LawTalkers

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   Politics (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   Election 2010: Teabaggin' the Ds & Rs (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=856)

Adder 12-07-2010 02:43 PM

Re: Huh?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Cletus Miller (Post 440199)
Also, are you *certain* you can get a cashout (re-)fi? Underwriting is a lot tougher, esp. for condos--if you aren't totally approved already, there's a meaningful risk you won't get a conforming loan.

No, not certain. We'll see. I was only hoping to take out about 50% of the equity, and assumed that wouldn't be hard, but haven't actually taken any steps down the road yet.

Hank Chinaski 12-07-2010 02:44 PM

Re: Election 2010: Teabaggin' the Ds & Rs
 
obama- the "negotiate with hostage takers" meme was unwise, you know- you'll see that in commercials next election.

but here is my question. the Rs support the "rich tax cut", okay, they can support a stance, right?

how is it obstructionism to fight to save them? the rs cut a deal to give the Dems stuff they felt important, but saved the thing they wanted. I mean the Rs control 1 house and almost control the other, as of the current will of the people. their stance should matter, shouldn't they?

edit: by the way, why did "the deal need to be done by 1/1 or middle class taxes will go up?" couldn't a deal be cut in March that would extend the "middle class breaks?"

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 12-07-2010 02:48 PM

Re: Huh?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 440196)
My sister and her husband are pros in that arena. I fear going out with them. Thankfully, Sat night is a birthday party for a friend, so aside from the cost of a bottle of Johnny Green* to lubricate ourselves beforehand, that evening is covered.

*I have yet to enjoy this in a condition in which I can truly, accurately claim to have appreciated the flavor.

As with all scotch, I'd suggest you see if you can find a good bar to have the first one in before investing in the bottle. Nothing worse than discovering the bottle is so-so but still having to finish it.

Cletus Miller 12-07-2010 02:50 PM

Re: Huh?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Adder (Post 440203)
No, not certain. We'll see. I was only hoping to take out about 50% of the equity, and assumed that wouldn't be hard, but haven't actually taken any steps down the road yet.

You'll be able to, but be prepared for a rate higher than the advertised rates for conforming loans.

sgtclub 12-07-2010 02:51 PM

Re: Huh?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 440202)
try it. you owe that to yourself. but if you like it, then you are ignorant of scotch- (hi Less!)

2 - don't like green or gold for that matter. I stick to black and blue. But Macallum 12 is the best bang for the buck out there.

Cletus Miller 12-07-2010 02:51 PM

Re: Huh?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 440202)
try it. you owe that to yourself. but if you like it, then you are ignorant of scotch- (hi Less!)

From the man enamored of Loch Dhu.

Hank Chinaski 12-07-2010 02:51 PM

Re: Huh?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy (Post 440205)
As with all scotch, I'd suggest you see if you can find a good bar to have the first one in before investing in the bottle. Nothing worse than discovering the bottle is so-so but still having to finish it.

well, one thing worse is not having scotch at all. Green isn't so bad as to be undrinkable, it's just an unwise choice made by someone who is tied up in trite brand loyalty, or like sebby, someone curious to try it. Sebby shoud try it. less on the other hand should be censured from posting on scotch.

Hank Chinaski 12-07-2010 02:52 PM

Re: Huh?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sgtclub (Post 440207)
2 - don't like green or gold for that matter. I stick to black and blue. But Macallum 12 is the best bang for the buck out there.

single malt as your main choice means you are not an alcoholic, no offense.

Hank Chinaski 12-07-2010 02:56 PM

Re: Election 2010: Teabaggin' the Ds & Rs
 
press conference- he seems to be arguing with the reporters as if the reporters were the left wingers that generate the question (which they are or course) but it's strange.


p.s. he just admitted the NYT is an extreme liberal opinion driven organ.

smh

sebastian_dangerfield 12-07-2010 02:57 PM

Re: Huh?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 440202)
try it. you owe that to yourself. but if you like it, then you are ignorant of scotch- (hi Less!)

It's hard to find in bars. But since you're so vehement on this, and I defer to you on scotch, perhaps I'll just buy another bottle of Black and see if we can find a bar serving Green.

The only problem is, by the time we get to the bar with the Green, I'll have already had too much Black to assess what the hell Green's like. Black is truly lethal. You can drink it like soda.

(I actually kind of like Black more than Blue. It's been an odd progression. Years ago, I thought Black too charcoaly. Now I like it more than any other.)

Adder 12-07-2010 02:57 PM

Re: Huh?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sgtclub (Post 440207)
2 - don't like green or gold for that matter. I stick to black and blue. But Macallum 12 is the best bang for the buck out there.

I tend to second your endorsement of Macallan, and agree that the 12 is a good value, although I have been mocked for that view on the FB before.

I also like Highland Park 12.

Hank Chinaski 12-07-2010 02:59 PM

Re: Huh?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 440212)
It's hard to find in bars. But since you're so vehement on this, and I defer to you on scotch, perhaps I'll just buy another bottle of Black and see if we can find a bar serving Green.

The only problem is, by the time we get to the bar with the Green, I'll have already had too much Black to assess what the hell Green's like. Black is truly lethal. You can drink it like soda.

buy the green. I bought 2 bottles, because I forgot I didn't like it a year before the second time.

sebastian_dangerfield 12-07-2010 03:01 PM

Re: Huh?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 440214)
buy the green. I bought 2 bottles, because I forgot I didn't like it a year before the second time.

Stop toying with me. I'm liable to get upset and confused at Pearson's Liquors and wind up buying a goddamned bottle of Glenlivet, which I think we can all agree is terrifically overrated.

Sidd Finch 12-07-2010 03:09 PM

Re: Huh?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 440155)
Having read this thread, I think the two best points are the one you make above, and somebody's later comment about how this deal is a bizarre rare compromise wholly satisfying both of the extremes while entirely screwing the middle.

STP. I made that other point a little later.

Yay, me.

Sidd Finch 12-07-2010 03:09 PM

Re: Gay Marriage
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 440159)
"nice for new year" hank passes on mean post here.

Too busy fucking the dog?


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:45 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com