| ThurgreedMarshall |
01-08-2009 03:48 PM |
Re: For Penkse
Quote:
Originally Posted by Penske_Account
(Post 376794)
Why? the start up production costs would be huge and the risk, especially in such a saturated market would probably make financing prohibitively costly. In the alternative she has been on, at the least, the Today show, in two segments, FoxNews and CBS morning, this week, all for free, and that is just based on my very imperfect knowledge of her TV appearances. Seems she is making some good moves and the result is, her schtick produces a lot more income for her than either of our relative talents produce for us. no offence.
|
I think you're completely full of shit. My point isn't that her shrill, annoying complaints and bullshit aren't effective when it comes to getting on tv and selling books to morons (in fact, I was implying that she's just as annoying as O'Reilly and probably could have her own show). This is not a study in business 101 where we are analyzing her barriers to entry in the television business. And I don't know why the hell you're comparing her income to ours since that has absolutely nothing to do with anything.
The point I made is, NBC need not play her stupid fucking game. I doubt the people who tune in to The Today Show would change the channel because Coulter yelled about being banned and I'm sure they wouldn't if they watched that interview with her (where she was rude, condescending and stupid all at the same time) and Lauer simply said, "Fuck off" (or the sanitized early-morning equivalent). If you think they need her more than she needs them, you are delusional.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Penske_Account
(Post 376794)
Based on your take on what she should do, i.e. start her own show, maybe you should start your own net based on the above principle. I, for one, would watch it, as I would with any entertainment appearances you might make.....that said, I'll take a wild guess that given the historical success, relatively, of NBC's Today show, that everything that they did this week was strategically motivated and that they consider it, essentially, a win.
|
Jesus Christ. Of course they do. I'm saying that they needn't. She knew her bitching would bring her more attention. They knew bringing her back would bring higher ratings. The question I am essentially asking is: When does the nuisance of dealing with her exceed the return that blip yields? You seem to think never. I think it was 10 years ago. Stop treating this topic like you're being objective and acknowledge that you're really just saying, "But MSNBC gave Olbermann a show and lots of money and I hate him, so I need to defend Coulter." I will be happy to acknowledge that I was in no way being objective either.
TM
|