| Tyrone Slothrop |
04-15-2005 04:46 PM |
Overturning Roe
Quote:
Originally posted by Say_hello_for_me
Or so you guys keep telling us.
Yet, as best I can tell, California would be losing population if it weren't for illegals, Massachusetts is losing population even after illegals are counted, and Illinois is losing its employers and employees (read: tax base).
Seems to me, people are already voting with their feet
|
And Western states that are growing are becoming more Democratic as they do so: Nevada, Arizona, Colorado. People who move from California, Massachusetts and Illinois to places like Nevada, Arizona and Colorado bring their politics with them.
And I don't understand what any of that has to do with my point. Politics is more than a series of exit polls. If Roe were reversed and abortion could be criminalized on a statewide basis, you would see an enormous mobilization around the issue on the left, comparable at the least to what you've seen with abortion on your side for the past three decades. People who already disagree with you would start to work a lot harder, instead of sitting back and letting the courts worry about it. That's one. You'd also see lots of moderate voters who are pro-choice, at least to an extent, who would feel threatened by the militant pro-life wing of the GOP. Right now, the GOP can play to that base and keep them riled up without doing much of anything for them. Has Bush and the GOP Congress made much of an effort to curtail abortion? No. And they can blame the Supreme Court for that. Without Roe to blame, they would have to take the heat for pissing off either moderates or their own most fervid supporters. I would like to see all of that happen, even though I know that it would make abortions unavailable to a great many people, because I think it would a better thing for the country in the long run. And I'm hardly the only Democrat who thinks this.
|