LawTalkers

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   Politics (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   Objectively intelligent. (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=884)

sebastian_dangerfield 10-30-2020 03:21 PM

Re: Objectively intelligent.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop (Post 530425)
"Gothams"? There's more than one now?

It was a Joker reference. But yes, I think a whole bunch of east coast and midwestern cities are going to get ugly this winter when the businesses eeking by using an outdoor model (sidewalk restaurants, etc.) start shutting down and the covid cases start increasing.

sebastian_dangerfield 10-30-2020 03:22 PM

Re: Objectively intelligent.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Did you just call me Coltrane? (Post 530427)
I agree...when I'm the plaintiff, which I am now more than I used to be.

The best check is the referral fee. None of the work, a third of the gain.

Hank Chinaski 10-30-2020 05:18 PM

Re: Objectively intelligent.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Did you just call me Coltrane? (Post 530427)
I agree...when I'm the plaintiff, which I am now more than I used to be.

I hate being defendant. I'll usually let one of my partners run with those cases. But my work is slow (biggest client is aerospace- would you people get back on airplanes? PLEASE?) so this week I eagerly put together a proposal to handle a big D case.

:mad::mad:The sacrifices this disease is making me endure......:(:(

LessinSF 10-30-2020 05:33 PM

Re: Objectively intelligent.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Did you just call me Coltrane? (Post 530423)
Almost all of my appellate work has been the result of me winning summary judgment and the plaintiff appealing. Even my one post-trial appeal was an appeal of an SJ motion that was denied way early in the case. All legal issues.

Trials are dumb - a case that goes to trial is a failure.

I worked for the Nevada Supreme Court for three years, and thereafter did a lot of appellate work for the firm to which I moved. But, other than one guy, I am not in any sort of loop, and he is Nevada only.

Hank Chinaski 10-30-2020 05:45 PM

Re: Objectively intelligent.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by LessinSF (Post 530432)
I worked for the Nevada Supreme Court for three years, and thereafter did a lot of appellate work for the firm to which I moved. But, other than one guy, I am not in any sort of loop, and he is Nevada only.

I'd imagine (at least in Michigan) that Sup Ct. experience is not really that useful? No commercial cases get to our Sup Ct (although some dick just Petitioned my appeals court win to our State Sup Ct), but he is just trying to delay the trial for 4 months. Ain't going up.

Icky Thump 10-30-2020 06:52 PM

Re: Objectively intelligent.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 530431)
(would you people get back on airplanes? PLEASE?)

That's gonna be a no from me, dawg.

Icky Thump 10-31-2020 06:57 AM

Re: Objectively intelligent.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 530428)
Yup. If you're trying a case, you're losing money. Or not making as much as you should have.

Some defendants, actually many defendants, won't pay unless they know the gun is loaded.

LessinSF 10-31-2020 01:03 PM

Re: Objectively intelligent.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 530433)
I'd imagine (at least in Michigan) that Sup Ct. experience is not really that useful? No commercial cases get to our Sup Ct (although some dick just Petitioned my appeals court win to our State Sup Ct), but he is just trying to delay the trial for 4 months. Ain't going up.

It has changed since I worked there, but you would have been wrong. There was no intermediate court of appeals, so every single appeal, whether a water rights issue, death penalty, divorce, DUI, or even commercial cases went to the Nevada Supreme Court

Hank Chinaski 10-31-2020 04:10 PM

Re: Objectively intelligent.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by LessinSF (Post 530436)
It has changed since I worked there, but you would have been wrong. There was no intermediate court of appeals, so every single appeal, whether a water rights issue, death penalty, divorce, DUI, or even commercial cases went to the Nevada Supreme Court

And they had to take every appeal?

LessinSF 10-31-2020 06:14 PM

Re: Objectively intelligent.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 530437)
And they had to take every appeal?

Yes. Statutory right of appeal and no intermediate court of appeal, so yes. When I was there it was about 2000 cases per year. Only 300 or so were chosen for oral argument, and only about 100 published opinions resulted . The remainder were resolved by unpublished order.

sebastian_dangerfield 11-01-2020 05:09 PM

Re: Objectively intelligent.
 
So we've got the Trump trains rolling through this state. A line of a about 50 cars beeping horns circled through the cul de sac today, flags flying. And I'm fairly isolated. Odd target for that sort of thing.

My folks told me they've clogged traffic in their area.

I found it to be dark comedy. But I don't think many neighbors shared that perspective. It seems counterproductive -- a really good way to alienate voters... a really good way to annoy the shit out of people.

The El Camino was to be expected. The 7 Series BMW looked out of place in the mix.

Hank Chinaski 11-01-2020 08:28 PM

Re: Objectively intelligent.
 
Sometimes I feel Trump might be a bit deranged. Am I crazy?

Tyrone Slothrop 11-01-2020 11:02 PM

Re: Objectively intelligent.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 530440)
Sometimes I feel Trump might be a bit deranged. Am I crazy?

He has the brainworms.

Icky Thump 11-02-2020 05:56 AM

Re: Objectively intelligent.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 530439)
So we've got the Trump trains rolling through this state. A line of a about 50 cars beeping horns circled through the cul de sac today, flags flying. And I'm fairly isolated. Odd target for that sort of thing.

My folks told me they've clogged traffic in their area.

I found it to be dark comedy. But I don't think many neighbors shared that perspective. It seems counterproductive -- a really good way to alienate voters... a really good way to annoy the shit out of people.

The El Camino was to be expected. The 7 Series BMW looked out of place in the mix.

Yeah, they are doing it everywhere. But so far, peaceful where I am. Don't be scared. It's not like these fat boys are the Jem'hadar.

sebastian_dangerfield 11-02-2020 08:57 AM

Re: Objectively intelligent.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Icky Thump (Post 530442)
Yeah, they are doing it everywhere. But so far, peaceful where I am. Don't be scared. It's not like these fat boys are the Jem'hadar.

I saw no reason for fear. They had more of a parade vibe than a menacing affect. Their choice of neighborhood, however, was odd. The houses are spaced pretty far apart, and it’s not like people have huge Biden signs all over their homes. Few votes to get, and few people to upset. If they wanted to “own” some Biden voters, they should have targeted a more densely populated neighborhood.

(I’ve a modified sign in our yard that mixes up the pres and vp candidates from both sides [Biden/Trump, Trump/Harris on alternate sides] as a goof, which may have confused them, but they were driving too fast for me to see their faces.)


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:45 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com