| 
		
			| paigowprincess | 10-07-2003 03:06 PM |  
 Not Amused by Poll! Poll
 
	Quote: 
	
		| Originally posted by Bad_Rich_Chic
 Ah, but that trailer trash comes by such names legitimately and by long tradition. I believe most of those white trash surname names are the names of significant confederate officers, and naming one's children after the man under whom their father served is a long, longstanding tradition.  There is a reason Beau ("Beaumont" "Beauregard") is a common southern name.
 
 |  if this is indeed accurate, how come these names are only trendy now when the person for whom the white trash brat is named for died in 1865 and the interceding peole were named Billy, Bob or Billy Bob?
 
	Quote: 
	
		| .
 
 I guess I don't get as worked up over people wanting their kids names to sound "waspy," any more than I do people wanting their kids names to sound biblical.  Do we required ethnic-advertising in child naming now?  What is a "legitimate" reason for picking a name?  I only get annoyed by the cross-cultural pretention when the guy named "Lipschitz" wears his clan tartan discovered in Glasgow - and then only because (i) he got sadly ripped off by the crafty scots and (ii) he is advertising himself as a fool.
 
 |  and what exactly is the difference here besdies the fact that one ethnic xerox is in the form of a name and the other is in the form of a man skirt?
 
it is a recent trend that screams "self loathing wannabe".  Have you read the Nanny Diaries?  It is all about social climbing women who finally marry some cash and give their kids the most rEdiculous names.  
 
Some of the women in my family are named Edith, Beatrice and Roxine. I am totally naming my future daughters Edie, Bea and Roxy.  However, I will not be naming any sons for my Uncle Marvin.   I think I will just stick with the classic names of Charles, Henry and James.  Simple, classic, lovely.   |