LawTalkers

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   SF/SV (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=33)
-   -   Discussion of Firms and Life in SF/SV (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=44)

frodo corleone 01-30-2004 01:01 PM

Patent Group Leaves Heller
 
"Stephanie Seidman, who led the biotech patent group at Heller Ehrman and was the first to make the move to Fish & Richardson, said her decision was based on the different cultures of a general-practice firm such as Heller Ehrman and a patent-focused practice such as Fish & Richardson.

In a patent operation, a firm often hires scientists with doctorates and trains them to be attorneys – often footing the bill for law school – whereas general practice firms hire associate attorneys out of law school. The emphasis on science of a patent firm was attractive for her and others in the group that was hired away, Seidman said."

What is interesting about this is that F&R has been moving more and more toward a GP model in recent years, particularly in their SD office. Also, from the experiences of some friends of mine (albeit in other F&R offices than San Diego), while they do have some patent agents go to law school on the firm's dime, they mostly hire law school graduates who have summered or Fed. Cir. clerks. That being said, F&R's biotech practice is pretty strong firm-wide, so probably the real reason is greener pastures (in some "cultures", apparently, less green pastures are prefered.)

Threads 01-30-2004 02:02 PM

Patent Group Leaves Heller
 
Quote:

Originally posted by frodo corleone
That being said, F&R's biotech practice is pretty strong firm-wide, so probably the real reason is greener pastures (in some "cultures", apparently, less green pastures are prefered.)
The Silicon Valley office is actively trying to recruit agents/associates in biotech, although at this point I don't believe there is work waiting for them. F&R recently hired a partner for the SV biotech from BDSM; and is hoping to build from there.

It's tricky for a firm to balance the conflict space and growth, though. Biotech is relatively small, and clients start to bump against each other.

frodo corleone 01-30-2004 02:34 PM

Patent Group Leaves Heller
 
I think Fish's biotech practice is strongest in SD, Minninninniapolis (I can't be expected to spell that, can I?), and Boston; I don't know about their SV office, except that they've supposedly been looking to start a biotech group there for years (at least according to every third recruiter who calls, looking for a biotech prosecutor.)

"Minneapolis" -- T.S.

Threads 01-30-2004 02:45 PM

Patent Group Leaves Heller
 
Quote:

Originally posted by frodo corleone
I think Fish's biotech practice is strongest in SD, Minninninniapolis (I can't be expected to spell that, can I?), and Boston; I don't know about their SV office, except that they've supposedly been looking to start a biotech group there for years (at least according to every third recruiter who calls, looking for a biotech prosecutor.)
They have hired and lost various biotech partners in the SV office, one circa 1995; another 1996 or thereabouts; from 98 to 03 not much going on - some dribs and drabs sent over from the Boston office. Mary Ann Dillahunty is the newly hired, current partner.

Personally I would be wary of going in to Fish, given that the job market is pretty good elsewhere for biotech prosecutors; and the practice there is not yet stable. But it could an opportunity for the right person, who wants to establish their own position and could bring in some clients. There still seems to be some prestige with the Fish name.

Sidd Finch 01-30-2004 03:58 PM

Patent Group Leaves Heller
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Threads
F&R recently hired a partner for the SV biotech from BDSM
Okay, I give up. What does BDSM stand for?

(I know how the term is used in San Francisco, but I'm pretty sure that's not what you mean.)

Threads 01-30-2004 04:02 PM

Patent Group Leaves Heller
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
Okay, I give up. What does BDSM stand for?

(I know how the term is used in San Francisco, but I'm pretty sure that's not what you mean.)
Burns, Doane, Swecker and Mathis.

frodo corleone 01-30-2004 04:32 PM

Patent Group Leaves Heller
 
I've never met the woman in question, but just for fun I'm going to assume "BDSM" doesn't mean Burns Doane, but instead means what it means in the personal ads in the Bay Guardian. Now that would be a lateral hire.

Tyrone Slothrop 02-03-2004 04:40 PM

Thelen SF
 
We have a request for information about the transaction practice at Thelen's SF office. Any skinny on type of work, hours, QOL, etc. would be greatly appreciated.

As always, if you don't want to post it here, feel free to send me a PM or e-mail.

Atticus Grinch 02-10-2004 07:11 PM

Heads up, people!
 
There's a post on the Stalin Board, SF/SV Division, that there's an e-mail floating around re: a married associate at Littler SF having an affair with a partner. Associate's husband intercepted partner's hot-talk e-mail to associate (the story goes) and forwarded the e-mail to every Littler attorney.

Anyone have access to the e-mail? PM it to Ty if you're worried about anonymity. I can vouch that Ty is trustworthy on non-partisan matters of general prurient interest.

C'mon, people, this is closer to home than Claire/Brad or Tucker Max, and it's slipping through the cracks! On our watch! Have some pride!

Threads 02-10-2004 07:42 PM

Heads up, people!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Atticus Grinch
There's a post on the Stalin Board, SF/SV Division, that there's an e-mail floating around re: a married associate at Littler SF having an affair with a partner. Associate's husband intercepted partner's hot-talk e-mail to associate (the story goes) and forwarded the e-mail to every Littler attorney.
Don't know anything about it, but I had fun pulling up bio/photos from the Littler webpage, and imagining mix and match combos.

Seems to be an odd ratio of partners to associates over there, too.

Hyperbaric 02-11-2004 01:44 AM

Partner, Associate, and Cuckold Triangle
 
I say let them alone. If you have the info, keep it as a confidence.

Heller Highwater 02-11-2004 10:59 AM

Littler bit on the side
 
Given that Littler's an employment shop, this is either ultimate irony or a complete hoax.

I'm inclined to suspect the latter.

Atticus Grinch 02-11-2004 01:02 PM

Partner, Associate, and Cuckold Triangle
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hyperbaric
I say let them alone. If you have the info, keep it as a confidence.
You're new here, aren't you?

ETA: Upon reflection, while I disagree with your apparent reasoning, I would be uncomfortable being the one responsible to decide how much and what identifying information should be redacted. Doubtless some should.

Tyrion Lannister 02-11-2004 04:07 PM

Somebody posted the e-mail on the other board. Better check it out quickly before it gets deleted!

Flinty_McFlint 02-11-2004 04:29 PM

stolen from stalin
 
smack(enjoy!)daddy


Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 16:02:32 -0800 (PST)
From: [Name deleted]
Subject: Fwd: [Name deleted] and my wife

in caes you guys haven't seen this yet, it's the e-mail i sent to every attorney at littler mendelson, and it explains why i'm divorcing my wife of 11 months. In case you hear some other reason understand that every word that comes out of [Name deleted]Â’s mouth is a lie. Please feel free to forward it on to everyone you may know

--- [Name deleted] wrote:
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 15:58:42 -0800 (PST)
From: [Name deleted]
Subject: [Name deleted]and my wife

As I am aware of my target audience and any possiblethreat of defamation I am going to limit this to brief factual matters and not what I have since discovered, deduced or had confessed to me.

On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 16:22:13 -0800 a message was sent to my wife's personal e-mail: entitled "for you only."

The sender was [Name deleted] and a word document was attached. The text of the attachment is as follows:

>>>>>
Sunday, en route to Chitown

Dear [Name deleted],

How did we find ourselves at this frustratingly wonderful junction of you and me? It seems like yesterday and long ago that a not-quite-innocent kiss became a spark that engulfed my entire being. It seemed improbable then, and does even today, that we should find such magnetic forces pulling us together.

I am, after all, more than 30 years your senior, slightly pooched around the mid-section; perhaps more a father figure than the kind you would pick for your boy friend. How could you possibly feel the way you do about me? How unlikely is that? What would your friends say after, "Ugh, how could you? He's older than your father?" Imagine bringing me to a baby shower for your friends. Not that I don't deserve the bated-breath of Britney-types, or the much more mature and older 30-somethings of the world. But in most cases the relationship would be a fleeting thing, a detour on the pursuit of the same-aged lover.

Imagine the reaction of even [Name deleted], closest in age to you, that her father had taken up with someone five years younger than she is. Not to mention her older sister.

Yet I can not find the will to resist pursuing the engaging time we spend together, for when we are not so involved I find myself thinking of you almost constantly - when can I talk to her next? See her again? Spend some truly personal time with you? I find it impossible not to think about when I can even leave a message for you, send an email (drat that Tuck who taketh away the Crackberry).

I know you have a lot to deal with in the weeks and months ahead, as I think I will also. I do want you to know that I will be supportive of you in every way you wish as you sort things out and decide what to do. I will do my utmost not to let my feelings affect my judgment, listening skills, advice that may be sought, etc. And I know you will do the same for me as things move forward for [Name deleted] and me (at least as she says they may). If you ever feel compromised by your feelings or desires and have to change things, you know that I will understand. Don't misconstrue that for meaning I would be happy about such change, but rather that I have an understanding of your priorities and I will be supportive of them, as you determine them, for your sake, rather than for mine. I believe you would (and will if necessary) freely do the same for me.

So where from here dear [Name deleted]? Can we find ways to be together discreetly and safely? Is that what you want? Will that be enough for now? For weeks? Months? Longer? Do you know that I think about how nice it would be to spend several consecutive days with you off by ourselves somewhere without having work responsibilities? Just time for you and me to invest in each other and explore each other's deepest inner thoughts and feelings? A warm climate would merely enhance the experience, but I don't care where it is as long as we can find some time just for us (check-in calls permitted, of course).

[Name deleted]. There was something about him last night that just didn't hit me right. I can't describe it, other than the aloofness that I mentioned earlier, and perhaps what I took to be a bit of something akin to quiet arrogance, in a way. A bit of "better than you" sort of attitude. Not directed at me, per se, just an attitude I sensed when he talked about himself -the Chesapeake, for example. And politics. He didn't say much about it, but there was an awfully funny look on his face when I mentioned the ultra-conservative attitudes of the folks that inhabit the Eastern Shore. Yet when I tried to draw him out about his job, for example, he was not talkative at all. His responses were somewhat ambiguous, and sensing what I took to be some mild discomfort I didn't pursue it. But I thought it wise to show some interest, as people do, in what he does for work.

You described him as similar to me, yet I didn't find him very sociable or humorous last night. That could easily be because of your circumstances, but he was far quieter and much more an observer than a participant than I had expected. And I did not get very good vibes about his feelings toward you, especially when you were being your usual witty self. He seemed tolerant, but not engaged, and wondered if he wouldn't have been happier if you weren't saying anything at all. So I wondered where all the chemistry is/was between you, and frankly what it was you see/saw in him that drew you two together. There was something closed, hinting of sinister, or dark, about him, that gave me pause. I was thinking, did he seize upon you in a weak moment so that he would gain your affection through that means? Is your happiness and role of chief breadwinner causing resentment? We've talked about this before, but the visual images of last night confirmed for me some of our discussion points.

I wish I could find you home alone tomorrow morning with a few minutes to spare. Perhaps I will leave you a message saying that if you can be home at 5:45 or so, to go ahead and wake me up so we can have some time together in private. Tired though I may be in the morning with the jet lag, the thought of your voice in my ear you wake me is one that causes a ripple of feelings to course through my entire body.

While I can't have you in my bed next to me tomorrow, I would settle for your voice, and particularly if you were to find yourself in your bed at the time you call me. Then we can see if we can replicate in that way some of the feelings that we share when we are together. Are you interested in that, or too reserved or shy? I long to be close to you, in that way, in every way, every day. Help me through this long and seemingly endless week, until Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday.

More by phone later,

Love,

[Name deleted]

Sidd Finch 02-11-2004 05:39 PM

Littler e-mail
 
Hoax or not, I feel a sudden urge to puke.

(Hi everyone!)

Flinty_McFlint 02-11-2004 05:57 PM

Littler e-mail
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
Hoax or not, I feel a sudden urge to puke.

(Hi everyone!)
In disgust or fear?

(Hi Sidd!)

Tyrion Lannister 02-11-2004 06:40 PM

Littler E-mail
 
The references to the "Eastern Shore" and "Chesapeake" indicate they're talking about Maryland...which means the people involved were probably from Littler's DC office....which only has 15 attorneys & 7 women. Eeek.

P.S. What the heck was this guy doing in his wife's "personal e-mail"?

Atticus Grinch 02-11-2004 06:53 PM

Littler E-mail
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrion Lannister
which means the people involved were probably from Littler's DC office....
Nope. Good sleuthing, but nope.

It means his family is probably originally from the Eastern Shore of Virginia or the Eastern Shore of Maryland (the "'better than you' attitude" comment favors Virginia by a slight margin --- long commute to D.C., that). But not that they live there presently.

She is not one of the associates listed on the Littler website, in any office.

robustpuppy 02-11-2004 06:56 PM

Littler E-mail
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Atticus Grinch
Nope. Good sleuthing, but nope.

It means his family is probably originally from the Eastern Shore of Virginia or the Eastern Shore of Maryland (the "'better than you' attitude" comment favors Virginia by a slight margin --- long commute to D.C., that). But not that they live there presently.

She is not one of the associates listed on the Littler website, in any office.
Thanks Atticus. As much as this subject entertains us, it's awful to subject every woman at Littler who fits the demographic to speculation that she is (allegedly) involved with a partner there.

NotFromHere 02-11-2004 06:59 PM

Littler E-mail
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Atticus Grinch
She is not one of the associates listed on the Littler website, in any office.
Because she's gone already?

Sonic Death Monkey 02-11-2004 06:59 PM

Littler Love Triangle
 
For what it's worth, I've been sent the original unexpurgated version of the email, and it involves people working in the SF office. Furthermore, the woman is not listed as an associate in any office because she has no law license. That's right: she's staff.

Sexual Harassment Panda 02-11-2004 08:52 PM

Littler Love Triangle
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Sonic Death Monkey
For what it's worth, I've been sent the original unexpurgated version of the email, and it involves people working in the SF office. Furthermore, the woman is not listed as an associate in any office because she has no law license. That's right: she's staff.
To quote Jon Lovitz, "EEEWW!! How de-liciously RIBALD!!"

Replaced_Texan 02-11-2004 09:03 PM

Littler Love Triangle
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Sonic Death Monkey
For what it's worth, I've been sent the original unexpurgated version of the email, and it involves people working in the SF office. Furthermore, the woman is not listed as an associate in any office because she has no law license. That's right: she's staff.
At least it wasn't a summer associate.

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) 02-11-2004 10:08 PM

Littler Love Triangle
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
At least it wasn't a summer associate.
For her, that would have been better.

frodo corleone 02-11-2004 10:39 PM

Littler Love Triangle
 
On the other board, more information was alleged about the woman in question and apparently she is a paralegal with a law degree, but no license to practice.

Having said all that, I'm still having a hard time believing everything about this. The "love letter" sounds like the back jacket of a bad romance novel (presuming there exists "good" romance novels.) I think we have enough anecdotal information that the letter was sent and that the players (or should I say "playas"?) were involved in some unseemly relationship, but does anyone have proof/knowledge beyond a reasonable doubt that the letter reported above is as it was sent?

Flinty_McFlint 02-12-2004 12:00 AM

Littler Love Triangle
 
Quote:

Originally posted by frodo corleone
On the other board, more information was alleged about the woman in question and apparently she is a paralegal with a law degree, but no license to practice.

Having said all that, I'm still having a hard time believing everything about this. The "love letter" sounds like the back jacket of a bad romance novel (presuming there exists "good" romance novels.) I think we have enough anecdotal information that the letter was sent and that the players (or should I say "playas"?) were involved in some unseemly relationship, but does anyone have proof/knowledge beyond a reasonable doubt that the letter reported above is as it was sent?
I remember this woman. Her daddy must be so proud.

edited to add: with a little digging, you can find their wedding registry.

Sidd Finch 02-12-2004 10:49 AM

Littler Love Triangle
 
Quote:

Originally posted by frodo corleone
does anyone have proof/knowledge beyond a reasonable doubt that the letter reported above is as it was sent?

That seems an awfully high standard to apply, especially on this board.

On the other hand, a letter with such putrid prose probably should be considered a crime, so maybe you're right....

Gattigap 02-12-2004 11:45 AM

Littler Love Triangle
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
On the other hand, a letter with such putrid prose probably should be considered a crime, so maybe you're right....
It's probably the stupid prose that horrifies colleagues the most.

After all, sin can be forgiven, but stupidity is forever.

Sonic Death Monkey 02-12-2004 12:39 PM

Littler Love Triangle
 
In response to the request for proof beyond a reasonable doubt of this sordid story, consider this:

1. Each of the parties actually exists; it's true that you can find the GP on the firm web site, and the wedding registry identifying the happily married couple by name and silver pattern.

2. For it to be a hoax, the hoaxer would have to hate all three people (GP, round-heeled paralegal, and cuckolded husband) enough to want to slander them all over the internet.

I can see hating one or two of the parties enough to risk that kind of liability, but not all three. I know that's not proof, but I'm more willing to believe that a pathetic philandering GP would be a sickeningly bad love-letter writer than that someone would torch the lives of three innocent people.

frodo corleone 02-12-2004 08:51 PM

Littler Love Triangle
 
I'm not implying that some 3rd party (4th party?) perpetuated this whole thing. What I'm wondering is whether the email from the dumbshit partner was actually sent to the whore-y paralegal. Not knowing any of the parties, and having watched a lot of television, I'm seeing the possibility of a disgruntled husband who discovers his wife is having an affair and decides to concoct a bogus love letter to embarass his wife and her lover. That almost seems more rational behavior (given the emotional devastation that he must have gone through upon finding out his bride of 11 months [at which point, spouses still love each other] has been disloyal) than an experienced lawyer writing such self-incriminating drivel.

There seems to be a lot of people with some degree of personal knowledge of the individuals; can any of you confirm this email was actually sent?

c2ed 02-13-2004 03:36 PM

Littler Love Triangle
 
Quote:

Originally posted by frodo corleone
I'm not implying that some 3rd party (4th party?) perpetuated this whole thing. What I'm wondering is whether the email from the dumbshit partner was actually sent to the whore-y paralegal. Not knowing any of the parties, and having watched a lot of television, I'm seeing the possibility of a disgruntled husband who discovers his wife is having an affair and decides to concoct a bogus love letter to embarass his wife and her lover. That almost seems more rational behavior (given the emotional devastation that he must have gone through upon finding out his bride of 11 months [at which point, spouses still love each other] has been disloyal) than an experienced lawyer writing such self-incriminating drivel.

There seems to be a lot of people with some degree of personal knowledge of the individuals; can any of you confirm this email was actually sent?
I can't confirm that at all - have no idea of who the parties are and don't give a rat's ass. But I have little doubt that it was sent. Look at the language - it seems to me to be from a lawyer in all its precise, careful wording and relative lack of emotion (sorry, but most senior partners at big firms that I know fall into this category). The guy hints at passion but in the end sounds like a rather boring creature.

What's really rather sad is that this is so unexciting, IMHO. These kinds of affairs happen all the time at firms, companies, and other organizations. What is a bit different is that the scorned husband decided to tell everyone they work with about it and make it very public. Usually I just see the firm management scramble to make sure the junior person isn't going to sue for harassment, the relevant couples divorce (and usually, not a pretty divorce), and the firm just gossips about the players enough that the junior person leaves. I've seen situations that make Ally McBeal plots look like Romper Room.

C(tries to stay out of the drama net)deuced

AngryMulletMan 02-13-2004 06:32 PM

Littler Love Triangle
 
Quote:

Originally posted by c2ed

What's really rather sad is that this is so unexciting, IMHO. These kinds of affairs happen all the time at firms, companies, and other organizations.
I'm not sure that the email wasn't manufactured by some eager associate goofing on GP's generally. It was chock full of stereotypical images and was written more like a memo to the file than a romance novel -- just plain creepy and, as you correctly point out, not at all interesting.

AM(oh for the days of nasty power sex in the copy room at the death star!)M

Tyrone Slothrop 02-13-2004 07:29 PM

Littler Love Triangle
 
Quote:

Originally posted by AngryMulletMan
AM(oh for the days of nasty power sex in the copy room at the death star!)M
Indeed! But why let bygones be bygones? Why not remind us what those heady days were like?

pun intended

Jack Manfred 02-17-2004 01:59 AM

San Francisco Spa Recommendations (cross post with FB)
 
I'm looking for recommendations for a spa in San Francisco. Family will be in town, and I wanted to treat. Will probably spring for massage and some sort of wrap/body treatment. Especially interested in feedback from those who have tried Novella Spa.

Thanks for all helpful responses.

Tyrion Lannister 02-17-2004 11:56 AM

SF Spa
 
I've been to International Orange on Fillmore @ California a few times. It's not a huge place, but they do offer a good variety of massages, facials, and other spa treatments. They also offer yoga classes, if you're into that. After you're done, your family can check out the shops on Fillmore or watch Lost In Translation at the UA Metro.

NotFromHere 02-17-2004 01:34 PM

San Francisco Spa Recommendations (cross post with FB)
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Jack Manfred
I'm looking for recommendations for a spa in San Francisco. Family will be in town, and I wanted to treat. Will probably spring for massage and some sort of wrap/body treatment. Especially interested in feedback from those who have tried Novella Spa.

Thanks for all helpful responses.
Have not tried the Novella Spa, but have been to the Nordstroms Spa. They have a wide variety of treatments and a nice atmosphere check it out here
Pedicure and facials are great. Hot stone massage was wonderful. Have not had any wraps. Bonus, it's right on the Bart/Bus lines, caters to men and women, you can get a nice glass of wine right downstairs on the 4th or 5th floor afterwards.

Tyrone Slothrop 02-17-2004 01:37 PM

spas
 
Are you interested in heading to Calistoga for the day?

Atticus Grinch 02-17-2004 01:57 PM

spas
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone_Slothrop
Are you interested in heading to Calistoga for the day?
Ty, you of all people should know that this board is not the appropriate venue for arranging homosexual liasons.

Tyrone Slothrop 02-17-2004 02:47 PM

spas
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Atticus Grinch
Ty, you of all people should know that this board is not the appropriate venue for arranging homosexual liasons.
Sorry. In the future, I will confine all such activity to the Technology board.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:48 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com