LawTalkers

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   Politics (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   A disgusting vat of filth that no self-respecting intelligent person would wade into. (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=757)

Penske_Account 01-09-2007 04:41 PM

This should make California politics fun........
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
There is the rub - "a state hospital". What if a private hospital is closer?
No pain, no gain?

Penske_Account 01-09-2007 04:42 PM

Baby steps
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
You trying to force me onto common ground with Penske and Hank?
No pain, no gain.

eta: ps: you can have Coltrane and Hank and I will square off against the two of you in the Battle of Italo-American Lawtalkers All-stars!

Replaced_Texan 01-09-2007 04:48 PM

Tiny Baby Steps
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
Unless you plan on dying in the next couple of years I don't think this is true, I think we will start seeing massive benefits from stem cell research in the next ten years.

At least that is what I have been told by the guys working on the Stem Cell project being funded by the California government. Clearly they are biased but they made a very convincing case.
It's not funded yet. It's still in appellate court and being hashed out. The agency had to get a loan from the government to kick start work because of the holdups.

BTW, for those of you obsessed as I am on this, these are fairly good resources for keeping up with what's going on in the stem cell world.

http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/sections/stem_cell/

http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/s...lantation.html

http://science.bio.org/cloning.news.html

Replaced_Texan 01-09-2007 04:51 PM

This should make California politics fun........
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
OK. I think it has a pretty good chance of succeeding. The way I look at it (and the reason I am lobbying for it) is that it can't be all bad to cover everyone. Once hospitals know that everyone has insurance then you won't have all those emergency room tragedies.

I hope I am not helping to bring the NHS to CA, but on the other hand, the current system just isn't working. We need to try something. People getting truned down at emergency rooms is unaccpetible, even if the fix means means becoming more ike those systems I hate. I guess that is a price I am willing to pay because anything is better than children getting denied medical care, especially in emergencies. Whatever the cost, that has to stop.
People are getting turned down at emergency rooms? That's illegal under EMTALA, which is why emergency rooms are as close to universal care in this country as we get.

Penske_Account 01-09-2007 04:54 PM

This should make California politics fun........
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
People are getting turned down at emergency rooms? That's illegal under EMTALA, which is why emergency rooms are as close to universal care in this country as we get.
Do we really need to get any closer? Isn't this the social safety net compromise?

Replaced_Texan 01-09-2007 05:00 PM

This should make California politics fun........
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
There is the rub - "a state hospital". What if a private hospital is closer?
Doesn't matter if it's a state or private hospital. They have to triage and stabilize anyone who shows up in the ER.

Spanky 01-09-2007 05:43 PM

This should make California politics fun........
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
People are getting turned down at emergency rooms? That's illegal under EMTALA, which is why emergency rooms are as close to universal care in this country as we get.
Maybe that was apocryphal. That is what I was told. Maybe they get triage but then are sent away to another hospital before they should be moved. I was also told that people were getting limbs amputated, that could be saved by transplants, because of lack of medical coverage.

Sidd Finch 01-09-2007 06:10 PM

This should make California politics fun........
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
People are getting turned down at emergency rooms? That's illegal under EMTALA, which is why emergency rooms are as close to universal care in this country as we get.

I thought that was part of the problem -- that people over-use emergency rooms because, for many people, that's the only way to get care. And as a result, some hospitals are closing ERs.


(Another reason people over-use ERs is because getting a regular appointment can be a miserable experience.)

Replaced_Texan 01-09-2007 06:20 PM

This should make California politics fun........
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
I thought that was part of the problem -- that people over-use emergency rooms because, for many people, that's the only way to get care. And as a result, some hospitals are closing ERs.


(Another reason people over-use ERs is because getting a regular appointment can be a miserable experience.)
Yes. And ER care is much, much more expensive than regular care.

ETA: The amputation thing would sorta kinda be related in an off way if people are delaying care for diabetes because they have no health insurance and eventually the disease progresses until circulation deficiencies kills a limb or two.

Tyrone Slothrop 01-09-2007 06:29 PM

Baby steps
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
Are you saying that politicians and parties don't do demographic studies and analysis to determine who is voting which way and then tailor, to an extent, messages, ads and candidates to appeal to those specific demographics?
No. I'm not saying that, and I don't think that has much to do with what I was saying.

Quote:

What does this mean, what are the factors?
Why does anyone vote the way they do? Some people vote out of self-interest, for the politician who will most likely increase their personal material well-being. Other people vote for the politician who most effectively expresses the values they wish to have expressed. Other people vote for the politician who they think will most likely increase the country's aggregate material well-being, regardless of their individual self-interest, because they're selfless and patriotic like that. Other people vote on a single issue, like abortion. And so on.

My point about the factors coinciding is that when you see (e.g.) 90% of the voters in a place (inner-city Detroit, rural Utah, etc.) vote for a particular candidate or party, it seems likely that most or all of these factors are cutting the same way, since people vary in the factors they consider important.

Quote:

Why can't you answer the questions?
What question didn't I answer? The question about RoI? That's the stupidest fucking question you've ever asked on these boards. Or in the last few days anyway.

Your point was that Democrats don't do a lot for inner-city blacks. And my point is that -- be that as it may -- inner-city blacks seem to prefer -- or to use your terms, get a better RoI -- to vote for Democrats rather than Republicans.

I don't believe I've anywhere suggested that the Democratic Party has been the wonder drug that works wonders for urban blacks. Why is it so hard for you to respond to what I have said instead of trying to put stupid words in my mouth?

etfs

Adder 01-09-2007 06:29 PM

This should make California politics fun........
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
People are getting turned down at emergency rooms? That's illegal under EMTALA, which is why emergency rooms are as close to universal care in this country as we get.
I thought emergency rooms could close themselves and, for example, not accept an ambulance? I thought that was alleged to have happened to a New York Times reporter who died as a result of a mugging afterwhich he apparently got inadequate care.

He was not turned down for inability to pay, of course, but I thought maybe this is what Spanky was thinking of.

Penske_Account 01-09-2007 06:29 PM

This should make California politics fun........
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
Yes. And ER care is much, much more expensive than regular care.

ETA: The amputation thing would sorta kinda be related in an off way if people are delaying care for diabetes because they have no health insurance and eventually the disease progresses until circulation deficiencies kills a limb or two.
I think ER did a sort kinda ripped from the headlines story about that a few weeks back......and maybe also the season before too!

Adder 01-09-2007 06:31 PM

Baby steps
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Why is it so hard for your to respond to what I have said instead of trying to put stupid words in my mouth?
Because he is Penske.

Penske_Account 01-09-2007 06:38 PM

Baby steps
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
No. I'm not saying that, and I don't think that has much to do with what I was saying.



Why does anyone vote the way they do? Some people vote out of self-interest, for the politician who will most likely increase their personal material well-being. Other people vote for the politician who most effectively expresses the values they wish to have expressed. Other people vote for the politician who they think will most likely increase the country's aggregate material well-being, regardless of their individual self-interest, because they're selfless and patriotic like that. Other people vote on a single issue, like abortion. And so on.

My point about the factors coinciding is that when you see (e.g.) 90% of the voters in a place (inner-city Detroit, rural Utah, etc.) vote for a particular candidate or party, it seems likely that most or all of these factors are cutting the same way, since people vary in the factors they consider important.



What question didn't I answer? The question about RoI? That's the stupidest fucking question you've ever asked on these boards. Or in the last few days anyway.

Your point was that Democrats don't do a lot for inner-city blacks. And my point is that -- be that as it may -- inner-city blacks seem to prefer -- or to use your terms, get a better RoI -- to vote for Democrats rather than Republicans.

I don't believe I've anywhere suggested that the Democratic Party has been the wonder drug that works wonders for urban blacks. Why is it so hard for your to respond to what I have said instead of trying to put stupid words in my mouth?
What are the common factors that you theorize are behind the voting pattersn of the inner city poor? Why is the RoI question stupid? Phrase it another way, based on the common factors that you identified in the first question, how successful are the local elected officials in delivering some meaningful fulfillment of such motivating factors? To the extent that there is a meaningful gap between the delivery of meaningful fulfillment and motivating factors, what intangibles do you think account for the continued voting patterns?

I don't expect that you will answer the above, because the answer would cause an honest look in the mirror assessment of the failure of the Democrat party to effectively deliver on its promises to the most disadvantaged in society (on a socio-economic basis, which, is in part, a factor of centuries of racial discrimination), but I will take your non-answer, duck and weave as confirmation of such failure.

Replaced_Texan 01-09-2007 06:40 PM

This should make California politics fun........
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Adder
I thought emergency rooms could close themselves and, for example, not accept an ambulance? I thought that was alleged to have happened to a New York Times reporter who died as a result of a mugging afterwhich he apparently got inadequate care.

He was not turned down for inability to pay, of course, but I thought maybe this is what Spanky was thinking of.
They can go on driveby status if they're overly full or understaffed. It looks like the hosptial in that case tried to go on driveby status but was denied by the local EMS authority if this editorial is right. Emergency rooms are pretty chaotic places, and it looks like that case was one where it's pretty clear that the system broke down pretty severely from the initial 911 call, to the ambulance pick up, to the triage in the ER, to his death.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:31 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com