| Not Bob |
05-11-2015 01:40 PM |
Re: I'm too appalled for a lyrical re line.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski
(Post 495970)
I have no energy to post about the truth here, it would take paragraphs because of the level of ignorance on this board. The main point of ignorance being the image that the people going in for cheap manis are wall street bankers. it is the poor shopping at the places fucking the poor that cause the issue. Once the poor decided to buy stuff not made by US paid labor then the rest became inevitable. And it all started when Pa steel workers and Cali electronics workers decided they should buy Asian made cars. Once others bought Asian steel it was suddenly an issue; Where can I buy an American made TV?
I won't engage again, unless someone here posts something more than kumbayah.
|
I don't disagree with you about the biggest fans of cheap goods and services being working class/lower middle class/whatever term you prefer. I also think that the law of unintended consequences applies pretty broadly, and that laws or rules passed with Kumbayah intentions can hurt those it was meant to protect and/or others who were not really targets of the law one way or another. You suggest, I think, that many aspects of Obamacare do this because of your experience with your firm's health insurance. I think that you may be wrong, but it's too early to tell. Or that the bad stuff you are seeing is attributable to other causes, or that the carriers could choose to screw your plan next year even if the ACA was never passed, etc. But you raise a fair point on this.
But while i see that demand for cheap manicures in some part helps create a market for corner cutting regulations to keep the price at $10, I just don't see how the law of unintended consequences applies to the nail salons - do you have a regulation or law in mind that has hurt the salon workers?
Also, I think it's too simple to say that customer choice of cars in the 1970s caused our current situation - though I agree that the shift for Chevy to Toyota was in the mix. But I'm old enough to remember that Detroit didn't really want to put out smaller and more fuel efficient cars, and the ones they did at first (Pinto, Vega) sucked. And while many would blame the unions for cost issues leading to crappy cars, it wasn't the guys and gals in places like Flint who were designing or marketing cars. They didn't create the mantra of "planned obsolescence" which was a business scheme that guaranteed that my mom's Maverick would break down and need replacement in 4 years, while Mr. Johnson's Datsun kept running like a clock until the salt-drenched winter roads of the Ancestral Homeland caused the body of the poor thing (a B-210, I think) to disintegrate at 150,000 miles.
But at some point, the American consumer became less interested in buying American, and I think the last TV made in the US was by Zenith in the early 1980s. You are completely correct that the loss of American manufacturing (and the jobs it provided) is the root of the problem.
I can't buy a TV made in the USA anymore, but I can buy shoes (Allen Edmond), suits (Hickey Freeman or Hart Shaffner & Marks), and sometimes shirts (Nordstrom, Brooks Brothers - but look at label). But even that is hard, because thanks to Casino Jack and Tom DeLay, swear-shops on certain Pacific Islands have the right to use the "Made in USA" label. And thanks to my dad and uncles, I've mostly owned cars/SUVs from one of the Ford brands (though I think some were made in Canada, but that's practically same, right?).
|