LawTalkers

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Fashionable (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=14)
-   -   Fashionistas you have arrived 3-25-03 - 10-3-03 (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=8)

Connect_the_Dots 06-02-2003 11:01 AM

Her Husband's Asian Obsession
 
Quote:

Originally posted by dtb
I have read that a cheap husband is statistically the least likely to cheat on his wife (which, if true, there is one less thing I have to worry about...)
Actually, I think an unattractive husband is the least likely to cheat. I don't know if it's because ugly people are inherently more moral because suffering actually does build character; or it may just be that no one wants to sleep with ugly people.

ABBAKiss 06-02-2003 11:07 AM

Her Husband's Asian Obsession
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Connect_the_Dots
Actually, I think an unattractive husband is the least likely to cheat. I don't know if it's because ugly people are inherently more moral because suffering actually does build character; or it may just be that no one wants to sleep with ugly people.
How do you explain Springer, Ricki, Jenny, etc. then? I recently caught a portion of Maury Povich (it must have been Memorial Day?) in which some really ugly young husband cheated on an equally freaky looking young wife with some other chick from their town. The wife was even more upset than she otherwise would have been, she said, because the mistress "has no effing nose."

?????

Apparently this woman has some disorder where she has no protuding portion of her nose, just two holes. She was apparently the town whore, so someone wanted to sleep with the ugly girl.

paigowprincess 06-02-2003 11:08 AM

more reality tv
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
They also seem to have trained him to have a Joe Millionaire look as much as possible.

That said, the outcome was made rather clear when he told Katie Couric that if she had been on the show, he would have picked her. Sure, he's kissing up and probably being facetious, but that doesn't sound like a man who found true love. And if he did, true love took the money and ran. Wouldn't you? I mean, $1m vs. a guy you met only a few weeks before? You can buy a lot of love with $1m.
How about some spoiler space, asshole?

Did you try out for the show?

bridge of love 06-02-2003 11:08 AM

Her Husband's Asian Obsession
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Connect_the_Dots
Actually, I think an unattractive husband is the least likely to cheat. ...........it may just be that no one wants to sleep with ugly people.
this theory is like communism, it sounds good on paper but.....
I know some really ugly people who cheat. it may be that cheating is tawdry, and the really ugly learn to accept tawdry as the standard early on, so cheating is normal, and the ugly thus sleep together with less inhibition, or reliance on society's institutions like marriage.

evenodds 06-02-2003 11:10 AM

Absinthe Cocktail for Sale in Britain
 
Perhaps "Deco" will be the cocktail of Summer 2003:

Potent Absinthe Mix Stirs Up Controversy

LONDON (Reuters) - Absinthe, the fiery tipple with purported hallucinogenic properties, has stirred up fresh controversy in Britain where it will go on sale in nightclubs and bars next month packaged to be mixed with beer.

"Deco" comes with a small bottle of Kronenbourg lager with a shot of absinthe attached. The idea is to down the 45 percent-strong absinthe and drink the five-percent strength lager as a chaser.

Popularly held responsible for painter Vincent Van Gogh's mutilation of his own ear, absinthe has been banned in many countries but was never outlawed in Britain.

Full text: http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmp...in_absinthe_dc

bridge of love 06-02-2003 11:11 AM

Her Husband's Asian Obsession
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ABBAKiss

Apparently this woman has some disorder where she has no protuding portion of her nose, just two holes.
wait there may be some non-white bread reason for her attractiveness.

purse junkie 06-02-2003 11:12 AM

Her Husband's Asian Obsession
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ABBAKiss
Apparently this woman has some disorder where she has no protuding portion of her nose, just two holes. She was apparently the town whore, so someone wanted to sleep with the ugly girl.
Must be the status-grabbing effect of being able to brag at a bar to your friends, "Did I tell you I nailed this chick last night who had NO NOSE? It was freaky, man!"

P(didn't MJ's nose disintegrate off and now he has the same problem? so she's got someone to emulate)J

notcasesensitive 06-02-2003 11:39 AM

Unfaithful
 
Quote:

Originally posted by evenodds
This morning, I awoke and tried to unravel the disturbing dream I had last night that I had cheated on the OddMan with a member of the New Jersey Nets.

Inside the dream, I kept wondering why was I having an affair, and why with Richard Jefferson, since he is a child.

Fully awake, I realized it was from watching Unfaithful last night, and then falling asleep to sports center while waiting for the OddMan to call from Canada.

Unfaithful is an interesting movie that could have been great had it been directed by anyone other than Adrian Lyne. Diane Lane is extraordinary and fully deserved all of the accolades bestowed upon her for that performance.

Just don't watch it too close to bedtime . . .


Edited to specify which Net, at the suggestion of one of our more perverse members (Leagl) who assumed I had an affair with the entire team.
I had two disturbing dreams last night... The first one was that my mom died while visiting some Eastern European country but that I couldn't get confirmation of her death because of some weird bureaucracy. Not likely to happen since my mom never travels out of the country, but still quite odd. The other one involved me having to climb out on a really unstable cliff/ledge to hit my golf ball that was perched up there. Once I got up there I realized that a golf game was really not worth dying over, so I starting trying to climb back down and was mid-descent when I woke up.

n(analysis anyone?)cs

Mister_Ruysbroeck 06-02-2003 11:41 AM

Online Monday
 
Quote:

Originally posted by leagleaze

I sent her an email asking her (a) why she bothered to interview me and (b) why she used MR's quote from the board out of context.
perhaps I should e-mail her and ask her why she is using copyrighted material (my post) without my permission in a publication designed to turn a profit?

robustpuppy 06-02-2003 11:47 AM

Just in time for Father's Day?
 
It's Fashion Insider Ken!

http://graphics7.nytimes.com/images/...on/01ken.1.jpg

And a link to the slightly amusing story:

http://www.nytimes.com/2003/06/01/fashion/01KEN.html

greatwhitenorthchick 06-02-2003 12:02 PM

Unfaithful
 
Quote:

Originally posted by notcasesensitive
I had two disturbing dreams last night... The first one was that my mom died while visiting some Eastern European country but that I couldn't get confirmation of her death because of some weird bureaucracy. Not likely to happen since my mom never travels out of the country, but still quite odd. The other one involved me having to climb out on a really unstable cliff/ledge to hit my golf ball that was perched up there. Once I got up there I realized that a golf game was really not worth dying over, so I starting trying to climb back down and was mid-descent when I woke up.

n(analysis anyone?)cs
I'll have to think about the first one if I have time. But as for the second one ... have you reached any big understandings or got new insight into something big or made a big decision lately (or is one hanging over your head)? Usually climbing up a cliff or reaching the top of a cliff and gaining a new insight means that you have had gained heightened awareness or understanding in your own life (whether good or bad), or you are about to. The fact it was golf that got you there in the dream is pretty irrelevant - it was just a vehicle.

The insight that you experienced in your dream (i.e. that golf is not worth risking your life), is probably similar to that which you have or will experience - e.g. you understand that something may not be worth what you initially think it is - or something like that.

The fact that you woke up while climbing down probably means that you are still trying to digest this understanding - if you are on the brink of this understanding - you will take a while to digest it. Expect to have more climbing/trekking/heights dreams in the future for a while. It looks as if it is something big you are thinking about.

leagleaze 06-02-2003 12:02 PM

Online Monday
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Mister_Ruysbroeck
perhaps I should e-mail her and ask her why she is using copyrighted material (my post) without my permission in a publication designed to turn a profit?

That would be fair use.

Mister_Ruysbroeck 06-02-2003 12:03 PM

Online Monday
 
Quote:

Originally posted by leagleaze
That would be fair use.
don't rain on my parade with your leagalities.

:smack:

leagleaze 06-02-2003 12:07 PM

Online Monday
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Mister_Ruysbroeck
don't rain on my parade with your leagalities.

:smack:

So sorry.

:rolleyes:

greatwhitenorthchick 06-02-2003 12:23 PM

Unfaithful
 
Quote:

Originally posted by notcasesensitive
I had two disturbing dreams last night... The first one was that my mom died while visiting some Eastern European country but that I couldn't get confirmation of her death because of some weird bureaucracy. Not likely to happen since my mom never travels out of the country, but still quite odd. The other one involved me having to climb out on a really unstable cliff/ledge to hit my golf ball that was perched up there. Once I got up there I realized that a golf game was really not worth dying over, so I starting trying to climb back down and was mid-descent when I woke up.

n(analysis anyone?)cs
Now this is interesting. I think your two dreams are tied together. This is what I think:

You are pissed off about something or other - you are having a hard time communicating to someone why you are pissed off - or someone doesn't seem to be understanding you lately, so you are frustrated. The first dream is all about this frustration. Death of a parent usually means that you fear some sort of loss, but I think in this case it is an outlet you are using to express some sort of anger.

So you're not mad at your mother - you're mad because of something going on in your life that (I think) involves some inability to communicate or reach understanding with someone. You dream that your mother dies so that you can have an acceptable outlet to express this anger. But it doesn't work because you get all snagged up in red tape. (I think actually that this red tape is your own invention - that you are scared of expressing this anger and so you are deliberately thwarting yourself).

So that dream gets you nowhere but makes you realize that you have to make a decision about what has got you angry (or your subconscious has made the decision already - it just has to tell your conscious mind about it), hence the next dream.

sebastian_dangerfield 06-02-2003 12:25 PM

Online Monday
 
Quote:

Originally posted by leagleaze
Wow, nice job there Heather. Not only did she not bother to report any of the items she got from me when she apparently wasted my time on an interview, she took a quote from Mr from the board, out of context.

http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1052440819671

I sent her an email asking her (a) why she bothered to interview me and (b) why she used MR's quote from the board out of context.


I know she interviewed Slave, Less and lord knows how many others. I have no problem with her story in and of itself, I just have to wonder why she bothered with all the research, and why she wasted all of our time.
That eight paragraph piece was touted as an in depth piece on the GA Findlaw debacle? That piece barely even gives a factual background on the history of the GA Boards. If I was virgin to the subject, I'd have learned absolutely nothing from that piece.

The brilliance of the piece is that it is so void of facts that it defies substance-based critique. Heather ought to write blurbs on new television shows for People Magazine because that's exactly what she wrote about Law Talkers.

Smith leaned over and spread them as wide as a desperate Tijuana hooker about to take it from a horse in front of a pack of drunken Americans for $500. Casting one's journalistic integrity to the wind for a miniscule bonus seems an awfully bad bargain... She probably could have kept more respect and wasted less effort for the check by just sucking off her supervisor.

Then again, what more can be expected in this economy? Everybody's a whore these days.

S(A shower probably won't cut it Heather... you'd better get some penicillin)D

notcasesensitive 06-02-2003 12:35 PM

Unfaithful
 
Quote:

Originally posted by greatwhitenorthchick
Now this is interesting. I think your two dreams are tied together. This is what I think:

You are pissed off about something or other - you are having a hard time communicating to someone why you are pissed off - or someone doesn't seem to be understanding you lately, so you are frustrated. The first dream is all about this frustration. Death of a parent usually means that you fear some sort of loss, but I think in this case it is an outlet you are using to express some sort of anger.

So you're not mad at your mother - you're mad because of something going on in your life that (I think) involves some inability to communicate or reach understanding with someone. You dream that your mother dies so that you can have an acceptable outlet to express this anger. But it doesn't work because you get all snagged up in red tape. (I think actually that this red tape is your own invention - that you are scared of expressing this anger and so you are deliberately thwarting yourself).

So that dream gets you nowhere but makes you realize that you have to make a decision about what has got you angry (or your subconscious has made the decision already - it just has to tell your conscious mind about it), hence the next dream.
Interesting thoughts, gwincky. Thanks. I do have some communication issues, but if there is a momentous decision relating to that stuff it hasn't made it into my consciousness yet...

Lexus Talionis 06-02-2003 12:37 PM

Online Monday
 
Here was my reaction - it'll be interesting to see how long it takes for SFTM to delete it. (Misspellings were required to get past West's filter.)
----------------------------------

SFTM: if I were you, I'd be pretty embarrassed by this article. If West is too pure of heart to be associated with GA's, it shouldn't have bought the site in the first place.

You were afraid you'd get sued, so you started deleting posts with content that you were afraid was too specific, defeating the purpose of the boards. You also deleted some smut. However, as I recall, some of the "potty mouth" words you deleted were "P@t@r Th@tt@m" and "www.l@wt@lkers.com".

Some folks decided that an alternative site would be more useful, and put a lot of hard work into setting it up. You plant an article smearing them, engaging in the very behavior you were afraid might happen here. You then accuse THEM of failing to "grow up." Here's a hint - your strategy for improving your corporate image is backfiring.

Tyrone Slothrop 06-02-2003 12:57 PM

book recommendation
 
I just read Positively Fifth Street, by James McManus, and liked it. He went to the World Series of Poker (not sure I have the title right -- there are others) in Las Vegas to cover it, and used his advance to enter the tournament. Not worth reading if you don't want to read about poker. If you do, you might also pick up The Biggest Game In Town, by A. Alvarez, an account of the 1981 World Series.

http://images.amazon.com/images/P/03...1.LZZZZZZZ.jpg

Positively Fifth Street is just out, so you have to buy it in hardcover, but stores like Cody's are selling it for 30% off, and Amazon is selling it for 40% off.

Replaced_Texan 06-02-2003 12:59 PM

Hipster Ironicus*
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Gattigap


* note: this is the article's reference, not my own. This board has caused me to remove the term ironic from my vocabulary altogether.
Me too.

Replaced_Texan 06-02-2003 01:11 PM

Absinthe Cocktail for Sale in Britain
 
Quote:

Originally posted by evenodds
Perhaps "Deco" will be the cocktail of Summer 2003:

Potent Absinthe Mix Stirs Up Controversy

LONDON (Reuters) - Absinthe, the fiery tipple with purported hallucinogenic properties, has stirred up fresh controversy in Britain where it will go on sale in nightclubs and bars next month packaged to be mixed with beer.

"Deco" comes with a small bottle of Kronenbourg lager with a shot of absinthe attached. The idea is to down the 45 percent-strong absinthe and drink the five-percent strength lager as a chaser.

Popularly held responsible for painter Vincent Van Gogh's mutilation of his own ear, absinthe has been banned in many countries but was never outlawed in Britain.

Full text: http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmp...in_absinthe_dc
Are they using the fake Absinthe without the wormwood? I thought the real stuff was only legal in Spain.

paigowprincess 06-02-2003 01:13 PM

On topicish: products!
 
I was just turned onto a new line of skin products by my fabulous new aesthetician, Epicuren Discovery. Not overly spendy, enzyme based line. ANyone try it?

purse junkie 06-02-2003 01:25 PM

Dawson's Creek--Plea for Help
 
Okay, who did Joey pick on the series finale, Pacey or Dawson?

I'm utterly embarrassed to be asking this so please be kind. I'm too wussy to Google it myself on my computer because I'm afraid it will pop up in the list of recent searches if anyone else here happens to use it.

P (I am so ashamed) J

Atticus Grinch 06-02-2003 01:27 PM

Fetish
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
1. An object that is believed to have magical or spiritual powers, especially such an object associated with animistic or shamanistic religious practices.
2. An object of unreasonably excessive attention or reverence: made a fetish of punctuality.
3. Something, such as a material object or a nonsexual part of the body, that arouses sexual desire and may become necessary for sexual gratification.
4. An abnormally obsessive preoccupation or attachment; a fixation.


At least def'ns 2 and 4 would allow for an "asian fetish." The (apparent) fact of it is that he has a particular attraction to women who are asian. We can argue whether it's "abnormally obsessive," but I don't see how you (or atticus, or whoever it was) can say it's definitely not a fetish.
Definition 2 involves fetish's non-sexual meaning. So does Definition 4, which becomes merely a value judgment when applied to sexual arousal.

I like brunettes with pale skin and medium-sized breasts. Is that a fetish? I've never slept with a redhead, but a co-worker told me they taste different, and I'm curious to know whether that's true. Is that a fetish? Billions of Asian men will only sleep with Asian women. Is that a fetish?

We, a majority white society, categorize people who are attracted to Asians as "fetishists." This accomplishes nothing other than dehumanizing Asians. I think we're putting a little too much stock in which aspects of attraction get their own subcategories on persiankitty.com.

ABBAKiss 06-02-2003 01:29 PM

Dawson's Creek--Plea for Help
 
Quote:

Originally posted by purse junkie
Okay, who did Joey pick on the series finale, Pacey or Dawson?

I'm utterly embarrassed to be asking this so please be kind. I'm too wussy to Google it myself on my computer because I'm afraid it will pop up in the list of recent searches if anyone else here happens to use it.

P (I am so ashamed) J
Pacey. She loves both of them, but she picked Pacey. Something about Jen's death showing them both that they had to be happy now, with what the reality of life was, and that they were happy together. The final scene was Pacy and Joey watching Dawson's movie in which the Joey character and the Dawson character get together and then calling Dawson to say the movie was perfect. So they sort of made everyone happy.

That said, I had not seen Dawson's Creek for about a season (at least). Who is the father of Jen's baby? What is that whole story? I didn't even know she was pregnant?

Sting 06-02-2003 01:29 PM

Online Monday
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Lexus Talionis
Here was my reaction - it'll be interesting to see how long it takes for SFTM to delete it. (Misspellings were required to get past West's filter.)
----------------------------------

SFTM: if I were you, I'd be pretty embarrassed by this article. If West is too pure of heart to be associated with GA's, it shouldn't have bought the site in the first place.

You were afraid you'd get sued, so you started deleting posts with content that you were afraid was too specific, defeating the purpose of the boards. You also deleted some smut. However, as I recall, some of the "potty mouth" words you deleted were "P@t@r Th@tt@m" and "www.l@wt@lkers.com".

Some folks decided that an alternative site would be more useful, and put a lot of hard work into setting it up. You plant an article smearing them, engaging in the very behavior you were afraid might happen here. You then accuse THEM of failing to "grow up." Here's a hint - your strategy for improving your corporate image is backfiring.
I was wondering when Infirmation would begin to see LawTalkers as a threat. Despite such attacks, the problem for both boards is that there is a dearth of practical and timely information about firms in the current legal economy.

There will always be a need for information about firms, salaries, QOL, etc... What we need even more are people who are willing to supply such information.

purse junkie 06-02-2003 01:39 PM

Dawson's Creek--Plea for Help
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ABBAKiss
Pacey. She loves both of them, but she picked Pacey... That said, I had not seen Dawson's Creek for about a season (at least). Who is the father of Jen's baby? What is that whole story? I didn't even know she was pregnant?
Goddammit! I hate being robbed of a sappy predictable ending! A charming fuckup like Pacey is the kind of guy you date, not marry! :mad:

No idea who's Jen's baby's dad. I'm shocked she chose to have it.

Replaced_Texan 06-02-2003 01:40 PM

Dawson's Creek--Plea for Help
 
Quote:

Originally posted by purse junkie
Okay, who did Joey pick on the series finale, Pacey or Dawson?

I'm utterly embarrassed to be asking this so please be kind. I'm too wussy to Google it myself on my computer because I'm afraid it will pop up in the list of recent searches if anyone else here happens to use it.

P (I am so ashamed) J
She picked Pacey, though she admitted that she and Dawson were "soulmates."

Edited to say "scroll, then post, scroll, then post."

Replaced_Texan 06-02-2003 01:45 PM

Dawson's Creek--Plea for Help
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ABBAKiss
Pacey. She loves both of them, but she picked Pacey. Something about Jen's death showing them both that they had to be happy now, with what the reality of life was, and that they were happy together. The final scene was Pacy and Joey watching Dawson's movie in which the Joey character and the Dawson character get together and then calling Dawson to say the movie was perfect. So they sort of made everyone happy.

That said, I had not seen Dawson's Creek for about a season (at least). Who is the father of Jen's baby? What is that whole story? I didn't even know she was pregnant?
The series finale was five years in the future from the last episode. Jen and Jack and Gran had moved to New York to live with Jen's mom, and Jen's then boyfriend (I'm blanking on his name) was also living in New York. In the interrum, it appears, Jack moved back to Capeside and hooked up with Doug. Jen drunkenly mentioned that her boyfriend knocked her up and left her, but she didn't mention who it was.

Atticus Grinch 06-02-2003 01:45 PM

Online Monday
 
Quote:

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
Smith leaned over and spread them as wide as a desperate Tijuana hooker about to take it from a horse in front of a pack of drunken Americans for $500. Casting one's journalistic integrity to the wind for a miniscule bonus seems an awfully bad bargain... She probably could have kept more respect and wasted less effort for the check by just sucking off her supervisor.
Oh, relax. It's a puff piece about West. Who knows whether it was always designed to be that way? Considering how many people she interviewed, and how none of it was used, Ms. Smith probably wrote a longer piece and it got cut down because it doesn't make for a very good story, except to us, and we're not the center of the target demographic for the American Lawyer. Otherwise, her editor should be pissed about how much time she wasted to get to this finished product.

My view is that it's a pretty rare journalist who would really think that a big corporation is right and a bunch of anonymous poo-flingers are wrong. It's hard for a PR flak to convince someone making <$40K that corporations are telling the truth. In any event, there were people on this board making the same point --- that the anticorporate purpose of the boards was fundamentally inconsistent with corporate ownership, and another move was inevitable. Making it about cuss words is just a convenient trope.

evenodds 06-02-2003 01:48 PM

On topicish: products!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by paigowprincess
I was just turned onto a new line of skin products by my fabulous new aesthetician, Epicuren Discovery. Not overly spendy, enzyme based line. ANyone try it?
Never heard of it, but I am on the cusp of replenishing my supplies, so I want recommendations.

Oh, and my hairdresser has just started stocking a new fab shampoo by Dikson. It's a great product for color-treated hair, and, of course, part of the allure is that it is not widely carried. Link: http://www.planethair.it/sottoMar.as...=Muster-Dikson

Even(embracing her inner product snob)Odds

Replaced_Texan 06-02-2003 01:54 PM

Online Monday
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Atticus Grinch
Oh, relax. It's a puff piece about West. Who knows whether it was always designed to be that way? Considering how many people she interviewed, and how none of it was used, Ms. Smith probably wrote a longer piece and it got cut down because it doesn't make for a very good story, except to us, and we're not the center of the target demographic for the American Lawyer. Otherwise, her editor should be pissed about how much time she wasted to get to this finished product.

My view is that it's a pretty rare journalist who would really think that a big corporation is right and a bunch of anonymous poo-flingers are wrong. It's hard for a PR flak to convince someone making <$40K that corporations are telling the truth. In any event, there were people on this board making the same point --- that the anticorporate purpose of the boards was fundamentally inconsistent with corporate ownership, and another move was inevitable. Making it about cuss words is just a convenient trope.
I was recently talking to one of our PR guys, and he was explaining to me that in the last five or so years, requests from the media for stories have changed dramatically. The reporters and producers expect everything to be ready to go and prepackaged. Interviews set up, consents obtained, and a press release or two ready to be cribbed. The PR guy in my company said that he's been in the media spin business for 18 years, and he's never seen the reporters so eager to just take what's handed to them.

I'd seen that "internet has grown up" comment at least two or three months ago in another publication, and it's obvious that West has it's prepackaged story ready for when a reporter comes calling about this issue. Deviations from whatever they've already put together will not be considered.

Maybe we should have our own little press package that we can put out there on the split from Infirmation. List posters who would be happy to be interviewed, put a couple of good quotes, maybe a timeline of the events. I can't imagine that there will be that many more stories about this issue, but you never know when something like that could be useful to counter the West media machine.

ABBAKiss 06-02-2003 01:57 PM

Dawson's Creek--Plea for Help
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
The series finale was five years in the future from the last episode. Jen and Jack and Gran had moved to New York to live with Jen's mom, and Jen's then boyfriend (I'm blanking on his name) was also living in New York. In the interrum, it appears, Jack moved back to Capeside and hooked up with Doug. Jen drunkenly mentioned that her boyfriend knocked her up and left her, but she didn't mention who it was.
Huh. I am really confused now. I caught just enough of the finale to know that Joey picked Pacey but I had no idea that it wasn't "real time." Weird. I guess I'll have to catch reruns.

I do not find Pacey or Dawson attractive, or Jen for that matter. The only decent looking person on that show is Joey, who is annoying as hell.

evenodds 06-02-2003 01:59 PM

Online Monday
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
Maybe we should have our own little press package that we can put out there on the split from Infirmation. List posters who would be happy to be interviewed, put a couple of good quotes, maybe a timeline of the events. I can't imagine that there will be that many more stories about this issue, but you never know when something like that could be useful to counter the West media machine.
That's an excellent idea. I've vetted press releases and I am always surprised at the number and quality of national newspapers who would publish our released with little or no alteration or reporting.

paigowprincess 06-02-2003 02:00 PM

Fetish
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Atticus Grinch
Definition 2 involves fetish's non-sexual meaning. So does Definition 4, which becomes merely a value judgment when applied to sexual arousal.

I like brunettes with pale skin and medium-sized breasts. Is that a fetish? I've never slept with a redhead, but a co-worker told me they taste different, and I'm curious to know whether that's true. Is that a fetish? Billions of Asian men will only sleep with Asian women. Is that a fetish?

We, a majority white society, categorize people who are attracted to Asians as "fetishists." This accomplishes nothing other than dehumanizing Asians. I think we're putting a little too much stock in which aspects of attraction get

their own subcategories on persiankitty.com.
Atticus, you do not get it. The fetish is focusing on something nonsexual (ie a race and its characteriftics; feet) and becomine obsessed with it, which can mean, only dating it, or only jerking off to it. But you are right that theperson who harbors such an asian fetish is dehumanizing the asians. This is prboably why an asian chick can spot a rice daddy a million miles away and will avoid him

As for your clear denial on this matter, it is what it is. Live with it, its who you are. For example, I forwarded the Prudence clip to my rice daddy friend (a ph.D is psychology- Dr. Rice Daddy). Now this guy is the first to admit he is an asian festishist and is actually toying with writing a book on how to be a successful rice daddy in manhattan (for example, he actually majored in chinese in college and taught ESL to chinese students in hopes of meeting FOB asians- backfired bc he could not tell by their names if they were male or female). Anyway, his response to the story , where Prudy suggested therapy was "wouldnt it be ironic if they ended up in my office?".

Wear your fetish proudly, Atticus. Just dont dehumanize any asians along the way.

leagleaze 06-02-2003 02:03 PM

Online Monday
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Replaced_Texan

Maybe we should have our own little press package that we can put out there on the split from Infirmation. List posters who would be happy to be interviewed, put a couple of good quotes, maybe a timeline of the events. I can't imagine that there will be that many more stories about this issue, but you never know when something like that could be useful to counter the West media machine.


This is a good idea, I'll write something up. People who would like to volunteer to speak to press if they ask for people please send me PM.


purse junkie 06-02-2003 02:03 PM

Dawson's Creek--Plea for Help
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ABBAKiss
I do not find Pacey or Dawson attractive, or Jen for that matter. The only decent looking person on that show is Joey, who is annoying as hell.
Which just goes to show, prime time's gone to hell in a handbasket ever since they cancelled 'Dynasty.'

Hell, even the butt-ugly cast of 'Falcon Crest' had the sleek Europimp look of Lorenzo Lamas going for it.

Atticus Grinch 06-02-2003 02:08 PM

Italian for Beginners
 
Caught this on cable. It was really quite good. Because it's Dogme 95 certified, the cinematography and the pacing are entirely different from an American movie, and the humor is very dry and subtle. I recommend it as a sweet little ensemble piece about loneliness and modern European life.

Italiensk for begyndere ("Italian for Beginners") (2001).

The woman who plays Guilia is a hot little filly. She's apparently a rock percussionist in real life. She replaces Audrey Tautou in my "I no speak English" sex fantasies.

paigowprincess 06-02-2003 02:08 PM

On topicish: products!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by evenodds
Never heard of it, but I am on the cusp of replenishing my supplies, so I want recommendations.

Oh, and my hairdresser has just started stocking a new fab shampoo by Dikson. It's a great product for color-treated hair, and, of course, part of the allure is that it is not widely carried. Link: http://www.planethair.it/sottoMar.as...=Muster-Dikson

Even(embracing her inner product snob)Odds
I had heard of the Epicuren facial and wanted to buy products but was told taht I should consult with an aesthetician who knew the line bc of the enzyme base of the products- could be harmful if the wrong products were used. I ended up getting the six step kit, which I had to wait like two weeks for bc the salon cannot keep it in stock. Just got it on Saturday and I love it. So far.

I would try to find a salon that does an epicuren facial in your neck of the woods. And give me feedback. You are my product hero.

Atticus Grinch 06-02-2003 02:18 PM

Fetish
 
Quote:

Originally posted by paigowprincess
Wear your fetish proudly, Atticus. Just dont dehumanize any asians along the way.
Hey, I clearly said I like brunettes with pale skin and medium sized tits. That's pretty open-minded. But if you can find me a redheaded Asian, I'll hit that with a quickness.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:14 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com