LawTalkers

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   Politics (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused. (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=879)

sebastian_dangerfield 02-06-2017 05:14 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
This one's particularly pointed on the issue of why a lot of people like us are uniquely incensed by Trump: http://m.truthdig.com/report/item/con_vs_con_20160619

sebastian_dangerfield 02-06-2017 05:22 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ThurgreedMarshall (Post 505552)
Enough of your empty-headed bullshit. I don't critique your inconsistency. I question your complete lack of any foundation whatsoever. You shift back and forth on whatever whim you're riding that day with this bullshit neutral outsider watching-the-world-burn poser image that you don't understand everyone sees right through. Inside baseball aspects. Fuck outta here with that.

TM

Sees right through to what? You yourself stated elsewhere: I don't have a side. That's my whole argument. Neither side was worth taking.

I'd like to have had a side. I had one with Kerry v. Bush (it was Kerry), but I haven't had much of one since. That's my fault? That's a pose? You're being silly.

ThurgreedMarshall 02-06-2017 05:32 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 505589)
Sees right through to what? You yourself stated elsewhere: I don't have a side. That's my whole argument. Neither side was worth taking.

I'd like to have had a side. I had one with Kerry v. Bush (it was Kerry), but I haven't had much of one since. That's my fault? That's a pose? You're being silly.

Right.

TM

sebastian_dangerfield 02-06-2017 05:38 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ThurgreedMarshall (Post 505590)
Right.

TM

Oh, I see what's going on here. You think I'm a Trump supporter.

You're not that pathetic, are you? If that's all you've got, concede.

ETA: I've never seen a point, particularly a strongly felt or indignantly made one, I couldn't help but attempt to destabilize. The reflexive desire to poke a hole in the consensus is too strong to resist.

ThurgreedMarshall 02-06-2017 05:50 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 505591)
Oh, I see what's going on here. You think I'm a Trump supporter.

Nope. Clearly you do not see what is going on here.

TM

Adder 02-06-2017 05:57 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 505577)
So let's say Party X wins a seat in London by 90%, party Y wins one in the country by 51%. Equal votes go to the Executive choice, yet the popular vote is quite slanted. I didn't say "we do that," I said we basically do the same.

No, it's not basically the same as even at the level of "seats" we give the rural candidate two votes that aren't justified by his district's population.

sebastian_dangerfield 02-06-2017 05:57 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop (Post 505573)
But this:
Goldman Sachs is now worried that Donald Trump was being serious this whole time.The folks at Goldman Sachs should, in theory, be thrilled. After all, Trump is filling his administration with the bank’s alumni. But now Goldman Sachs has come out with a dour report dampening expectations of a Trump-inspired economic boom.

When Trump won the presidency, Wall Street was overjoyed. The thinking was that he would give them big tax cuts, deregulation, and infrastructure spending. This would set the stage for economic liftoff. But this optimism was predicated on the theory that Trump was just kidding about the immigration and trade policies that Wall Street doesn’t like.

The grim conclusion that Goldman Sachs’s economists have reached could be summed up as: “Oh my God, Trump actually believes the things he says. He’s really going to clamp down on immigration and re-write trade rules along protectionists lines.” As the report actually says, “Some of the recent administrative actions by the Trump Administration serve as a reminder that the president is likely to follow through on campaign promises on trade and immigration, some of which could be disruptive for financial markets and the real economy.”

In other words: This clown in the White House is for real and our fantasies that he’d govern like a conventional Republican were folly.

In the report, anxiety about Trump’s policies is coupled with a realization that, despite unified government, gridlock persists in Washington because the Republicans can’t agree on basic policy and the two parties are becoming even more polarized. Don’t bet your farm on the expected Trump boom.
Jeet Heer

I think he's just trying to knock out all of his promises on paper early, so he can move along to the profiteering with appropriate political cover as soon as possible.

They're just orders. "So called" judges will invalidate a bunch anyway, soon after the base is done following the stories. Credit for promises technically made. Hell, he'll probably undo a bunch of them quietly when they become problematic.

sebastian_dangerfield 02-06-2017 05:59 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ThurgreedMarshall (Post 505592)
Nope. Clearly you do not see what is going on here.

TM

I'm trolling in an echo chamber?

ETA: Refute Hedges. I'd find that amusing.

Tyrone Slothrop 02-06-2017 06:42 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 505589)
You yourself stated elsewhere: I don't have a side. That's my whole argument.

If you keep choosing to stake out the center, you might as well have a side -- it's saying that you make up your mind on the basis of what other people think, but without actually caring about anything except how you are perceived.

Tyrone Slothrop 02-06-2017 06:44 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 505594)
I think he's just trying to knock out all of his promises on paper early, so he can move along to the profiteering with appropriate political cover as soon as possible.

They're just orders. "So called" judges will invalidate a bunch anyway, soon after the base is done following the stories. Credit for promises technically made. Hell, he'll probably undo a bunch of them quietly when they become problematic.

You and I seem to have very different understandings of how the man's mind works. You seem to think he's a conventional politician. I'm more with Josh on this.

Hank Chinaski 02-06-2017 07:28 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Adder (Post 505593)
No, it's not basically the same as even at the level of "seats" we give the rural candidate two votes that aren't justified by his district's population.

Exactly. It isn't mathematically precise, but very very close to it.

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 02-06-2017 07:47 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 505577)
So let's say Party X wins a seat in London by 90%, party Y wins one in the country by 51%. Equal votes go to the Executive choice, yet the popular vote is quite slanted. I didn't say "we do that," I said we basically do the same.

Because I am helpful, there are many countries that elect a head of state by direct election.

But, point made, many states do not, and almost all indirect elections will have some form of distortion between the popular vote and whatever vote counts.

Hank Chinaski 02-06-2017 10:09 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy (Post 505599)
Because I am helpful, there are many countries that elect a head of state by direct election.

But, point made, many states do not, and almost all indirect elections will have some form of distortion between the popular vote and whatever vote counts.

Your link seems to require searching by country. I'm short for Commish of PTO. Can't be caught searching such stuff. Adder, would you research?

sebastian_dangerfield 02-06-2017 11:09 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop (Post 505596)
If you keep choosing to stake out the center, you might as well have a side -- it's saying that you make up your mind on the basis of what other people think, but without actually caring about anything except how you are perceived.

"Neither" isn't the center. It's not making up your mind, but opting out.

But it's not stance without principle. As Hedges notes, if all the system offers is different varieties of corruption, hitting "none of the above" sends a message. The parties are sclerotic, and entirely out of touch, but they got the message this year: Offer More of the Same, and you'll get the mother of all protest candidates.

I think it was Mencken who said every decent man has to hoist the black flag and act as a pirate now and again. If Trump's the near death drunk our system needs to get sober, indulgence of his debauched administration will have served a significant purpose.

Personally, I believe our problems are beyond a political fix, for all of the reasons Hedges eloquently explains. You've read War is a Force that Gives Us Meaning. He applies the same lucidity in Empire of Delusion. Read that and tell me he hasn't perfectly described this country. Perhaps only something as volcanic as the forecasted Trumpocalypse will shake us to serious policy change.

More of the same was going to be fine for people like us. But in case you hadn't noticed, I'm guessing all of the households on this board are in the top 10%. Our perceptions are the rose colored opinions of courtiers. Or as Hedges would more aggressively note, the useful idiot servants and creators of intellectual cover for corporatist masters.

No one misses the irony that some of the loudest liberals we know speak from gilded perches funded by corporations working against many of the progressive policy planks they profess to hold dear. Handing out hypocrite citations to the professional liberal set is like passing out speeding tickets at the Indy 500.

Hank Chinaski 02-06-2017 11:38 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop (Post 505596)
If you keep choosing to stake out the center, you might as well have a side -- it's saying that you make up your mind on the basis of what other people think, but without actually caring about anything except how you are perceived.

Yet the middle, as in people who don't buy into either party whole heartedly, is, I think thinking, but whatever. You lot are the thinkers, with accepting the dogma. I can't tell you how ill it made me the last weeks of the campaign, when I seemed the only voice saying " don't vote third party, this is a toss up," and then the meme started of "if you say hil is a poor candidate you are sexist." My prayer is the dems dig theirs heads out of their asses and realize how this perfect storm happened.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:45 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com