LawTalkers

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Fashionable (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=14)
-   -   Towards A Virtual Williamsburg! (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=868)

dtb 11-08-2013 03:34 PM

Re: Interesting Article
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Replaced_Texan (Post 484204)
Absolutely. Especially when "not seeing" a characteristic can often mean removing a really important part of who someone is.


My attempts at self-censorship were not about pretending not to notice, but an attempt (ham-fisted, no doubt) to avoid reducing a person to one trait (being black, or gay, or whatever). Of course it's not "racist" to notice someone's race -- as I have heard kids grappling with issues of racism claim -- but I am hopeful that by taking note of when I feel the impulse to shorthand a description with "that Chinese guy" or similar, I think twice about whether I'm guilty of defining a person by his/her racial description.

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 11-08-2013 03:56 PM

Re: Interesting Article
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by dtb (Post 484264)
My attempts at self-censorship were not about pretending not to notice, but an attempt (ham-fisted, no doubt) to avoid reducing a person to one trait (being black, or gay, or whatever). Of course it's not "racist" to notice someone's race -- as I have heard kids grappling with issues of racism claim -- but I am hopeful that by taking note of when I feel the impulse to shorthand a description with "that Chinese guy" or similar, I think twice about whether I'm guilty of defining a person by his/her racial description.

Just so I don't get myself in trouble, "hot Jewess" isn't a perjorative, right?

ThurgreedMarshall 11-08-2013 04:17 PM

Incognito and the NFL
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ferrets_bueller (Post 484254)
There is an explosion of commentary on Incognito and the Dolphins. The best I've seen is by Tom Boswell in the Washington Post. He scorches the entire NFL and its accumulated atrocities. Feel free to disagree with any one or two of his examples. (Did Ray Lewis get away with murder?) But the overall indictment holds. Here is Boswell's column:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/sports...769_story.html

Boswell also missed a point.

I have season tickets to the Redskins. The game day experience of tailgating is great. But once you get in FedEx field....and many other stadiums around the NFL, you face moronic louts in such great numbers that you wonder how these slathering drunkards walk upright, and indeed sometimes they can't. Don't get me wrong. I'm no teetotaler. I've been overserved by any number of unscrupulous innkeepers. But the puking obscenities by men, and it is mostly, but not exclusively men, are repulsive. The fans are taking cues from players, and vice-versa, in a widening circle offal.

The NFL is only a short bus ride from a breakdown. Teddy Roosevelt, (who, we later learn, had, shall we say, other issues) cleaned up college football from his bully pulpit. Time to do the same thing with the Gangster players and fans in the pro game.

Save football, and save ferrets.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) (Post 484256)
How do you even make it from your tailgate party to the stadium without encountering this behavior? Attending football games is miserable these days because it's an excuse men use to get totally loaded and behave like, well, Richie Incognito.

I think Ray Lewis got away with ordering a murder, FWIW. But it's okay, because he found god.

A few things.

1. Ray Lewis is a fucking piece of shit. He either ordered a murder or assissted in trying to cover it up. I suppose you can't keep him from playing in the league, but the NFL practically made him the face of the league because he's good at football. And ESPN picked up that torch and ran 26 miles with it (and they're still going). If that doesn't send a message to all players and fans that there is almost nothing you can do to lose your status if you are really good, nothing will.

2. These guys, from the minute they hit college (and for many, way before that), are treated like Gods. And they are trained to hurt people and to act like animals on the field while being forgiven for being animals off the field. The more insane you are, the more adulation and money you get. Every institution that allows them to play pretends like these fuckers can turn it off when they step off the field. Privilege plus an atmosphere of cultivating violence = unchecked lunacy.

3. The last clip in PLF's post shows Incognito screaming "Nigger," in public, wihtout a shirt, clearly drunk, surrounded by his teammates (including some black ones). Every single one of them who has his back now is partially to blame for his out-of-control behavior w/r/t Martin. They all gave him a stamp of approval to say whatever the fuck he wants and to do whatever the fuck he wants.

4. I refuse to go to live football games unless someone gets me into a luxury box. First, it's more fun to watch on tv. Second, the fans are disgusting. No way the NFL does anything about it until someone is murdered in the stands or the parking lot before the game. Budweiser needs the NFL's core demo as drunk and stupid as possible. And when it happens (like it happened in baseball), there will be huge blowback because the NFL runs the world and the fans will not be told they can't drink to Bolivian* on gameday.

TM

*Special thanks to Mike Tyson.

ThurgreedMarshall 11-08-2013 04:27 PM

Top 20
 
http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=2123

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=2124

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=2125

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=2126

TM

taxwonk 11-08-2013 06:01 PM

Re: Towards A Virtual Williamsburg!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 484247)
Why do they use "bullying" here? Bullying is hazing people, kids picking on each other, etc. It's not a form of abuse like this. This stuff is bigoted harassment, hostile work environment, racist abuse, etc.

Calling this guy a bully is expanding that term way beyond what it is, and letting him off way too easy. The NFL should call him the simple thing he is: Racist. And then fire the asshole as any corporation would.

No. It's bullying. You are operating under the illusion that it is less reprehensible if children do it. But it's the same thing, no matter the age: physical assault coupled with intolerance of one form or another. Either way, it's wrong and indefensible.

taxwonk 11-08-2013 06:06 PM

Re: Towards A Virtual Williamsburg!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 484252)
I think the "bullying crisis" is bullshit. It's a soft-headed fixation of bleeding hearts who need hobbies. Kids get picked on. Pledges, players, and employees get hazed and demeaned. It's part of life.

I dissent. Kids who get picked on grow up to be people who pick on kids, the elderly, and anybody they can victimize. The bullies grow up thinking that their Neanderthal bullshit is acceptable behavior. It's part of life because people get away with it. The notion that Martin should respond by escalating to physical violence on the field is barbaric.

taxwonk 11-08-2013 06:07 PM

Re: Towards A Virtual Williamsburg!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pretty Little Flower (Post 484253)
The general reaction is more along the lines of what GGG says. See:

http://espn.go.com/blog/miami-dolphi...oom-for-martin

At worst, they say, he is a "jokester" with "no filter." Here, he showed no filter while allegedly molesting a young black woman:

http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/99...012-no-charges

Here he is, shirtless and loaded, screaming racial epithets and profanities in a bar in some steroid-induced rage:

http://www.tmz.com/2013/11/04/richie...ar-rage-video/

I know I should be fretting about the societal implications of bullying in the NFL locker room, but like I said, I could not care less what these guys do, except for the entertainment value, and this is highly entertaining stuff. I think the NFL should have Incognito and Martin star in some sort of halftime show special.

Perhaps a pairing in midfield, to the death? One could go with net and halberd and the other would get a cutlass and buckler.

taxwonk 11-08-2013 06:12 PM

Re: Towards A Virtual Williamsburg!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Replaced_Texan (Post 484257)
I haven't really encountered much of this in the 12 years that I've had Texans tickets. There have been some issues up in the top levels, but by and large, it's always been a pretty decent place to watch football. Granted, the people around me are generally also PSL holders and we've known each other since the 2002 season. But opposing fans around us have always commented that it's a downright pleasant experience to come to our stadium.

I do think that the NFL is at a crossroads right now where it's suddenly asked to be part of the modern era, and it's kicking and screaming the whole way as it "evolves". Attitudes about the possibility of gay players. Concern about head injuries/CTE. (Tony Dorsett is the latest, though I was interested that he said in one article that he was told it could be reversed.) An awareness of a female audience. Now scrutiny over bullying and hazing and the bullshit tough guy attitudes that were addressed in the article Ty posted. Some of these issues (like the female audience, given the demographics I see at games every other week in the fall and winter) it has been fairly good addressing, but others have resulted in major missteps and all out fuckups.

My husband is pulling back from football and focusing his rooting interests in soccer instead. One of my regular companions at games declined an offer to go to the Sunday night game because she was so put off by the Frontline documentary. (I saw it too, and the comparison to Big Tobacco is apt.) Increasingly, I suspect that I'll not renew my season tickets eventually, which was unthinkable when I bought the PSL in 2001.

At times, I agree with a lot of people who think that the NFL is at its peak and will fall soon. But then I remember that it's not just the NFL, but thousands of high schools and colleges across the country. Getting the NFL to change because of economics is one thing. Getting emotionally invested booster clubs at square state universities? That's an entirely different story. It'd be a massive cultural shift that I'm not sure the country wants. OTOH, I'm probably one of those who wouldn't let her kid play football, knowing what I know currently about the head trauma issues.

Going back to the fan stuff, Real Sports with Bryant Gumble had a fairly decent piece on fan on fan violence last year.

I think the problem isn't with the square states as much as it is the South. Football is the primary belief system in many southern locales.

bold_n_brazen 11-08-2013 06:58 PM

Re: Towards A Virtual Williamsburg!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) (Post 484263)
You should take the Brazenette to an Iggles game.

Like I haven't??

Icky Thump 11-08-2013 07:08 PM

Re: Towards A Virtual Williamsburg!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 484259)
this part is just not true. The players are locked in a protected cage and fed any number of drugs (at least they were. In the novel "North Dallas Forty" the protagonist complained about the o-line because they all took speed, but were so poorly trained on doing it they tended to peak a few hours after the games). Whether the behavior of players in the confines of the team relationship is objectionable strikes me as the same question Colonel Jessup posed in a Few Good men.

The fans otoh are out of control. I took my kids to a few Lions game and we sat in the Club Level. Even that was drunken ugly. Two games and I was out of ever doing that.

they sell beer and booze way too freely. In fact, there is little else to buy. What percentage of commercials are for beer during an average NFL game? The drunken fans are a result of the teams and the league wanting to ring that cash register.

I think the fans at Jets games seem pretty cool.

Replaced_Texan 11-08-2013 07:33 PM

Re: Towards A Virtual Williamsburg!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by taxwonk (Post 484275)
I think the problem isn't with the square states as much as it is the South. Football is the primary belief system in many southern locales.

My husband is from Ohio. His brother-in-law is tailgating at every single OU home game, 200 miles from where he lives, six or seven years after he graduated. The Stubenville thing, while just as likely in a small Texas town, was well north of the Mason Dixon line. My brother is doing a graduate degree at Michigan. That stadium is one of the largest in the country. This ins't just a culture of the South.

Hank Chinaski 11-08-2013 07:51 PM

Re: Towards A Virtual Williamsburg!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Icky Thump (Post 484277)
I think the fans at Jets games seem pretty cool.

Queens is an oasis of sanity and security.

Atticus Grinch 11-08-2013 08:07 PM

Apropos of nothing
 
Cal player hurt in altercation had missed workout; Coach Jessup to be asked whether he ordered Code Red

Icky Thump 11-08-2013 09:04 PM

Re: Towards A Virtual Williamsburg!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 484279)
Queens is an oasis of sanity and security.

They haven't played in Queens since 1984. Now they are in the far more pleasant state of NJ.

http://people.wku.edu/douglas.smith/...20Behavior.pdf

ETA: I was at this game but left before the fires.

Hank Chinaski 11-08-2013 09:30 PM

Re: Towards A Virtual Williamsburg!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Icky Thump (Post 484281)
They haven't played in Queens since 1984. Now they are in the far more pleasant state of NJ.

exactly.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:24 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com