as fuzzy brained as the Guardian.

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 05-04-2015 07:45 PM

Re: ugh
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sidd Finch (Post 495892)
The last part didn't surprise me. I think most military operations has that same overarching priority, of minimizing their own casualties. The question, of course, is how far you go to achieve that priority, in terms of both how much death and destruction you are willing to inflict and how much you are willing to compromise the military objective.

What surprised me was the testimony that the presumption was that there were no civilians in areas the military entered, and essentially the "shoot everything that moves" strategy.

That was more or less our strategy in the opening round of Battles of Fallujah. It embittered the town against us and made it three times harder to take. It may well have planted some of the seeds whose stalks we now have to reap. By the end of those battles, we had almost completely shifted strategy, and were willing to take significant losses to protect civilians. But it was one of the major military mistakes of the 2nd War.

Gaza wasn't a place Israel was looking to take, where they needed or wanted anyone's cooperation. It's a different kind of battle. Do the damage fast and hard and get out.

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 05-04-2015 08:03 PM

Re: ugh
 
I'm confused. I haven't seen a single #jesuisGeller all day.

Seriously, I think the heros here are the cops, just as in Paris, and that's who we should praise.

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 05-05-2015 10:26 AM

Re: ugh
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 495893)
Never assume anything Ty posts is accurate or factual ESPECIALLY when fro a source as fuzzy brained as the Guardian.

You prefer the article from the Jerusalem Post?

taxwonk 05-05-2015 05:54 PM

Re: I dream about Paris when I'm high on red wine,
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 495832)
what is your fave Jimmy buffet LP?

Don't listen to him, Hank. Yours is no disgrace

taxwonk 05-05-2015 05:58 PM

Re: I dream about Paris when I'm high on red wine,
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Not Bob (Post 495834)
Of all the Not Bobs, I am the Not Bobbiest.

Ah, Cheap Trick - I always think of them as springing onto the scene the following year, fully-formed like Athena from the forehead of Zeus, with the release of Live in Budokan. But that is merely my memory of how they sprung into my awareness.

And my list was not meant to be all-inclusive, and I simply picked the first two albums that I was aware of in 1977 and think are, even now, good. (To be clear, Rumors is a stone-cold classic, while Changes is just (hah! "just") really good.) I mean, I didn't mention Elvis Costello's My Aim is True because I wasn't introduced to it until several years later.

I'm sure I missed this thread entirely, but I want to throw some support, NB. The Ramones, Talking Heads:77, and My Aim Is True changed my life.

taxwonk 05-05-2015 06:02 PM

Re: I dream about Paris when I'm high on red wine,
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy (Post 495835)
Gil Scott Heron.

Times have changed. Not only wii the revolution be televised, it will go viral onYouTube before being picked up by CNN and al-Jazeera America

taxwonk 05-05-2015 06:04 PM

Re: Is Ted Cruz Satan? Discuss.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sidd Finch (Post 495838)
Someone has to watch out for the black helicopters, no?

Last week in Savannah, I actually saw a black helicopter.

Carry on.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:47 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com