| sebastian_dangerfield |
10-20-2020 08:24 PM |
Re: Yah as shitty an idea as Ikea fucking furniture
Quote:
That's exactly the wrong way to think about it. It's not a binary world, where things are categorically safe or unsafe.
|
Incorrect. Gyms are unsafe. I deem school unsafe. I'm affluent. Neither matters to me. YMMV if you weren't as lucky, or you were more lucky (there are very safe schools for a price).
Quote:
There is some risk to, say, eating at a restaurant, or going to the DMV, or having a kid go to school, or getting a haircut. The way to think about it is NOT: well, it's safe for my kid to go to school, so it must be safe to do all those things -- I'm going to do them all.
|
I agree. But I didn't say that. We're disagreeing about how to disagree with binary thinking.
Quote:
It's more like, I going to get a haircut today, so I'm not going to compound the risk by eating out and going to the DMV. If you want to balance COVID risk and living your life, you have to think about what cumulative risk you're willing to take, not just apply a simple go/no-go heuristic for everything in your life. Too many people doing the latter.
|
That's one approach. I think my approach, which is to eschew high risk elective activities while engaging liberally in low to no risk activities, and engaging in high risk activities only when required or the cost-benefit warrants it, is preferable. We've different paths to similar ends.
Quote:
Yes, rather. My point was that he wasn't being tribal or Trumpy. Your media diet may feature two opposing tribes all the time, but people are a little more complicated.
|
You and I may be. The person you met was behaving badly, in terms of his own risk and risk to others.
Quote:
That's a lovely sentiment, but it missed the point in a way that the media (for example, the local news here) is constantly missing the point. Those people are not only taking risk on themselves, they are endangering other people around them. If the only consequences were for themselves and their hypothetical offspring, it's easier to think in libertarian terms, but the issue here is that in a pandemic, sick people make other people sick.
|
You're not going to solve that, so it's pointless to dwell on it. All one can do is avoid them.
Quote:
I drove through Utah and Arizona not too long ago. Didn't see anyone wearing masks in Utah. There were some in Arizona, but by far the exceptions rather than there rule.
|
I have friends in Utah and will be there. My friends who moved there from CT will be wearing masks, and we will be visiting places where people are largely outside and wearing masks when not. I may be fine. I may not be fine. I may have had it and get it again. I may relapse (a friend of mine had that experience). I will wear a mask, I will avoid people, and in that regard, I will have acted decently, respectably, and sensibly. That is all one can do.
And if I die young, I'll regret seeing my family in its older years. But it'll be a gift to my wife. And let's be honest -- we've all had a better run than most of us deserve. And most of it's been luck. I have no business having had the life I've had. That's probably the only self awareness I have, but it's a pretty essential variant of it. And I recommend imbibing it. Imagine how lucky we are. How dare we be neurotic except in regard to protecting others.
|