![]() |
Overturning Roe
Quote:
How will Bush not get to appoint anyone? Are you saying that the Chief's seat will remain vacant for 4 years? I don't see that happening. As obstructionist at the Dems are and as willfully blind to the lack of a sufficient majority that the R's are, Rehnquist's successor will be sworn in by Thanksgiving of this year. And Bush will get at least one more appointment--either Stevens or O'Connor (or both) will need replacing in 2006 or 2007. |
Should five percent appear too small
Quote:
And it wasn't Hawaii, it was Saba. And also Jackson Hole. |
Overturning Roe
Quote:
Basically, some people have boiled his logic down to ...if we announce that Roe was a mistake, we'll look stoopid. Nevertheles, I don't even recall who was who in Casey. A long time ago. |
Overturning Roe
Quote:
|
tax question
Quote:
And you could let the IRS figure it for you, but TurboTax is generally cheaper. |
tax question
Quote:
I am a bitter old solo who was in BIGLAW pre-Gunderson Effect. My GA discount is factored by adding to my real people rate 10% of the excess of their salary over mine when I was their age. |
Christianity
Quote:
|
Should five percent appear too small
Quote:
|
Overturning Roe
Quote:
We can only pray that the grace of God prevails or at least has mercy on the faithful. As Proverbs 8:35,36 instructs us: For whoever finds Me finds life and receives favor from the LORD. But whoever fails to find Me harms himself; all who hate Me (like Michael Schiavo and his supporters) love death. |
Should five percent appear too small
Quote:
|
Tortious Interference
It's Friday. Abortion's already at the plate. Let's put another fun topic on deck.
The Administration is all atwitter about so-called tort reform, particulary in med mal, arguing it's driving up health care costs and driving docs out of town. Bush insists that if we don't put a cap on pain and suffering and punitive damages, we'll all be forced to become home surgeons and midwives. Suppose we put a cap on pain and suffering damages at, say, $250,000. And suppose we cap punitives at the lesser of $100,000 per year of the plaintiff's life expectancy or $2.5 million. That would, according to the insurance industry and their paid shills -- er, duly elected government officials -- dramatically reduce insurance costs, thus keeping doctors around and lowering health care costs for everyone. Okay, I'll bite. But here's the catch. The legislation enacting "tort reform" also has to spread the benefit of these cost savings. Medical liability insurers, health care insurers, health care providers, and pharmaceutical companies all have to reduce their rates and charges, across the board, by some percentage, say 15%. Anybody still interested in tort reform if the benefit doesn't stay in their shareholders' pockets? |
Should five percent appear too small
Quote:
|
tax question
Quote:
Of course in effort to oppress the patriots of this nation every year around April 15, the liberal strongholds of our government will abuse its power to court order the murder of an innocent or send in the ATF and FBI assassins to shoot some supposed rebels' dogs and children or wife. Or burn a community of children with firebombs. Or kidnap an innocent child and export him to the communists. Beware, because all of this is a smoke and mirrors warning to the sheep amongst us to pay our taxes. the liberal media elite loves to advertise this coercion. But don't be swayed, for the Lord and the Second Amendment can repel such blasphemy. |
Should five percent appear too small
Quote:
Do slave and paigow know about the Tax Code? |
Tortious Interference
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:20 AM. |
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com