![]() |
Re: Doesn’t Matter Who Wins the K Race; We’re All the Same
Quote:
Real change would involve rethinking all kinds of corporate subsidies and a reduction in defense and incarceration spending and an actual investment in our infrastructure and health and other safety net systems. TM |
Re: Doesn’t Matter Who Wins the K Race; We’re All the Same
Quote:
|
Re: Doesn’t Matter Who Wins the K Race; We’re All the Same
Quote:
|
Re: Doesn’t Matter Who Wins the K Race; We’re All the Same
Quote:
|
Re: Doesn’t Matter Who Wins the K Race; We’re All the Same
Quote:
|
Re: Doesn’t Matter Who Wins the K Race; We’re All the Same
Quote:
https://thechive.files.wordpress.com...rip=info&w=600 TM |
Re: Doesn’t Matter Who Wins the K Race; We’re All the Same
Quote:
|
Re: Doesn’t Matter Who Wins the K Race; We’re All the Same
Quote:
|
Re: Doesn’t Matter Who Wins the K Race; We’re All the Same
Quote:
The argument that increased minimum wage will come out of the pockets of shareholders, owners, and management has as much heft as the argument you raise. Quote:
We profit from, I believe the term is, "informational asymmetries." A discussion that introduces intrinsic value, which is nothing but a focus on the basic value of something before the exchange value is established, would help to lower our exchange value. A really amusing way of effecting a correction would be for someone on a big network to put out a primetime ten part series, taking ten overpaid-for jobs, and analyzing each, with whistle-blowers making admissions about what the jobs really involve. Call it, "What Your [Insert Job] Really Does." Quote:
Quote:
We already have a form of intrinsic valuation of labor: Minimum wage. That's a baseline value assigned to an hour of labor, regardless of what exchange value would dictate. In a socialist or communist system, one could assign all sorts of intrinsic values to different types of work. But again, we needn't do that. All we need to do is start the conversation about intrinsic valuation here and let it become an academic scaffolding for the argument that management and professionals are overpaid. Market forces would do the rest. (It would work hand in hand with tech, which is already doing this in a different manner.) The argument that the upper middle class is actually stealing the most from the economy and keeping the poor poor, rather than the 1%, is quietly gaining traction already. We've all seen articles about that, and there's some truth to it. Quote:
And cited within it: https://slate.com/news-and-politics/...t-america.html I could cite a bunch more like that. Quote:
______ * YMMV, but law, regulatory issues, etc. are a limited chessboard, involving a lot of baseline manipulation of humans. I think the ability to manipulate situations and people is at least as much if not more innate than learned. You either know how to manipulate or you don't, and while I think a bit of it can be learned, the ability to do it at the level required to be an effective strategist is in your bones, or it isn't. |
Re: Doesn’t Matter Who Wins the K Race; We’re All the Same
Quote:
|
Re: Doesn’t Matter Who Wins the K Race; We’re All the Same
Quote:
|
Re: Doesn’t Matter Who Wins the K Race; We’re All the Same
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
2. ?????? 3. Social justice and peace on Earth Sounds so crazy it just might work. Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Doesn’t Matter Who Wins the K Race; We’re All the Same
Quote:
|
Re: Doesn’t Matter Who Wins the K Race; We’re All the Same
Quote:
|
Re: Doesn’t Matter Who Wins the K Race; We’re All the Same
Quote:
LessinYangon, Myanmar |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:36 AM. |
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com