LawTalkers

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Fashionable (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=14)
-   -   Welcome back E/O, leagl and Fringey: no one say the name "Penske" 3 times in a row (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=845)

sebastian_dangerfield 12-03-2009 06:11 PM

Re: On a "need to know" basis
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop (Post 409137)
I was going to tell her to go for it, if only to get some reverse psychology going.

This is not a comment on ABBA, but one someone asks for advice on a chat board and the response is this loud and uniform, you've got to know that em is going to make the opposite decision, because the only reason em is asking for advice at all is that em wants to do it but knows that it's a bad idea.

I can't believe this is even debated. The guy's treatment of her during pregnancy proves him what she called him - a fucking sociopath. The solution here is to suck it up, deal with being a single parent and limit the kid's involvement with the asshole to as little time as possible. All other options are wishful delusions.

Some people are just shit. This guy fits the bill. Take out life insurance on him. He sounds like the sort of idiot who'll fall off the wagon and wreck some high powered automobile or jet ski three sheets to the wind. Load up on a pile of insurance so the kid gets a nice nest egg for college. That's about the only value you'll get from what sounds like an utter piece of trash.

Direct enough?

Flinty_McFlint 12-03-2009 06:14 PM

Re: Welcome back E/O, leagl and Fringey: no one say the name "Penske" 3 times in a ro
 
Man, I'm so glad I'm a devout Christian.

Hank Chinaski 12-03-2009 06:15 PM

Re: Welcome back E/O, leagl and Fringey: no one say the name "Penske" 3 times in a ro
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Cletus Miller (Post 409153)
Do you have a suggestion for a better way to "leave it alone"* than the tack she has taken thus far**? I guess she could get more socratic or say "ask your father", but either of those have most of the same pitfalls as just telling the truth or not.

*which I agree is the correct advice.
**which I think is walking the tightrope b/t telling the truth and not.

tugging on her underwear gets her mind on something else.

cheval de frise 12-03-2009 06:15 PM

Willow -- the director's cut
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by PresentTense Pirate Penske (Post 409165)
[true story] People get really worked up over this issue. I remember some years back I was out at a bar in the Chi, with an old college friend of my first wife and some friends of the friend (a newly married midwestern couple in their early 30s). The first wife wasn't there. At that point, to, quote the Luniz, we had been together "too long". Anyhoo, the 4 of us got into a conceptual discussion of monogamy and cheating yada yada yada. So, much like some of my socks on the PB I staked out the outlier position and said sex is sex, its no big deal and I really don't care if the first wife is nailing someone else as long as its not Hank. The newlyweds, at least the wife, was super offended (and oozing insecurities) by this. We argued about for about 3 hours. By this time everyone was fairly buzzed, i.e. drunk as hell, and it was 2 in the AM, which made it seem like a good time to go to some late night place (the Catacombs in Lincoln Park I think it was called).

When we got there we kept arguing and I said I think I will pick up someone up and you can report it back to the wife if you want. Did I mention I was wearing a kilt? So I propositioned some drunken college girl who was arguing with her friends over whether I was truly "Scottish Style", which out of a sense of honour I did righteously prove and which such forthrighteousness endeared me to the coed and got me an invite back to her bachelorette pad. This whole exchange inflamed the newlywed wife who jumped into the fray and cockblocked me. All in all I didn't care as I wasn't going to go back to her place anyway, but it gave me more ability to stoke her fires on the monogamy/cheating issue. So we end up at the bar, she's drunk and livid about my behaviour and tries to order a drink and the bartender cuts her off. She turns around and starts to walk away from the bar, then whips around runs at the bar, hurdles it and takes out the bartender with a drunken haymaker.

End result, she ends up in jail and I end up not getting laid. All in the name of monogamy and anti-cheating. [/true story]

ymmv

What, no unicorns?

CDF

Fugee 12-03-2009 06:16 PM

Re: On a "need to know" basis
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ABBAKiss (Post 409144)
I honestly don't know what to do. We are not together, but he is making my life living hell. Unfortunately, I do still hate-fuck him pretty regularly.

Anyway, I find it interesting that I am being told both that "people change" and that my douchebag ex won't.

Honestly, I don't think he is capable of a relationship. I think his character is fatally flawed and he may even be a sociopath, because no one in their right mind would cheat on me and tell me they were leaving me when I was pregnant at their request for a 21-year-old who lives with her parents and cannot hold a candle to me in any aspect of life whatsoever. And this is not merely my biased opinion.

That said, I cannot simply get him out of my life because he is my daughter's father. So I feel very trapped.

Go back and read Thurgreed's posts about changing. He didn't change until he wanted to change. So far nothing you posted has indicated McDouche wants to change -- he just wants you back. Those are not the same thing. And why should he change when he's got you all torn up not wanting to be a single mom and still fucking him? He's got you right where he wants you -- just like he always has.

Unless and until he changes, you would still be a single mom if you got back together with him -- the only difference would be that one of your "kids" is technically an adult.

Yeah it sucks to be a single mom when you didn't even want to have kids at all. But you've got a really cute little girl who depends on you and as someone else said, the only way out of that is to give full custody to McDouche which sounds like a bad bad idea. If you limit your relationship with him to being your daughter's father, maybe you can meet someone nice and get a healthy relationship.

Unfortunately I think Lester called this. But just stop and think about the previous times the board has resoundingly told you what you wanted to do was a very bad idea and consider what might have happened if you had listened.

Hank Chinaski 12-03-2009 06:17 PM

Re: On a "need to know" basis
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cheval de frise (Post 409155)
Well put (and 3).

CDF

here's the thing- I always give great advice and every bim here knows that BUT when semi-retards like Sidd and you and 3457 "2" me then Abba has to question the wisdom of what I told her. You're a net negative when you do this. think. about. it.

Pretty Little Flower 12-03-2009 06:17 PM

Re: Willow -- the director's cut
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cheval de frise (Post 409173)
What, no unicorns?

CDF

[true story] I read the entire story thinking that Penske was for sure going to end the night having the sex with the cockblocking angry newlywed wife. I was very disappointed. [/true story]

dtb 12-03-2009 06:19 PM

Re: On a "need to know" basis
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ABBAKiss (Post 409150)
I am terrified of being a single mother. My daughter is great, and I love her, but I have no interest in being a single mother. None. I am so fucking livid that I am. I am doing the best I can, but I do not want to be a mom on my own, and I cannot be with him, so I am fucking trapped.

I did not want kids. He talked me into it. I still do not want kids.

Being a single parent is terrifying. And hard. Really hard. Especially if you're working full-time, and your child(ren) is very young.

But please believe me on this one. You must perform douchebag extraction before you can find someone who will give you what you want. It's imperative. Do not hate fuck him, do not give him the time of day other than what you must in order to fulfill your court-ordered obligations.

Trust me also that there are loads of men who would appreciate you, worship you! and treat you as you want to be treated. Lots of men would love to have a ready-made family. It sounds implausible (especially among the male participants on this board), but it's true.

But the first step is getting rid of the douchebags in your life. I speak from experience.

Adder 12-03-2009 06:19 PM

Re: On a "need to know" basis
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Fugee (Post 409174)
But you've got a really cute little girl who depends on you and as someone else said, the only way out of that is to give full custody to McDouche which sounds like a bad bad idea.

Actually, I think someone else said "adopt her to someone" which does not necessarily mean McDouche, assuming he would consent.

Cletus Miller 12-03-2009 06:19 PM

Re: Welcome back E/O, leagl and Fringey: no one say the name "Penske" 3 times in a ro
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Replaced_Texan (Post 409169)
I think, "I don't know" is a good answer to most questions about the reasons for someone else's behavior. It's usually not a lie, though one can of course speculate.

But in this case, its a lie and puts dtb in the future role of the lying stepmother.

The more I think about it, quasi-socratic would be the way I'd probably go--I like the "I don't believe it either" because it's a non-answer that doesn't make one sound clueless (as I think "I don't know" does).

Adder 12-03-2009 06:19 PM

Re: Willow -- the director's cut
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pretty Little Flower (Post 409176)
[true story] I read the entire story ...[/true story]

You're a liar.

Hank Chinaski 12-03-2009 06:22 PM

Re: On a "need to know" basis
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by PresentTense Pirate Penske (Post 409165)
[true story] People get really worked up over this issue. I remember some years back I was out at a bar in the Chi, with an old college friend of my first wife and some friends of the friend (a newly married midwestern couple in their early 30s). The first wife wasn't there. At that point, to, quote the Luniz, we had been together "too long". Anyhoo, the 4 of us got into a conceptual discussion of monogamy and cheating yada yada yada. So, much like some of my socks on the PB I staked out the outlier position and said sex is sex, its no big deal and I really don't care if the first wife is nailing someone else as long as its not Hank. The newlyweds, at least the wife, was super offended (and oozing insecurities) by this. We argued about for about 3 hours. By this time everyone was fairly buzzed, i.e. drunk as hell, and it was 2 in the AM, which made it seem like a good time to go to some late night place (the Catacombs in Lincoln Park I think it was called).

When we got there we kept arguing and I said I think I will pick up someone up and you can report it back to the wife if you want. Did I mention I was wearing a kilt? So I propositioned some drunken college girl who was arguing with her friends over whether I was truly "Scottish Style", which out of a sense of honour I did righteously prove and which such forthrighteousness endeared me to the coed and got me an invite back to her bachelorette pad. This whole exchange inflamed the newlywed wife who jumped into the fray and cockblocked me. All in all I didn't care as I wasn't going to go back to her place anyway, but it gave me more ability to stoke her fires on the monogamy/cheating issue. So we end up at the bar, she's drunk and livid about my behaviour and tries to order a drink and the bartender cuts her off. She turns around and starts to walk away from the bar, then whips around runs at the bar, hurdles it and takes out the bartender with a drunken haymaker.

End result, she ends up in jail and I end up not getting laid. All in the name of monogamy and anti-cheating. [/true story]

ymmv

translation: Tucker Max has begun selling his factory seconds.

LessinSF 12-03-2009 06:25 PM

Breaking tiger prenup news!
 
Elin offered $5MM now, $55M in two years, staggering up to $80MM.

Hank Chinaski 12-03-2009 06:30 PM

Re: Breaking tiger prenup news!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by LessinSF (Post 409182)

abba, toss him this story and ask him what he can do to match?

Adder 12-03-2009 06:30 PM

Re: Breaking tiger prenup news!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by LessinSF (Post 409182)
Elin offered $5MM now, $55M in two years, staggering up to $80MM.

"Because if he doesn’t pay now, he’ll be paying more later - in lost endorsements. Woods needs Nordegren to stay with him to maintain the fraudulent image that will cause his sponsors to likely honor his deals with them short-term. Woods has morals clauses in most of those contracts, and an ugly divorce on top of everything else we now know could be a death blow to his endorsement career. At least among his brand advertising partners"

This is absurd.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:24 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com