LawTalkers

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   Politics (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   You (all) lie! (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=848)

Adder 01-11-2010 09:07 PM

Re: You (all) lie!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 412553)
how many former klan in the R senators?

that the Dems have the black vote simply means they hide their feelings, and make it that much more revealing when a reid comes out of the woods with his true feelings.

You are above this level of cheap faux cyncism.

Hank Chinaski 01-11-2010 09:12 PM

Re: You (all) lie!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Adder (Post 412561)
Because unlike Lott, who said, "the world would have been better if segregationist (liberals, sort of) had been elected" which is much different than Reid using antiquated terminology in expressing what might be uncomfortable, but not irrelevant, electoral analysis.

In other words, it's what you say and not how you say it.

read everything i wrote and then answer yourself

sebastian_dangerfield 01-11-2010 09:14 PM

Re: You (all) lie!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Adder (Post 412562)
I read it the same that Cletus did.

This doesn't support Cletus's position.

sebastian_dangerfield 01-11-2010 09:16 PM

Re: You (all) lie!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 412554)
again, if I cared to, I could post Carl levin saying how great Byrd has always been. the point would be?

I don't know. If you have one, please articulate it.

Adder 01-11-2010 09:18 PM

Re: You (all) lie!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 412564)
read everything i wrote and then answer yourself

As I did not ask a question, I am not sure what I am supposed to answer.

Also, you have not said anything intelligent on the "issue." Reid chose his words poorly. As to Lott, you are right that it was probably blown out of proportion, but there was no looking past his word choice to an innocent meeting.

sebastian_dangerfield 01-11-2010 09:25 PM

Re: You (all) lie!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 412559)
fuck history- justify what reid said.

No one can. But it was a harmless gaffe. He was speaking about Obama from a marketing standpoint - asserting cynically that the man could sell to various audiences. Comes off coarse for obvious reasons, the biggest being the archaic and patronizing "Negro" descriptive. But it wasn't racist and the man's clearly not a racist.

Neither are Republicans just because they're Republicans. The only people who believe they are are the idiots posting at Dailykos or Democratic Underground. You're setting up a strawman here, trying to conflate those giving Reid a pass with the shrill morons who blindly assert all Republicans are racists. They're not the same. Not even close. Serious, thoughtful people on both sides of the aisle agree that Reid's comment was terrible and stupid, but in no way racist. The only people seeing it another way are nuts like Steele and hacks trying to create controversy with it.

Hank Chinaski 01-11-2010 09:32 PM

Re: You (all) lie!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 412569)
No one can. But it was a harmless gaffe. He was speaking about Obama from a marketing standpoint - asserting cynically that the man could sell to various audiences. Comes off coarse for obvious reasons, the biggest being the archaic and patronizing "Negro" descriptive. But it wasn't racist and the man's clearly not a racist.

Neither are Republicans just because they're Republicans. The only people who believe they are are the idiots posting at Dailykos or Democratic Underground. You're setting up a strawman here, trying to conflate those giving Reid a pass with the shrill morons who blindly assert all Republicans are racists. They're not the same. Not even close. Serious, thoughtful people on both sides of the aisle agree that Reid's comment was terrible and stupid, but in no way racist. The only people seeing it another way are nuts like Steele and hacks trying to create controversy with it.

so he's not a racist cuz he's not? got it,

Tyrone Slothrop 01-11-2010 09:36 PM

Re: You (all) lie!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by PresentTense Pirate Penske (Post 412525)
That is ridiculous, the picture and its graphic imagery were part of the story, and at whose workplace is the front page of the NewYorkTimes not safe? The pictures of chicks in bikinis that get posted on the FB all the time are far more likely to create a workplace issue than the front page of the NYTImes and you know it. Why did you work so hard to defend such an odious practice as censourship?!!?

I have issues when people post those pictures on the FB, both because I work in an office which other people frequently walk into and because I live in a house with small children. Not because I dislike looking at chicks in bikinis. However, I am not an FB mod.

Tyrone Slothrop 01-11-2010 09:38 PM

Re: You (all) lie!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sidd Finch (Post 412535)
When did the GOP turn on Lott ("admit he should be toast") -- when he publicly lauded the segregationist party platform, or when, in a fitful effort to improve his image, he said he supported affirmative action?

But, no, you're right -- the Dems and the Rs have exactly the same problem with racism. That explains their virtual 50-50 split of the African-American vote.

Reid was explaining why he was supporting the first black President. Lott was explaining why we'd have been better off if a segregationist had been elected President in 1948. Just the same thing, really.

Hank Chinaski 01-11-2010 09:39 PM

Re: You (all) lie!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop (Post 412571)
I have issues when people post those pictures on the FB, both because I work in an office which other people frequently walk into and because I live in a house with small children. Not because I dislike looking at chicks in bikinis. However, I am not an FB mod.

are people in your office in denial about beslan/or 9/11?

you might be helping them if they see the pix?

Hank Chinaski 01-11-2010 09:40 PM

Re: You (all) lie!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop (Post 412572)
Reid was explaining why he was supporting the first black President. Lott was explaining why we'd have been better off if a segregationist had been elected President in 1948. Just the same thing, really.

translation: I never said bush fucked up the vaccine thing

i quit. this is pointless

Tyrone Slothrop 01-11-2010 09:45 PM

Re: You (all) lie!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 412557)
i remember 3 deletions; the contractors, WTC with people jumping out windows, and dead kids from Russia. i think DK posted them all.

as to their offensiveness, if I was her attorney, and since we can all read, and we allowed w/o deletion posts claiming president bush lied us into war and 100,000 or so people died, I would submit the deleted pictures were not as offensive as the bush lied/people died posts.

My test is whether I'm comfortable having it on my screen if someone I work with walks into my office. If I thought I was an outlier in this regard, I would lump, but my recollection is that I got complaints from other posters in at least one of those instances.

sebastian_dangerfield 01-11-2010 09:48 PM

Re: You (all) lie!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 412570)
so he's not a racist cuz he's not? got it,

I noted earlier why the man isn't a racist. His comment's only racist if you're the close-minded sort of person who thinks any comment that notes cultural difference between races is racist. He very crudely discussed something you know damn well all sorts of politicians talk about behind the scenes. You think the following conversations never go on anywhere anymore?
. . . .

Handler: "He, can you 'ethnic' it up here? It's a majority [insert demographics] audience."

Candidate: "Sure. I'll drop the Georgetown accent and go [insert demographic]."
. . . .

"Hey Georgie, can you bag the Connecticut inflections, play heartlander for the rubes?"

"Sheeeure. I'm from the sticks. Lit's go scrub sum brushhh."
. . . .

You, me, and every person alive knows Reid was discussing Obama's electability, and in doing that, politicians discuss some nasty sounding shit. But it is not racist.

What it is, however, is frightening. That a doddering old fool clueless enough to think that language is appropriate is shepherding health care "reform" through the senate underscores just how fucked the processes are down there.

Thankfully, whatever the outcome, there's a good chance this waterhead will be gone come November. His constituents are not fond of him.

Hank Chinaski 01-11-2010 09:50 PM

Re: You (all) lie!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop (Post 412575)
My test is whether I'm comfortable having it on my screen if someone I work with walks into my office. If I thought I was an outlier in this regard, I would lump, but my recollection is that I got complaints from other posters in at least one of those instances.

then own it. (i deleted a rant because we're just fucking with you but you do delete things only when a d asks. if I had asked the posts "bush lied people died" be deleted, you would have agreed? yes? no? I have a prediction)

Adder 01-11-2010 09:59 PM

Re: You (all) lie!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 412574)
translation: I never said bush fucked up the vaccine thing

Perhaps it is the belgian beer, but I do not see the parallel you are trying to draw.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:36 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com