| 
		
			| Tyrone Slothrop | 01-23-2007 12:33 PM |  
 global warming, illustrated
 
	Quote: 
	
		| Originally posted by sgtclub
 First of all, since when did economics become a science?
 
 |  It's the dismal science.  
 
Whatever you think of economics as a discipline, the question of whether inequality is increasing is an empirical one.
 
	Quote: 
	
		| Second this politization of science is nothing new and happens on both sides of the aisle.  I don't know why you want to make this a partisan issue.
 
 |  That is, of course, exactly what many conservatives want you to think, on a range of issues from evolution/ID to global warming to inequality.  Who are the lefty partisans peddling junk science and trying to create uncertainty on those issues?
 
You can find lefty hacks peddling junk on other issues -- Michael Bellesiles' "research" on colonial gun ownership comes to mind, but he was abandoned by the academy once his hackery became evident.  On the issues I named above, people like Reynolds are funded by conservative-aligned interests -- corporations and the religious right -- who have good reasons to confuse and forestall science.  Where do lefties have analogous interests?  I'm not saying it never happens, but off the top of my head I can't think of an example.
 
	Quote: 
	
		| Third,  why is the rising gap, if it exists, necessarily bad?
 
 |  That is a whole separate conversation that I don't have the time to get into now.  Suffice it to say that once you acknowledge that inequality is rising, the next question is: why?  To the extent that governmental policies are to blame, even a libertarian should be able to see that the benefits of government action should not go dispropotionately to the most well off. |