LawTalkers

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   Politics (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   Pepper sprayed for public safety. (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=863)

ThurgreedMarshall 08-27-2012 12:52 PM

Re: Great article
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by taxwonk (Post 471963)
I'm sure that is cold comfort to the men and boys in Gitmo. He promised to shut it down. He hasn't, because the prisoners there now hate the US and have been turned into potential enemies. He campaigned as critical of the PATRIOT Act, calling it the blot on our nation that it is. He has since fought to keep its abuses in place.

I counted on Obama to be the greatest President since Lincoln. I believed he wanted to serve as not just the leader, but also the conscience of the American People. I am bitter and disenchanted. I'll vote for him, if the race is close. If it isn't, I'll use my franchise to vote "none of the above" by writing in my own name.

Your expectations are fucking ridiculous. The system is no longer built to allow such a person to succeed. Obviously you should vote whatever way you see fit. But the fact that you can so easily overlook the good that he's done and attempted to do (and I've seen you make no mention of all that he's accomplished) in the face of the disrespect and unprecedented opposition means you can go ahead and retire your vote (in all but the closest of races, of course) for the rest of your life. Close the door, pull the blinds, unplug the phone, turn off your computer and tv, and stew 'til it's time to go.

TM

taxwonk 08-27-2012 12:52 PM

Re: Great article
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ThurgreedMarshall (Post 471964)
Uh, what the fuck did you just say?

This is not a phenomenon particular to black politicians from Chicago. This is something all black people live with every day.

Jesus. I need to get outta here.

TM

Thurgreed, isn't that one of the points of the Atlantic article you posted that started all this off? It is something that all black people live with every day. Isn't part of what Obama is supposed to be doing living without showing that hesitation? He's the leader of the free world. If he won't stand up and say "no more" then who will?

ThurgreedMarshall 08-27-2012 12:59 PM

Re: Great article
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by taxwonk (Post 471965)
That may be what some people who don't know anything about Chicago think. Anyone who lives here knows that Chicago voters who aren't Black are more afraid of putting a Black in local office than they would be voting in a communist. Chicago is quieter about its racism these days, but all you have to do is take a drive down Ashland Avenue from North to South to see that the divide between North and South mimics the antebellum South.

What the fuck are you talking about? The Republican party doesn't throw that term around to influence people in Chicago. That's why I'm telling you what it means outside Chicago.

And I've spent plenty of time in Chicago and based on my experiences and my friends' input, it's always been segregated and racist.

But I truly don't understand your point. If Chicago voters who aren't black are afraid of putting a black person in local office, and I say the same general thing about people outside of Chicago, then what the hell are you actually trying to say? Somehow Obama's reluctance to come across as too black is a symptom of local Chicago politics? That may be part of it, but I'm telling you as a black man who is neither a politician or from Chicago, that this is not a phenomenon unique to black politicians from Chicago. It is necessary for many of us to perform our fucking jobs--just like it is for Obama to perform his.

TM

taxwonk 08-27-2012 01:10 PM

Re: Great article
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ThurgreedMarshall (Post 471968)
What the fuck are you talking about? The Republican party doesn't throw that term around to influence people in Chicago. That's why I'm telling you what it means outside Chicago.

And I've spent plenty of time in Chicago and based on my experiences and my friends' input, it's always been segregated and racist.

But I truly don't understand your point. If Chicago voters who aren't black are afraid of putting a black person in local office, and I say the same general thing about people outside of Chicago, then what the hell are you actually trying to say? Somehow Obama's reluctance to come across as too black is a symptom of local Chicago politics? That may be part of it, but I'm telling you as a black man who is neither a politician or from Chicago, that this is not a phenomenon unique to black politicians from Chicago. It is necessary for many of us to perform our fucking jobs--just like it is for Obama to perform his.

TM

I was simply trying to answer Ty's question about what a Chicagoan means when he says someone is a Chicago pol.

I don't think that it is the same for Obama as it is for any other black man. POTUS should not look at the first term as little more than a platform from which to begin the race for a second term. That applies to black and white (as well as brown, yellow, or a Skittles rainbow of flavor). He has the office and has had it for almost four years. I wish he had used it more forcefully. I wish he had changed the discussion more.

Did you just call me Coltrane? 08-27-2012 01:12 PM

Re: Great article
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ThurgreedMarshall (Post 471962)
I don't believe this. Outside Chicago, it means urban and corrupt. And "urban" is shorthand for black.

TM

I don't know what it means outside Chicago, but Rahm, Daley (and Blago) and all of Daley's cronies (white or black) are/were considered to be "Chicago" politicians. It's the mafia-like attitude of you pat my back I'll pat yours exchanges that have gone on for decades.

Adder 08-27-2012 01:13 PM

Re: Great article
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by taxwonk (Post 471959)
Florida did move forward. Weeks and weeks after the incident. Meanwhile, the best Obama could come up with is "If I had a son, he would look like Trayvon." He didn't campaign with a promise to let the media and the public do his job.

I'm not sure prosecuting murders in Florida is his job.

Adder 08-27-2012 01:14 PM

Re: Great article
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by taxwonk (Post 471963)
I'm sure that is cold comfort to the men and boys in Gitmo. He promised to shut it down. He hasn't, because the prisoners there now hate the US and have been turned into potential enemies.

Also because Congress, which controls the pursestrings, has been adament that he not do so.

taxwonk 08-27-2012 01:19 PM

Re: Great article
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Adder (Post 471972)
Also because Congress, which controls the pursestrings, has been adament that he not do so.

He's the Commander-in-Chief. All he needs is a signature to shut it down. Congress and its purse strings are irrelevant. You don't need a budget appropriation to not spend money on something.

taxwonk 08-27-2012 01:23 PM

Re: Great article
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Adder (Post 471971)
I'm not sure prosecuting murders in Florida is his job.

The Civil Rights Act of 1968 enacted 18 U.S.C. § 245(b)(2), which permits federal prosecution of anyone who "willingly injures, intimidates or interferes with another person, or attempts to do so, by force because of the other person's race, color, religion or national origin."

Tyrone Slothrop 08-27-2012 01:25 PM

Re: Great article
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Did you just call me Coltrane? (Post 471958)
It doesn't mean black. It means corrupt and mafia-like.

In Chicago it doesn't mean black. But that's not what the rest of the country hears.

Adder 08-27-2012 01:25 PM

Re: Great article
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by taxwonk (Post 471973)
He's the Commander-in-Chief. All he needs is a signature to shut it down. Congress and its purse strings are irrelevant. You don't need a budget appropriation to not spend money on something.

Don't be silly. You need an appropriation to spend on everything, and displeasing Congress can get very uncomfortable.

Especially when the displeasing you're doing is so easily demogogued.

Don't get me wrong, if he was an extraordinary visionary of the type you seek, maybe he would have done it. I'm disappointed, but not surprised, that he isn't.

Did you just call me Coltrane? 08-27-2012 01:26 PM

Re: Great article
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop (Post 471975)
In Chicago it doesn't mean black. But that's not what the rest of the country hears.

Okay. I learned something today.

Tyrone Slothrop 08-27-2012 01:27 PM

Re: Great article
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by taxwonk (Post 471961)
Yes, I do see it differently. Obama is very hesitant to take a position that will upset the Democratic Old Guard here in town. It's a big part of the reason he's afraid to be "too black." He remembers what happened to Harold Washington. Washington got elected primarily because even the Machine was pissed off at Jane Byrne and Michael Bilandic. He didn't get re-elected because he placed more faith (and support) in Eugene Pincham and Bobby Rush than he did in the two Eddies (Burke and Vrdolyak) and the precinct captains.

I don't see a reluctance specifically to upset the Democratic Old Guard in Chicago -- please go on -- nor do I think that makes one a Chicago politician. As Coltraine says, the term has a different significance.

Adder 08-27-2012 01:29 PM

Re: Great article
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by taxwonk (Post 471974)
The Civil Rights Act of 1968 enacted 18 U.S.C. § 245(b)(2), which permits federal prosecution of anyone who "willingly injures, intimidates or interferes with another person, or attempts to do so, by force because of the other person's race, color, religion or national origin."

So you think it would have been better to test (and quite possibly lose) the case in federal court first?

Also you left out the rest of that subsection, listing the circumstances in which such violence becomes a federal issue. It's not clear that any of them apply to Trayvon.

Tyrone Slothrop 08-27-2012 01:29 PM

Re: Great article
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Did you just call me Coltrane? (Post 471970)
I don't know what it means outside Chicago, but Rahm, Daley (and Blago) and all of Daley's cronies (white or black) are/were considered to be "Chicago" politicians. It's the mafia-like attitude of you pat my back I'll pat yours exchanges that have gone on for decades.

Agree with this, and don't think it fits Obama much at all.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:38 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com