![]() |
60,000 wakadoos
Quote:
S_A_M |
Overturning Roe
Quote:
Quote:
|
Overturning Roe
Quote:
Quote:
|
Overturning Roe
Quote:
Have a good weekend Ty and all others! Hello |
Overturning Roe
Quote:
Have a good weekend. |
60,000 wakadoos
Quote:
If I take the"permitted" part and the "a bar, a church, a city hall, a park, his car" part as premises, I don't see the campus thing as distinguishable (though I guess one could always argue hypotheticals). Hello |
what bugs me
Quote:
Ad(admitted to practice in more than one jurisdiction... what the hell were they thinking??)der |
60,000 wakadoos
Quote:
I'd imagine the individual private business can ban it on premises. I was going to construct an argument about the dangers of allowing young folks with (almost by definition) not fully mature judgment to carry weapons when surrounded by thousands like them in an atmosphere fraught with alcohol and sexual tension -- but hell, if you can carry in bars why not anywhere else? Might as well let guns into the bleachers in Yankee Stadium and Fenway Park -- people would be much politer to each other and the players. (Isn't that the argument?) S_A_M |
60,000 wakadoos
Quote:
There were articles in the Washington Post about some of the gun-rights people exercising their rights to "openly" carry (I think it was even without permit), and I don't recall exactly where they were banned at all. I know from reading the Post that the issue has arisen in the context of Fairfax Co. (or some Co.'s) parks (ban overruled), and the Dulles Access road (overruled). It arose with respect to libraries in Falls Church?, and the gun people showed what they thought of the city instructing its employees to call the police at the sight of an openly-carried gun... by openly carrying guns into the next city council meeting. I think I see where you are going though, and I'm not taking a position one way or another on it. If anything, I would take a position in favor of banning anyone who has taken alchohol in the last 24 hours from carrying a weapon. Anyhoo, its all academic to me. Seems like these people really are pushing the issue into the fringes though. Oh yeah, and I think you are right about individual private businesses. In other news, Illinois just turned back all kinds of anti-gun measures, and passed a few that would curtail local jurisdiction on guns. A few years ago, a guy up on the North Shore shot and wounded or killed a home-invader from Chicago. His town promptly charged him with violating guns laws. If government officials on both sides would just use a little better discretion on these issues, entire states wouldn't get up in arms like this. But where in the world can we trust government officials to use good discretion? |
If the numbers ain't with ya ...
... then, by God, stop publishing the numbers.
Really, it's surprising that we had to wait until 2005 to see this happen. In the old days, they'd have been so on top of this stuff that we'd never have seen the 2004 statistics in the first place. With everybody on the road trying to sell Social Security, perhaps they're geting slow. |
If the numbers ain't with ya ...
Quote:
Can you explain Gatti? |
If the numbers ain't with ya ...
Quote:
|
If the numbers ain't with ya ...
Quote:
Sadly, your argument also suggests that Secretary Rice, in choosing to terminate the report, is a disloyal, treasonist fuck. *Sniff* I, for one, shall miss her. |
60,000 wakadoos
Quote:
Hospitals and nursing homes also have to have the signs, and I've seen them on the local University of Texas buildings, so I'm guessing that we, not exactly known for gun-control, think that it's ok to prohibit firearms in some locations. |
60,000 wakadoos
Quote:
Anyway, if anyone has any good articles, cites, sources, quotes or arguments that are generally against conceal-carry, I've got some time today to do some reading. Hello *Or Maybe There Is |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:18 AM. |
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com