|  | 
| 
 Too funny "KARL ROVE'S WEB OF EVIL Right from day one, Karl Rove cemented his link with the religious right, by being born on Dec 25, 1950, a day many on the right refer to as “Christmas," a celebration of the birth of Jesus Christ (an influential leader worshiped by the religious right.) It was no surprise that Dec 25, 1950 was ALSO the same EXACT day Communist forces recrossed the 38th parallel into South Korea. Clearly, Rove was already making an impact. "This is what he does," says one observer. After an unremarkable stint in high school, Rove entered the University of Utah, which currently ranks FIFTH HIGHEST among the nation's campuses for drug-related arrests. Rove dropped out after a few years. What is more interesting: when you research other individuals who have dropped out of college, two names keep coming up. Rush Limbaugh. Tucker Carlson. Coincidence? . . . (more) .. . http://www.huffingtonpost.com/theblo...evil_3731.html | 
| 
 Too funny Quote: 
 Wait, didn't Teddy K. drop out of law school? eta: oops, me bad, TK was expelled from HLS. Twice. once for cheating on a test, and once for paying a classmate to cheat for him. the immoral depravity of the Dummos knows no bounds. | 
| 
 Too funny Quote: 
 | 
| 
 Das anti-Kapitalists! Quote: 
 | 
| 
 Voodoo Economics 
 | 
| 
 Voodoo Economics Quote: 
 | 
| 
 Rare Honesty From the interview: AMC: That's true. I think...and this is a rare case for the Bush administration. The more detail you get into with this story, the more clear it becomes not only did Rove not break the law, that by Washington standards, he didn't really do anything wrong, either. But again, this is a situation where the headline may sway people. I don't know if it will or not. This is certainly an inside the Beltway story. CB: Do you agree with Hugh that it doesn't relate at all then to people out in the Midwest, or people in California don't care that Karl Rove was part of this story, Ana Marie? AMC: Well, I think that they could care. It's really...the Democrats, for once, have a story where they don't have to do the explaining, that it's actually the White House's duty to try and explain the situation in such a way that it doesn't make it look like Rove did something wrong. And it's true. I think it's pretty clear from the E-mail at least that he sent to Cooper, that he didn't break the law. But to be on the defensive, where you're explaining the difference between breaking the law and doing something wrong, is a situation that the Bush White House doesn't want to be in. . . . . AMC: I think again, I'm just going to repeat myself, that the nature of cable news is going to be what benefits the Democrats in this case, if they choose to make an issue out of it. Because I can just sit here and repeat Karl Rove identified and undercover CIA agent, and then it's up to Hugh and his compatriots to kind of explain why that's not such a wrong thing to do. --------------------- http://www.radioblogger.com/#000822 (AMC is Wonkette. Her point is, this is a BS noisebomb, and it only has legs to the extent that people only see and remember the initial NYT headlines.) | 
| 
 He'd like to buy the world a Coke... Quote: 
 | 
| 
 Quote: 
 | 
| 
 Quote: 
 | 
| 
 Quote: 
 | 
| 
 I'll Make It Simple, Slave Quote: 
 | 
| 
 Quote: 
 | 
| 
 Das anti-Kapitalists! Quote: 
 | 
| 
 Das anti-Kapitalists! Quote: 
 | 
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:48 PM. | 
	Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com