LawTalkers

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Fashionable (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=14)
-   -   Towards A Virtual Williamsburg! (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=868)

taxwonk 10-04-2013 12:05 AM

Re: Towards A Virtual Williamsburg!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by bold_n_brazen (Post 482989)
Terri Hatcher and I once talked about our tits.

And both sets were real and they were spectacular.

taxwonk 10-04-2013 12:09 AM

Re: Towards A Virtual Williamsburg!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Did you just call me Coltrane? (Post 482996)
The best looking undressed breasts are those blessed with milk ready to be expressed.

The best looking undressed breasts in the world are the ones that right now, you are allowed to put your hands on pretty much at will, allowing for decorum, of course.

dtb 10-04-2013 12:55 PM

Re: The board is so dead, Hank doesn't bother to make new avatars
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Did you just call me Coltrane? (Post 483022)
2:03:23

Did anyone see the somewhat-amusing-but-not-terribly-memorable movie about identity theft starring Michael from Arrested Development and the full-figured gal from Bridesmaids? (I think her last name is McCarthy and she's a first cousin to Jenny McCarthy -- at least I inferred that from something I saw on a magazine cover in the checkout line at Duane Reade.)

But anyway, the funniest scene in the whole movie is when the full-figured gal is trying to make her escape from Michael Bluth on foot. She's got a big backpack or something and tries to run away on a super-highway after he's pulled the car over. He kind of half-jogs/half-walks and easily catches up to her, and she says pantingly, "What are you? Kenyan?" I still giggle just remembering that scene. I was going to just use that line, but figured it didn't have the legs (ha!) to be very successful, as probably only seven other people even saw that movie. Maybe it was called Identity Theft? Meh.

As for the 2:03:23 [ahem], my husband has only run two marathons. The first one, he entered on a lark, without marathon-specific training, and finished in 3:07. He figured if he trained for the next one, he could do better, which he did, but only by about four minutes. He is Superman!

Did you just call me Coltrane? 10-04-2013 01:28 PM

Re: The board is so dead, Hank doesn't bother to make new avatars
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by dtb (Post 483028)
.

As for the 2:03:23 [ahem], my husband has only run two marathons. The first one, he entered on a lark, without marathon-specific training, and finished in 3:07. He figured if he trained for the next one, he could do better, which he did, but only by about four minutes. He is Superman!

Damn. So he trained and only gained 4 minutes? I'd feel like the training was a waste of time.

dtb 10-04-2013 02:06 PM

Re: The board is so dead, Hank doesn't bother to make new avatars
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Did you just call me Coltrane? (Post 483029)
Damn. So he trained and only gained 4 minutes? I'd feel like the training was a waste of time.

Exactly. That's why he's only run two. He runs a lot, just not marathons.

He runs shorter races and almost always wins his age group. If he doesn't win, he's in the top two or three. Of course, we're not in a big urban area, but the people who win even our cute little local races are decent runners. The guys who win in the 20s and 30s age groups are sub-6'ers.

ThurgreedMarshall 10-04-2013 03:50 PM

Top 20
 
http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=2031

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=2032

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=2033

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=2034

TM

ThurgreedMarshall 10-04-2013 03:51 PM

Re: The board is so dead, Hank doesn't bother to make new avatars
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by dtb (Post 483030)
Exactly. That's why he's only run two. He runs a lot, just not marathons.

He runs shorter races and almost always wins his age group. If he doesn't win, he's in the top two or three.

He sure does sound dreamy. Tell us more.

TM

Hank Chinaski 10-04-2013 04:51 PM

Re: The board is so dead, Hank doesn't bother to make new avatars
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by dtb (Post 483030)
Exactly. That's why he's only run two. He runs a lot, just not marathons.

He runs shorter races and almost always wins his age group. If he doesn't win, he's in the top two or three. Of course, we're not in a big urban area, but the people who win even our cute little local races are decent runners. The guys who win in the 20s and 30s age groups are sub-6'ers.

What is a "sub-6'er?" and for what distance?

Pretty Little Flower 10-04-2013 05:01 PM

Re: The board is so dead, Hank doesn't bother to make new avatars
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 483037)
What is a "sub-6'er?" and for what distance?

It's a special short guy division. Kind of like a Clydesdale class.

Hank Chinaski 10-04-2013 05:06 PM

Re: The board is so dead, Hank doesn't bother to make new avatars
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pretty Little Flower (Post 483038)
It's a special short guy division. Kind of like a Clydesdale class.

conf to flower: short in height or short, you know? to be discrete maybe ask dtb what shoe size her husband wears?

dtb 10-06-2013 11:39 PM

Re: The board is so dead, Hank doesn't bother to make new avatars
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 483039)
conf to flower: short in height or short, you know? to be discrete maybe ask dtb what shoe size her husband wears?

Discrete? Huh? Any chance you meant discreet?

13.5, for the curious.

Now even Thurgreed thinks he's dreamy! (Almost typed Thurgreed's real name, there. And there, too.)

Did you just call me Coltrane? 10-07-2013 11:51 AM

Re: The board is so dead, Hank doesn't bother to make new avatars
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 483037)
What is a "sub-6'er?" and for what distance?

Right. Are we talking 5k or 13.1? Because if it's 5k that's fast but not THAT fast. We have guys in my small local burb going sub-18 for 5k. I'm not one of those people.

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 10-07-2013 12:58 PM

Re: The board is so dead, Hank doesn't bother to make new avatars
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by dtb (Post 483040)
Discrete? Huh? Any chance you meant discreet?

13.5, for the curious.

Now even Thurgreed thinks he's dreamy! (Almost typed Thurgreed's real name, there. And there, too.)

Thurgreed has a foot fetish? This is new.

dtb 10-07-2013 01:46 PM

Re: The board is so dead, Hank doesn't bother to make new avatars
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Did you just call me Coltrane? (Post 483041)
Right. Are we talking 5k or 13.1? Because if it's 5k that's fast but not THAT fast. We have guys in my small local burb going sub-18 for 5k. I'm not one of those people.

There's a cluster of youngish dudes who run low 5's (up to 5:15 for a 5k) and under 6 for a 10k. Most races around here are 5 and 10ks, with an occasional 5-miler. I don't know, that seems pretty darned fast to me.

Did you just call me Coltrane? 10-07-2013 01:54 PM

Re: The board is so dead, Hank doesn't bother to make new avatars
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by dtb (Post 483047)
There's a cluster of youngish dudes who run low 5's (up to 5:15 for a 5k) and under 6 for a 10k. Most races around here are 5 and 10ks, with an occasional 5-miler. I don't know, that seems pretty darned fast to me.

Low 5s is fast. I get smoked by the local HS CC boys running sub-17s. Of course it probably doesn't help that I outweigh them by 40 lbs.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:40 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com