| Greedy,Greedy,Greedy |
01-04-2017 02:40 PM |
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
Quote:
Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield
(Post 504846)
I didn't say there were two sides. I said you picked a side. I see four sides:
1. Hillary
2. Trump
3. Bernie
4. None of the above
You're in camp 1. And you hate camp 2. Any source arguing 2 sucks and 1 was robbed will be supported by you. Any source arguing 1 sucked, 2 is great, or 2 is okay, will be ripped by you. Any source arguing 3 was screwed by 1 will be recognized, but fought by you on the grounds that 3 was unelectable and unrealistic. Anyone like me, who falls into 4, but enjoys challenging your narratives, will be ripped as a 2 supporter, or 2 enabler.
2 will be in charge. We'll both deal with it. Maybe it'll be great, or a mess, or a fucking disaster. But until I know, I can't whine. But trust me -- if I don't like what I get out of 2, I'll be right there whining with you. But now, this early, that'd be premature. I'll save my bleating until it's warranted.
|
So which of your little camps do most Republicans fall in these days?
In case you haven't noticed, Hillary isn't running for anything these days, and Bernie's not likely to be either, once he gets whatever committee seats he's jockeying for. Expect Obama to be a force in the party long after both those suns have set.
I've always seen eye to eye with a lot of Republicans on things like TPP, which Hill went soft on. And I've always been with the progressive wing of the party on things like minimum wage and civil rights (note: not a Bernie issue). And the foreign policy world rarely fits these neat little categories. But I will say this, I don't care if shallow is the Intercept or Breitbart or you, shallow is shallow.
|