LawTalkers

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Fashionable (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=14)
-   -   Fashion Board 12-09-03 through 1-08-04 (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=511)

Pretty Little Flower 01-05-2004 05:02 PM

Excellent opportunity for a joke.
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone_Slothrop
http://i.cnn.net/cnn/2004/TECH/space...ars.3d.pan.jpg

Because I like all of you -- well, almost all of you -- let me tip you off to a terrific Opportunity For Humor just sitting out there. Be the first in your office to make this joke: "The first pictures are just back from Mars, and they found ____________."

Fill in the blank with something unrelated but topical:

a) John Kerry's presidential chances.
b) Osama bin Laden
c) Jimmy Hoffa (not topical, but usually good for a chuckle)
d) The guy who programmed the BCS computer.
e) JustForFun
f) etc.

Your pal,

T.S.
Oh man, there goes my week.

Alex_de_Large 01-05-2004 05:03 PM

Excellent opportunity for a joke.
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone_Slothrop
http://i.cnn.net/cnn/2004/TECH/space...ars.3d.pan.jpg

Because I like all of you -- well, almost all of you -- let me tip you off to a terrific Opportunity For Humor just sitting out there. Be the first in your office to make this joke: "The first pictures are just back from Mars, and they found ____________."

Fill in the blank with something unrelated but topical:

a) John Kerry's presidential chances.
b) Osama bin Laden
c) Jimmy Hoffa (not topical, but usually good for a chuckle)
d) The guy who programmed the BCS computer.
e) JustForFun
f) etc.

Your pal,

T.S.
-Michael Jackson's nose
-Monticore
-Lacy Petersen
-Joe Strummer

taxwonk 01-05-2004 05:16 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by robustpuppy
Hank, much as I would rather pretend that shite you quoted didn't exist, could you post a link to a source for it?

I'm too lazy and too busy looking for schoolmarm avatars to research it myself.
It's funny how she just assumes it her in the hypothetical. I suppose she also believes that X was me, and not dualit.

Replaced_Texan 01-05-2004 05:16 PM

A ranting and a raving
 
Because I'm totally and completely disinclined to do much work at all today, I've been taking a look at the rants and raves forum on Houston's Craigslist.

I found this gem. I don't care if it's true or not, but it's one of the funniest things I've read in awhile:

http://houston.craigslist.org/rnr/21516553.html (spree: rant, sex alluded to, but no pictures, nothing graphic)

ThurgreedMarshall 01-05-2004 05:19 PM

SnoopDog says buy a Nokia
 
Quote:

Originally posted by baltassoc
I also wasn't trying to be too judgemental: this site is (or was) all about the Benjamines too. Nothing wrong with that. I was just trying to wrap my head around the fact that when I thought the term "sell out" at seeing Snoop Dog selling cell phones, and the negative connotation that invokes, I was perhaps imposing a cultural assumption that is inappropriate (or perhaps simply irrelevant) in the rap context. I'm willing to accept that, but as my post noted, my biases are such that while I can see relaxing the standard (i.e. selling out is okay), there is still some limit (custom written songs and redickulous videos are still too far).

So I ask again: is selling out really "selling out" when making money is considered a definative positive in the underlying cultural paradigm? And if so, isn't this really more honest than the pablum rock artist try to spout about not being in it for the money?
There is more than one form of selling out.

1. Willing to do what it takes to make the most money one can.

2. Willing to change who you are to maximize your earning potential.

It seems like your definition of selling out falls closer to (1) (Although you can argue that (2) is a subset of (1), I don't think it's that simple.) The term sell-out was charged in black communities long before rap music. And it doesn't just mean getting as much money as you can. It means a lot of things from trying to pass as white to swallowing your opinions around white people in order to get a job, keep a job, move ahead, etc. So, your question is more complicated than you probably think. I will only answer it as it applies to rap music.

It used to be that if you were a rap artist, you took one of two paths. You would either try to maximize your earning potential by doing whatever the label wanted you to do (read: mold yourself into what some white executive thought white kids wanted to hear) -- and that meant, be as much like Will Smith or MC Hammer as possible. Wear shiny clothes. Rap about harmless shit. Etc. You were viewed as a sell-out because you'd be selling your soul to be successful -- trying to be someone you are not. Trying to be less black (and therefore less threatening) than you are.

But, back then, you sold a few records and (as Ice Cube put it) your Ghetto Pass was revoked. You were a joke in the industry and all that fame and fortune did you no good because it didn't last long and you couldn't carry it to the places you wanted to go, since you got no respect once labeled a sell-out.

So, few people sold out that way. Everyone made many attempts to be "true" and "real" to who they were. The sad thing is, the people who were becoming the most popular with suburban white kids (read: MTV/Clear Channel) were the ones who had gang or drug dealing and violent histories. So, being "real" took on a whole new meaning that had nothing to do with the actual origin of the word. A new form of selling out arose -- that of acting like you were a hood when you just graduated from The School of Performing Arts.

Now that the industry has caught up with such frauds, you need actual ghetto credentials to be big time. That's why every rapper talks about which projects he's from, how many times he's been shot and how much crack they used to have to sling. The Jay Zs, Biggie Smalls and Fifty Cents of the world aren't sell outs in that they actually did sell drugs and had violent pasts. When they rap about where they're from and what they've seen, it rings true. In that sense, they aren't sell outs. And it is that sense and only that sense that is important to them. Because (1) now, success (selling to white suburban kids) only comes when you have the right background and that authenticity and (2) you don't lose credibility with black people for trying to be something you're not. Translation: Successful rappers can stay true to who they are, and who they are is what young suburban white kids who watch MTV want.

Now, if we look at your question using your definition of sell-out, it's a different analysis. Snoop Dogg is extreme because he's doing fucking AOL commercials for christsakes. He is a caricature of who he once was and is clearly only interested in cashing in. I think he's a joke (but that is neither here nor there). [I will note that he is a sell-out much like the Stones are sell outs for selling their songs to companies to be used in ads, though.] As for all those other artists who are doing commercials or endorsing products, I would say they're seizing an opportunity that only recently has presented itself to them. Would you call that selling out? Maybe you would. Is LL a sell out when he does a Sprite commercial, even though he now does movies as well as (crappy) CDs? Is that selling out (If I knew your sense of humor better, I would ask, "What? A nigger can't drink a soda?")? Is it just about product placement? What's your definition?

Also, most rap artists came from nothing. When you come from absolutely nothing, you are constantly trying to show everyone you have something (even when you don't). That's why so many artists spend so much on material crap. "Oh, you're big time? How come you ain't got no ice? Where's yo' Bentley?" Is this the cultural paradigm you speak of? If it is, I wouldn't say it's necessarily selling out. I wouldn't even say it's cultural. I think everyone who comes from nothing, whether they've made it or not, spends time and money letting everyone else know that they do in fact have something. That's why clothes companies put the labels on the outside of clothes -- to take advantage of that insecurity so many people have.

Let me also add that there are quite a few artists who don't care much about MTV-type success and therefore wouldn't fall into the sell-out analysis in any way.

TM

Dualit 01-05-2004 05:19 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by taxwonk
I suppose she also believes that X was me, and not dualit.
Well, I'm not

a) fat
b) bald
c) married (in the legal sense)
d) a tax attorney

so X being me is out of the question.

Dua(svelte, well-coiffed, partnered, in-house legal god)lit

greatwhitenorthchick 01-05-2004 05:21 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Dualit
Well, I'm not

a) fat
b) bald
c) married (in the legal sense)
d) a tax attorney

so X being me is out of the question.

Dua(svelte, well-coiffed, partnered, in-house legal god)lit
You are also like the non-subtle person. People please, let's stop being like the non-subtle person.

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) 01-05-2004 05:22 PM

Not that it hasn't been simply charming...
 
Quote:

Originally posted by NotFromHere
Marriage question, I thought that if you "consummated" the marriage, that you couldn't get an annulment, or is that just a Catholic thing? Or am I thinking soap opera law?

Maybe it's soap opera law, but I think annulment on the basis of inability to consumate/frigidity goes out the window if you do consumate. There may be other grounds, like the person was married, is a felon, is drunk, wasn't actually a former member of the mickey mouse club, isn't cool enough to hang with me, and so on.

Dualit 01-05-2004 05:23 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by greatwhitenorthchick
You are also like the non-subtle person. People please, let's stop being like the non-subtle person.
Sorry. It's Monday (first day back after 2 weeks vacation) and I am very cranky.

NotFromHere 01-05-2004 05:25 PM

Not that it hasn't been simply charming...
 
Quote:

Originally posted by taxwonk
If you were Brittney, would you fuck me if I looked like that? And if the answer is yes, then PM me for travel arrangements. Even I'm better looking than Bilmore -- uh, that guy.
Hmmm, can't really tell from that picture. He seems to have a little trouble in the eyebrow area and flapping ears, but he has nice teeth, good skin. He'd have to have a really smoking hot body, though.......but maybe with enough alcohol.......hmmmmmm.

NotFromHere 01-05-2004 05:28 PM

Not that it hasn't been simply charming...
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Maybe it's soap opera law, but I think annulment on the basis of inability to consumate/frigidity goes out the window if you do consumate. There may be other grounds, like the person was married, is a felon, is drunk, wasn't actually a former member of the mickey mouse club, isn't cool enough to hang with me, and so on.
So that's why they had to come up with the lame "not compatible" reasoning. Isn't there a no-fault annulment?

And why not just get the cheapy quicky divorce? Is annulment really more desireable?

evenodds 01-05-2004 05:29 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Dualit
Sorry. It's Monday (first day back after 2 weeks vacation) and I am very cranky.
Now, I am back after more than two weeks away and I could not be less cranky . . . and I spent this afternoon listening to a new client whine for an hour and a half on the phone.

Maybe you needed a longer vacation?

bilmore 01-05-2004 05:31 PM

Not that it hasn't been simply charming...
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Maybe it's soap opera law, but I think annulment on the basis of inability to consumate/frigidity goes out the window if you do consumate. There may be other grounds, like the person was married, is a felon, is drunk, wasn't actually a former member of the mickey mouse club, isn't cool enough to hang with me, and so on.
Under the new version of the DOMA, (submitted by Falwell, I think), an annulment is almost automatic if you find your new partner is a vegan, a Muslim, a liberal, an environmentalist, or someone involved even marginally in the tofu industry.

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) 01-05-2004 05:31 PM

Not that it hasn't been simply charming...
 
Quote:

Originally posted by NotFromHere
So that's why they had to come up with the lame "not compatible" reasoning. Isn't there a no-fault annulment?

And why not just get the cheapy quicky divorce? Is annulment really more desireable?
I assume, although citing the inability to consummate might not play well in the sticks.

And, since Brittney's "catholic" perhaps she doesn't want a divorce. Isn't that why Ted Kennedy paid the church to get his first marriage, of many years, annulled?

ETA: Oops. That's Joe Kennedy who did the twelve-years-after annulment.

taxwonk 01-05-2004 05:31 PM

SnoopDog says buy a Nokia
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall
There is more than one form of selling out.

1. Willing to do what it takes to make the most money one can.

2. Willing to change who you are to maximize your earning potential.

TM
There's also the type of selling out which comes from having a "film career" based on doing "Snoop Dogg's Girls Gone Wild" videos to be sold on late night basic cable and the internet. That's got nothing one way or another with being black. That's just being a ho.

Like yo' Moms.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:55 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com