| 
		
			| ltl/fb | 02-21-2006 01:51 PM |  
 A Few Good Men
 
	Quote: 
	
		| Originally posted by Sexual Harassment Panda
 I'm confused.  I guess the Turks v. Armenians would be genocide, but what about the Romans and the Christians?  Genocide, or just an ass-kickin' party?
 
 |   Well, I am not a European history buff, but I think that the Romans basically controlled all of the known world.  If they were trying to obliterate all Christians in the territory they controlled, which was all of the known world, then it seems like it would be genocide.  If there were known areas that were not controlled by the Romans, and the Romans were aware of large Christian populations in those areas, and the Romans weren't trying to obliterate the Christians in areas outside of their control, then not genocide.  Unless they planned to conquer all unknown territories and obliterate the Christians there too.  Then it's planned genocide.
 
I think perhaps we are confusing "genocide" with "ethnic cleansing," and, even worse, thinking that one of those two terms applies to the Fringe Plan.  The Japanese killing all Koreans in Japan, but letting them continue to exist/procreate in Korea (which they controlled?), seems more like an ethnic cleansing thing -- Koreans outside of Japan OK, but no Koreans in Japan.  Hitler's plan was a genocide/holocaust because he seemed to want to conquer the world, and kill all Jews in the areas he controlled, which, if all went according to plan, would mean no Jews anywhere.  
 
Under the Fringe Plan, Middle Easterners in the US and the west, OK; anyone currently in the Middle East, not OK. |