Quote:
	
	
		| 
 
					Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop
					(Post 518089)
				 If I understand you correctly, you object to this "sort of lingo" because it seems artificial to you,* which is to say that it does not reflect the reality you live in. Upon encountering it, you are unable to suspend disbelief.
 * Or, if there's an echo in here, you object both to the use of artifice, and to the fact that it isn't executed seamlessly.
 
 | 
	
 No.  I object to it because it dumbs down conversation.  Rape denial, downplaying of it, and blaming of victims, are very real things.  But there are hundreds of discrete reasons that people do those things.  Some people do one of those things, some two, some all three, and they often do these things for a mix of reasons unique to each person guilty of these behaviors.  To lump them all under the umbrella of "rape culture" eliminates the unique indictments and examinations that should be made and replaces them with a blunt catch-all accusation.  
And let's be honest about why this word has become popular today.  It is not intended to be a serious diagnosis.  It is intended to operate as a shorthand accusation.  It has bite.  And it's designed to have bite.  You hear it and you immediately think, "that's horrid."  It allows the user to throw it into a conversation like a hand grenade.  Instead of talking about the varieties of different ways people deny or downplay rape, you can call them all a part of "rape culture."  Cazart!  You've got everybody's attention.  
But then when you look into the word, and you realize it swallows so many disparate concepts as to make it rather meaningless, you realize you've been duped, as you might be duped by a Madison Avenue advertising slogan.  A collection of very serious issues has been pressed into a soundbite.  
Use any words you like, but if I were speaking to a broad audience of people about such a topic, I'd use words like rape denial, and blaming the victim.  And I'd call the people who are part of this undefinable "culture" rape and sexual assault apologists.  These do the trick without any hint of simplification or sensationalism.
ETA: While we're at it, this one really, really needs to go: "My truth."  Nobody has "his truth" or "her truth."  There are facts, which are what objectively occurred.  There are perceptions, which can differ, but generally dovetail on facts observed by the people perceiving events.  But there are no "unique truths."  This notion of "my truth" which I'm hearing a lot these days is in the same nuclear family as Kelly Anne Conway's "alternative facts."  
On the left, it's usually "my truth," and it seems to claim that one's emotional view trumps facts.  That seems mostly narcissism.  On the right, it's usually offered as "the way I see things."  ("Obama was not a socialist, and was not born in Kenya.  Those allegations are simply untrue.  I can show you documents proving them untrue."  "I don't care what you show me.  That's the way I see things.")  That's naked self-delusion.  
This shit needs to go.  I won't even talk to a person using these phrases, and I think that should be the rule for all thinking people.